PDA

View Full Version : have you ever been approached?



snowultra
11-14-2007, 12:03 AM
for gay sex, at a rest area?

im sure this is a united states thing.

Smith
11-14-2007, 12:05 AM
You wouldn't believe the PM's I get when I log on here sometimes...

You know who you are.

Jiggles
11-14-2007, 12:12 AM
not me, you probly get that because you look gay so gays will approach you. im too scary to be approached by women let alone men.

Barbarossa
11-14-2007, 12:16 AM
It's probably herbert. Ignore him :dabs:

Jiggles
11-14-2007, 12:17 AM
It's probably herbert. Ignore him :dabs:

or benchez.

Snee
11-14-2007, 12:18 AM
I've never met any of you IRL, so no.

_coder_
11-14-2007, 12:25 AM
If you look gay as in if your appearnce and behaviour is considered to be gay then most likely you will be approached by a gay guy. If you dont look or sound gay then chances are very unlikley that this would happened to you.

Back to the thread, No I havent

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:44 AM
No. His guide dog steered him away from a smelly old bloke. Me.:lol:

When I was younger I am sure I was 'approached' and did not realize it. Homosexuality was never spoken about. IMO a lot of children suffered because of this. If you are not told what the dangers are how do you know you are in danger?

kallieb
11-14-2007, 05:22 PM
Homosexuality was never spoken about. IMO a lot of children suffered because of this. If you are not told what the dangers are how do you know you are in danger?

Can't resist a comment: It is important to distinguish between homosexuality and paedophilia. The former does not suggest the latter. Each one is a distinct form of sexual orientation.

Mr. Mulder
11-14-2007, 05:25 PM
homos, paedos - they're all pink on the inside :smilie4:

Barbarossa
11-14-2007, 05:26 PM
except the dead ones. They go yellow

Hairbautt
11-14-2007, 05:30 PM
I wouldn't stoop as low as snowultra. Maybe Smith. :unsure:

clocker
11-14-2007, 06:17 PM
for gay sex, at a rest area?

im sure this is a united states thing.
Why do you think this is a "united states thing"?

Skweeky
11-14-2007, 06:55 PM
Happens to me all the time

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 07:00 PM
It's known as cottaging in Britain. I'm pretty sure we invented it.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:10 PM
Homosexuality was never spoken about. IMO a lot of children suffered because of this. If you are not told what the dangers are how do you know you are in danger?

Can't resist a comment: It is important to distinguish between homosexuality and paedophilia. The former does not suggest the latter. Each one is a distinct form of sexual orientation.

Not in the mind of homophobes, it's a classic response from that type of narrow minded prick.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:29 PM
Can't resist a comment: It is important to distinguish between homosexuality and paedophilia. The former does not suggest the latter. Each one is a distinct form of sexual orientation.

Not in the mind of homophobes, it's a classic response from that type of narrow minded prick.

I would much rather be a narrow minded prick than post a paedophile picture of a wee lassie. :angry: Thankfully someone in charge had the good sense and taste to take it off.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:31 PM
Not in the mind of homophobes, it's a classic response from that type of narrow minded prick.

I would much rather be a narrow minded prick than post a paedophile picture of a wee lassie. :angry: Thankfully someone in charge had the good sense and taste to take it off.

Who posted such a picture.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:32 PM
I would much rather be a narrow minded prick than post a paedophile picture of a wee lassie. :angry: Thankfully someone in charge had the good sense and taste to take it off.

Who posted such a picture.

You

100%
11-14-2007, 07:36 PM
Instinct is a good thing. naivety is cute but is not.

kallieb
11-14-2007, 07:37 PM
Sextent you naughty lad.

Maybe it was one of those looks-barely-legal-but-is-actually-over-age kind of photos.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:37 PM
Who posted such a picture.

You

When did I do this.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:38 PM
Sextent you naughty lad.

Maybe it was one of those looks-barely-legal-but-is-actually-over-age kind of photos.

I have no idea what he is talking about, hopefully he will let me know.

kallieb
11-14-2007, 07:43 PM
I hear you. Baseless accusations that cut to our core and make us feel shitty are not pleasant events.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:44 PM
You

When did I do this.

About a year ago. One of the Mods will enlighten you. I dont know who complained, if anybody. It was removed within short period of time.

It was a pic of a wee lassie sitting on a 'rocking horse'. The head of the rocking horse was turned around and looking up the wee girls upturned skirt. It sounds by that description as a 'larf'.

However you have to consider that someone set this up using a wee lassie, then taking a pic of it.

As I said lucky there was a Mod online at the time and took appropriate action.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:46 PM
I'm sure I'm going to get an explanation of the accusation, just waiting for it. What confuses me is that if a mod thought I had posted such a thing, to the extent of deleting it, then the very least they would have done would be to contact me via PM.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:47 PM
I hear you. Baseless accusations that cut to our core and make us feel shitty are not pleasant events.

How could I prove it if a Mod deleted the pic and closed the thread?

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:48 PM
I'm sure I'm going to get an explanation of the accusation, just waiting for it. What confuses me is that if a mod thought I had posted such a thing, to the extent of deleting it, then the very least they would have done would be to contact me via PM.


I agree they should have contacted you.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:50 PM
When did I do this.

About a year ago. One of the Mods will enlighten you. I dont know who complained, if anybody. It was removed within short period of time.

It was a pic of a wee lassie sitting on a 'rocking horse'. The head of the rocking horse was turned around and looking up the wee girls upturned skirt. It sounds by that description as a 'larf'.

However you have to consider that someone set this up using a wee lassie, then taking a pic of it.

As I said lucky there was a Mod online at the time and took appropriate action.

What the fuck are you talking about.

kallieb
11-14-2007, 07:51 PM
How could I prove it if a Mod deleted the pic and closed the thread?

You don't need to prove anything. It just causes a flame up and and no other useful purpose. The start of all this thread was about gay pick-ups, and then there was this assertion that somehow gay is the same as paedophile, and now there's this photo thing happening.

Sounds like a good stopping spot.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:53 PM
Fuck that, this twisted prick has accused me of posting paedophile images. Which no-one else saw because the thread was deleted.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:54 PM
About a year ago. One of the Mods will enlighten you. I dont know who complained, if anybody. It was removed within short period of time.

It was a pic of a wee lassie sitting on a 'rocking horse'. The head of the rocking horse was turned around and looking up the wee girls upturned skirt. It sounds by that description as a 'larf'.

However you have to consider that someone set this up using a wee lassie, then taking a pic of it.

As I said lucky there was a Mod online at the time and took appropriate action.

What the fuck are you talking about.

Other than me, only the Mod concerned can tell you.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 07:54 PM
Oh really and who would that be.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 07:58 PM
Oh really and who would that be.

I haven't got a clue. I am not lying about the posting of the pic.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:05 PM
So your story is that I posted this image in a thread, only you saw it and the thread was deleted by a mod, who never contacted me about it.

You really are a sick lying bastard. Do you seriously expect anyone to believe this.

You don't like me, fair enough and you revelled in it when you reported me for posting links to Rick Astley and I got banned for it. Even listing names to make sure none were missed.

This however is a whole different ball game, to accuse a person of such a thing. You are pathetic and twisted.

Biggles
11-14-2007, 08:11 PM
From the description it sounds like the picture of the Donald Duck ride in one of US Amusement parks which rather bizarrely has Donald (or one of those characters I forget which) with the head and eyes facing backwards. If it is the picture I am thinking about then it is not porn in the least and there are probably millions of photos in peoples albums with their kid sitting on that ride. However, it is rather odd and one wonders what they were on when they designed it.

If it was not that picture then I have no idea what we are discussing either.

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 08:12 PM
Not in the mind of homophobes, it's a classic response from that type of narrow minded prick.

I would much rather be a narrow minded prick than post a paedophile picture of a wee lassie. :angry: Thankfully someone in charge had the good sense and taste to take it off.

You sick fuck. Don't accuse people of stuff like that. :angry:

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:12 PM
Les

He specifically said rocking horse and that it's head was turned round to look up her skirt.

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 08:15 PM
I personally think it may have been his interpretation of whatever picture it was. In which case he's the twisted fuck. I for one am sure that JP or any other sane member of this forum would not have done such a thing, because for one it's wrong, and for two they'd have been hounded off the board whoever they were.

Biggles
11-14-2007, 08:16 PM
Les

He specifically said rocking horse and that it's head was turned round to look up her skirt.

Well the Donald ride is sort of like that I think he is supposed to be floating on his back and the kid sits on the stomach - or something :unsure:

But if it was a rocking horse then no I didn't see it.

No to the toilet thing too btw - obviously not their type or I frequent the wrong/right public loos.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 08:17 PM
So your story is that I posted this image in a thread, only you saw it and the thread was deleted by a mod, who never contacted me about it.

You really are a sick lying bastard. Do you seriously expect anyone to believe this.

You don't like me, fair enough and you revelled in it when you reported me for posting links to Rick Astley and I got banned for it. Even listing names to make sure none were missed.

This however is a whole different ball game, to accuse a person of such a thing. You are pathetic and twisted.

I believe you have had a few threads/posts deleted and you have not been contacted. You said that yourself just a few weeks ago.
What will you do if the mod concerned comes forward and confirms what I am saying.

I broached this subject before, I think it was Dan that accused me of picking on you.
I am telling you the truth, my conscience is clear. Now you know and everyone else knows why I pick on you.

Alien5
11-14-2007, 08:18 PM
wots all this about then?

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 08:18 PM
Google donald duck ride and the first image you'll see is the one I think he means, with the caption "who designed this ride" on it. There's a moving one about three lines down. It's commenting on the stupidity of the ride Boab, and posting it would be doing exactly that, not glorifying in the sexuality of young children. Where the hell is your mind?

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:19 PM
See this is the point and what the twisted bastard is trying to do. He's obviously been involved in fitting people up before.

Decent spuds like Les and Crabgirl are rationalizing ways in which such a thing may be justified or misinterpreted or not really paedophile. I agree with all of that, however the bottom line is that he is just lying.

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 08:20 PM
Accusing people of stuff like that and then saying "that's the reason i don't like you" is fucking out of order. Jesus.

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 08:20 PM
See this is the point and what the twisted bastard is trying to do. He's obviously been involved in fitting people up before.

Decent spuds like Les and Crabgirl are rationalizing ways in which such a thing may be justified or misinterpreted or not really paedophile. I agree with all of that, however the bottom line is that he is just lying.

Do what I said and have a look at what he means.

Alien5
11-14-2007, 08:21 PM
whos accusing who of pedophilia?

bigboab
11-14-2007, 08:21 PM
See this is the point and what the twisted bastard is trying to do. He's obviously been involved in fitting people up before.

Decent spuds like Les and Crabgirl are rationalizing ways in which such a thing may be justified or misinterpreted or not really paedophile. I agree with all of that, however the bottom line is that he is just lying.

If it was innocent then why was it removed?

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:21 PM
I am telling you the truth, my conscience is clear. Now you know and everyone else knows why I pick on you.

:lol: You pick on me.

You're a pathetic wee man who actually walked to the town centre and waved at a webcam.

You posted crap another time, then invented a son who had logged into your account and caused mischief.

People are laughing at you not with you.

Biggles
11-14-2007, 08:22 PM
Google donald duck ride and the first image you'll see is the one I think he means, with the caption "who designed this ride" on it. There's a moving one about three lines down. It's commenting on the stupidity of the ride Boab, and posting it would be doing exactly that, not glorifying in the sexuality of young children. Where the hell is your mind?

That's the fella - don't recall seeing it here but it pops up all over the place.

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 08:25 PM
Because it's really stupid, not because it's pedophilic. To make something such, you have to be viewing an image as one of those people, in which case any image of children can be considered such. I know thats a bad sentence but I hate typing that word.

Boab leave him alone. What you said was out of order.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:26 PM
See this is the point and what the twisted bastard is trying to do. He's obviously been involved in fitting people up before.

Decent spuds like Les and Crabgirl are rationalizing ways in which such a thing may be justified or misinterpreted or not really paedophile. I agree with all of that, however the bottom line is that he is just lying.

Do what I said and have a look at what he means.

So the whole story of a horses head being turned round and looking up a wee girls skirt, which had obviously been set up for the photo to be taken, is all just fucking lies.

That's even more pathetic.

CrabGirl
11-14-2007, 08:26 PM
He's that out of touch he cant even recognise a disney character

100%
11-14-2007, 08:28 PM
Trade (2007) Trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRM4h7iDYoE

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:30 PM
He's that out of touch he cant even recognise a disney character

No, that's what he wants folk to think.

All to cover his own blatantly homophobic post.

kallieb
11-14-2007, 08:39 PM
I agree. You crossed the line Boab. You did it when you mixed homosexuality with paedophilia, and when your bias was questioned you did it again when you lashed out and made very hurtful accusations. It is one thing to talk about ridiculous rides and such. I've been on a few and they are kind of creepy the way you sit on them, but talking about some silly ride design is a FAR cry from paedophilia.

Remember. It is best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 08:45 PM
I agree. You crossed the line Boab. You did it when you mixed homosexuality with paedophilia, and when your bias was questioned you did it again when you lashed out and made very hurtful accusations. It is one thing to talk about ridiculous rides and such. I've been on a few and they are kind of creepy the way you sit on them, but talking about some silly ride design is a FAR cry from paedophilia.

Remember. It is best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

It was not Donald Duck. It was not a ride. It could have been a lion. It was a rocking type toy.
The head was covered by the wee girls skirt.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:49 PM
I agree. You crossed the line Boab. You did it when you mixed homosexuality with paedophilia, and when your bias was questioned you did it again when you lashed out and made very hurtful accusations. It is one thing to talk about ridiculous rides and such. I've been on a few and they are kind of creepy the way you sit on them, but talking about some silly ride design is a FAR cry from paedophilia.

Remember. It is best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

It was not Donald Duck. It was not a ride. It could have been a lion. It was a rocking type toy.
The head was covered by the wee girls skirt.

That is an absolute lie and you know it.

I'll give you your only possible out from this. That you saw such a thing posted by an account that you assumed to be me but it wasn't.

Now we know that's not true, but it is plausible.

Biggles
11-14-2007, 08:49 PM
I agree. You crossed the line Boab. You did it when you mixed homosexuality with paedophilia, and when your bias was questioned you did it again when you lashed out and made very hurtful accusations. It is one thing to talk about ridiculous rides and such. I've been on a few and they are kind of creepy the way you sit on them, but talking about some silly ride design is a FAR cry from paedophilia.

Remember. It is best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

To be fair they are meant for wee kids.

kallieb
11-14-2007, 08:49 PM
Even so Boab. Paedophilia is a horrid accusation. Absolutely the worst thing you can levy at anyone, or even remotely allude to. I would never even remotely hurl that towards someone as the taboo, and disgusting nature of it all, is the worst insult possible.

We joke and poke each other, but some boundaries remain inviolate. It's best to stop.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:51 PM
Even so Boab. Paedophilia is a horrid accusation. Absolutely the worst thing you can levy at anyone, or even remotely allude to. I would never even remotely hurl that towards someone as the taboo, and disgusting nature of it all, is the worst insult possible.

We joke and poke each other, but some boundaries remain inviolate. It's best to stop.

Your falling into his trap again, it's an absolute lie.

kallieb
11-14-2007, 08:52 PM
To be fair they are meant for wee kids.

I've done the adventure ride theme park foray's with my kids. It's amazing the things you do when you're a mommy!!!

kallieb
11-14-2007, 08:54 PM
Even so Boab. Paedophilia is a horrid accusation. Absolutely the worst thing you can levy at anyone, or even remotely allude to. I would never even remotely hurl that towards someone as the taboo, and disgusting nature of it all, is the worst insult possible.

We joke and poke each other, but some boundaries remain inviolate. It's best to stop.

Your falling into his trap again, it's an absolute lie.

I'm not!!! Really. I'm asking him to stop saying those terrible things because you NEVER say these things to people in a haphazard manner -- ever.

bigboab
11-14-2007, 08:55 PM
Even so Boab. Paedophilia is a horrid accusation. Absolutely the worst thing you can levy at anyone, or even remotely allude to. I would never even remotely hurl that towards someone as the taboo, and disgusting nature of it all, is the worst insult possible.

We joke and poke each other, but some boundaries remain inviolate. It's best to stop.

I have not accused anyone of being a paedophile. I have accused them of posting that type of pic on the forum.
The thing that really sickens me is that there must be two or three other members who saw this and are keeping stum. There is definitely a Mod.

I wont say anymore on the subject. I'm away to type for an hour. Putting just one member on ignore.

Biggles
11-14-2007, 08:55 PM
To be fair they are meant for wee kids.

I've done the adventure ride theme park foray's with my kids. It's amazing the things you do when you're a mommy!!!

Tell me about it - went on a flying fox thing with my daughter and thought my arms were going to come out of their sockets. :cry:

But I was macho ....

until she wanted to go on it again.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 08:56 PM
At least the harmless old chap facade is down and people can see the twisted individual behind it. All started by his own homophobic posting.

I suppose that's a good thing

kallieb
11-14-2007, 09:04 PM
Tell me about it - went on a flying fox thing with my daughter and thought my arms were going to come out of their sockets. :cry:

But I was macho ....

until she wanted to go on it again.

Big warning to others. If you ever go to Islands of Adventure down in Florida DO NOT EVER wear a white cotton t-shirt. :noes:I had no idea it was a water park and every ride results in you getting completely soaked.:O Thank goodness I wore a dark t-shirt but I felt so bad for a number of other women who spent the day with their arms crossed over their chest.

After a while the thought of getting sprayed with more water just became disgusting. Any water that got in my mouth made me want to gag. It reminded me of what it would be like to drink toilet water:sick::sick::sick:

Biggles
11-14-2007, 09:06 PM
I would be surprised if the Donald Duck lunacy hasn't been posted here at some point as it is a standard internet "it's a mad world" sort of pic which crops up on most message boards at some point and it is the only one I have seen like that :idunno:

As a rule a plastic duck cannot look up a skirt and therefore the skirt is not looked up.

Sextent
11-14-2007, 09:16 PM
I would be surprised if the Donald Duck lunacy hasn't been posted here at some point as it is a standard internet "it's a mad world" sort of pic which crops up on most message boards at some point and it is the only one I have seen like that :idunno:

As a rule a plastic duck cannot look up a skirt and therefore the skirt is not looked up.

You didn't read the rest of the post, Les. The lying prick has said it wasn't that and has described what the image was like.

Hairbautt
11-14-2007, 10:07 PM
:mellow: Whoa. I don't remember any of this.

I did once see a pic posted of two kids, a boy and a girl, and the boy used a stick to look up the girl's skirt. The caption read "What's up there?" It was awhile ago and I'm pretty sure it was a BT-tard. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v383/Hairbautt/Smilies/Dabs1.gif That's all that jogs my memory.

weenden
11-15-2007, 12:34 AM
as much as im out driving never been approached and dont want them approaching me but then again they might have got a good look at me and figured uuuggghhhh

j2k4
11-15-2007, 01:05 AM
Please allow me to strongly suggest Sextant and Boab immediately cease posting in this thread while I jump from a great height into the morass of their conflict.

PMs only, gentlemen, and only to me.

On your honor, now.

Something Else
11-15-2007, 01:15 AM
Even so Boab. Paedophilia is a horrid accusation. Absolutely the worst thing you can levy at anyone, or even remotely allude to. I would never even remotely hurl that towards someone as the taboo, and disgusting nature of it all, is the worst insult possible.

We joke and poke each other, but some boundaries remain inviolate. It's best to stop.

But that's what I shout at the traffic wardens :unsure: