Split BT invites.

[KennyX]

I am sick of the 'morality police' spamming all the trade and account give away topics. Can you do something about it?

The best idea I had was creating a forum where the anti-traders just cannot post. Make an anti-trade post here and it gets deleted and you are disabled from this part of the forum. Let the hate brigade see it, just don't let them post: it will drive them crazy!

[Mr.sharer]

i agree . its lame when people start flaming traders when the site (FST ) actually allows it

[Something Else]

It goes both ways. The tards flame each other. Traders/Anti Traders.
All fuckwits. They are as bad as each other. It's like a zoo in there.

[Hairbautt]

It goes both ways. The tards flame each other. Traders/Anti Traders.
All fuckwits. They are as bad as each other. It's like a zoo in there.
It's more like an asylum. Some people go to zoos for their own enjoyment as a vacation get-away.

[Something Else]

:lol:
Plus won. I agree with that. As long as the mentalists stay in the asylum let them kill each other.

[Mr JP Fugley]

I am sick of the 'morality police' spamming all the trade and account give away topics. Can you do something about it?

The best idea I had was creating a forum where the anti-traders just cannot post. Make an anti-trade post here and it gets deleted and you are disabled from this part of the forum. Let the hate brigade see it, just don't let them post: it will drive them crazy!

Fuck off and die, soon. You selfish bastard.

"I want to trade invites to private trackers and people don't like me doing it and are nasty to me."

Good, cunt. I don't want pricks like you fucking about with my security and privacy.

[KennyX]

I am sick of the 'morality police' spamming all the trade and account give away topics. Can you do something about it?

The best idea I had was creating a forum where the anti-traders just cannot post. Make an anti-trade post here and it gets deleted and you are disabled from this part of the forum. Let the hate brigade see it, just don't let them post: it will drive them crazy!

Fuck off and die, soon. You selfish bastard.

"I want to trade invites to private trackers and people don't like me doing it and are nasty to me."

Good, cunt. I don't want pricks like you fucking about with my security and privacy.


Thanks for the reasoned reply.

[Mr JP Fugley]

Why would I give you a reasoned reply, I think you're a cunt. I'm pretty sure I made that clear enough.

[KennyX]

I was talking about the actual argument you put forth (security and privacy) and I will deal with it when the time is right in the BT section. The time will be soon.


The rest of your post is not for me to deal with as the rules of FST clearly apply: if they do not then expect a reply in kind.



Rule 8 - Profanity There will be no excessive use of profanity. Please keep all foul language to a minimum. Action will be taken against those who choose to disobey, no exceptions.

Rule 9 - Racism/Discrimination/Insults There will be no offensive or inflammatory posts meant to offend or hurt any other member(s) or guest(s) of this forum. The use of racial, ethnic, gender based insults, contents or discriminatory comments of any kind will not be allowed or tolerated. Expect action against you if you do.

[Something Else]

:emo: :ghey:

[hitman51]

:emo: :ghey:

rofl!

[sear]

I was talking about the actual argument you put forth (security and privacy) and I will deal with it when the time is right in the BT section. The time will be soon.

/stalker...looks like he's coming to get you :fear:

[Chip Monk]

That was rather enigmatic. He'll deal with it when the time is right, apparently. In the BT section, presumably with an audience of others who don't care what effect their actions may have on other people.

Presumably by way of some form of learnéd pronouncement if the tone is anything to go by. I'm guessing he'll end the piece with, "That is all" and await the plaudits of his peers. A stream of one post smilies or "+1" from a group of semi-literates and troglodytes.

Maybe that's why he started this thread, he sees hiself as some sort of messianic figure. Fighting for the rights of invite traders. Let my people go, leave us to do as we will. If anyone disagrees let them be banned from our midst, that we may trade invites as we see fit.

Freedom of expression ftw.

[KennyX]

I was simply going to refute the two arguments posted by Mr JP Fugley as I stated, but if you all want to read more into it then feel free. Yes, it is a BT issue so where else would I post it? As for the timing, it seems someone has opened a suitable thread so the time is now.

'Fighting for the rights of invite traders', I like that but if I was a crusader would I not want to join the anti-traders and fight for the minority viewpoint? Anyway, it is not accurate as all I hoped for was:
1. a split in invites and trades so I would not have to wade through loads of badly titled trade requests thinking they were invites offered.
2. A reduction in the amount of thinly veiled vindictive spam from the anti-trade mob who, lets face it, are not going to have any real effect.



I think you are neither thick enough, or enough of a cunt to reside in this section. :smilie4:

The only 'retard cunts' I have encountered on FST have not been in the BT section where this was posted, but on posts in this thread from people who ascribe motives that don't exist and enjoy making up fanatasies about how things should be.


Chip Monk, I did it funny that you criticise others for possible 'one post smilies': tell me do you think the two smilie post from Benchez in this thread is a work of genius?

[Nemrod]

I really don´t see a difference that could help to increase or decrease the trading.
If any given staffer comes here for hunting, he will have all the deers in one plot.
As long as there are not restrictions but those about 1 month membership, etc. it only could help to keep some kind of order inside the chaos. If I don´t like trading I won´t enter to that sub-forum, if I like trading that will be my home.

[Sextent]

I was simply going to refute the two arguments posted by Mr JP Fugley as I stated, but if you all want to read more into it then feel free.

Refute away, please, I'm interested in how you feel his position is wrong. You're the one who started the thread, so let's hear your well thought out arguments.


Chip Monk, I did it funny that you criticise others for possible 'one post smilies': tell me do you think the two smilie post from Benchez in this thread is a work of genius?

Apart from that being badly written drivel. The point is that he doesn't only do that. He posts well most of the time. However he sometimes makes a minimalist post to make a point. It's all the better and more effective when juxtaposing it with his normal style.

That's entirely different from the people who seem only capable of 1 smilie posts or "+1"

[Something Else]

I think you are neither thick enough, or enough of a cunt to reside in this section. :smilie4:


I wasn't referring to you. :dry:



The only 'retard cunts' I have encountered on FST have not been in the BT section where this was posted, but on posts in this thread from people who ascribe motives that don't exist and enjoy making up fanatasies about how things should be.

What are these motives that don't exist and what are these fantasies that you are referring to. What point were you trying to get accross with this statement because it seems vague at best.

[hitman51]

I was talking about the actual argument you put forth (security and privacy) and I will deal with it when the time is right in the BT section. The time will be soon.

/stalker...looks like he's coming to get you :fear:

i'm after sear...wants to have secks?

[sear]

only if I can drive.

[Skiz]

We've split the sections; it was due anyhow.

Hopefully that will seperate the tards and trolls. :whistling