tracker rating, is it?

[zorozilka]

sct,aom are 6
those are greater than 6th level

NB[8] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-and-tracker-reviews-post1677693/postcount642) - TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
SweDVDR[8] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2373388/postcount8189)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)- FSC[8] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2322672/postcount7511)

i tell you the truth,to get an SCT invite is like a kid's game near to AOM.

i had the opportunity to get NB,TT,sweDVDR (account), FSC,FTN, like 3 times each.

i still haven't got the opportunity to get into AOM.

so, is this table realy show the tracker's rarity or it's just a matter of advertisment?

and how the hell FileList is on L2 (though it's a lousy tracker), i dont see anyone having this to offer.
and RevTT is on 4th.

i dont think this table express any rarity of these sites.

[sovaz]

Hey cool down...Keep ur opinion...we all have ours...n they vary greatly. For some sct is really difficult to obtain...AOM many don't even care coz its a content specific tracker. The WIAW table is not something to always count on...If each one of us have to make complaints about the WIAW thread, we would have many spam topics like urs. Better express ur opinion here http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bittorrent-invites-90/t-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-142446