PDA

View Full Version : Zola Vs Bergkamp



DarthInsinuate
08-17-2003, 09:12 AM
there hasn't been enough sport around here lately - so who do you think is the better player out of this technically masterful duo?

http://www.mychelseafc.com/images/zola.jpghttp://www.arsenal.com/images/playerfiles/bergkamp.jpg

i'd say Bergkamp because he's younger, taller, dutchier, and a Gooner - he also looks like Beavis from that MTV show

EDIT: i couldn't be arsed to find decent pics

brotherdoobie
08-17-2003, 09:28 AM
Uhh! whatever one you said I dont follow Soccer........uuhhh I mean football ;)
even If I did play all through school.......I'm more excited about American Football
and College football I live in Ohio and my team the Ohio State Buckeyes won the national champonship last season and are defending there title.

Goodluck with your team! :D


Peace brotherdoobie

Proper Bo
08-17-2003, 10:36 AM
You know who doesn't get enough recognition for his tecnical skills? Okocha. He played for bolton last season but has probably transferred since.

Dapadipz
08-17-2003, 11:55 AM
i think bergkamp is better

J'Pol
08-17-2003, 12:02 PM
Do you mean just now, or at their peak, or over there career, or none of the above ?

MetroStars
08-17-2003, 12:20 PM
Bergkamp gets my vote

Spider_dude
08-17-2003, 01:44 PM
neither gets my vote, it goes to lubo moravcik.
http://www.celticfc.net/graphics/players/moravcik/MORAVCIK2.jpg

http://www.slovakfutball.com/futbalisti1/moravcik-slovakia.jpg

http://www.soccerage.com/en/00/53589a.jpg

or even better/equal - Larsson


http://www.sportcartoons.co.uk/larsson.jpg

http://kane-galileo.uhome.net/football/larsson.jpg

[BlackAnvil]
08-18-2003, 07:18 AM
damn right!

LUBO!

http://www.celticfc.net/graphics/players/moravcik/MORAVCIK2.jpg

ZechsMarquise
08-18-2003, 07:29 AM
I think Figo is better :P

DarthInsinuate
08-19-2003, 10:11 PM
Originally posted by JPaul@17 August 2003 - 13:02
Do you mean just now, or at their peak, or over there career, or none of the above ?
i'm thinking about last year because it's still fresh in my mind - and they both had fairly good seasons

The Horror fanatic
09-05-2003, 02:19 AM
zola would be better freekick wise, dennis the more agile wise. But both are in the shadow of the great Zee Zee (zinedine Zidane). What class all round, forget beckham, zeezee is the man of madrid :D

dfhsfgjdgjdg
09-05-2003, 06:59 AM
Isn't Beckham just good at placing a ball, I mean passing or in free kicks? He's bloody good at it, maybe the best on the planet, but Zola can do a lot more with the ball, he has more imagination, he tries to beat players, he entertains - he gets my vote anyway.

Oops!

Oh, Bergkamp!

That's a bit tougher. They both have VISION.

Billy_Dean
09-05-2003, 07:15 AM
Beckham has had a great start for Madrid cos they let him play where he wants to be. When you play on the wing you're somewhat restricted. He plays better for England than he did for Man U.

As for the original question, Bergkamp gets my vote, just, he must be one of the best all rounders the game has seen. Pity he plays for that bunch of pansies tho!!


B)

DarthInsinuate
09-05-2003, 09:54 AM
Originally posted by Billy_Dean@5 September 2003 - 08:15
When you play on the wing you're somewhat restricted. He plays better for England than he did for Man U
When ever i watch Beckham play he never seems to stay on the wing - i notice him drifting towards the centre, sometimes he ends up on the left - something to watch out for tomorrow