PDA

View Full Version : Relations Break Down Between U.s And Them.



mogadishu
09-12-2003, 03:54 PM
Relations Break Down Between U.S and Them.

http://www.theonion.com/3935/top_story.html

clocker
09-12-2003, 04:01 PM
I get along just fine with most of Them, but some of Them really piss me off. :P

sabbath
09-12-2003, 04:05 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Snee
09-12-2003, 04:05 PM
Somehow, it does feel real :D

mogadishu
09-12-2003, 06:34 PM
Originally posted by SnnY@12 September 2003 - 11:05
Somehow, it does feel real :D
scarily enough, yes.

evilbagpuss
09-12-2003, 06:36 PM
Originally posted by mogadishu+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mogadishu)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-SnnY
Somehow, it does feel real&nbsp; :D
scarily enough, yes. [/b][/quote]

Indeed.


"I wouldn&#39;t worry," Harvard political analyst Gregory Peters said. "Sure, the U.S. makes Them mad, but since we have unilateral military supremacy, it&#39;s not as if They can do anything about it."

I&#39;ve even seen the same sentiment argued on this forum&#33;

j2k4
09-12-2003, 06:53 PM
Originally posted by evilbagpuss@12 September 2003 - 13:36

"I wouldn&#39;t worry," Harvard political analyst Gregory Peters said. "Sure, the U.S. makes Them mad, but since we have unilateral military supremacy, it&#39;s not as if They can do anything about it."

I&#39;ve even seen the same sentiment argued on this forum&#33;
Yes, EBP-you have.

evilbagpuss
09-12-2003, 07:09 PM
Originally posted by j2k4
Yes, EBP-you have.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

hobbes
09-12-2003, 09:22 PM
Originally posted by evilbagpuss@12 September 2003 - 19:36



"I wouldn&#39;t worry," Harvard political analyst Gregory Peters said. "Sure, the U.S. makes Them mad, but since we have unilateral military supremacy, it&#39;s not as if They can do anything about it."

I&#39;ve even seen the same sentiment argued on this forum&#33;

It is the same old bullshit, no matter the trangressions made by THEM, THEY are always covering their back like some 800lb gorilla. THEY are always taking care of THEM, but this time, THEY will get theirs.

evilbagpuss
09-12-2003, 09:58 PM
Originally posted by hobbes
It is the same old bullshit, no matter the trangressions made by THEM, THEY are always covering their back like some 800lb gorilla. THEY are always taking care of THEM, but this time, THEY will get theirs.

I&#39;m sure that made sense to someone... somewhere...

:wacko:

How does an 800lb gorilla cover its back exactly? I would also like to see your definition of &#39;transgressions&#39; in this context.

I think I&#39;m getting to know the real you hobbes. More fruitcake? :D

hobbes
09-13-2003, 03:50 AM
Originally posted by evilbagpuss+12 September 2003 - 22:58--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (evilbagpuss &#064; 12 September 2003 - 22:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-hobbes
It is the same old bullshit, no matter the trangressions made by THEM, THEY are always covering their back like some 800lb gorilla. THEY are always taking care of THEM, but this time, THEY will get theirs.

I&#39;m sure that made sense to someone... somewhere...

:wacko:

How does an 800lb gorilla cover its back exactly? I would also like to see your definition of &#39;transgressions&#39; in this context.

I think I&#39;m getting to know the real you hobbes. More fruitcake? :D[/b][/quote]
Don&#39;t bring him into this affair, SOMEONE will shoot you first and ask questions later.

In this context, "transgression" has a meaning which would be considered a "double entendre" in another, to SOMEONE, if he were somewhere.

As we all know, a gorilla covers its back with hair, and don&#39;t call me "Exactly". The name is Hobbes.

BTW, I&#39;ll take some fruitcake, as apparently, you have removed and are in possesion of the "nuts".

chalice
09-13-2003, 04:01 AM
Originally posted by hobbes+13 September 2003 - 03:50--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes @ 13 September 2003 - 03:50)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by evilbagpuss@12 September 2003 - 22:58
<!--QuoteBegin-hobbes
It is the same old bullshit, no matter the trangressions made by THEM, THEY are always covering their back like some 800lb gorilla. THEY are always taking care of THEM, but this time, THEY will get theirs.

I&#39;m sure that made sense to someone... somewhere...

:wacko:

How does an 800lb gorilla cover its back exactly? I would also like to see your definition of &#39;transgressions&#39; in this context.

I think I&#39;m getting to know the real you hobbes. More fruitcake? :D
Don&#39;t bring him into this affair, SOMEONE will shoot you first and ask questions later.

In this context, "transgression" has a meaning which would be considered a "double entendre" in another, to SOMEONE, if he were somewhere.

As we all know, a gorilla covers its back with hair, and don&#39;t call me "Exactly". The name is Hobbes.

BTW, I&#39;ll take some fruitcake, as apparently, you have removed and are in possesion of the "nuts". [/b][/quote]
Fruitcake crumbs. It&#39;s for the birds, man.

hobbes
09-13-2003, 04:22 AM
I have to go OT here.

Every time I look at the signature by Sabbath, I think of the old slogan:

"Have a Coke and a smile". I had no idea that is what they meant&#33;

chalice
09-13-2003, 04:29 AM
Originally posted by hobbes@13 September 2003 - 04:22
I have to go OT here.

Every time I look at the signature by Sabbath, I think of the old slogan:

"Have a Coke and a smile". I had no idea that is what they meant&#33;
Its one of those flexible phrases, Hobbes.
Oxymorons resound&#33;&#33;&#33;

sabbath
09-13-2003, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by hobbes@13 September 2003 - 06:22
I have to go OT here.

Every time I look at the signature by Sabbath, I think of the old slogan:

"Have a Coke and a smile". I had no idea that is what they meant&#33;
It&#39;s scary, I&#39;m seriously thinking of changing it