What Trackers Are Best, WTAB

[oilslick]

Post the levels below I haven't done yet, and i will edit this opening post. If everybody does a level, we will be done in no time :)
(the new 1 = the old content/speed/pre 10 rating,
the new 2 = the old content/speed/pre 9 rating,
the new 3 = the old content/speed/pre 8 rating,
the new 4 = the old content/speed/pre 8 rating,
etc.), for now we are only CONVERTING the old list. The old rarity rating we place between the []. Before you start converting, make sure you are using the correct new system, so look carefully at this first post.

Based on Content and Speed and Pre-Times. Their so called rarity rating is in the [#] tags.


Dark Red [] 0-day trackers with rare files and packs.
Green [] 0-day trackers.
Blue [] dedicated tracker.

Level 1 (the best): ScT[7] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1600757/postcount12), FTN[9] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1602808/postcount62), HDBits[4] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1688726/postcount717), BitMeTV[5] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1635123/postcount369), etc.

Level 2: TL[2] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1755342/postcount1094), PWT[2] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1941888/postcount3029), BitMe[4] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-reviews-and-ratings--post1716084/postcount883), OiNK[4] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1616935/postcount169)

Level 3: LinkoManija[3] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1882651/postcount2344), FB[5] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1602368/postcount50), FSC[8] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1612455/postcount148), NB[8] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-and-tracker-reviews-post1677693/postcount642), Partis[1] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bittorrent-43/t-partissi-review-192121), Arenabg[1] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2046560/postcount4174), Swebits[3] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1658714/postcount584), RevTT[5] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1811875/postcount1514), CZone[6] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1606073/postcount96), PT[6] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1634273/postcount355), iPLAY[6] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2054314/postcount4233), XboxSky[2] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1860213/postcount1946), PussyTorrents[2] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1873790/postcount2189), Dimeadozen[2] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1860334/postcount1948), cheggit[2] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1892040/postcount2356), HDBITS.ro[2] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1895138/postcount2416), TVTorrents[3] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1856689/postcount1904), DesiTorrents[4] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/bittorrent-invites-section/t-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-142446-post1882744), SweDVDR[8] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1624841/postcount220), TT[8] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post1634712/postcount365), Exigo[9] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2131077/postcount4925)

[GaleaNatur]

TL isn't in lvl1?.....i think it has to be lvl1

[oilslick]

TL isn't in lvl1?.....i think it has to be lvl1

Thanks for the reply, but for this moment we will use the content level rating from Patriot foreve's WIAW thread.

I am currently converting the WIAW content rating 8 to the new WTAB 3LVL. If somebody could convert the wiaw content rating 7 to the new WTAB 4 lvl system i would be very thankfull :)

[amdxp]

TL is the best. Maybe later they can open the invites system.

[SgtMajor]

It needs to be:

0day :
very good=
good=
average=

Music:
very good=
good=
average=

DVDRs:
very good=
good=
average=

Learning:
very good=
good=
average=

etc, etc

[seppypom]

if you are using the same content level ratings, then what is the point of this thread? (not that i am a big fan of any of these ratings threads)

[oilslick]

To keep this thread a little clean, discussion about this subject please in the following thread: http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bittorrent-invites-90/t-new-wiaw-based-content-215543

For now we need only help from people converting the list :)

[SgtMajor]

if you are using the same content level ratings, then what is the point of this thread? (not that i am a big fan of any of these ratings threads)

Exactly, it needs to be a totally fresh approach, and by giving posters options for the categories they are interested in, with the rarity rating in brackets, it gives people options when they are looking for that something they require, knowing full well that some trackers will be out of reach, in the short term at least.


To keep this thread a little clean, discussion about this subject please in the following thread: http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bittorrent-invites-90/t-new-wiaw-based-content-215543

For now we need only help from people converting the list :)

But it's just the same list as WAIW, with your opinion as to what is the best tracker, or not as the case may be.

[tominaomi]

Level 1
TL,FTN,SCT,
Level 2 Midnight Torrent, RevTT,Oink,Supertorrents.org

[rocknrule]

scc is lvl 1 oday general tracker
btmusci is lvl 2 music tracker
oink is absolutely lvl 1 music tracker
kg is lvl 1 movie tracker (as for OLD movie)
demonoid is lvl 2 music tracker (as for music)
bitsoup is lvl 2 oday general tracker

[Aboud2010]

If it Based on Content I think Demonoid should be in the list

[oilslick]

I am using the 'Content and Speed and Pre-Times' ratings from the WIAW threath, not my own opinion. So yes, it is basicly the same list as the WIAW, but in a different order.

Best thing to do now is: convert the list.
When that is done, than we could discuss our new list. But first the new list should be done!

[AugustoP]

If it Based on Content I think Demonoid should be in the list


While you can get lots of stuff at demonoid its basically an awfully slow junkyard of a tracker. Not that I don't like demonoid, but we should face the truth.

[rocknrule]

-----------------------------

ftn & sct are lvl 3 0day general trackers (difficult in getting some buffer)



If it Based on Content I think Demonoid should be in the list


While you can get lots of stuff at demonoid its basically an awfully slow junkyard of a tracker. Not that I don't like demonoid, but we should face the truth.


I was easily able to get 300g buffer in 3 weeks from demonoid. Check your connection speed, and then seed torrents as long as you can.

[oilslick]

If somebody would convert from the WIAW thread the trackers with content, speed, etc. rated 7 to the new WTAB system (level 4). I would be gratefull, to see exactly what I mean read the opening post :)

[luismelo4]

sct rocks ftn i would like to have and tl should be in level 1 and torrent damage in level 2

[oilslick]

sct rocks ftn i would like to have and tl should be in level 1 and torrent damage in level 2

Thanks for you comment luismelo4 :). But for this moment we are only converting the old list to the new one. After that we will discuss it :)

[amahk]

you are arrangine trackers in revers.. :D
I think the best must be at the higher level

[Sylar666]

This thread doesn't make any sense...It is a PITA...

[xbawksz]

This thread is retarded. It's the same thing as the WIAW thread only backwards. Nice try at trying to take control over the bittorrent invites section, but it's not going to work.

[oilslick]

This thread is retarded. It's the same thing as the WIAW thread only backwards. Nice try at trying to take control over the bittorrent invites section, but it's not going to work.

NO! this is the content/speed/pre-times list! This isn't my idea, and i don't make the levels. I toke those from the WIAW thread.

[SgtMajor]

But you are not listening to the majority, it is not what is required.

A new, fresh approach completely is what is required, and a break away from the WAIW approach.

Maybe the discussion needs to be what type of content thread we should have before doing all that work?

[oilslick]

And to make sure this gets done, I will give a Oink invite to the first 5 persons to convert a level, that isn't done yet. Make sure it's done correctly (exactly like in first post, with colored hyperlinks, old rarity ratings between[] etc.), otherwise you will not get any. And announce what level you are doing, so nobody is doing double work. You won't get an invite if already are a member of oink, or if you are banned from it, etc.

[Presto]

That's more like it.

[boostermx31]

level 1: revolutionTT, blackcats and Bitmetv

level 2: oink, bitme , ethor , sct, ftn

level 3: hdbits, bit Hdtvt ,tl

[p1r4t3]

hey oilslick, This thread should be completed but theres a point in the fact that there should be a whole new approach to the concept. I already had a general Idea when I started that poll.

As soon as I am done with my work, I ll pick it up and build the thread,.

[oilslick]

hey oilslick, This thread should be completed but theres a point in the fact that there should be a whole new approach to the concept. I already had a general Idea when I started that poll.

As soon as I am done with my work, I ll pick it up and build the thread,.

ok p1r4t3, i will close this thread and all for now. We can best combine forces. :)