Sites ranked level 10

[monk3y]

NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
[Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :

HDBits[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-tracker-reviews-post2474603/postcount166)
TL[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2323030/postcount7516)
BitMeTV[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2311329/postcount7337)
ScT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2318237/postcount7439)
TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)

Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
// edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?

[SaviouR]

i am surprisd KG doesnt have a perfect 10 for its contents ......

[monk3y]

i am surprised KG doesn't have a perfect 10 for its contents ......

Yea, in it's category it's the best :|

[mrnobody]

Yes i do think all of the above mentioned site deserve [10] based on content, speed and pre times

As for KG, it has awesome conent but speed isn't. And, there isn't any pre time for old movies lol

...and i think TT should get [10], it fuflils all requirement to it's best!

edit: TT is [10] :)

edit2: i think SCC should step one more to [10]

[yayyyyyy]

You can always do better... mostly on speed and pretimes

but i'm sure those numbers are relative... not absolute...

like HDbits is really #1 ... so if you have to line up all the trackers from 0 to 10, HDbits would be placed on 10... nothing can beat them...

of course if all the files had at least one gbit seedbox sharing them would be the "perfection"... lol

[NOLF]

i am surprisd KG doesnt have a perfect 10 for its contents ......

My kinda guy, I totally agree :P

[Artemis]

The first intelligent ratings thread I have seen in awhile, actually I think though that the content etc. is up to the individual, I enjoy trackers that have a mix of the 0day scenestuff and packs that are made up by members.
Everyone values content differently based on their personal interests, so what I find is a good tracker others may not like at all, but the content indicators are a good reference guide to what a tracker offers.

[pro267]

I think the quality rating is subjective, based on the taste of the reviewer. The quality rating tends to be quite fixed as opposed to the rarity ranking where there are parties with interest that are trying to push the trackers up/down the list and make it more dynamic.

As for KG, if it was only contents then it's definitely a 10. Pretimes make no difference on a tracker like KG as it's not a 0-day tracker, but tbh the speed could be somewhat better. So overall a 9 is a very good score for KG.

[Polarbear]

NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
[Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :

HDBits[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-tracker-reviews-post2474603/postcount166)
TL[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2323030/postcount7516)
BitMeTV[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2311329/postcount7337)
ScT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2318237/postcount7439)
TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)

Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
// edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?


looking at content, speed and pretimes:

hdbits: is there a better hd site? :noes:

tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites? :noes:

bitmetv: is there a better tv site? :noes:

tt: is there a better site for trance? :noes:

that's why they all deserve the best [10].


waffles and what should be compared to oink[10], because it was the best.

but they are too young to be rated yet. (ok, maybe a [7-8])

[zxion]

NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
[Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :

HDBits[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-tracker-reviews-post2474603/postcount166)
TL[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2323030/postcount7516)
BitMeTV[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2311329/postcount7337)
ScT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2318237/postcount7439)
TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)

Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
// edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?


looking at content, speed and pretimes:

hdbits: is there a better hd site? :noes:

tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites? :noes:

bitmetv: is there a better tv site? :noes:

tt: is there a better site for trance? :noes:

that's why they all deserve the best [10].


waffles and what should be compared to oink[10], because it was the best.

but they are too young to be rated yet. (ok, maybe a [7-8])

I agree with you, those are the sites that really set the bar on content, no matter how rare they are :)

[Grind$oFine]

Honestly, in specialized trackers, specifically trackers that are the only in their class worth being mentioned, speed isn't an issue in rating. And I think a lot of the specialized trackers ratings are unjust because they're using the same system as 0-days/scene/seedbox trackers.

If you're downloading a file that you have no chance at downloading anywhere else, then in my eyes... you can wait a little longer.

Thus, KG and BlackCats should be 10s, easily.
BrokenStones also could be a 10.

What and Waffles are definitely not 10s. Maybe 7s, honestly. OiNK was a 10. Waffles and What just aren't there.

[SaviouR]

Honestly, in specialized trackers, specifically trackers that are the only in their class worth being mentioned, speed isn't an issue in rating. And I think a lot of the specialized trackers ratings are unjust because they're using the same system as 0-days/scene/seedbox trackers.

If you're downloading a file that you have no chance at downloading anywhere else, then in my eyes... you can wait a little longer.

Thus, KG and BlackCats should be 10s, easily.


+1 Couldnt have said it better myself .

[Nemrod]

HDBits[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-tracker-reviews-post2474603/postcount166)
TL[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2323030/postcount7516)
BitMeTV[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2311329/postcount7337)
ScT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2318237/postcount7439)
TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)

HDBits>>>>> Yes
TL>>>>>>>> Yes
BitMETV>>>> Yes
ScT>>>>>>> Yes
TT>>>>>>>> I don´t know, I´m not a member.
FTN>>>>>>> Yes.

And there are others sites that deserve 10 as well.

[Zaxx]

What Polar Bear said... ;)

[DanielleD87]

scc should be a lvl 10 i think.

[t0mmy]

TL, TT, and bitmetv deserve the 10 rankings, i wouldnt know on the others sites, because im not a member, but these trackers are truly deserving of the 10, cant really comment on SCT as i dont use it profusely like i do with my other ones ive mentioned

[mrnobody]

scc should be a lvl 10 i think.

yeah, the rating/ranking.

SCC has the best pretime.

[Ikslej]

What others have already hinted at is. Isn't how good the content of a tracker differ from person to person depending on there interests and what they need or want? So if it is relative for each person it would be impossible to give a straight answer.

Now if your going by generalities and what the majority says well then yes, they deserve a 10.

[RoSsoNeRI]

NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
[Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :

HDBits[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-tracker-reviews-post2474603/postcount166)
TL[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2323030/postcount7516)
BitMeTV[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2311329/postcount7337)
ScT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2318237/postcount7439)
TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)

Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
// edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?


looking at content, speed and pretimes:

hdbits: is there a better hd site? :noes:

tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites? :noes:

bitmetv: is there a better tv site? :noes:

tt: is there a better site for trance? :noes:

that's why they all deserve the best [10].


Exactly......also SCC is a deserved 10 when it comes to 0-day trackers. BIT-HDTV is a close 10 as well in my opinion when it comes to HD stuff

[dineshreddy]

i agree

[vinhkhang01]

Anyone mentions RevTT - right up there with the packs.
I think their contents are excellent even better than the top dogs but lack of speed just like TL.

[.:Him:.]

I agree that HDBits, TL, and ScT should all be 10's but with the other's, I wouldn't know, because I don't have FTN or BitMeTV and don't want TT.

[ChampJulius]

I agree on all you listed.

[singing_sol]

think for the reasons may be speed, seeders leechers and u name it thats what leads to those rates

[fstokebanget]

revtt has good speed too, but maybe because it's too easy to get a ratio there, they offers double ratio donating too frequent

[krunktastic]

Is TL really equal to ScT?

Besides, I think there should be ONE level 10, it doesn't make sense to have several 10's per category.

[pandabear]

Blackcats should get 10, if we are ranking best of catogeries. TL should go to 9, and i think SCC should get a 10 :)

[Adama]

TL and SCT and FTN deserve 10

[ScreaminJay]

i am surprisd KG doesnt have a perfect 10 for its contents ......

Indeed... KG=10... Rest=5 and under

There is more content on KG than on all other trackers put together!

[FatBob]

only public trackers deserves a perfect 10 for content

speed is a different thing though :D

[ecin]

Based on that scc should have 10/10 too. For their categories it's ok then I guess, as they're best available there.
If you compare all categories, TT would probably be the only real 10/10, seeing it has only trance/techno compared to the amount of its quality torrents. Else OiNK would have had 20/10 or something :f

So far my opinion :ermm:

Btw, why is BCG not [10] ? :blink:


I think the quality rating is subjective, based on the taste of the reviewer. The quality rating tends to be quite fixed as opposed to the rarity ranking where there are parties with interest that are trying to push the trackers up/down the list and make it more dynamic.


I've just read this post. I think he is very right. :yup:

Also it's very unclear what the ratings are actually based on. They appear sorta fuzzy, which automatically leeds to a partially biased result.
They should be more detailed.
But in the end, every person will have his/her own rating, based on personal taste, anyway. :happy:

[bikernin]

i agree with pro267 that the ratings are highly subjective. we can only say which tracker is best in its respective category although there will still be considerable debate on that for the 0day trackers. BMTV, BCG, HDBits are the absolute bests in their categories.
Also, a perfect 10 implies that the site has the best content with little or no scope for improvement. in this respect i feel that there are very few sites which derserve a perfect 10 because most of these sites have a lot of scope for improvement

[KFlint]

blackcats and revtt are now rated 10 also btw

[krunktastic]

blackcats and revtt are now rated 10 also btw

A 10 should justify an essentially perfect site (i.e. barely any more content could improve the tracker, speeds are always maxed, highly active communities, variety, etc) and there's no way we should be pushing for MORE 10's. There should be very few (IF ANY) all around 10's. Yes, BlackCats is an awesome gaming site. Is it absolutely perfect in every way? Is TL absolutely equal to ScT? These ratings need to be SERIOUSLY reconsidered before they become laughed at as much as the "rarity ratings" which cause so much more trouble than they're worth. Rating trackers should be done by averaging a cumulative vote on the criteria, not just giving some arbitrary number to try and please the public. If FST expects anyone to take them seriously, they need to get rid of the 10's and start rating these trackers as 7's, 8's, and 9's. VERY FEW trackers are *PERFECT*.

:dabs:

Nice1 guy below me.

[disconny]

puretna should get a 10

[Adman65]

i almost like TR better than TT....

[KFlint]

blackcats and revtt are now rated 10 also btw

A 10 should justify an essentially perfect site (i.e. barely any more content could improve the tracker, speeds are always maxed, highly active communities, variety, etc) and there's no way we should be pushing for MORE 10's. There should be very few (IF ANY) all around 10's. Yes, BlackCats is an awesome gaming site. Is it absolutely perfect in every way? Is TL absolutely equal to ScT? These ratings need to be SERIOUSLY reconsidered before they become laughed at as much as the "rarity ratings" which cause so much more trouble than they're worth. Rating trackers should be done by averaging a cumulative vote on the criteria, not just giving some arbitrary number to try and please the public. If FST expects anyone to take them seriously, they need to get rid of the 10's and start rating these trackers as 7's, 8's, and 9's. VERY FEW trackers are *PERFECT*.

:dabs:

Nice1 guy below me.

you are taking this a little bit too seriously imo, no need to create a comitee to vote for tracker ratings

it's just logical that the best game tracker (by far) get a 10 for outstanding quality

if we wait for absolute perfection, none would ever be rated 10 because perfection is not human

[ceasar]

Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?

Absolutely:
Bitme should be rated 10, the other ones: TheVault - perfect 10 in it's category.
Sport trackers: 5minsforfighting getting 10 - content is very good there's no other hockey tracker at all, also would give lots of respect to Sportbit and Sport-scene, but here's the catch none of them probably can't get 10, because some torrents are on one tracker, some on the other, but Sportbit + Sport-Scene = 10 in it's category - Basketball.

[t0mmy]

if its just judged on content, then what about mma-tracker, it has everything, and one of my favourite trackers now

[Dark Archon]

i have TL and TTi i think that

TL - it's very fast pre-time and very good 0day releases. I think it's a lot better than Revtt (it doesn't show pre-time)

TTi - there is the poker cup thing..also the web interface is very techish, and it has Free Leech Movie of the Day so that is really nice.

[Thatsgreat]

It's kinda stupid that TT has a 10/10, then indietorrents should have a 10/10 as well. Cause there is no better torrent site for indie-music then indietorrents. The speeds are good and the content is also top class. The same thing for indietorrents as for KG concerning the pre-times. Old stuff is uploaded all the time at indietorrents so the pre-times aren't that important. So for that indietorrents deserve a 10/10 if TT has one.

These sites deserve a 10/10:
TL, FTN, ScT, HDBits, Swedvdr, Waffles, What, Bitmetv and KG. Cause they are best in what they do and have. SCC and RevTT are also good. But if you compare them to FTN, ScT and TL you can clearly see that there is a difference. As long as you are the best in your ''category'' you should deserve a 10/10. At least that's how I see it.

[C-mos]

what ????? is not stupid that TT has 10/10 ..if we are looking carefully TT has extreme and very good trance stuff (pre-times)i don;t know why u think that TT sucks

indietorrents is nothing compare to TT ..

but anyways good luck ;)

[crackerjack]

HDBits[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-tracker-reviews-post2474603/postcount166)
TL[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2323030/postcount7516)
BitMeTV[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2311329/postcount7337)
ScT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2318237/postcount7439)
TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)
Waffles[10]
What[10]

[monk3y]

what ????? is not stupid that TT has 10/10 ..if we are looking carefully TT has extreme and very good trance stuff (pre-times)i don;t know why u think that TT sucks

indietorrents is nothing compare to TT ..

but anyways good luck ;)

+1


HDBits[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-tracker-reviews-post2474603/postcount166)
TL[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2323030/postcount7516)
BitMeTV[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2311329/postcount7337)
ScT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2318237/postcount7439)
TT[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-invites-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2327549/postcount7600)
FTN[10] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)
Waffles[10]
What[10]



wow waffles and what really deserve 10 ? i don't think so, i think i'll give what 8 and waffles 7

[Polarbear]

the quality ratings are overall ratings based on three factors: content, speed, pretimes.

some sites without any doubt have excellent (10) content, but it can't beat the fact, that their speed is very very bad.

the fact that the users don't care about the speed there doesn't make it better.

you can always say: "hey speed is not important, why doesn't this site get an overall (10)?"

it doesn't get it because speed is calculated in the overall rating.

the rating is a combination and not just content.

indietorrents will never reach the speed of tt. that's why it won't get an overall 10.

even if it has the greatest independent music on earth.

[KFlint]

(http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../p-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-post2438830/postcount8823)
Waffles[10]
What[10]



if you want to submit changes to the ratings, post it here (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bittorrent-invites-90/t-what-trackers-worth-with-reviews-and-ratings-142446) and say why

however, it's clear to me what and waffles aren't 10 at all right now

[Thatsgreat]

what ????? is not stupid that TT has 10/10 ..if we are looking carefully TT has extreme and very good trance stuff (pre-times)i don;t know why u think that TT sucks

indietorrents is nothing compare to TT ..

but anyways good luck ;)

Haha. OMG, that's because you like trance music. I like indie music. That is just stupid. The speeds are very good at IT and they have a very good content. And as I said about the pre-times. Older stuff is more likely to get uploaded than some new music, even tho new music is uploaded. So it's hard to say if the pre-times are good. So for that IT should have 10/10. The speed is as good as the speed at TT and the content is in the same class as TT. If you ask a indie-fan about IT, he will say it's heaven for indie-music. Same thing about a trance-fan. So the sites are equal. Then they both deserve a 10/10.

For what and waffles. The speed is very good at both sites and so is the content. It's most likely that you will find what you search for in either of the sites if it's not ultra rare. And the pre-times are good. And as I said. In my eyes, the tracker that's best ain what it does should deserve a 10/10. Waffles and What are like comparing ScT to FTN. They both are top class in what they offer. There is no better music-torrent-sites than Waffles and What. So they should deserve a 10/10.

Blackcats-games has 10/10. It deserves a 10/10 also. But I find Blackcats-games equal to indietorrents. They both have a great content and the speeds are good. But how can you judge the pre-times when there are games there that are like 10 years old etc. etc.? If blackcats-games is a 10/10 then indietorrents and what and waffles also should be a 10/10.

I mean, if you compare the speed at ScT to BCG, then there is a big difference. But you have to be relative. Don't expect top speeds in BCG, you can say that the speed is relatively good for a site like that. And if you look at waffles and what. You can't compare the speed at ScT and Waffles and What either. Cause at ScT there are special uploaders who upload torrents. Then of course the speed is good. But at what and waffles all users can upload. So you can't expect that you will get max every time. But I bet that you can hold on 15-20 min to download a album that is 100mb if that would be the case.

Cause they are the best in what they do!

This is from my point of view.

[KFlint]

the quality ratings are overall ratings based on three factors: content, speed, pretimes.

some sites without any doubt have excellent (10) content, but it can't beat the fact, that their speed is very very bad.

the fact that the users don't care about the speed there doesn't make it better.

you can always say: "hey speed is not important, why doesn't this site get an overall (10)?"

it doesn't get it because speed is calculated in the overall rating.

the rating is a combination and not just content.

indietorrents will never reach the speed of tt. that's why it won't get an overall 10.

even if it has the greatest independent music on earth.

true

however, i think that the speed is less important than content when we are talking about a specialized tracker

sites like blackcats for example might not have the speed of sct (especially on new content)

the vocation of the tracker is really different and it still can have an overall 10 because of the amazing content it has

if the speed is plainly average on new, few days released and old stuff, than it won't get a 10

[Polarbear]

the quality ratings are overall ratings based on three factors: content, speed, pretimes.

some sites without any doubt have excellent (10) content, but it can't beat the fact, that their speed is very very bad.

the fact that the users don't care about the speed there doesn't make it better.

you can always say: "hey speed is not important, why doesn't this site get an overall (10)?"

it doesn't get it because speed is calculated in the overall rating.

the rating is a combination and not just content.

indietorrents will never reach the speed of tt. that's why it won't get an overall 10.

even if it has the greatest independent music on earth.

true

however, i think that the speed is less important than content when we are talking about a specialized tracker

sites like blackcats for example might not have the speed of sct (especially on new content)

the vocation of the tracker is really different and it still can have an overall 10 because of the amazing content it has

if the speed is plainly average on new, few days released and old stuff, than it won't get a 10

that's right. there's always room for flexibilty and elasticity as long as the decision is objectiv and based on a majority.

[lsw0794]

all of them are perfect

[stoi]

I am not saying we are fast with Pre-times or even with seeding.

and we have just put a pre time mod on the tracker not to long ago, but there hasnt been that many new games out since we put it on.

but i just had a very quick glance, and everything that has been released within the last week or so, got uploaded within 24 hours of pre, most within 4 hours, and some within 30 minutes.

and i know for a fact those have been uploaded by members with seedboxes, and i know one of my uploaders has a gbit SB so i very much doubt they would have been slow going.

But its still far to early to say if we are "fast" or not, but i would rather have a one stop shop for everything, than very fast pre-times but the torrents dont last 2-3 months.

[grimms]

Quality and content is what really matters. I agree, everyone likes speed and good pre-times, but in the end. How good is the quality of your product? (Tracker) Thats the question that should be raised.


I am not saying we are fast with Pre-times or even with seeding.

and we have just put a pre time mod on the tracker not to long ago, but there hasnt been that many new games out since we put it on.

but i just had a very quick glance, and everything that has been released within the last week or so, got uploaded within 24 hours of pre, most within 4 hours, and some within 30 minutes.

and i know for a fact those have been uploaded by members with seedboxes, and i know one of my uploaders has a gbit SB so i very much doubt they would have been slow going.

But its still far to early to say if we are "fast" or not, but i would rather have a one stop shop for everything, than very fast pre-times but the torrents dont last 2-3 months.

Your explanation is great, but is not needed. BCG is the best game site in town (for games). BCG is a prime example of what good quality is and means. BCG is a specialized tracker for games, even if it's not the fastest (pretty damn fast to me)It's a 10 for what the tracker specializes in (Games for most systems).:)

[TP635]

Porn- Puretna =10

[monk3y]

I am not saying we are fast with Pre-times or even with seeding.

and we have just put a pre time mod on the tracker not to long ago, but there hasnt been that many new games out since we put it on.

but i just had a very quick glance, and everything that has been released within the last week or so, got uploaded within 24 hours of pre, most within 4 hours, and some within 30 minutes.

and i know for a fact those have been uploaded by members with seedboxes, and i know one of my uploaders has a gbit SB so i very much doubt they would have been slow going.

But its still far to early to say if we are "fast" or not, but i would rather have a one stop shop for everything, than very fast pre-times but the torrents dont last 2-3 months.

i am not registered to BCG but i heard speeds are nice, content is excellent.
i don't think that in a tracker that focuses on games category, pre-times are the main thing. Generally people will look for content in a site like BCG so i don't think you should be worried about pre times :cool:

[magushun]

i dont give a shit for pretimes, when i had a ps2, bcg was the place to be at dot