PDA

View Full Version : endorsed utorrent?



Ph4wX
12-29-2007, 05:32 PM
D:!

Failure: MPAA endorsed Versions of uTorrent are banned. Please use 1610.

it's the only tracker ive seen with that problem :\

and i have another tracker that only accept 1.7.5 i think =[

so, any solutions? that's really dumb, i dont see why this is the only site hwo dosnt accept

fstokebanget
12-29-2007, 05:52 PM
lol, what tracker is that ? :lol:

krunktastic
12-29-2007, 05:55 PM
I've had to cancel registering on certain trackers because they've banned 1.7.5. when I have other (albeit better) trackers that won't accept anything BUT 1.7.5. It sucks.

chillincool
12-29-2007, 08:44 PM
bitme and bmtv are really gay about clients. Really tbh banning clients is pretty retarded...there's pleanty of trackers that don't and they run perfectly fine.

fatcat69
12-29-2007, 11:39 PM
bitme and bmtv are really gay about clients. Really tbh banning clients is pretty retarded...there's pleanty of trackers that don't and they run perfectly fine.

Well I wouldn't say they are gay, its just that most torrent clients suck balls...just use utorrent 1.6.1 and your fine:

grimms
12-29-2007, 11:42 PM
I use nothing but 1.6.1. All the newer versions suck. After the downfall of bitcomet utorrent 1.6.1 has always come through you cannot go wrong with that version.

maul1515
12-30-2007, 07:11 AM
1.6.1 build 490 standalone is ultimate! You can find it on filehippo. I am surprised some trackers don't allow anything but 1.7.5. The saying "if it aint broke, dont fix it" holds true :)

fstokebanget
12-30-2007, 08:46 AM
so which sites do that just allowed nothing but 1.7.5 ?

lostdemon
12-30-2007, 08:12 PM
I use 1.7.5 and want to know whats the difference between that and 1.6.1?
why is 1.6.1 better is really what I am asking and should I switch to that version?

Ph4wX
01-02-2008, 09:11 AM
idk for 1.6.1, but my 1.7.5 has tetris in the help menu =D

no but srsly... what i dont get is the "endorsed mpaa client" wtf???? like, i dont even get what it means D:

also, if its that bad, why ALL my other tracker allow it?

pandabear
01-02-2008, 09:24 AM
I use 1.7.5 and want to know whats the difference between that and 1.6.1?
why is 1.6.1 better is really what I am asking and should I switch to that version?

Only reason you would switch if paranoia > new features for you. I personally think there is nothing wrong with the new utorrents, and they give a few nifty features.

$we
01-02-2008, 06:09 PM
D:!

Failure: MPAA endorsed Versions of uTorrent are banned. Please use 1610.

it's the only tracker ive seen with that problem :\

and i have another tracker that only accept 1.7.5 i think =[

so, any solutions? that's really dumb, i dont see why this is the only site hwo dosnt accept Yeah, bittorrent inc. is endorsed. solution: downgrade or get another client (azureus (http://azureus.sourceforge.net) is never blocked).

The Wanderer
01-02-2008, 06:17 PM
latest beta are great, lots of new features: disk cache improvements, teredo, greater speeds. Can't wait for the final version.

Tokeman
01-02-2008, 06:18 PM
LAME
any tracker avoiding the latest stable release that is widely accepted, is not going to be used by me. This MPAA thing is going too far. So we going to see the rumors start again about MPAA tracking dl's through utorrent? Give me a break guys. This is what happens when kids run trackers, stupid pointless rules that hinder usage.

kaler
01-02-2008, 06:23 PM
I myself use latest uTorrent But never BETA versions

fatcat69
01-02-2008, 06:26 PM
I myself use latest uTorrent But never BETA versions

I stick with 1.6.1, why fix it if it isnt broken?

Thats my question :lol:

maddoxro
01-02-2008, 06:42 PM
my utorrent 1.75 works everywhere :)

$we
01-02-2008, 07:36 PM
I myself use latest uTorrent But never BETA versions

I stick with 1.6.1, why fix it if it isnt broken?

Thats my [rhetorical] question :lol:

That logic is fallacious because your conclusion is based upon the false premise that people choose clients just because they 'aren't broken.' A two-year-ld could spot this one. You are completely disregarding desired improvements, optimizations, and features that make one client, or one version of a client better than the other.

Did I even have to say this? I guess I did. It is your opinion, fatcat, so just leave it as such.

Tokeman
01-02-2008, 07:40 PM
hey, if fatcat is happy with win95, netscape navigator, and aol 2.5 "cause its not broken", then leave him to his outdated tech. Not like there could be any reason to upgrade software like hacks, vulnerabilities, or memory leaks (to name a few things)...

Yes I know he isn't really using those things, but it makes a good point.

yayyyyyy
01-02-2008, 08:02 PM
change tracker man... :D

even azureus have the function "remove unauthorized torrents" lmao

what shall windows users use?? 2+ years old clients?
Dos6.2 (when MS was not producing drm techs?)