View Full Version : Foxnews reaches a new low...
...attacking this wonderful man. :whistling
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/09/report-illinois-governor-taken-federal-custody/
clocker
12-10-2008, 12:22 AM
Oh, are we feeling beset again, Kev?
Everybody is jumping on this slimeball- and rightly so.
Did you expect us libs to jump to his defense just because he is titularly a Democrat?
Sorry, better luck next time.
Beset?
Why should I feel beset?
BTW-
Do Larry Craig and "Duke" Cunningham qualify as "titular" republicans?
Is William Jefferson a "titular" democrat?
Why do you disavow Blagojevich?
clocker
12-10-2008, 01:22 AM
I'd never even heard of the guy til yesterday...hard to "disavow" a stranger.
Let's hope our President Elect isn't involved in this three year probe. As much as I can't stand the guy, I'd hate to see a scandal of this magnitude before the inauguration.
Do Larry Craig and "Duke" Cunningham qualify as "titular" republicans?
Is William Jefferson a "titular" democrat?
Why do you disavow Blagojevich?
I'd never even heard of the guy til yesterday...hard to "disavow" a stranger.
...he is titularly a Democrat?
This^^^tipped me off.
"titularly a democrat".
When/how does party affiliation become "titular".
Is this option reserved for democrats.
clocker
12-10-2008, 01:19 PM
When/how does party affiliation become "titular".
Is this option reserved for democrats.
No, does it matter?
When/how does party affiliation become "titular".
Is this option reserved for democrats.
No, does it matter?
Yes, it does, especially when republicans are never republicans "titularly", or "in name only" when they misbehave.
Liberals and the press report instead about "staunch", "rock-ribbed", "unapologetically" "hawkish" republicans, who are "morally far-right, thru-and-thru".
Why don't you let me know, the next time a Blagojevich wanders across the screen on CNN and is identified as a DEMOCRAT on first report.
Let me know the next time Barney Frank, "Big" Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, or, God forbid, Barry Obama be described as a "flaming liberal".
Busyman
12-11-2008, 08:02 AM
The problem is that Republicans are identified with being one-way about so many things while Democrats represent a bigger multitude of stances.
Republicans are identified as being bible thumpers, pro-gun, pro-life yet pro-death penalty, anti-tax, big business, pro-torture, and pro-Iraq war....all rolled into one.
It's like every Republican seems this exact way.
Busyman
12-11-2008, 08:04 AM
Let's hope our President Elect isn't involved in this three year probe. As much as I can't stand the guy, I'd hate to see a scandal of this magnitude before the inauguration.
You can't stand him cuz he's black.
Come on. Admit it.:lol:
pentomato
12-11-2008, 04:43 PM
Let's hope our President Elect isn't involved in this three year probe. As much as I can't stand the guy, I'd hate to see a scandal of this magnitude before the inauguration.
You can't stand him cuz he's black.
Come on. Admit it.:lol:
You said it, very well said.
pentomato
12-11-2008, 04:46 PM
...attacking this wonderful man. :whistling
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/09/report-illinois-governor-taken-federal-custody/
It reminds me of dozens of other guys,. some accussed of sending homosexual emails to their interns, another one of trying to get homosexual sex in the bathroom of an airport, oh yeah this one is the best, Ted Stevens playing idiot after poocketing houndreds of thousands of dollars.
The problem is that Republicans are identified with being one-way about so many things while Democrats represent a bigger multitude of stances.
Even the way you choose your words has implications.
"Republicans are identified..."?
Identified by....whom?
The media, that's who, and you eat it up without question, my ovine friend.
Same thing with the rest of it-
"While democrats represent a bigger multitude of stances...
Yup = democrats represent, no question there.
Multitude?
As calculated by the great majority of Americans, no doubt.
Sheepish, is what that is. :whistling
Republicans are identified as being bible thumpers, pro-gun, pro-life yet pro-death penalty, anti-tax, big business, pro-torture, and pro-Iraq war....all rolled into one.
You (however repetitively) make my point so eloquently.
It's like every Republican seems this exact way.
That's 'cuz you eat the BS without benefit of a smell-test.
Start using your nose.
clocker
12-12-2008, 12:16 AM
Having endured eight years of a Republican (excuse me, "titularly Republican") administration, his nose may be overloaded and need a rest to recover.
Mine does.
Having endured eight years of a Republican (excuse me, "titularly Republican") administration, his nose may be overloaded and need a rest to recover.
Mine does.
Well, enjoy the rest it while it lasts; it'll be over around January 20th, I reckon.
clocker
12-12-2008, 11:12 AM
What will be over?
What will be over?
The "rest".
Rat Faced
02-03-2009, 10:39 PM
Let's hope our President Elect isn't involved in this three year probe. As much as I can't stand the guy, I'd hate to see a scandal of this magnitude before the inauguration.
You can't stand him cuz he's black.
Come on. Admit it.:lol:
Is he?
Thought he looked more a light cocoa sorta colour myself :unsure:
Mind, the Tele is on the fritz :(
You can't stand him cuz he's black.
Come on. Admit it.:lol:
Is he?
Thought he looked more a light cocoa sorta colour myself :unsure:
Mind, the Tele is on the fritz :(
That would be the Auntie Beeb telly, no?
Rat Faced
02-04-2009, 04:35 PM
No, it's a Schneider :unsure:
Beeb make Tele's now?
Kewl.. I wont go after that 50" LCD from LG then :)
No, no - I've just heard the Beeb played games with the "black" level when Obama was on camera.
Busyman
02-05-2009, 05:08 AM
Republicans are identified as being bible thumpers, pro-gun, pro-life yet pro-death penalty, anti-tax, big business, pro-torture, and pro-Iraq war....all rolled into one.
You (however repetitively) make my point so eloquently.
It's like every Republican seems this exact way.
That's 'cuz you eat the BS without benefit of a smell-test.
Start using your nose.
How about you eat shit.
I got you pegged. No need to get testy, Al Borland.
You have me pegged.
That's rich.
'Tis an illusion handed you by the liberal media.
They provide you with manipulated content and then give you your conclusion, which you then carry about as if it were your own.
Rat Faced
02-05-2009, 06:37 PM
Unlike Fox... which couldn't get a license as a News Station in some places, just as an Entertainment Channel :whistling
Unlike Fox... which couldn't get a license as a News Station in some places, just as an Entertainment Channel :whistling
I don't believe that.
Busyman
02-06-2009, 02:55 AM
You have me pegged.
That's rich.
'Tis an illusion handed you by the liberal media.
They provide you with manipulated content and then give you your conclusion, which you then carry about as if it were your own.
My bad, you don't like Jesus.
You have me pegged.
That's rich.
'Tis an illusion handed you by the liberal media.
They provide you with manipulated content and then give you your conclusion, which you then carry about as if it were your own.
My bad, you don't like Jesus.
I'm confused; are you referring to Barry.
Honestly, that post was far enough back that I don't remember the precise context, and you've been lax in attendance, so.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.