ScT News

[JA]

Check it out:w00t:

[Feeling]

I dont get it?

[tintin123]

second that

something happen to jessica alba?
nervous breakdown??

[JA]

I dont get it?
Nice poll :)

[Feeling]

So, thats the poll then, not the news

i voted

Yes - I Never Post

:shifty:

[JA]

So, thats the poll then, not the news

i voted

Yes - I Never Post

:shifty:
Ahh everything on the front page is news :)

[MaaxHimself]

66% voted wtf is that?...lol

[Adam1990]

I voted blank in case they ban everybody who said yes or something lol.

[KFlint]

So, thats the poll then, not the news

i voted

Yes - I Never Post

:shifty:

This pool ain't some kind of witch hunting Feeling ? :lol:

[Something Else]

second that

something happen to jessica alba?
nervous breakdown??

nope she's still in ok magazine :D

[Fibre]

I think FST should expect a sudden influx of traffic :D

[th0r]

What does the news say?

[misledhope]

wouldnt you like to know......

i know i would

[JA]

It was a poll saying how many ScT members where members of FST....

[kimii]

It was only asking if you were a member here and the degree of activity.

[Polarbear]

:Dgreat advertisment for the forum! any sct user knows it now.

there also a thread in the forum regarding fst and the poll

[sense]

It was only asking if you were a member here and the degree of activity.

I don't know if you're going to get many honest answers though. :mellow:

[th0r]

wouldnt you like to know......

Thank you for contributing ever so intelligently to the conversation.

:rolleyes:

[JA]

It was only asking if you were a member here and the degree of activity.

I don't know if you're going to get many honest answers though. :mellow:
I voted No :D

[Skiz]

There isn't a chance in hell I'm honestly voting in that poll.

I assume thousands of others will fib or not vote as well.

[Cmon]

I also doubt people will vote the right answer :P (or just blank :P)

[Ghost+Rider]

I voted blank in case they ban everybody who said yes or something lol.

Itz not bitmetv lol :P itz SCT :w00t:

[saulin]

lol. I voted "blank". I always do on all trackers cause most of their polls are dumb. Haha I just read it though. It's interesting haha.

[FACE_TO_FACE]

The question is... for what they need to know if we are members of fst...???? :shifty:

[Cmon]

This poll is just to see the statistics.:whistling

[Zeus]

lol. you are a paranoid bunch. If you too scared to own up to being a member here then you only perpetuate the view that FST membership is somehow something to be ashamed of. I voted Yes - I post a lot (I dont think I do post a lot, but I do post :) )

[BawA]

no shock, we are famous in P2P world http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/images/smilies/biggrin.gif
i voted yes, am proud to be a member here, ive nothing to hide.

[akkk]

I bet 99% of the guys who voted that they aren't members of FST lied :)

[Ghost+Rider]

^^ Agreed

[Swax]

There isn't a chance in hell I'm honestly voting in that poll.

I assume thousands of others will fib or not vote as well.

When your own Staff are afraid to openly show that they use your site aren't you in a bit of trouble? :ermm:

[SliDer5]

I think it's a nice try to catch some n00bs

[kimii]

It was only asking if you were a member here and the degree of activity.

I don't know if you're going to get many honest answers though. :mellow:

I don't see why people feel the need to lie. Oh yes we're gonna ban every FST user. (Added sarcasm because I know many of you can't detect sarcasm and take things seriously.) Geezuz we're not that desperate to ban users.

[Cmon]

I don't see why people feel the need to lie.
paranoia :lol:

[Nogimics]

I was a member here long before ScT, granted I haven't used this account since 2003 recently lol. But it wouldn't stop me voting YES.

Any site that bans you because you're a member of another site is not worth being a member of, a lot of members and staff at ScT look down on FST, I don't know why. Maybe because FST attracts a lot of noobs being open registration and all. But we all had to start off somewhere.

Either way, ill vote yes and this is my ScT user nickname anyway, so it's already quite obvious!

[nihility]

Look At The New Buttons Zomg

[KFlint]

I don't know if you're going to get many honest answers though. :mellow:

I don't see why people feel the need to lie. Oh yes we're gonna ban every FST user. (Added sarcasm because I know many of you can't detect sarcasm and take things seriously.) Geezuz we're not that desperate to ban users.

some remember the massive FST members ban on FTWR last year i guess ;)

[optimus_prime]

never reveal your fst membership to trackers. they don't need to know it and it can only work against you.

[ADELA]

edit

[thelevy23]

the new buttons are ugly

[Skiz]

There isn't a chance in hell I'm honestly voting in that poll.

I assume thousands of others will fib or not vote as well.

When your own Staff are afraid to openly show that they use your site aren't you in a bit of trouble? :ermm:

I think you're the only poster in this thread who took that completely out of context.

Almost every tracker I'm a member of knows exactly who I am. I've nothing to hide. The only sites I don't openly provide that information to are those that have staff proven to be a bit, how should I say it? Unstable.

[_coder_]

When your own Staff are afraid to openly show that they use your site aren't you in a bit of trouble? :ermm:

I think you're the only poster in this thread who took that completely out of context.

Almost every tracker I'm a member of knows exactly who I am. I've nothing to hide. The only sites I don't openly provide that information to are those that have staff proven to be a bit, how should I say it? Unstable.

Nicely put :cool:

[Something Else]

the new buttons are ugly

agreed :O

[StoicLee]

When your own Staff are afraid to openly show that they use your site aren't you in a bit of trouble? :ermm:

I think you're the only poster in this thread who took that completely out of context.

Almost every tracker I'm a member of knows exactly who I am. I've nothing to hide. The only sites I don't openly provide that information to are those that have staff proven to be a bit, how should I say it? Unstable.


Unstable = thinking you are a cheater?
Like OiNK?

Now go ahead and ban me for dissent as you lament how other trackers are ban happy and unstable.

:lol:

[KFlint]

I think you're the only poster in this thread who took that completely out of context.

Almost every tracker I'm a member of knows exactly who I am. I've nothing to hide. The only sites I don't openly provide that information to are those that have staff proven to be a bit, how should I say it? Unstable.


Unstable = thinking you are a cheater?
Like OiNK?

Now go ahead and ban me for dissent as you lament how other trackers are ban happy and unstable.

:lol:

let me guess, 007 (agent47) strikes back?

[kallieb]

Unstable = thinking you are a cheater?
Like OiNK?

Now go ahead and ban me for dissent as you lament how other trackers are ban happy and unstable.

:lol:

let me guess, 007 (agent47) strikes back?

Speaking of people who hide their identity. Isn't this a bit of the pot calling the kettle noir :shifty::shifty::shifty:

For someone with ONE post to their name to come and make a critical statement about people who post under a different identity is hypocrisy at its worst. Shame, shame..we know your name.

[Skiz]

I think you're the only poster in this thread who took that completely out of context.

Almost every tracker I'm a member of knows exactly who I am. I've nothing to hide. The only sites I don't openly provide that information to are those that have staff proven to be a bit, how should I say it? Unstable.


Unstable = thinking you are a cheater?
Like OiNK?

Now go ahead and ban me for dissent as you lament how other trackers are ban happy and unstable.

:lol:

How is that a reasonable assumption? :blink:

Unstable. As in, makes brash decisions and acts rather crass with its members.

Not saying that to bash them as I've never had even a slight bit of communication with any of them. Just going on what I've seen and heard loike.

As for oink, no comments needed, really. Their reputation precedes them. :dabs:

[Gish]

personally I have different usernames for all my accounts. do I have anything to hide...no
is it safer that way...yes

[Swax]

Almost every tracker I'm a member of knows exactly who I am. I've nothing to hide. The only sites I don't openly provide that information to are those that have staff proven to be a bit, how should I say it? Unstable.



Unstable. As in, makes brash decisions and acts rather crass with its members.

Not saying that to bash them as I've never had even a slight bit of communication with any of them.

:huh:

If their reputation of being 'unstable' is simply through word-of-mouth, and not through any form of first hand communication I'm not sure how you can really believe that.

Anyway, I'm not trying to kick up a fuss. I'm merely saying that you should stick by 'your site' wherever you are, and not mute yourself due to the possible consequences of a mere reputation.

It'd be like going to a sports game and wearing your team's shirt, then covering the shirt with a jacket when surrounded by rival fans.

Sure some Staff on sites have a reputation for being hot-headed and short-tempered, but not all a site's staff are necessarily like that. A little bit of communication on any site gets you a long way.

[fstrulz]

Who's the head SysOp of SCT again? And is he/she a community rep here in FST, like Brandon and the others?

[Kyl3KK]

I believe the only staff from ScT here are kimii (lush) and one forum mod... but no sysops here.

[th0r]

Who's the head SysOp of SCT again? And is he/she a community rep here in FST, like Brandon and the others?

DjGrrr does the coding, so I'd say that's the whole lot of it besides moderating, but anyone can do that. And no, he doesn't have community rep status here.

[Kyl3KK]

Feeling is a member here too, he's an admin.

[Swax]

Every member of ScT Staff is a member here as far as I'm aware.

Not being a "community rep" on here is hardly the end of the world. If someone has a problem ScT-related why would they come here to speak to a member of staff as opposed to ScT Forums or IRC?

[j0hn]

There isn't a chance in hell I'm honestly voting in that poll.

I assume thousands of others will fib or not vote as well.

u seriously think they would ban everyone who voted yes?
tin foil hat anyone?

this place is disliked by alot of trackers due to its invite section being so busy, with that comes the cheaters/scammers/etc. but im quite happy to say im a member here, and voted yes - i post alot. sct aren't nazi's like some other trackers, and i highly doubt they'd ban someone simply for being a member here.

[Roark]

sct aren't nazi's like some other trackers

Last I checked the jury was still out on Eezee :P

[PiraSoftCORP]

full of newbs

[Polarbear]

sct aren't nazi's like some other trackers

godwin's law.

http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/faqs/godwin.html