View Full Version : wine utorrent vs tflux-b4rt
Submission
12-23-2007, 01:30 AM
Does anyone know which one is more resource friendly?
fstokebanget
12-23-2007, 03:53 AM
if you compared those two, there'll be torrentflux, because it's native, while utorrent via wine emulates win environment, takes up more resources
but if you wanna something that lighter, that would be rtorrent
Submission
12-23-2007, 05:24 AM
yeah but i can't get rtorrent ui to install
its a god damn bitch.
fstrulz
12-23-2007, 03:14 PM
Haven't tried Tflux, but uTorrent 1.6.1 on Wine worked flawlessly for me with only 512MB of RAM.
Have you tried Transmission (http://transmission.m0k.org/)?
Scavenger
12-24-2007, 05:50 AM
Wine + Utorrent + Web ui works perfect with me with only 256MB of RAM, on Fedora.
fstokebanget
12-24-2007, 08:24 PM
really ? wow I thought wine+utorrent will consume so much resources, because it's not native
Submission
12-24-2007, 11:03 PM
Hm. I can't believe wine utorrent is the best.
Tflux b4rt uses an old transmission version
rtorrent ui sucks
btg sucks
clutch sucks too
Scavenger
12-26-2007, 01:29 AM
uTorrent is a little complicated, and Torrent Flux is so slow, consumes a lot of Ram, and if the Pc is not god it crashes a lot. I recommend Wine+Utorrent+Web Ui.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.