PDA

View Full Version : Rogers Continues to Throttle BitTorrent Traffic, Despite Contentious Pricing Scheme



IdolEyes787
04-10-2008, 12:41 PM
http://torrentfreak.com//images/rogers1.gifThe Canadian ISP Rogers recently introduced contentious hosting plans, which means that users have to pay for every extra gigabyte they consume. The problem is, however, that Rogers continues to throttle BitTorrent traffic, so most BitTorrent users will never reach their quota anyway.

Rogers (http://rogers.com/)‘ new pricing scheme (see image below) gets rid of the all-you-can-eat plans most ISPs offer, and charges customers for every additional gigabyte once they have reached their monthly quota. For example, customers with an “extreme plus” plan pay $99.95 a month for the first 95GB, and $1.25 for every additional gigabyte they consume.

Here’s what Rogers wrote in a letter to their customers: “With households doing more online every day - from downloading music and streaming videos to joining online communities - it’s important to have an Internet provider that evolves to meet your online needs. At Rogers, we remain committed to always providing you with the best Internet experience possible.”

Don’t get me wrong, a contentious pricing scheme makes sense. The more people consume, the more they pay, fair enough. What bothers most Rogers users is that, even with this new pricing scheme, their BitTorrent traffic is still being throttled.

Rogers was one of the early adopters of BitTorrent traffic shaping. The first reports date back to 2005 (http://torrentfreak.com/canadian-isp-is-throttling-bittorrent-traffic/), and last year Rogers even decided to block all encrypted traffic (http://torrentfreak.com/rogers-fighting-bittorrent-by-throttling-all-encrypted-transfers/), just to make sure that BitTorrent protocol encryption didn’t work.
Nevertheless, Rogers plays nice to its customers, and says it is “committed to providing the best Internet experience as possible”, but how can this be true if their customers can hardly use BitTorrent?

In the letter they sent to their customers they mention that, with a monthly bandwidth limit of 95GB, users can download a whopping 24,320 songs a month. However, if Rogers continues to throttle BitTorrent traffic, it can take up to 67.6 months before their customers actually reach their quota.

In a response to the new pricing scheme, a Rogers subscriber told TorrentFreak: “Pretty funny actually, as with the throttling they are doing, I could downgrade my service considerably.”

Not to worry though, there are several tip and tricks to get around the traffic shaping devices rogers uses. For some, BitTorrent encryption (http://torrentfreak.com/how-to-encrypt-bittorrent-traffic/) is sufficient to circumvent Rogers’ throttling, others need to adjust a few extra settings (http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=31905) to enjoy their torrents in full-speed.
Happy torrenting…

Rogers’ new pricing scheme
http://torrentfreak.com//images/rogers-throttling.jpg

:source: Source: http://torrentfreak.com/rogers-bittorrent-throttling-080309/

onin1911
04-10-2008, 09:23 PM
These guys sent me a letter and said from October 07 to February 08 I was averaging 300GBs of bandwidth per month :whistling and on my last bill, they waived like 280$ something dollars because of excess bandwidth usage. what should I do now? bell sucks balls on my area. o well. :cry: I better lay off the downloads.

4play
04-10-2008, 09:49 PM
These guys sent me a letter and said from October 07 to February 08 I was averaging 300GBs of bandwidth per month :whistling and on my last bill, they waived like 280$ something dollars because of excess bandwidth usage. what should I do now? bell sucks balls on my area. o well. :cry: I better lay off the downloads.

if you have another adsl provider in your area go with them instead.

im sure they will say you are still in contract with them but tell them that they offered an unlimited service which they have changed. this was one of the major factors in you signing a contract with them and they have altered it. the contract is no longer valid and you will be moving services.

of course this is only if you have someone else to go to.

colbert
04-10-2008, 10:44 PM
95GB limit per month is pathetic. I would rather have a slower ASDL service that's unlimited than this Rogers crap.

thedemon44
04-11-2008, 04:28 AM
Wow. I am so glad we dont have Rogers here.

At the rates they are charging my internet would have cost me about $250.00, instead of $45.00 a few months back.

I feel for Rogers customers.

saqib
04-11-2008, 10:49 AM
it sucks big time .... 95 GB limit

IdolEyes787
04-11-2008, 11:42 AM
Wow. I am so glad we dont have Rogers here.



Rogers is an evil company.I had the misfortune to have a cellphone account with them a few years ago.Never again.
However for some it's the only game in town.
I'm with Cogeco they don't throttle but it has a 60 GB cap.What good is high speed if you can run through your monthly bandwidth in a week?

accat13
04-13-2008, 08:56 PM
Only the half of it Rogers is starting to add warning banners to regular web pages while a user is surfing...http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20286767-Extreme-Overusage-Reminder-Banners-while-you-surf-now
Oh so great to be a rogers customer...The limit used to be 100g at 9megs...They increased the speed but decreased the cap and are going to start to charge in June...Do to our insane CRTC regulations in Canada and limited competition rogers has you by the Balls...Threaten to leave and they are happy to see you go,they only want the people who pay and barely use there connection.I do believe they limit the excess charges to 25$

tesco
04-13-2008, 11:43 PM
The letter I got (Rogers) said I was only using 10gb for the last month.
:lol: doesn't even come close to matching what my newsleecher says. And that's only counting what I download on newsgroups, from THIS computer. :lol:
So I'm hoping they continue to make teh same mistake or i'll be changing ISPs.

Blackbeard
04-13-2008, 11:58 PM
that sucks but i have a sucky 50gb download limit, and if i go over they limit my speeds to crap. =[

dmanjohn
04-14-2008, 07:08 AM
This sucks as Rogers is the only internet service in my area. I have all they services, phone, cell phone, cable, and internet and I've had problems with all of them at least once every 2months. I recommend that you never choose rogers if you have a choice.

Aaxel21
04-14-2008, 09:28 AM
This sucks as Rogers is the only internet service in my area. I have all they services, phone, cell phone, cable, and internet and I've had problems with all of them at least once every 2months. I recommend that you never choose rogers if you have a choice.


Crap that does suck

link2009
06-11-2008, 12:21 AM
Well, yesterday was officially the day. The limit is in place and you now have to pay for every GB you go over...

I can't change because I have my e-mail tied to them and everyone I talk to uses that e-mail, it's too complicated to move.

IGetMoney
07-09-2008, 10:35 PM
so what speeds are you guys getting with Rogers on the 18MBps option?

I have shaw and they throttle the dog shit outta my download speed lol

lostdemon
07-10-2008, 12:31 AM
I really feel for you guys that sucks. I use roadrunner and hope that they don't end up doing the same thing.

Jdsnut
07-10-2008, 01:22 AM
I smell lawsuit. Or Crazy Insane man pissed at Rogers so he decides to be good to everyone and walk into there corporate office with a bomb on his chest and BOOM radical statement made, lol or they just MOVE.

markupmaster
07-10-2008, 01:39 AM
Bellsouth is quite shitty too.

:dabs:

Sanka113
07-10-2008, 05:07 AM
Sounds to me that Rodgers is the crapcastbable of canada. If only the swedes would hurry up and invade north america...with their technology of course.

IGetMoney
07-10-2008, 05:22 PM
i know eh^

lostdemon
07-14-2008, 05:54 AM
So is Rogers the only choice for alot of people and absolutely no other?

link2009
07-27-2008, 05:52 PM
Rogers is the only choice for some people but their speeds are amazing. When I used to use torrents, hence I can't anymore, I would get 1.2MB/s average which is amazing in my opinion... 5 years ago 350kb/s was the max they offered.

If only they didn't have that goddamn stupid limit and I can't change because I have everything hooked up with them -> Cable, Internet, Phone etc..