Its

[messi30]

Only have count upload?

Its the same thats ftn??

[maddoxro]

yes

[jonny81985]

I wouldnt compare it to FTN, i guess the no ratio thing is similiar, but i** is much smaller and tight knit i think.

Hope this helps

Jon

[monk3y]

ratio system is similar yes.

[Vitality]

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-tracker-reviews-post2585927/postcount203
this might clear all doubts......

[Grind$oFine]

Yes, there's a bonus system, too, though.

[Dark Archon]

u need to seed back atleast 72 hours

[marwell]

FTN:

36 hours seed
better speed
more users
https :(


iTS:
72 hours seed
slower speed than ftn
<1000 user now
and this time good pre-times :)

anyway, I think iTS is better . . .

[markupmaster]

iTS has a closer community in my opinion...


:)

[rodinhas]

iTS has a closer community in my opinion...


:)



yeah :D

[Giveaway]

FTN >>>> iTS

its has got karma points

[fsephie]

FTN:

36 hours seed
better speed
more users
https :(


iTS:
72 hours seed
slower speed than ftn
<1000 user now
and this time good pre-times :)

anyway, I think iTS is better . . .

The one thing I wonder about this thread is how many people in this thread who are making these decisions are actually members on both sites...or even members on one of them.

Also, https is a very good thing. Unless you don't like security.

[marwell]

The one thing I wonder about this thread is how many people in this thread who are making these decisions are actually members on both sites...or even members on one of them.

Also, https is a very good thing. Unless you don't like security.

Im on iTS and Ive heard (or read) a lot of bad things about it, like the DoS attack, broken announce, empty pre chan ... but good community and cool style :ermm:

[Tokeman]

and how many other sites have been DOS'd in the past 6 months? How many have had bugs that needed fixing? Many many well established trackers had these same issues, it comes with the territory and is not a good basis for judging a site.

[jericospeedy]

I think its pretty pathetic that ITS blatantly copied Pethron's design for FTN. No shame.

[edeinho]

The one thing I wonder about this thread is how many people in this thread who are making these decisions are actually members on both sites...or even members on one of them.

Also, https is a very good thing. Unless you don't like security.

Im on iTS and Ive heard (or read) a lot of bad things about it, like the DoS attack, broken announce, empty pre chan ... but good community and cool style :ermm:

You just heard things about ftn!:lol: Poor guy.... and you want to compare it with its? :frusty:

[monk3y]

both sites are great, even though its has less users which causes lower speeds, it's a more closed community with great people who wouldn't go and *cough* sell *cough* invites ( btw good decision by ftn staff to close invites due to this retard people selling invites ).

[ideto]

Are just trying to get iTS down? Won't succed.
Obviously ftn has more speeds pres bla bla bla. Is there any1 capable to make a new trakcer better than ftn? lol
Both have great community, and nothing else matters.

[JROQuinn]

I like them both Sct & FSC as well I like to post certain things at random....everyone has their preference but I wouldnt say one is that much better than the other, but some have more cocky forums users than others

[C-mos]

FTN:

36 hours seed
better speed
more users
https :(


iTS:
72 hours seed
slower speed than ftn
<1000 user now
and this time good pre-times :)

anyway, I think iTS is better . . .


what ????:blink::blink::blink::blink::blink::blink::O:O:O
u are crazy man :)

iTs is nothing compare to FTN :)
u are not well informed my friend :)