***my Dsl Speed***

[BawA]

http://photothru.com/photo_filedb1/A4/83/4B/A4834B/viewable/A4834B_131A55319DBB_1.jpg

[lynx]

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/negative13.jpg
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/negative10.jpg

[p2pmaster]

wots this got to do with software? <_<

[smellmycomputer]

erm, mine says 10mbit/s i&#39;m way to lazy to post a screen shot, and it&#39;s not acctualy the speed of my modem, just the speed of the connection fromthe modem to the computer, so i&#39;d assume your post doesn&#39;t prove a lot

[Xilo]

You do know thats megaBITS per second right? So:

1 Mb = 1,048,576 bits
2.8 Mb * 1,048,576 bits = 2,936,012.8 bits
8 bits = 1 byte
2,936,012.8 bits / 8 bits = 397,001.6 bytes
1,024 bytes = 1 kilobyte
397,001.6 bytes / 1,024 bytes = 358.4 kilobytes.

PS: And big deal, mine says 100Mbps...

[mikester]

lol, check out OC192

[Xilo]

Damn, OC192 is an almost 80 MB connection. The highest record though has been almost 120 MB connection. :blink: You could fill an 80 gig harddrive in a little over a minute...

[3rd gen noob]

OC192 is rated at between 9.5 and 10 Gbits/sec

10Gbits/sec = 10240Mbits/sec = 1280MBytes/sec

isn&#39;t that right?

a little faster than 120MB

:blink:

[NightStalker]

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/whocares3.jpg

Really though, are you all trying to make me jealous? :ermm:

[Xilo]

Originally posted by 3rd gen noob@3 August 2003 - 12:04
OC192 is rated at between 9.5 and 10 Gbits/sec

10Gbits/sec = 10240Mbits/sec = 1280MBytes/sec

isn&#39;t that right?

a little faster than 120MB

:blink:
I dunno. O.o

[Storm]

<_<

i got a 256kbps wit a limit of 750MB/month................. butem........... i think ill go with the tomato an the babe..............

now if u were 2 start a tread on how much ur SHARING, that would b diffrent........

[Xilo]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2822333.stm

There&#39;s a link to the world records transfer speed. It was around 923 Mbit/sec... I was talking about transfer speed heh.

[mogadishu]

god thats your ethernet connection u dumbass.. i have a 100mb ethernet connection so i beat you all.. if you are talking about your actual dsl.. i have 768.

[dgmortal]

I challenge you............































http://www.angelfire.com/alt2/dg_mortal/images/connection.gif

I WIN&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; :D :P

[Eradication]

Originally posted by mogadishu@3 August 2003 - 19:03
god thats your ethernet connection u dumbass.. i have a 100mb ethernet connection so i beat you all.. if you are talking about your actual dsl.. i have 768.
Well I doubt that all of you have a 100MB connection anyways lol. It says on my connection that it&#39;s at 100MB but in reality like mogadishu said, that&#39;s your ethernet speed or something like that. And I&#39;m a...

Speed Test (http://bandwidthplace.com/speedtest/)


404.4 ker (56kers are in reality like 36kers)

I go at an average of 49.4kb/sec

And a 1MB file would take me 20.7 seconds.

[dgmortal]

Originally posted by Eradication+3 August 2003 - 18:11--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Eradication @ 3 August 2003 - 18:11)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-mogadishu@3 August 2003 - 19:03
god thats your ethernet connection u dumbass.. i have a 100mb ethernet connection so i beat you all.. if you are talking about your actual dsl.. i have 768.
Well I doubt that all of you have a 100MB connection anyways lol. It says on my connection that it&#39;s at 100MB but in reality like mogadishu said, that&#39;s your ethernet speed or something like that. [/b][/quote]
i never said i had a 100Mb connection :P . i forgot my sarcasm tags :lol: .

insert sarcasm here

[ultimatejester]

big deal mine says 3mb

[shn]

Thats a load of crap. Ill bet you thats just a lan (local area network) connection which can actually have speeds up to 100 megs per second.

[Livy]

my network conection say 100mb, but i have a router and when i have upnp enabled i could see the info from my router the same as a network connection and it said 2.8mb i think, which is wrong as i only have 512k cable,

[Xilo]

The speed it shows is in megaBITS not megaBYTES. Bits are represented by a b and bytes are represented by a B.

[Dalegas]

Yawn....

http://cablemodem.fibertel.com.ar/gemini/speed.jpg

REAL 512kbps.

Even so.. I get bored..

btw shn....wtf is that machine????.... U_U.-...

[Izagaia]

Originally posted by Xilo@3 August 2003 - 11:37
You do know thats megaBITS per second right? So:

1 Mb = 1,048,576 bits
2.8 Mb * 1,048,576 bits = 2,936,012.8 bits
8 bits = 1 byte
2,936,012.8 bits / 8 bits = 397,001.6 bytes
1,024 bytes = 1 kilobyte
397,001.6 bytes / 1,024 bytes = 358.4 kilobytes.

PS: And big deal, mine says 100Mbps...
Same here. I am using a DSL connection with my system network connections manager stating it runs @ 100Mbps...

If you perform a "through-test" of your system&#39;s connection, the results will be significantly different. My IP is clocking me at an actual speed of 674kbps connection and downloads at roughly 128kbps.

[chalkmongoose]

Mine are about what they are advertised as:
Details

Your raw speed was 721420.67 bits per second which is the same as:

Communications

721.4 kilobits per second
How communication devices are rated. Kilo means 1,000 and mega means 1,000,000. Examples include 56k modem and 10Mbit Ethernet

Storage

88.1 kilobytes per second
The way data is measured on your hard drive and how file sharing and FTP programs measure transfer speeds. Kilo is 1,024 and mega is 1,048,576.

1MB file download

11.6 seconds
The time it would take you to download a 1 megabyte file at this speed.

Rating

Compared to all connection types worldwide, yours is fantastic

[BawA]

[QUOTE=Xilo,3 August 2003 - 20:37]


i think u got 100Kbps not Mbps
MBps is not MegaByte its MegaBits

[chalkmongoose]

Originally posted by bawa@Klite_user@4 August 2003 - 05:26
[QUOTE=Xilo,3 August 2003 - 20:37]


i think u got 100Kbps not Mbps
No, 100Mbs sounds right. That&#39;s the maximum amount of bits per second... For his card. I&#39;d guess a 100Mb Ethernet card... Probably not wireless since you usually are hard pressed to find a 100Mb wireless card, unless you feel like fiddling with 802.11G...

[Busyman]

HEY
does anyone have a T1
then shut up
thats 1.544 Mbps (1544 Kbps)
Noone&#39;s connection actually gets their full bandwidth. Current protocols for DSL and cable are too inefficient.

By the way noone here can get an OC 192 or even an OC 3 (is 3 T3&#39;s muxed together) for that matter without a mux in their house.
Most of you guys don&#39;t know what the fuck your&#39;re talking about.
bawa thinks his ethernet connection is his real outside connection :lol:

[chalkmongoose]

Originally posted by Busyman@4 August 2003 - 05:49
HEY
does anyone have a T1
then shut up
thats 1.544 Mbps (1544 Kbps)
Noone&#39;s connection actually gets their full bandwidth. Current protocols for DSL and cable are too inefficient.

By the way noone here can get an OC 192 or even an OC 3 (is 3 T3&#39;s muxed together) for that matter without a mux in their house.
Most of you guys don&#39;t know what the fuck your&#39;re talking about.
bawa thinks his ethernet connection is his real outside connection :lol:
I happen to know quite a bit about network design and communication, as both me and my estranged father do work in that area. The only major limitation towards installing an OC192 would be cost, because after installing the equipment needed to properly run the plant, you&#39;d be up to several hundred thousand monthly. Partial T3 should be fine for most of what people need these days.

EDIT:
Of course, you could pay additional fees and install fifty phone lines in your house, and then connect them all to fifty modems in your computer, link the modems together and get 56Kb per second rates multiplied by fifty, which leads to very sexy speeds.

[Eradication]

http://www.angelfire.com/droid/lolclan/images/Connection.JPG

:lol:

<<Edit>>

......How did that 999...ahem...yeah...

[BawA]

very funny

so u think we just changed mbps by ms paint
its not like u dump

[WebCheF]

http://bandwidthplace.com/speedtest/results.html


I don&#39;t know if that compares to you guys, but it seems good? for dsl..

???

[WebCheF]

Sorry about that, here maybe this will work....?

Results

1.3 megabits per second

Run the test again Discuss in the forum
Details

Your raw speed was 1261751.53 bits per second which is the same as:

Communications

1.3 megabits per second
How communication devices are rated. Kilo means 1,000 and mega means 1,000,000. Examples include 56k modem and 10Mbit Ethernet

Storage

154 kilobytes per second
The way data is measured on your hard drive and how file sharing and FTP programs measure transfer speeds. Kilo is 1,024 and mega is 1,048,576.

1MB file download

6.6 seconds
The time it would take you to download a 1 megabyte file at this speed.

Rating

Compared to all connection types worldwide, yours is fantastic
Comparisons

not enough data yet


Complete stats See all the speed test statistics
Info


test type Downstream Test v3 (605 KB idt type)

test was run 22:10CDT Aug 3, 2003

[mogadishu]

http://www.chinkii.com/uploads/album/misc/ethernet.jpg

[Eradication]

8 days&#33;&#33; ROFL&#33;

Your computer must run really slow or you&#39;re good with mspaint too :P

[Storm]

well if u guys tell me a good site 2 upload pics 2, i can post 1 of a dl speed of 112mBYTE/s

an that though i connect @ only 256kbps......... hehe............ and no, no network.......
















dun tell i had already dl it b4 an opera cached it.........lol

[dgmortal]

Originally posted by Busyman@4 August 2003 - 00:49
HEY
does anyone have a T1
then shut up
thats 1.544 Mbps (1544 Kbps)
Noone&#39;s connection actually gets their full bandwidth. Current protocols for DSL and cable are too inefficient.
actually, 1.544 Mbps is 1581.06 Kbps or 197.63 KBps. i have 1.5 Mbps (192 KBps) DSL that can (and does) reach its max speed quite often. basically, you dont need a T1 connection to get the speeds that you&#39;re talking about here :P . so shut up. :lol:

[Izagaia]

My service is being upgraded on the august sixth. :D

Ameritech is offering a deal through Yahoo for DSL for &#036;29.99/month for the first twelve months. Depending upon what other packages you have through them (phone, long distance, cellular, etc...) you can roll-over that &#036;29.99 price and make it permanent.

So for the same price I am paying now, I am upgrading to a 1.5mbps connection speed. Question however: right now my package says that I have or am using five "static IP&#39;s". My new package says that I will have one "dynamic IP".

What is the difference or what are they talking about static vs dymanic?

[G-Tzmax]

how i can speed up my dsl connection

[Busyman]

actually, 1.544 Mbps is 1581.06 Kbps or 197.63 KBps. i have 1.5 Mbps (192 KBps) DSL that can (and does) reach its max speed quite often. basically, you dont need a T1 connection to get the speeds that you&#39;re talking about here&nbsp; . so shut up.&nbsp;

1.544 Mbps is NOT 1581.06 Kbps. Do the math.
and...........I never said you HAVE to have a T1 to get those speeds.
You can get an FNS line which is a 10.1 megabit circuit or get DSL yes DSL
for an astounding 7.1 megabits&#33;&#33;&#33;
so go back to algerbra class and also

shut up&#33;&#33; :lol: :lol:

[johnboy27]

Here is my speed as tested threw www.dslreports.com
2885 kbps down and 952 kbps upload.

[Busyman]

how i can speed up my dsl connection

You can&#39;t

(pay for a higher speed)

[3rd gen noob]

Originally posted by Busyman@5 August 2003 - 00:10
1.544 Mbps is NOT 1581.06 Kbps. Do the math.

:blink:

am i missing something here?

[Spicker]

http://www.fhost.org/x/jaigandhi5/speedtest.JPG
BEAT THT&#33;&#33;HEHEHEHEEHE

[Eradication]

Holy jeez........... :(

[Busyman]

What type of connection do you have?
Most of those bandwidth meters are bullshit&#33;&#33;&#33;
I install and test broadband lines.

[Rip The Jacker]

Originally posted by jaigandhi5@4 August 2003 - 19:25
BEAT THT&#33;&#33;HEHEHEHEEHE
Yep, Photoshop is a talent... :P

[3rd gen noob]

i went to the bandwidth place speed test a little while ago, and ran the 56k test

i got 39k or whatever, but when i used the back button, the test repeated. because the image was already in my cache, it loaded extremely quickly

however, when i loaded it again, i got a negative rate

how is this possible??

:blink:

http://mysite.freeserve.com/MSchumiFTP/speed.JPG

[Busyman]

Most of those bandwidth meters are bullshit&#33;&#33;&#33;
:lol:

[mogadishu]

lol photoshop.

[3rd gen noob]

Originally posted by mogadishu@5 August 2003 - 07:23
lol photoshop.
if you&#39;re referring to my pic, i assure you it&#39;s a genuine pic...i don&#39;t even have photoshop installed anyway

[Eradication]

Originally posted by KrackHead2k+5 August 2003 - 05:17--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (KrackHead2k @ 5 August 2003 - 05:17)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-jaigandhi5@4 August 2003 - 19:25
BEAT THT&#33;&#33;HEHEHEHEEHE
Yep, Photoshop is a talent... :P [/b][/quote]
Photoshop?&#33; That&#39;s BS, that&#39;s real&#33;

[dgmortal]

Originally posted by Busyman@4 August 2003 - 18:10
1.544 Mbps is NOT 1581.06 Kbps. Do the math.
and...........
actually i did do the math.......

1.544 Mbps x 1024 = 1581.06 Kbps

maybe you have a little to learn about equations in computer terms ;) .

[Spicker]

i didnt use photoshop EITHER&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; ;) heheheehehe&#33;&#33;




ok ok heres wut i did....ok when u get the results click back and wen it loads again it loads way faster = showing faster speeds. :D :P

[Amarjit]

I&#39;m on 576/288Kbps ADSL but it displays my status correctly :blink:, but I&#39;m on PPPoA when the majority of you on DSL will be on PPPoA. The 100Mbps is probably the LAN thingy, if you&#39;re like me and on WAN it won&#39;t display it ...

[Busyman]

maybe you have a little to learn about equations in computer terms

not 1581.06 but......


1.544 x 1024 = 1581.056

good try though :lol: :lol:

[Eradication]

Originally posted by jaigandhi5@5 August 2003 - 13:32
i didnt use photoshop EITHER&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; ;) heheheehehe&#33;&#33;




ok ok heres wut i did....ok when u get the results click back and wen it loads again it loads way faster = showing faster speeds. :D :P
Nnooo I&#39;ve been betrayed&#33;

[WebCheF]

OH yeah, well my dick is bigger that yours And I can piss way way further too. I am sure I can post a photoshop pic to prove it. lmao. This thread is sooo funny. no disrespect meant, just a zinger.

BTW I need to upgrade to Norton Securities with the msblaster virus going ar :lol: ound....