Why Was mr.mystery Banned?

[brotherdoobie]

Don't tell me...he slipped up and used a semi-colon.


-bd :idunno:

[Skiz]

Twas another ******* idiot.

Circumventing original ban.

[brotherdoobie]

I'll miss his turgid prose. :mellow:



-bd

[mievmo]

why not.... too many reasons.

[Something Else]

Free Mr.Mystery and his other 4 aliases!!!!!

[100%]

I find him rather amusing.

[Barbarossa]

I don't think Mr Mystery was own.ster related.

I just think he was a pathetic little troll, but not deserving of a ban.

Skizo if you have evidence he was own.ster then pm me, ok?

[Something Else]

Just throwing a wobbly at one at all............not amusing just sad and angry trolling...isn't that enough?

[Barbarossa]

Not really.

We never banned allen when he went crazy :emo:

[Something Else]

:glag:

Well I missed that. Mr.Mystery: Unlucky Fucker.... :D

[Hairbautt]

Not really.

We never banned allen when he went crazy :emo:
When you say crazy do you mean ******* crazy? :unsure: Or another kind of crazy?

'Cause I'd like to think allen is an original kinda crazy, but that's just me.

[Barbarossa]

One day he started posting really wide stuff to annoy everyone because it made the page margins all wrong, so we all put him on ignore.

He then went mental and created about 30 useless threads saying how sorry he was

[Hairbautt]

Oh, I remember that.

[Something Else]

That's sounds great, were the topics kept?

[Barbarossa]

Oh yeah. Search for threads started by alien5 in the lounge.

[Biggles]

So who was Mr M? I assumed it was JP having a rant although it was not as sophisticated as JPs usual rantings :unsure:

[Something Else]

Nobody it seems other than another own--star eedjit les.
I don't see any other accts that got banned with it...

[Biggles]

Nobody it seems other than another own--star eedjit les.
I don't see any other accts that got banned with it...

That is a relief! :happy:

[brotherdoobie]

I don't think Mr Mystery was own.ster related.

I just think he was a pathetic little troll, but not deserving of a ban.

Skizo if you have evidence he was own.ster then pm me, ok?


I agree. If he was circumventing a ban, then by all means- ban him. However, if he was just a troll; then he must be let loose.

It's the right thing to do.


-bd :yup:

[Alien5]

We never banned allen when he went crazy :emo: t'was a full moon :shifty:

[Spider_dude]

and the fact you are a mentalist.

[Sextent]

and the fact you are a mentalist.

He's only a mentalist online tho'. There's people here who are mentalists :earl:

There's a guy right, that's got me on ignore and can still click things in my posts. Even if they haven't been quoted. True story.

[Sextent]

this is mr.mystery's thread, admire what you will never be.

What's that then.

[thewizeard]

Now that depends what "what" is

[Sextent]

What what "what" is.

[Hairbautt]

Glad you're back. :dabs:

My brain is already starting to hurt.

[Alien5]

is what what?

[Sextent]

is what what?

Is what is what "what".

[Sextent]

My brain is already starting to hurt.

Drink more fluids.

[Alien5]

is what what 'what' is

[thewizeard]

Did he ever leave?

erm the what bit


this is mr.mystery's thread, admire what you will never be.

erm..That what, I was wondering what that is

[Sextent]

Did he ever leave?

erm the what bit


this is mr.mystery's thread, admire what you will never be.

erm..That what, I was wondering what that is

Oh that what, I asked what what that what was too.

[Sextent]

I think I may have metamorphosed into Ronnie Barker which would make nigel wee Ronnie Corbett.

[chalice]

I thought he was really good.

People only started taking the pish out of him.

He was good for a couple of weeks.

Fucking Piranhas.

You've got to learn to savour your prey.

[Sextent]

I thought he was really good.

People only started taking the pish out of him.

He was good for a couple of weeks.

Fucking Piranhas.

You've got to learn to savour your prey.

Word, I thought he was good laugh and also nothing too personal or hurtful. Just a big silly really.

[Snee]

Did he ever leave?

erm the what bit



erm..That what, I was wondering what that is

Oh that what, I asked what what that what was too.

I thought it was tewtally enrevelling.

[Sextent]

Oh that what, I asked what what that what was too.

I thought it was tewtally enrevelling.

You sounded really willowfull there. Your emotions were pretruding and no mistake.

[Skiz]

I don't think Mr Mystery was own.ster related.

I just think he was a pathetic little troll, but not deserving of a ban.

Skizo if you have evidence he was own.ster then pm me, ok?

You're correct. He wasn't o.wnster related; he is that little prick who begged us us to ban him - killer23.

He has created 7 new accounts since then. What, 3 days ago? :dabs:

[Barbarossa]

So why have you banned him then? :blink:

[Something Else]

Because he's standing by whoever banned killer23....even though it was himself :lol: I thought that kid nagged to be banned until you lot got annoyed enough and did it?

[thewizeard]

Just lift the ban so he can return..all sorted :)

[Sextent]

killer23 was just a pain in the arse. mr.mystery was OK. He tried to be annoying and mock people but it never really worked as he didn't seem to have the heart for it.

[Barbarossa]

Banning someone for creating new accounts which supposedly circumvent a ban that was in actual fact voluntary is insane :wacko:

Even if he is a prick.

[Sextent]

If it's voluntary it's more a request that the account be deleted than a ban. Albeit he presumably did use the word "ban".

Bearing in mind that English isn't everyone's main language. Including those who don't speak another one.

[Biggles]

Banning someone for creating new accounts which supposedly circumvent a ban that was in actual fact voluntary is insane :wacko:

Even if he is a prick.

I thought he was banned for being the latter rather than doing the former.

His second incarnation was a lot more humourless than his first.

[Something Else]

If you ask to leave, or be banned, then return, it's reasonable to be asked to leave/banned.

[Sextent]

Banning someone for creating new accounts which supposedly circumvent a ban that was in actual fact voluntary is insane :wacko:

Even if he is a prick.

I thought he was banned for being the latter rather than doing the former.

His second incarnation was a lot more humourless than his first.

I understood that on like the 7th reading.

[Skiz]

Banning someone for creating new accounts which supposedly circumvent a ban that was in actual fact voluntary is insane :wacko:

Even if he is a prick.

Didn't you read? I banned the first new account before I knew it was killer23. That took a bit of searching to uncover.

mrmystery had 152 posts of straight flaming. Not for comedic purposes, but just to be a disruptive idiot. No one wants to read that blather and it has no place on the forum. 25 of those were outside the Lounge as well, so he's flaming and name calling at will all over the board.

I initially had him confused with the o.wnster idiots as the posting style was exactly the same.

[Beenieman]

Maybe it's just me but I've noticed that in the last 2 weeks I've not really felt like posting in the lounge due to the useless posts that have been floating about, It's definatly been shite anyway and if banning a few shites helps then it's all good.

[brotherdoobie]

Banning someone for creating new accounts which supposedly circumvent a ban that was in actual fact voluntary is insane :wacko:

Even if he is a prick.

Didn't you read? I banned the first new account before I knew it was killer23. That took a bit of searching to uncover.

mrmystery had 152 posts of straight flaming. Not for comedic purposes, but just to be a disruptive idiot. No one wants to read that blather and it has no place on the forum. 25 of those were outside the Lounge as well, so he's flaming and name calling at will all over the board.

I initially had him confused with the o.wnster idiots as the posting style was exactly the same.


So, you initially banned him, because he had a "similar" posting style...as another banned member? You're treading dangerous waters, Skizo. imho


-bd

[Skiz]

So, you initially banned him, because he had a "similar" posting style...as another banned member? You're treading dangerous waters, Skizo. imho


-bd

Yes, his posting style was the same as another member who was banned for incessant flaming. There's no difference there.

152 posts (under that account alone) of nothing but flaming and trying to cause disorder has nothing to do anything and isn't to be allowed on the board.

Members complain, reports get made, etc...

There was more than one reason to ban the guy, but the above was sufficient enough.

[Something Else]

........................meanwhile.........in other shocking news :O
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/1756/pythonthesunsd1.gif (http://imageshack.us)

[Hairbautt]

Did someone say 'news' :smilie4:

[Biggles]

I thought he was banned for being the latter rather than doing the former.

His second incarnation was a lot more humourless than his first.

I understood that on like the 7th reading.

Not my most lucid prose - was multi tasking which clearly is a girly thing after all.

[brotherdoobie]

^ True.



-bd

[Sextent]

I understood that on like the 7th reading.

Not my most lucid prose - was multi tasking which clearly is a girly thing after all.

4th that time, you're getting better.

[Barbarossa]

...or maybe you are getting worse :mellow:

[Sextent]

Relativity FTW.

[Barbarossa]

Indeed. That reminds me, you might like this (if you haven't seen it already)

Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity In Words of Four Letters or Less (http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/txt/al.html)

Very clever! :smilie4:

[Sextent]

Much as that's genious and it most certainly is, the beginning makes no sence. If the Universe consists of only you an a bed, fair enough you may move away from each other, Newton's laws and so forth. You may push the bed, exerting an equal force on both of you. You would then ask which is moving away from the other. Let's not get into which would move faster, it's meaningless in a 2 body Universe. Fair enough.

However with a Sun, no way are you pushing that, it's mad talk. So there is no feasible way for you to move away from it, or vice versa, you would move towards it.

Back to reading para II.

[Sextent]

Oh FFS it's talking about c as a constant now, that's so not true.

[Barbarossa]

chrissakes it's like talking to snee :frusty:

[Sextent]

chrissakes it's like talking to snee :frusty:

That was really good, thank for the link.

[Barbarossa]

:lol:

[Sextent]

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092.html

[Something Else]

Have you heard of georges perec? The guy without an E!

http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/perec.htm

''Experimenting with the lipogram - a text which one or more letters of the alphabet may not appear - Perec produced La Disparition (1969, A Void, translated by Gilbert Adair), a 200-page detective novel (in some sources 311-page novel), in which the central puzzle deals with the disappearance of the efrom the alphabet. (But the letter appears outside the main text.) Perec's translator, Gilbert Adair, managed to replicate the feat in English, although the pioneering work is Ernest Vincent Wright Gads, a novel with over 50000 words, written in English without the letter E.''

Now that's an amazing show of charm and skill. His book did accomplish, and not contain a solitary showing of what I said was missing...Christ writing this is hard to begin with :blink:

[Sextent]

chrissakes it's like talking to snee :frusty:


I was actually referring to the speed of light being legal on American roads, at absolute zero.

However that link (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092.html) is also interesting.

[Something Else]

You missed a great spammer last night, I'm still filling in until he returns :P

[chalice]

Oh FFS it's talking about c as a consonant now, that's so not true.


But c is a consonant. Carol Vorderman will confirm.

[Something Else]

I dont see a C?

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/6474/countdownjl5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Sextent]

Oh FFS it's talking about c as a consonant now, that's so not true.


But c is a consonant. Carol Vorderman will confirm.

:badabumdeesh:

[Imagine_If]

Chalice if Sextent says c is not a consonant then it's not...anymore...

[thewizeard]

Of course, I tend to agree :)

[Something Else]

constant, consonant, it's all the same here anyway .....meh