*The New and Improved Waffles vs What Poll*

[WarrenBuffet]

Looks like What.cd is getting their act together and Waffles is still blooming. With about 20k members at What and 36000 torrents. Waffles has 12k members and 46k torrents.
Now is the time to make the true Waffles vs What thread.

wow....... I forgot 2 add i poll. Oh well, lets just hear opinions

[arkiebrian]

I'd say they're about the same...honestly.

So far my shares have been leeched quicker on Waffles.

[Polarbear]

:blink: where's the poll?

[0Ri0N]

Waffles is already a mature tracker, What.CD has bugs to fix yet, i like both tho. I don't care which is better, i just want 2 strong trackers to replace OiNK.

[sexydingo]

Both are great trackers, but I find myself spending more time on Waffles

[Grind$oFine]

I actually lost my entire music collection (130gb worth( a few days after joining both sites.
So I've truly been testing both out.

And although both are good, Waffles has most of the cds I want, whereas what.cd lacks some of them.
Also, Waffles seems to have a wider variety of formats.
And I've been more successful with their request section.

But what.cd has had some downtiem problems, and they had to deal with a lot of shit so who knows? They have just as much potential. And there's a new script to come, thats kind of exciting.

[blackbird]

waffles.fm has more potential to be the next oink . it has a community thats more like oink's community .

what.cd has an appz section and thats a big advantage . its been really hard to find appz after oink has gone down. i hope they can fill that gap

but in terms of music waffles > what

[Kyl3KK]

Yeah, if Waffles had an application section, it would be so much better.

[prescript]

still too early.
waffles has more music but is slow to implement user suggestions to improve
what has a nice site but too buggy and too much downtime.
personally i think its stupid to have two sites basically duplicating work and content but whatever

[xJohnxSmithx]

what.cd is my favorite because it is soo much like oink. I like waffles on its own but it can not be compared to oink.

[SgtMajor]

WTF gives an improved shit - again.

FFS, give it a rest.

[arkiebrian]

I'd prefer if both focused on music...

I've noticed both also are missing a lot of music. I listen to stuff that is a bit more obscure...gives me the opportunity to share!

[Hrvoje]

waffles are better to me...

[0Ri0N]

personally i think its stupid to have two sites basically duplicating work and content but whatever

If you think better its not stupid, remember what happened to OiNK all the music concentrated there and no alternatives? backups are always welcom. ;)

[GoLDeN]

Waffles i suppose they r better

[MaaxHimself]

Yeah, it is still too early to tell.
From what I see though, Waffles has more torrents and variety, while
what.cd has the most seeders per torrent, and a faster growing userbase.

[wheeloftime]

I like both but what.cd has appz and that is a big plus for me. I have some big appz that I used for seeding on oink and leaving them seeding on what.cd I have upped over 5g just leaving one of them seeding. I got into waffles after freeleech and on a 4mb connection I find it a nightmare to seed anything back to it so I find I mainly use what.cd.

[Torn]

I like the fact that waffles is taking their time with new users. There's no rush adding 10K in less than one week. The harder it is obtaining a site, the more chance the user will share and upload.