PDA

View Full Version : Seedbox VS RS Acc



FileZ
12-27-2008, 10:11 PM
if u r heavy downloader , What will be used ?
1 - server ( seedbox ) then transfer files through FTP
2 - RS acc for 1 year or so

horiZen
12-27-2008, 10:16 PM
server/box is my pref

H&K
12-27-2008, 10:33 PM
A server for sure, the releases themselves are available much quicker on torrents/ftp

LJ.
12-27-2008, 10:41 PM
Seedbox :)

FileZ
12-27-2008, 10:44 PM
A server for sure, the releases themselves are available much quicker on torrents.

good choise , but many ppl prefer RS coz cheaper and have many rare and old files with great speed unlike torrent when find old file with 1 seeder

Vor
12-27-2008, 11:03 PM
RS limits you to 2.66GB per day, although you can save up to 10GB. So if you're a "heavy" downloader then you may find that you often cannot download everything you want from RS because of the limit.

spark
12-27-2008, 11:13 PM
Rs

lysine
12-27-2008, 11:15 PM
server. you can run programs, private proxy, irc bouncer, website, etc...

with rapidshare you can only download.

naikon
12-27-2008, 11:21 PM
seedbox to buffer SCT or TL, or just FTN and no worry about ratio ;)

becomehokage
12-27-2008, 11:34 PM
Rs ofc.

Detale
12-28-2008, 12:38 AM
For loads cheaper than both you can get usenet access and not have to upload anything or deal with anyone ;)

There's an astraweb banner up top for $11 a month cant beat that using a seedbox or rapidshare acct

Funkin'
12-28-2008, 12:49 AM
Actually a years RS account is cheaper than a years worth of Astraweb. But either way, I would still rather spend my money on a RS account or Usenet account(which I have both) than a seedbox.

whiteboy
12-28-2008, 02:01 AM
Wait RS has a 2.6 gb a day limit. Man thats like 2 xvids! Or half a dvdr, thats weak!!!!

puckface
12-28-2008, 02:20 AM
For loads cheaper than both you can get usenet access and not have to upload anything or deal with anyone ;)

There's an astraweb banner up top for $11 a month cant beat that using a seedbox or rapidshare acct


Agreed. Although Easynews is the shit.

bentomans
12-28-2008, 04:39 AM
i'm a torrenter so seedbox is really important :D

meelad
12-28-2008, 04:46 AM
RS and usenet for me. Very hasslefree. The advantage with seedbox is that you can rent a seedbox for one month, buffer your main accounts and use the buffer for months. Just download whatever you want and seed it for few days (don't hit and run). The buffer will last long enough.

shadowhero
12-28-2008, 04:49 AM
prefer RS

ChorniyVolk
12-28-2008, 05:10 AM
I say seedbox, only thing RS has over torrents is the rare/old files that you still have access to, but if you look hard enough you can usually find it, or something even better on torrents, and the pros of a seedbox like all it's different uses outweigh rapidshare.

But this is coming from a guy who has neither ¯\_(o_o)_/¯

Detale
12-28-2008, 05:31 AM
For loads cheaper than both you can get usenet access and not have to upload anything or deal with anyone ;)

There's an astraweb banner up top for $11 a month cant beat that using a seedbox or rapidshare acct


Agreed. Although Easynews is the shit. Well Giga is my server of choice ;)


Actually a years RS account is cheaper than a years worth of Astraweb. But either way, I would still rather spend my money on a RS account or Usenet account(which I have both) than a seedbox.

Well

Wait RS has a 2.6 gb a day limit. Man thats like 2 xvids! Or half a dvdr, thats weak!!!!
You can get unlimited Dl with NZB's Funk ;)

Funkin'
12-28-2008, 06:31 AM
Right. That definitely is a downfall of RS right now. I was lucky enough to get a couple accounts that still have the 10GB a day download limit. But still, the limit for heavy downloaders definitely will suck...

But, you have to think that with Astraweb(or even Giganews), eventhough it's unlimited downloads you still get a retention. With RS you don't. I've been downloading files anywhere from a year to two old from RS forums. So both methods have their pro's and con's. I think a combination of both is the best way to download(Usenet for all the big files, RS for all the old files).

amirji
12-28-2008, 06:48 AM
seedbox/ftp. :D

tnt
12-28-2008, 07:11 AM
2.5GB/day is not heavy downloader this is super light downloader
and some rs links are deleted so fast that the retention is even worst than newsgroups.

HINT
12-28-2008, 07:47 AM
RS but box is really good too

LJ.
12-28-2008, 08:35 AM
Right. That definitely is a downfall of RS right now. I was lucky enough to get a couple accounts that still have the 10GB a day download limit. But still, the limit for heavy downloaders definitely will suck...

But, you have to think that with Astraweb(or even Giganews), eventhough it's unlimited downloads you still get a retention. With RS you don't. I've been downloading files anywhere from a year to two old from RS forums. So both methods have their pro's and con's. I think a combination of both is the best way to download(Usenet for all the big files, RS for all the old files).

Yeah i got 1 lucky account too :P it expires tomorrow so i am downloading this shit out of warezbb

hayden61108
12-28-2008, 08:53 AM
warezbb, lol i know there :)

Valoo
12-28-2008, 09:19 AM
What a strange poll, it's not the same price, not the same use ! RS vs Usenet would have more sense

Rikikii
12-28-2008, 10:59 AM
Seedbox FTW!

basilhaydens
12-28-2008, 11:02 AM
For loads cheaper than both you can get usenet access and not have to upload anything or deal with anyone ;)

There's an astraweb banner up top for $11 a month cant beat that using a seedbox or rapidshare acct

This is what I would recommend. RS has daily limits, torrents have limited speeds and ratio requirements, usenet is the best for straight up leeching.

If you'd rather spend more a month for a seedbox (for what, the community? lol), you're just silly.

dragoi92
12-28-2008, 11:35 AM
both are good
But i prefer torrent and seedbox