PDA

View Full Version : Hoi Jay Pish



The Flying Cow
11-15-2008, 11:00 PM
I'll agree with you that Catherine Zeta-Jones is a very mediocre actress, and her displays as a supposedly "cougarish-like" enticing babe leave much to be desired, and that thus, conversely, her representation in Traffic is, as was to be expected, very poor.

I will also agree that Michael Douglas is not all that.

Finally, I will agree that the remainder of the cast (the Swimfan girl, who plays the junkie daughter, making use of perhaps one single facial expression throughout the entire fillum, as well as her multiple drug-ingesting classmates, and so on), with very few exceptions, is watchable at best.

However, you cannot intend to suggest that Benicio Del Toro's performance is nothing shy of pure genious in that picture.

To be frank, Benicio's performances tend to impress me wherever he is. Be it Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas, Snatch, Sin City, or 21 Grams. In any of those movies he leaves me flabbergasted, to say the least.

Nevertheless, it is not solely Benicio's astounding performance (which I believe earned him an oscar?) in Traffic, that makes the movie worthwhile. A few other elements (Don Cheadle, his partner, Dennis Quaid (very impressive display from him in this movie), even the drug dealer who's to be a witness in Zeta-Jones' trial plays a solid role, the corrupted Tijuana general - Salazar, the homosexual hitman Francisco, Manolo (Del Toro's closest friend), Manolo's girlfriend, the American general Douglas conferences with throughout, and one or two more) also add to a movie that, whilst it may have one or two moments that bore the eager eye (a tad slowish), is overall very well elaborated.






Yes?

IdolEyes787
11-15-2008, 11:53 PM
Can you link to jp's remark.I'd like to read it.

Otherwise I won't comment since you weren't asking me.:drunk:

JPaul
11-16-2008, 12:04 AM
I'll agree with you that Catherine Zeta-Jones is a very mediocre actress, and to be frank her displays as a supposedly "cougarish-like" enticing babe leave much to be desired, and that thus, conversely, her representation in Traffic is, as was to be expected, very poor.

I will also agree that Michael Douglas is not all that.

Finally, I will agree that the remainder of the cast (the Swimfan girl, who plays the junkie daughter, making use of perhaps one single facial expression throughout the entire fillum, as well as her multiple drug-ingesting classmates, and so on), with very few exceptions, is watchable at best.

However, you cannot intend to suggest that Benicio Del Toro's performance is nothing shy of pure genious in that picture.

To be frank, Benicio's performances tend to impress me wherever he is. Be it Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas, Snatch, Sin City, or 21 Grams. In any of those movies he leaves me flabbergasted, to say the least.

Nevertheless, it is not solely Benicio's astounding performance (which I believe earned him an oscar?) in Traffic, that makes the movie worthwhile. A few other elements (Don Cheadle, his partner, Dennis Quaid (very impressive display from him in this movie), even the drug dealer who's to be a witness in Zeta-Jones' trial plays a solid role, the corrupted Tijuana general - Salazar, the homosexual hitman Francisco, Manolo (Del Toro's closest friend), Manolo's girlfriend, the American general Douglas conferences with throughout, and one or two more) also add to a movie that, whilst it may have one or two moments that bore the eager eye (a tad slowish), is overall very well elaborated.






Yes?

What the fuck are you talking about.

clocker
11-16-2008, 12:20 AM
I assumed he was talking about the movie Traffic but admit I'm terrible with subtext.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 12:23 AM
I assumed he was talking about the movie Traffic but admit I'm terrible with subtext.

I've not seen that particular movie, so there's every chance you are correct.

Snee
11-16-2008, 12:28 AM
I suppose he's not the village idiot for nothing, like :blink:

clocker
11-16-2008, 12:29 AM
Apparently, in ShamanWorld you two are having a spirited discussion regarding the merits of this film.
It doesn't bode well that you haven't seen it.

callum
11-16-2008, 12:51 AM
This should be moved to movieworld, there might be someone there that gives a fuck.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 02:01 AM
Apparently, in ShamanWorld you two are having a spirited discussion regarding the merits of this film.
It doesn't bode well that you haven't seen it.

Whilst not having seen said movie doesn't actually preclude me from discussing it I'm sure most people can see how it would put me at a slight disadvantage.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 02:02 AM
This should be moved to movieworld, there might be someone there that gives a fuck.

Hardly likely one would have thought.

callum
11-16-2008, 02:39 AM
This should be moved to movieworld, there might be someone there that gives a fuck.

Hardly likely one would have thought.

Just went into movieworld and noticed someone who's norwegian, has the username roooney, the liverpool club badge as his avatar and is obviously mental.

The Flying Cow
11-16-2008, 10:13 AM
My mistake.

This was meant to be directed at Benchez.

He's the one was saying harsh comments about the fillum.

Sorry JP.

:eyeroll:

JPaul
11-16-2008, 12:10 PM
My mistake.

This was meant to be directed at Benchez.

He's the one was saying harsh comments about the fillum.

Sorry JP.

:eyeroll:

I'll log back in as benchez and discuss it if you want.

PlayeR
11-16-2008, 12:15 PM
I would like to hear the discussion

Something Else
11-16-2008, 01:59 PM
FFS I've still got him on ignore with this account.

IdolEyes787
11-16-2008, 02:00 PM
Yes Del Toro won an Oscar but considering his role was primarily in Spanish how would the average dolt in Tinseltown know if he was any good or not?
Surprised to simplify matters they didn't just give the award to the film's subtitler.

Furthermore Benchez' may be a bit caustic but I've never had reason to question his taste in movies.
You on the other hand said that The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was a good film so all of your past and future comments shall by me be taken with a bucket of salt(seeing that a grain is insufficient)


In fairness Benicio is alleged gave Scarlett Johansson the hard high one in an elevator so the man deserves some respect.


I would like to hear the discussion

Make it up.That way you can forego the boring parts and imagine bits about lesbians instead.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 02:03 PM
... so all of your past and future comments shall by me be taken with a bucket of salt(seeing that a grain is insufficient)



You could go with a pinch. That seems a fair compromise.

PlayeR
11-16-2008, 02:06 PM
I would like to hear the discussion

Make it up.That way you can forego the boring parts and imagine bits about lesbians instead.

:glag:
you got a point there.

Snee
11-16-2008, 02:06 PM
FFS I've still got him on ignore with this account.

I fully endorse this statement and/or course of action :dabs:

The Flying Cow
11-16-2008, 07:14 PM
If you're just here to be a snob little cunt please see yourself out, snee the pregnant man.

As to the League of Xtraordinary Gents, I said the movie was entertaining, and even if it wasn't grandiose, you can't deny the entretainemente factor in it Idol. You might, but I don't think others would.

Sean Connery I don't feel very grandly about, so if I say he was good in the League, that's because I don't gauge him very accurately seeing as I don't really consider him anything truly fantastic.

I'll watch that The Hunt For Red October fillum and see if it says contrariwise, but I doubt it. As James Bond he was just himself, really. Always the same. Generic, like.

And Bench, stand up and defend yourself against what I said about Traffic. Back up your insults (Traffic-wise).

Del Toro spoke in Spanish, but so do 50% of Americans. If you couldn't follow with the subs then that's not my problem.

Saying you can't gauge if he was a good actor because you didn't follow his dialect is rubbish: you can see him, see what he's up to, his expressions. With those alone his oscar was merited.

clocker
11-16-2008, 07:16 PM
Um, 50% of Americans do not speak Spanish.

The Flying Cow
11-16-2008, 07:17 PM
How many is it?

JPaul
11-16-2008, 07:18 PM
Um, 50% of Americans do not speak Spanish.
I'm sure it's a much higher figure than that mate.

Snee
11-16-2008, 07:35 PM
And Bench, stand up and defend yourself against what I said about Traffic. Back up your insults (Traffic-wise).
What part of him having you on ignore did you not get?

And as for the rest: come back when you've found a personality on your own, like chalice said.

Snee
11-16-2008, 07:36 PM
Um, 50% of Americans do not speak Spanish.
I'm sure it's a much higher figure than that mate.

Depends on what you count as americans, don't it?

clocker
11-16-2008, 07:37 PM
How many is it?

After English (215.4 million) and Spanish (28.1 million), Chinese (2 million) was the language most commonly spoken at home, eclipsing French, German and Italian over the 1990s.
Granted, this info is 8 years old, but still...

IdolEyes787
11-16-2008, 07:52 PM
Doesn't count the illegals so adding them on to your figures I'd say 50% is on the low side.

I think Skizo would agree.:whistling

JPaul
11-16-2008, 07:52 PM
After English (215.4 million) and Spanish (28.1 million), Chinese (2 million) was the language most commonly spoken at home, eclipsing French, German and Italian over the 1990s.
Granted, this info is 8 years old, but still...

See, you were talking shite.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 07:53 PM
Doesn't count the illegals so adding them on to your figures I'd say 50% is on the low side.

I think Skizo would agree.:whistling

It's not like you to be a racist.

Maybe it is, I don't actually know you.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 07:53 PM
I'm sure it's a much higher figure than that mate.

Depends on what you count as americans, don't it?

Good point, I just assumed he meant the USA.

My bad.

IdolEyes787
11-16-2008, 08:20 PM
It's not like you to be a racist.

Maybe it is, I don't actually know you.

In that I don't see the racism in my remark I suppose I might be.:(

The Flying Cow
11-16-2008, 09:13 PM
And Bench, stand up and defend yourself against what I said about Traffic. Back up your insults (Traffic-wise).
What part of him having you on ignore did you not get?

And as for the rest: come back when you've found a personality on your own, like chalice said.

Who the fuck are you?

IdolEyes787
11-16-2008, 09:47 PM
An object of implacable enmity.

And there is an abundance of evidence that he's a communist.

clocker
11-16-2008, 09:55 PM
I think he speaks Spanish as well.

IdolEyes787
11-16-2008, 10:07 PM
Cabrón

clocker
11-16-2008, 10:09 PM
Poopoohead.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 10:10 PM
I think he speaks Spanish as well.

What other languages do you think he speaks.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 10:10 PM
I think he speaks Spanish as well.

As well as who.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 10:11 PM
I think he speaks Spanish as well.

What else do you think.

IdolEyes787
11-16-2008, 10:11 PM
Communist.

Meaning the language he speaks.

clocker
11-16-2008, 10:15 PM
Republican.

JPaul
11-16-2008, 10:16 PM
Where

clocker
11-16-2008, 10:30 PM
There.
As well.

The Flying Cow
11-17-2008, 03:49 PM
For the effects of the discussion, here are benchez's words regarding said film:

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-last-one-post-gets-2000-post3026077/postcount10448

clocker
11-17-2008, 03:57 PM
Short and to the point.
Roger Ebert would be envious.

IdolEyes787
11-17-2008, 04:04 PM
Comments

Benchez' anti-Americanism borders on the fanatical.

Soderbergh may be many things but a rubbish director he ain't.

Michael Douglas is shite.

Most importantly disregard what I said before about Benchez knowing what he is talking about.

Something Else
11-17-2008, 04:21 PM
I'm not anti-American at all. I just don't enjoy cheesy TV/Cinema wherever it's from. Cawk. What made you come to that conclusion about me.

Something Else
11-17-2008, 04:25 PM
Taste in entertainment is entirely subjective. When I say I think something is shite, it's because I do. You're welcome to have a different opinion. I wouldn't accuse you of being anti-intelligence because you liked something I thought was stupid. Racialist.

IdolEyes787
11-17-2008, 04:37 PM
I'm not anti-American at all. I just don't enjoy cheesy TV/Cinema wherever it's from. Cawk. What made you come to that conclusion about me.

It could be he fact that you keep negatively referring to them posts.

Other than that I was (mostly)joking.I thought that would be blatantly obvious.

Coont.

Skweeky
11-17-2008, 04:57 PM
Damn Canadians, always trying to be subversive :no:

Something Else
11-17-2008, 05:41 PM
It could be he fact that you keep negatively referring to them posts.


Which posts. :blink:

IdolEyes787
11-17-2008, 05:53 PM
Forget it.What was hostility towards the culture I mistook as hostility towards the people.
I apologize.





Which posts. :blink:

I'd have to feel a whole lot more guilty than I do to wade 12000+ posts of shite.:yup:

.......so I'm delegating to Herman.
Keep him out of trouble.

The Flying Cow
11-17-2008, 06:19 PM
Who?


What?


:puzzled:


So, all in all, one would say you agree with my initial rhetoric Idol?

JPaul
11-17-2008, 07:24 PM
They just agree that you are a cunt

IdolEyes787
11-17-2008, 08:49 PM
Who?


What?


:puzzled:



We had a deal.
I said that I would stop that silly Canadian sea hunt thingy and in return you had your choice- either help me with some basic research or stop irritating chalice.
You said you'd rather help me with some research.(sorry chalice I did my best.:idunno:)

IdolEyes787
11-17-2008, 08:51 PM
They just agree that you are a cunt

True that.

chalice
11-17-2008, 08:59 PM
Who?


What?


:puzzled:



We had a deal.
I said that I would stop that silly Canadian sea hunt thingy and in return you had your choice- either help me with some basic research or stop irritating chalice.
You said you'd rather help me with some research.(sorry chalice I did my best.:idunno:)

Nothing to do with me, I think you'll find.

I find it rather redundant now to insult Sherman. All the decent ones go rocketing over his little head and you end up feeling rather dissatisfied.

Of course, he'll wax indignant at this post and I'll laugh but he still won't have appreciated its intricacies and have accepted that I have his best interests at heart.

He's like a spastic son to me, that kid.

Snee
11-17-2008, 09:12 PM
You, sir, are a patient and charitable man.

I stopped ignoring him for a bit so I could laugh at him being a stupid. It ended up being more sad than anything, though :dabs:

He's not even a quality mong.

anoneemuse
11-17-2008, 09:27 PM
Forget it.What was hostility towards the culture I mistook as hostility towards the people.
I apologize.





Which posts. :blink:

I'd have to feel a whole lot more guilty than I do to wade 12000+ posts of shite.:yup:

.......so I'm delegating to Herman.
Keep him out of trouble.

americans cheesified british art :mellow:

IdolEyes787
11-17-2008, 09:43 PM
Although I wouldn't go so far as to call Strictly Come Dancing or Pop Idol art for the most part I agree.

They did do alright by Till Death Us Do Part and The Office though.

Skiz
11-17-2008, 11:54 PM
Doesn't count the illegals so adding them on to your figures I'd say 50% is on the low side.

I think Skizo would agree.:whistling

It isn't quite 50% but it's getting there quickly.

Take whatever census numbers you have and tack on the 20 million+ illegals which have come from south of the border and the number is staggering. In my home state, whites are predicted to be the minority within the next two years. :dry:

JPaul
11-18-2008, 12:16 AM
Doesn't count the illegals so adding them on to your figures I'd say 50% is on the low side.

I think Skizo would agree.:whistling

It isn't quite 50% but it's getting there quickly.

Take whatever census numbers you have and tack on the 20 million+ illegals which have come from south of the border and the number is staggering. In my home state, whites are predicted to be the minority within the next two years. :dry:

So South Americans aren't white.

I though that, for the most part, they were.

Something Else
11-18-2008, 02:14 PM
Trafic > Traffic.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069400/

IdolEyes787
11-18-2008, 05:15 PM
Traffik > Trafic > Traffic

anoneemuse
11-18-2008, 06:23 PM
terrific

The Flying Cow
11-18-2008, 08:04 PM
What are you still doing in my thread Pee.

Chavis, I stopped answering your aggressive remarks because I know it's just your frustrations being vented via the Lounge.

And, considering your contributions to the active running of said Lounge, comedy and otherwise, I don't really mind.

It's not that I don't get your convoluted rants. Believe me they're not that intricate.

Pee, on the other hand, I've never seen or spoken to. When I say I've never seen him I mean I've never seen absolutely anything worth reading from his profusely intellectual mind.

So I just don't care. About his shite, that is.

I've invited him out of my thread before, but he keeps bouncing back here. What can one do.

Let him stay, even if he wasn't invited.

I guess he's used to doing that by now.

The Flying Cow
11-18-2008, 08:06 PM
You can't even begin to compare Jacques Tati with Soderbergh.

They work in completely different circles.

But I'll agree Trafic>Traffic.

Tati>All IMO.

You seen "Mon Oncle"? About the American uncle?

Insanely funny.

chalice
11-18-2008, 08:45 PM
What are you still doing in my thread Pee.

Chavis, I stopped answering your aggressive remarks because I know it's just your frustrations being vented via the Lounge.

And, considering your contributions to the active running of said Lounge, comedy and otherwise, I don't really mind.

It's not that I don't get your convoluted rants. Believe me they're not that intricate.

Pee, on the other hand, I've never seen or spoken to. When I say I've never seen him I mean I've never seen absolutely anything worth reading from his profusely intellectual mind.

So I just don't give a fuck. About his shite, that is.

I've invited him out of my thread before, but his little cock keeps bouncing back here. What can one do.

Let him stay, even if he wasn't invited.

I guess he's used to doing that by now.

You're right. I do vent my frustrations in the lounge. My frustrations at idiots in general and yourself in particular. I understand that your understanding was that to adopt a prevalent attitude or trend of posting in the lounge in order (to some degree) to figure in quickly.

What happened though, was you seemed overly familiar. You used users first names when you couldn't possibly have been given them first hand. You adopted styles in what could only be seen as in ingratiating circumstances. You even went so far as to adopt a previous avatar of mine (albeit briefly) which was made by Bo in a thread as a personal joke.

I love it when people call threads in the lounge 'my thread'. What a load of fucking pish. When you you start a thread in the lounge, you might as well call it, 'Rip The Fucking Pish Outta Me, Please'. So wise the fuck up.

In short, the forum will provide you with wheelchair access at the nearest eventuality.

The Flying Cow
11-18-2008, 08:57 PM
To figure in? Well, to be honest, I wanted to be a part of the hilarious chaos taking place here.

The first time I had contact with this place was when someone moved my comments about the main actress in Untraceable here and I was arse-whipped by many, yourself in particular. Arse-whipping aside, I then went on to investigate what kind of threads this place was made up of, and I found myself laughing repetitively and with absolutely no control.

So I decided to sit around and see if I could take part here.

If that is interpreted - oh and about your avatar - I thought it was very funny myself. Granted adopting it wasn't really that sensible, but so what? why should that incite aggression for crying out loud? - as trying to "blend in", well let me just point out this is a forum. An internet forum. Aside from the fact I never did that in real life, I most certainly didn't do that here. If that is what you thought my taking part here was, then you were incorrect.

Adopted styles? Tell me, please, what you can mean by that. I can write in any style I want to in here, this is the place to write in different styles. If it looks like I'm "copying" from copyrighted styles then it's just what it seems. You forget I'm not English as a first language.

And about me referring to first names when they weren't given me "first hand" - permission, you mean - who says I need any permission man? You people don't need permission to piss on people's faces whenever you get the chance; why should I?

Because of a possible age difference? It's the bloody internet.

10-year-old kids are making viruses taking down corporations and 50-year-olds are sweet-talking 10-year-old girls.

Age is completely irrelevant.

To finalize, I call it my thread not as a sign of ownership. What I mean (didn't you figure that out?) is if someone doesn't like what I write or my persona here then why post in my threads? Isn't it a bit of a party pooper stance?

I don't post in Pee's things.

Here's to hoping I made myself clear.

_______________________________

You consider me an idiot?

Fine. I don't know you, so why should that matter?

Call me an idiot as many times as you want.

chalice
11-18-2008, 09:09 PM
:lol:

Give me a minute or two and I'll give you a reason to post an even bigger rant.

See, that was you being yourself Sherman. How does it feel?

Don't know about you, but that's what I would prefer to read from you instead of the shite you've lapsed into.

:patshead:

chalice
11-18-2008, 09:29 PM
And as to styles, everybody has one and each one is different.

They're as recognisable as any artist, any poet, any spastic with at least three fingers.

It is the internets. It is representative of your mind, Sherman. And your mind seems to be flapping about like a fucking seagull wot's been zapped through the eyeball with a missing jigsaw piece wot was previously digested by next door's cat but happened to be vomited serendipidously in your lucky face in order for you to fully comprehend the wonders of the universe, like.

You lucky lucky cunt you.

IdolEyes787
11-18-2008, 09:30 PM
Is there a cliff notes version of that available?

I managed to get Sherman not being able to speak English ,being an idiot and something about seducing 10 year olds but frankly I couldn't be bothered with the rest.

The Flying Cow
11-18-2008, 09:58 PM
You're the one that's lapsing into shaite now.

What with all that patronizing bollocks and what.

:sage:

chalice
11-18-2008, 10:09 PM
You're the one that's lapsing into shaite now.

What with all that patronizing bollocks and what.

:sage:

I thought you'd gotten the message.

Turns out you can't help yourself. I can't help it if you're thick as a treacle sammich, like.

I'm only capable of patronising idiots and you're just making it easy for me.

JPaul
11-18-2008, 10:31 PM
What are you still doing in my thread Pee.

Chavis, I stopped answering your aggressive remarks because I know it's just your frustrations being vented via the Lounge.

And, considering your contributions to the active running of said Lounge, comedy and otherwise, I don't really mind.

It's not that I don't get your convoluted rants. Believe me they're not that intricate.

Pee, on the other hand, I've never seen or spoken to. When I say I've never seen him I mean I've never seen absolutely anything worth reading from his profusely intellectual mind.

So I just don't give a fuck. About his shite, that is.

I've invited him out of my thread before, but his little cock keeps bouncing back here. What can one do.

Let him stay, even if he wasn't invited.

I guess he's used to doing that by now.

Is that aimed at me, it's difficult to tell. :blink:

chalice
11-18-2008, 10:35 PM
What are you still doing in my thread Pee.

Chavis, I stopped answering your aggressive remarks because I know it's just your frustrations being vented via the Lounge.

And, considering your contributions to the active running of said Lounge, comedy and otherwise, I don't really mind.

It's not that I don't get your convoluted rants. Believe me they're not that intricate.

Pee, on the other hand, I've never seen or spoken to. When I say I've never seen him I mean I've never seen absolutely anything worth reading from his profusely intellectual mind.

So I just don't give a fuck. About his shite, that is.

I've invited him out of my thread before, but his little cock keeps bouncing back here. What can one do.

Let him stay, even if he wasn't invited.

I guess he's used to doing that by now.

Is that aimed at me, it's difficult to tell. :blink:

Don't flatter youself.

It's all about Sherman.

Whoever the fuck that is like.

JPaul
11-18-2008, 10:36 PM
I thought Village Idiot was Sherman.

chalice
11-18-2008, 10:38 PM
I thought Village Idiot was Sherman.

In this case, Doublethink is correct. :blink:

The Flying Cow
11-18-2008, 10:51 PM
Fancy that, an Orwell quote.

Posh coont.

It's aimed at Pee (Snee) JP.

chalice
11-18-2008, 11:06 PM
Fancy that, an Orwell quote.

Posh coont.

It's aimed at Pee (Snee) JP.


On the syllabus, was it?

Or did you get ambushed by the Rid The World Of Idiots brigade?

JPaul
11-18-2008, 11:20 PM
Fancy that, an Orwell quote.

Posh coont.

It's aimed at Pee (Snee) JP.

That's a pity, what with him being one of my most fave blokes on the interwebs.

I was hoping you were going to get interesting, eventually. Now I may never know.

clocker
11-18-2008, 11:55 PM
It is representative of your mind, Sherman. And your mind seems to be flapping about like a fucking seagull wot's been zapped through the eyeball with a missing jigsaw piece wot was previously digested by next door's cat but happened to be vomited serendipidously in your lucky face in order for you to fully comprehend the wonders of the universe, like.


I am reminded of Dennis Miller here.
The new Dennis Miller and no, that's not a good thing.

Way too labored this time, Cup-person.

The Flying Cow
11-19-2008, 03:02 AM
lolol

Brought down at his own game.

We need more support from non-britannics here, this place is too ghettoed.

Chalice, no, not everyone knows literature because they got spoon-fed it at school. Sorry if that's your case mate.

I actually read 1984 out of pure curiosity.

Fancy that.

I also don't flash the fact I did about, in an attempt at posh coontness.

Oh, and please stop blabbering on about how I "go at it again".

I'll write how I fucking feel like it, and your comments won't change a thing. If I want to write shit as "shaite", I will.

If I want to call you a posh coont, or a sleazy bastard, I will.

You, on the other hand, won't be able to do shaite aboot it.

Got me?

Good.

The Flying Cow
11-19-2008, 03:06 AM
Just another thing (I have to mention it)

It's ironic (isn't that how you "erudites" say it?) that you should be the one making all these tiring allusions at me being younger, when you're the one acting like a child here.

Get over whatever it is in my discourse that bothers you man.

Seriously. Go sip a pint or something. Watch some football.

All right?


Thanks. From the bottom of my heart.

clocker
11-19-2008, 03:10 AM
Does one allude "at" someone?

I think not.

chalice
11-19-2008, 10:57 AM
It is representative of your mind, Sherman. And your mind seems to be flapping about like a fucking seagull wot's been zapped through the eyeball with a missing jigsaw piece wot was previously digested by next door's cat but happened to be vomited serendipidously in your lucky face in order for you to fully comprehend the wonders of the universe, like.


I am reminded of Dennis Miller here.
The new Dennis Miller and no, that's not a good thing.

Way too labored this time, Cup-person.

Nothing laboured about it. It took a good 15 seconds from the moment it popped into my mind to get it on screen. I think I even picked my nose within that time frame too.

As soon as they start paying me to post here, I'll be sure to engage your editorship skills. We'll be rich.

chalice
11-19-2008, 10:57 AM
lolol

Brought down at his own game.

We need more support from non-britannics here, this place is too ghettoed.

Chalice, no, not everyone knows literature because they got spoon-fed it at school. Sorry if that's your case mate.

I actually read 1984 out of pure curiosity.

Fancy that.

I also don't flash the fact I did about, in an attempt at posh coontness.

Oh, and please stop blabbering on about how I "go at it again".

I'll write how I fucking feel like it, and your comments won't change a thing. If I want to write shit as "shaite", I will.

If I want to call you a posh coont, or a sleazy bastard, I will.

You, on the other hand, won't be able to do shaite aboot it.

Got me?

Good.

This place is too ghettoed? I'm not British, Sherman, never was, never will be.

I certainly wasn't spoon-fed literature at school. Don't know where you got that impression, like. I chose a phase that has come into modern usage and is known by millions of people. Not in the slightest bit obscure. The fact that you had to mention that you knew it was Orwell shows how pretentious you are. So you did flash the fact that you'd read it to try to be a 'posh coont', you stupid bastard.

And yes, you can post however the fuck you want. I can't stop you nor would I want to. And I can point out what a clueless cunt you are to my heart's content. :01:

chalice
11-19-2008, 11:02 AM
Just another thing (I have to mention it)

It's ironic (isn't that how you "erudites" say it?) that you should be the one making all these tiring allusions at me being younger, when you're the one acting like a child here.

Get over whatever it is in my discourse that bothers you man.

Seriously. Go sip a pint or something. Watch some football.

All right?


Thanks. From the bottom of my heart.

You've got it all wrong, Sherman. You don't bother me at all. You amuse the fuck out of me.

I will have that pint though. I don't like football so I'll watch a movie instead if that's alright with you. No wait, I won't. I'll just call you a fucking child again and laugh my bollocks off at your next inept rant. Woo hoo!

PlayeR
11-19-2008, 12:54 PM
I read the posts but couldnt really get it.

All I can say is chill out. easy guys. Hope you dont mind :happy:

IdolEyes787
11-19-2008, 01:00 PM
1984 that's some brainiac book about pigs written by George Plimpton right ?

Geez the things people came up with back in the distant past.


Note.
I read Paper Tiger. Disappointed the hell out of me.Not an animal in it.


Secondary note.
I realize I'm only amusing myself here but someone has to since you lot are currently doing a piss poor job of it.

clocker
11-19-2008, 01:10 PM
I realize I'm only amusing myself here but someone has to since you lot are currently doing a piss poor job of it.
You get what you pay for.

chalice
11-19-2008, 01:12 PM
1984 that's some brainiac book about pigs written by George Plimpton right ?

Geez the things people came up with back in the distant past.


Note.
I read Paper Tiger. Disappointed the hell out of me.Not an animal in it.


Secondary note.
I realize I'm only amusing myself here but someone has to since you lot are currently doing a piss poor job of it.

I'll be sure to factor in the 'keep Idol entertained' element next time I decide to wind Sherman up.

However, I just don't know how I could conceivably manage to be on a par with the comedy platinum you're amusing yourself with there. It's best not to even try. :dabs:

IdolEyes787
11-19-2008, 01:15 PM
Agreed.

I'm a hoot down at the local hockey rink.

Snee
11-19-2008, 04:53 PM
Pee, on the other hand, I've never seen or spoken to. When I say I've never seen him I mean I've never seen absolutely anything worth reading from his profusely intellectual mind.


Fascinating.

1 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-last-one-post-gets-2000-post3026013/postcount10437)
2 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-last-one-post-gets-2000-post3028101/postcount10538)
3 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-last-one-post-gets-2000-post3028102/postcount10539)

If by saying
Pee, on the other hand, I've never seen or spoken to.

You mean you've never gotten a response from me before making this moronic thread, then yes, you've never spoken to me.

I can honestly say that I generally can't give less of a fuck about most things you've posted on here.

From the first time I even noticed you were in the lounge, some thread about your experiences with drugs or somesuch, until this one about a fairly pretentious film about, well, more drugs, I've always found you profoundly boring, to the point of finally putting you on ignore so I'd have less scrolling-past-without-reading to do.


As for venting my frustrations on the lounge, I can't say I cathegorically do that. I do get harsh at times, when stupid people get in the way of interesting conversations, and the dedication with which I do that CAN vary with my current moods.

I do think it fairly hilarious when I get absolute wankers, like your mediocre self, to go off on rants and whatnot.

I found your trying to talk with someone who also had you on ignore, and who by all accounts isn't interested in what you have to say, a bit of a laugh as well, when combined with the fact that you aimed it at the wrong person AND tried to sound like someone else in the process.

To bad it always tends to wax pathetic with you, which is what makes it sad.

Even so, this is the most interesting you've ever managed to be.

I will be putting you back on ignore though, cos you're embarassing enough to make me cringe.

-=-=-

I can't believe I took him off ignore just to go find those, and read that, and even respond with the above. But the quotes were funny.

Great insults, by the way, it's like he's aging backwards or possibly turning into yet someone else. Busy maybe, like.

The Flying Cow
11-19-2008, 05:42 PM
If you consider digging up posts from the past to be intellectual work, then I guess you circumvent my earlier statement...

Salutations are in order for understanding what I meant by not having spoken to you. That shows an eager eye, no doubt.

The fact that Traffic is a film about drugs is completely coincidental. I don't see anywhere in this thread or in any of my past threads (other than that one you so emphatically refer to) any mention of drugs of any sort. But sure, you can link them like that to make your arguments more compelling.

Bench says he has me on ignore all the time. It's an old joke. There is proof otherwise, though, like when I asked him in 2000cents if he had it in his knowledge where I could find the movie, seeing as it wasn't on his site. And the fact that we've spoken via PM a couple times, where he clarified the prank. But I had to just spell it out for you, seeing as you didn't get that, thinking simply that, like yourself, every other wanker with 20000 posts here takes it upon himself to comment (daftly) about me, or my style of writing as being similar to someone else's when I decide to use more literary wording in a comment about a film I felt needed justice be made about.

If this is the kind of shit any member of this board has to put up with when he decides to write about something he enjoyed or liked here, then you guys (you in particular Snee, because I'm not the only one that thinks you're an incredibly rude and net-bullyish clown) are making a pretty good job of shutting everyone but your elected comrades up. I call it the britannia gang but I guess it does also include peoples from the adjacent isles.

I will at this point stop writing, because I realize this is really a waste of my time. I'd rather stare at the wall than try to defend myself from your very accurate descriptions of my personality (making conclusions about my person through a bunch of posts, most of them pish, seeing as the Lounge is pish-land, and because since I'm not Irish or Scottish or British or Welsh (did I miss any other independent nation from the neighborhood there? please do let me know) speaking in a style perceived as being similar to chalice's means I'm attempting to ingratiate myself with him, by imitating him - forgive me if I see that as a very racist way of approaching things (it's not like certain ways of speaking, or writing, have property or owner rights on them, you do understand that, don't you? as if certain terminologies are reserved for an exclusive club of ponces) - oh, I'm sorry if that offends you (the part about the lounge being pish-land), I guess you take the lounge as a very serious place, so if someone decides to play around a bit, and post some pure pish as it comes, you get offended because we're not all treating it as a sanctuary where you make your holy appearance.

How was it? - "when stupid people get in the way of interesting conversations" - go ahead and have your interesting conversations. I won't be here to interrupt your constant high-speed flow of pure unadulterated intellect.

The truth is you don't actually know me, at all. And forgive me for not wanting to show myself as I "really am" in an internet forum that discusses how to better steal and pirate everything the modern sapiens can. How to stick it to the man in every possible way. I just don't feel comfortable there. I'm also not obliged to give out any of me to complete unknowns (as in strangers). In a lounge where I choose to write freely and as differently as I possibly can every time because I find it (or found it, before it became known I was not from the aforementioned nations) more entertaining that way, and so would others if they did the same (I'm sure some do).

The assumptions you make are just far off. You don't even come close knowing absolute shite about me. The fact you think you do just shows how much you need to get out there and maybe look at the sky? Talk to someone through more than just your internet connection? I don't know, who am I to suggest possible alleys of treatment. I'm younger, aren't I? More immature, isn't it? I'd direct you to a professional, but I presume you're already seeing a team of them.

Congratulations on achieving absolutely nothing: simply once again showing the internet world at large just how obnoxious and pathetic you really are.

Goodbye.

Barbarossa
11-19-2008, 05:48 PM
Did you know you wrote 300 more words after you said "I will at this point stop writing" :dabs:

anoneemuse
11-19-2008, 06:01 PM
If you consider digging up posts from the past to be intellectual work, then I guess you circumvent my earlier statement...

Salutations are in order for understanding what I meant by not having spoken to you. That shows an eager eye, no doubt.

Oh and the fact that Traffic is a film about drugs where? is completely coincidental. I don't see anywhere in this thread or in any of my past threads (other than that one you so emphatically refer to) any mention of drugs of any sort. But sure, you can link them like that to make your arguments more compelling.

Oh and Bench says he has me on ignore all the time. It's an old joke. There is proof otherwise, though, like when I asked him in 2000cents if he had it in his knowledge where I could find the movie, seeing as it wasn't on his site. And the fact that we've spoken via PM a couple times, where he clarified the prank. But I had to just spell it out for you, seeing as you didn't get that, thinking simply that, like yourself, every other wanker with 20000 posts here takes it upon himself to comment (daftly) about me, or my style of writing as being similar to someone else's when I decide to use more literary wording in a comment about a film I felt needed justice be made about.

If this is the kind of shit any member of this board has to put up with when he decides to write about something he enjoyed or liked here, then you guys (you in particular Snee, because I'm not the only one that thinks you're an incredibly rude and net-bullyish clown) are making a pretty good job of shutting everyone but your elected comrades up. I call it the britannia gang but I guess it does also include peoples from the adjacent isles.

I will at this point stop writing, because I realize this is really a waste of my time. I'd rather stare at the wall than try to defend myself from your very accurate descriptions of my personality (making conclusions about my person through a bunch of posts, most of them pish, seeing as the Lounge is pish-land, and because since I'm not Irish or Scottish or British or Welsh (did I miss any other independent nation from the neighborhood there? please do let me know) speaking in a style perceived as being similar to chalice's means I'm attempting to ingratiate myself with him, by imitating him - forgive me if I see that as a very racist way of approaching things (it's not like certain ways of speaking, or writing, have property or owner rights on them, you do understand that, don't you? as if certain terminologies are reserved for an exclusive club of ponces) - oh, I'm sorry if that offends you (the part about the lounge being pish-land), I guess you take the lounge as a very serious place, so if someone decides to play around a bit, and post some pure pish as it comes, you get offended because we're not all treating it as a sanctuary where you make your holy appearance.

How was it? - "when stupid people get in the way of interesting conversations" - go ahead and have your interesting conversations. I won't be here to interrupt your constant high-speed flow of pure unadulterated intellect.

The truth is you don't actually know me, at all. And forgive me for not wanting to show myself as I "really am" in an internet forum that discusses how to better steal and pirate everything the modern sapiens can. How to stick it to the man in every possible way. I just don't feel comfortable there. I'm also not obliged to give out any of me to complete unknowns (as in strangers). In a lounge where I choose to write freely and as differently as I possibly can every time because I find it (or found it, before it became known I was not from the aforementioned nations) more entertaining that way, and so would others if they did the same (I'm sure some do).

The assumptions you make are just far off. You don't even come close knowing absolute shite about me. The fact you think you do just shows how much you need to get out there and maybe look at the sky? Talk to someone through more than just your internet connection? I don't know, who am I to suggest possible alleys of treatment. I'm younger, aren't I? More immature, isn't it? I'd direct you to a professional, but I presume you're already seeing a team of them.

Congratulations on achieving absolutely nothing: simply once again showing the internet world at large just how obnoxious and pathetic you really are.

Goodbye.

:unsure:

Snee
11-19-2008, 06:04 PM
I really can't be bothered to read any of that.

Here's a sad sad song, though:

xQOBoA8g3RI

IdolEyes787
11-19-2008, 06:05 PM
600 but who's counting.



snee faux superiority is the bastion of true wankers.

Oops forgot he has me on ignore.
Case proven.

chalice
11-19-2008, 06:22 PM
Today's burning questions:

Will Sherman really go away for good or can he be goaded back from self-imposed exile for one 'final' rant?

Will Sherman realise that nobody actually mentioned anything about race until he went off on his little tirade? And even then, it was on his part nobody elses'.

Will Sherman realise that Sweden is not yet a part of Ireland, England, Scotland or Wales or will he continue being an idiot?

Can I have Sherman's avatar now that he won't be needing it?

And who really gives a fuck?

anoneemuse
11-19-2008, 06:27 PM
Today's burning questions:

Will Sherman really go away for good or can he be goaded back from self-imposed exile for one 'final' rant?

Will Sherman realise that nobody actually mentioned anything about race until he went off on his little tirade? And even then, it was on his part nobody elses'.

Will Sherman realise that Sweden is not yet a part of Ireland, England, Scotland or Wales or will he continue being an idiot?

Can I have Sherman's avatar now that he won't be needing it?

And who really gives a fuck?

:lol:








Jinkies :O