throwing away "low" levels?? what do you think?

[BlueLabel]

hello everyone

lately I see frequent phenomenon here in fst.
I see new members here (less than 3 months) requsting invites (whice is OK).
the invite requset divide to 2 parts- the "high" lv request and "low" lv request.
the phenomenon is that any time there is "low" lv req people jump with "PM me your mail" without asking any proofs and asking no question (100% of trusting),
and when there is "high" lv req people becoming more suspicious.
its look like that people less care about their "low" level trackers and don't respect them.

do you think its OK to throwing low levels invites like that without checking people??

edit:
by mention "new members" I mean to members that we dont know anything about them cause they haven't been here enough time, so give invites to guys like that without checking them its completely unresponsible.
I'm not talking about cases when older member (lats say a good member for example) that well known request invite and other members that already know him and know how much good and responsible he is give him invite without checking him.

[stoi]

its silly, mind you saying that, i have not seen one BCG referral go on here yet, so maybe we are doing something right lol

[Polarbear]

many people still think that rep points will open the door for the trackers they desire. they don't know how wrong they are.

[BlueLabel]

its silly, mind you saying that, i have not seen one BCG referral go on here yet, so maybe we are doing something right lol
you can call it good management

[integral]

its silly, mind you saying that, i have not seen one BCG referral go on here yet, so maybe we are doing something right lol

maybe people are just plain confused by it, or they dont want to risk inviting some noob that ruins their account.

[stoi]

well being confused with something we do wont be the first lol

and the 2nd part is the idea, but saying that, every tracker has, invite a cheat, your account gets banned or whatever, but it doesnt stop them from doing it.

I suppose the proof will be when we open it up to User and PU soon, and we have a lot in the system, we have 14,500 now with just SPU, so i would hate to hazzard a guess with how many will be in the system soon.

[Funkin']

I hate it when people take no caution at all when giving invites to so-called "lower level" sites. These people I call douchebags. I value one of my "lower level" sites much more than one of my "high level" sites. But eventhough I value one tracker more than another, I would still take the same level caution inviting a person to it, since that person will always be on my invite tree.

As was mentioned already, I think people do this just to rack up rep points. Thinking someone around here with a "high level" invite will see these rep points and automatically think he's a good member, then give him this invite.

[kukushka]

for some sites invites is just a kind of MLM. some of them are going to open signups from time to time. so in some cases can't see nothing bad in "throwing" invites. stmusic, hd-bits.ro, pussytorrents, demonoid... can't see no big problem here )) maybe i'm blind ;)

[(I)]

People who are just inviting others w/o asking their proofs are idiots, and don't respect their trackers

However, I don't agree with the idea of giving away inv.s on public
So don't make a diff

BTW, people are just doing that to increase their reps, cuz lots of inviters still thinking high rep = trustworthy person
So I don't blame those high rep seekers, it's their job, sign up, giving away 50+ invites to strange sites and then winning a sct inv from a moron member, bah

[stroj]

New members will just look at level thread and follow it, since they are pretty much leaded that way everywhere they look on this forum. Yes I blame FST.

[kukushka]

People who are just inviting others w/o asking their proofs are idiots
so? fst survives on ads and idiots are clicking on ads more than non-idiots )
so they're welcomed here )))

[Sanka113]

Honeslty it just depends on the tracker. Some trackers don't care about giving out invites to it's members as it likes turning over it's userbase, they like having lots of peers, etc. So if a tracker doesn't care about how many invites it gives to it's members than it's members don't care about giving out invites to strangers.

[brightsid]

The majority of "older" members are "raised" with the knowledge that the more rep points
they get the faster they become members to the level-100 ***** tracker.
What is the easiest way? Give as many "cheap" invites as you can.
When it comes to "expensive" ones you cannot request unless you have +200 trading rep points,
or more than 10TB upload in another "expensive" tracker.
As invites are becoming currency it's normal to have "expensive" and "cheap" ones.

[bladesharp]

i think "newer" members learning from "older" members :D

[brightsid]

Honeslty it just depends on the tracker. Some trackers don't care about giving out invites to it's members as it likes turning over it's userbase, they like having lots of peers, etc. So if a tracker doesn't care about how many invites it gives to it's members than it's members don't care about giving out invites to strangers.
Name one tracker to make sure I delete my account

[Sanka113]

Umm idk, any tracker that open signups all the time, give it's members tons of invites, and don't have anything in their rules about giving away invites. So that would narrow it down to Eleventy Seven trackers.

[(I)]

so? fst survives on ads and idiots are clicking on ads more than non-idiots )
so they're welcomed here )))

You had doubts?

[BlueLabel]

Honeslty it just depends on the tracker. Some trackers don't care about giving out invites to it's members as it likes turning over it's userbase, they like having lots of peers, etc. So if a tracker doesn't care about how many invites it gives to it's members than it's members don't care about giving out invites to strangers.

but there is still big differents between filled stranger request by throwing to him invite like that and filled stranger request after checking his past and doing little research on him and see how he's doing in other trackers.

[apextwin146]

Honeslty it just depends on the tracker. Some trackers don't care about giving out invites to it's members as it likes turning over it's userbase, they like having lots of peers, etc. So if a tracker doesn't care about how many invites it gives to it's members than it's members don't care about giving out invites to strangers.

but there is still big differents between filled stranger request by throwing to him invite like that and filled stranger request after checking his past and doing little research on him and see how he's doing in other trackers.
In an ideal world what you are saying would be perfectly plausible but then again it aint ..
In an ideal scenario there wont be any BT rep which prompts users to give away invites in the first place so that they can garner more rep in order to pursue their dream of gettin into high level trackers ..
In an ideal scenario there shouldnt be a invite/trade section as both of them are percieved to be equally bad by the staff ..(Invite only ppl you know and trust) .. There would only be a request section
Most importantly there wudnt have been any levels to talk about
But this would never happen as this is how the things works .. Debating wether this is right or wrong wont change the way the things work ..
Its wrong but then if every person would actually care about the tracker community then every tracker would be as good as its members and there would be no sense in having levels ..