Users Sig

[BawA]

these day lots of users use nude images in theyr sig and me and i belive lots of users cant surf page's with nude image in front of there family

so plz use something else

[DarthInsinuate]

i think the rules should be changed

- semi-nudity (tits) allowed in topics, to please the sexiest ladies readers (including me)

- no nudity (bare-skin is ok) in avatars and signitures, because they can't be contained

[Sparkle1984]

Yes I agree with you, it's quite embarrassing for me. Especially for example if someone was viewing this website in a busy library or cybercafe.

[Benno]

Do you mean pics like my avatar?

[Sparkle1984]

Do you mean pics like my avatar?

Yours isn't as bad (as in embarrassing) as some of the others I've seen on this board.

[NikkiD]

4. There will be no offensive or inflammatory posts meant to offend or hurt any other member(s) or guest(s) including the use of photos containing obscene, grotesque or bare nudity in this forum. Please keep photos of this nature within the Lounge area. Nudity may not exceed topless in nature unless the lower extremeties are covered. Nudity posts can be edited or removed as deemed necessary by a Mod or Admin without question.

9. Signatures will be restricted in size and content which includes the use bare nudity. Signatures may not exceed a 495x150 pixels or 100,000 bytes combined in size. Signatures that do not comply may be removed or edited by a moderator or administator without question.

10. Avatars can not be uploaded; they must be linked from a web address or picture hosting site. They can not exceed 80x80 in size, and must not be offensive in nature which includes the use of bare nudity.

This is already the case - bare butts aren't really offensive - everyone has one, but if someone has an issue with an avatar or a signature, please PM a moderator with the member's name so that we can deal with the issue.

Thanks :)

[RPerry]

also, its possible to disable the viewing of avatars and sigs when you have a problem with family looking over your shoulder ;)


@NikkiD - bare boobs aren't really offensive either, everyone has them ( just some are bigger than others) :lol:

[[B][O][T]]

Originally posted by RPerry@20 September 2003 - 18:22
@NikkiD - bare boobs aren't really offensive either, everyone has them ( just some are bigger than others) :lol:
:rolleyes:

[Sparkle1984]

also, its possible to disable the viewing of avatars and sigs when you have a problem with family looking over your shoulder

OK, I've just found out how to do it. For anyone who wants to know, go to My Controls, then Board Settings.

[Rat Faced]

@NikkiD - bare boobs aren't really offensive either, everyone has them ( just some are bigger than others) 



:-"


:lol: :lol: :lol:

[NikkiD]

Somehow I think you guys are referring to me... <_<

[mogadishu]

eh.. paul has an ass avatar. and a damn fine one at that. so i think we should be able to post boobalies.

[BawA]

Originally posted by NikkiD@20 September 2003 - 21:06
but if someone has an issue with an avatar or a signature, please PM a moderator with the member&#39;s name so that we can deal with the issue.

Thanks :)
look at "Amarjit" sig and plz some 1 explain to him or pm mods

[Adster]

yes true if Paul can have a arse we all can fair is fair

[Amarjit]

Someone call me? B)
EDIT Like someone said earlier, if the administrator can have an ass avatar, why should we not be influenced by him?

[RGX]

you dont see anything more in amarjits sig thn you would on any beach, in fact a whole lot less

[NikkiD]

Amarjit&#39;s signature doesn&#39;t include any nudity - it is within these rules. All three women are covered (though not by much).

Although... it is over the filesize limit by about 30KB...

;)

[Lamsey]

Originally posted by NikkiD@21 September 2003 - 17:27
Amarjit&#39;s signature doesn&#39;t include any nudity - it is within these rules. All three women are covered (though not by much).
It used to have some nudity (a nipple, as I remember), but he changed it as soon as a mod asked :).

[Rip The Jacker]

Amarjit&#39;s sig is just fine with me&#33; :P

If you have a problem, or your in a public library or wherever, just turn sigs off.

[Somebody1234]

Amarjit&#39;s sig is just fine with me&#33;
Not to me.


Originally posted by NikkiD@21 September 2003 - 12:27
Although... it is over the filesize limit by about 30KB...
It&#39;s not like it&#39;s difficult for that signature to be reduced in filesize or anything.

Original : http://members.lycos.co.uk/kazaaliter2k3/signature.png

Reduced: http://www.uploadit.org/files/220903-ReducedbySb1234.gif

- The original is 133k
- The reduced one is 45k

[LeGoMyFnLeg]

Originally posted by Lamsey+21 September 2003 - 17:29--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lamsey @ 21 September 2003 - 17:29)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-NikkiD@21 September 2003 - 17:27
Amarjit&#39;s signature doesn&#39;t include any nudity - it is within these rules. All three women are covered (though not by much).
It used to have some nudity (a nipple, as I remember), but he changed it as soon as a mod asked :). [/b][/quote]
Pornstars clutching themselves.. :unsure: Nothing wrong with that :blink:

[Schumacher_Skaife]

I had a couple of lovley bums but i have removed them for a bitta Christina&#33; :D

Dave

[Rip The Jacker]

I just made a new one. If anyone has a problem with it, and can give me a good reason why, I will change it. If you are in a public place, you could always just turn sigs off, or browse this board with images off.

[asmithz]

Originally posted by KrackHead2k@21 September 2003 - 21:46
I just made a new one. If anyone has a problem with it, and can give me a good reason why, I will change it. If you are in a public place, you could always just turn sigs off, or browse this board with images off.
where&#39;s tawny roberts?

[RealitY]

How many mods have posted in this topic so far...
I count 5...

Who&#39;s missing...
Balamm
Bender

Anyone else...

You guys are BUM bored...

[asmithz]

Were board or your board, i am tired. :lol:

[Rip The Jacker]

Originally posted by Shad0w Hacker@21 September 2003 - 23:19
where&#39;s tawny roberts?
:P
I&#39;d never forget gorgeous Tawny Roberts... I&#39;m looking for a better pic of her. Until then, I&#39;ll stick with Aria Giovanni, Briana Banks, and Sky Lopez. :wub:

[asmithz]

I thoght the last was sky, i think your first pis of tawny was the best. (althogh i like tawnee stone more) :)

[Rip The Jacker]

Yea Tawnee Stone is also very nice... :)

[Schumacher_Skaife]

KrackHead2k, firstly i dont have a problem with your sig, i love it, but if i was offended with it i shouldnt have to go and turn off avatars, people want to see avatars and shouldnt have to turn them all off just so they dont see things that they think is offensive. They should be able to browse this forum without eyes in the back of their head.

Take this into account please

Dave

[Benno]

Originally posted by Schumacher_Skaife@22 September 2003 - 11:56
KrackHead2k, firstly i dont have a problem with your sig, i love it, but if i was offended with it i shouldnt have to go and turn off avatars, people want to see avatars and shouldnt have to turn them all off just so they dont see things that they think is offensive. They should be able to browse this forum without eyes in the back of their head.

Take this into account please

Dave
You are over the limit with about 30k ;)

[vader]

I like them. In fact soon as I saw them my sabre lit up :blink:

[Smith]

Originally posted by NikkiD@20 September 2003 - 17:06

4. There will be no offensive or inflammatory posts meant to offend or hurt any other member(s) or guest(s) including the use of photos containing obscene, grotesque or bare nudity in this forum. Please keep photos of this nature within the Lounge area. Nudity may not exceed topless in nature unless the lower extremeties are covered. Nudity posts can be edited or removed as deemed necessary by a Mod or Admin without question.

9. Signatures will be restricted in size and content which includes the use bare nudity. Signatures may not exceed a 495x150 pixels or 100,000 bytes combined in size. Signatures that do not comply may be removed or edited by a moderator or administator without question.

10. Avatars can not be uploaded; they must be linked from a web address or picture hosting site. They can not exceed 80x80 in size, and must not be offensive in nature which includes the use of bare nudity.

This is already the case - bare butts aren&#39;t really offensive - everyone has one, but if someone has an issue with an avatar or a signature, please PM a moderator with the member&#39;s name so that we can deal with the issue.

Thanks :)
nikki i live ur avatar. being canadian i wiish the leafs win the stanley cup in the next 50 years :P

[Schumacher_Skaife]

Originally posted by Benno+22 September 2003 - 20:15--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Benno @ 22 September 2003 - 20:15)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Schumacher_Skaife@22 September 2003 - 11:56
KrackHead2k, firstly i dont have a problem with your sig, i love it, but if i was offended with it i shouldnt have to go and turn off avatars, people want to see avatars and shouldnt have to turn them all off just so they dont see things that they think is offensive. They should be able to browse this forum without eyes in the back of their head.

Take this into account please

Dave
You are over the limit with about 30k ;) [/b][/quote]
Are you sure? I Thought it was around 64? If i am i will change it

Dave

[ilw]

I think Benno is right
avatar ~ 65k & each sig pic is ~ 30
:)

[Schumacher_Skaife]

oh shit i didnt realise it was sig n ava combined, sorry ill get on it now

dave

[Wizzandabe]

What about mine?

[Schumacher_Skaife]

Wizzandabe, your fine

Dave

[fr600]

I don&#39;t know why people are so desparate to use nude images... May be you think its your pleasure but it doesn&#39;t make any difference if you don&#39;t use them...

[Dapadipz]

Originally posted by KrackHead2k@22 September 2003 - 05:46
I just made a new one. If anyone has a problem with it, and can give me a good reason why, I will change it. If you are in a public place, you could always just turn sigs off, or browse this board with images off.
Great Sig&#33; ;) ;) ;) :lol:

I dnt have a problem with the sigs

at school i jus turn them off&#33; loads quicker too ;)

[Rip The Jacker]

@Schumacher_Skaife
I completely understand and respect your reply. Also, I like your avatar, Christina is damn sexy.

@Dapadipz
Thanks&#33;

[Schumacher_Skaife]

Originally posted by KrackHead2k@24 September 2003 - 05:36
@Schumacher_Skaife
I completely understand and respect your reply. Also, I like your avatar, Christina is damn sexy.

@Dapadipz
Thanks&#33;
Thanks mate, most people would have flammed me for that, so thanks for taking it the right way, and yes Christina is quite a lovley looking lady&#33; :P :D :P &#33;

Dave

[silent VI]

personaly i think nudity is diffren tfrom pornography nudity should be acceptibal its not like its anything we havent all seen before right ;) nudity can be beutiful and <_< :( nudity can also be very unacceptibal) eg kiddy, rape, agrresive sex or an acts of sex ingeneral these things are pornography so basicly i think nudity should be ok just pornigraphical images shouldnt be allwoed :)

[Amarjit]

Originally posted by DrunkeNStylE@24 September 2003 - 08:48
personaly i think nudity is diffren tfrom pornography nudity should be acceptibal its not like its anything we havent all seen before right ;) nudity can be beutiful and <_< :( nudity can also be very unacceptibal) eg kiddy, rape, agrresive sex or an acts of sex ingeneral these things are pornography so basicly i think nudity should be ok just pornigraphical images shouldnt be allwoed :)
I agree, nothing in-adequate like hardcore pornography, but say ... signatures like mine are fine (like NikkiD previously stated), and BTW, I fixed my signature size. ;)

[silent VI]

;) alright i say every1 should vote toward nudity but non pornigraphical images in ava an dsig

[balamm]

Sure, let&#39;s just ignore all the rules.

Kinda like you&#39;re doing with your combined sig and avatar size again.

[silent VI]

:rolleyes: by 1kb iil change now though

[Wizzandabe]

Originally posted by Schumacher_Skaife@23 September 2003 - 13:34
Wizzandabe, your fine

Dave
:D

[tantric]

I think this user&#39;s avatar is gross: http://www.klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showuser=25756.
Why is it considered acceptable to show male genitalia but not female?

http://www.funpic.hu/ad/ad631.gif

[Smooch]

http://www.mcbriens.net/liam/img/smilies/sneaky.gif

[Lamsey]

Originally posted by AfterBurn@28 September 2003 - 18:46
I think this user&#39;s avatar is gross: http://www.klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showuser=25756.
Why is it considered acceptable to show male genitalia but not female?

http://www.funpic.hu/ad/ad631.gif
It&#39;s not&#33;&#33;&#33;

Fixed.

[Advantix]

nice sig Amarjit :beerchug:

[BCCorn]

I finally got my scanner going and uploaded a Sig scanned from a holiday snap. This seemed like an appropriate thread to test it in.

Does it offend anyone?

edit: a question - how do you keep the text to the right of the image? I thought that I&#39;d done that, obviously I missed something.

[VIDE-VICI]

Originally posted by BCCorn@5 October 2003 - 19:04
I finally got my scanner going and uploaded a Sig scanned from a holiday snap. This seemed like an appropriate thread to test it in.

Does it offend anyone?

edit: a question - how do you keep the text to the right of the image? I thought that I&#39;d done that, obviously I missed something.
It doesn&#39;t offend me at all, there isn&#39;t much that does, to be honest. I can see why some would be offended by hardcore porn images, but simple inoccuous photos of the human form are nothing to get upset about, in my opinion.

I don&#39;t know about how to keep your text to the right of the pic, but maybe add some html to the text? Or make the text into an image. The size of the window is obviously causing your text to wrap.

[N£MO]

Originally posted by BCCorn@5 October 2003 - 19:04
I finally got my scanner going and uploaded a Sig scanned from a holiday snap. This seemed like an appropriate thread to test it in.

Does it offend anyone?

edit: a question - how do you keep the text to the right of the image? I thought that I&#39;d done that, obviously I missed something.
I am not offended by it,just think it looks poor and amateurish.That is just my opinion though. :D

[BCCorn]

Originally posted by N£MO@6 October 2003 - 00:24
I am not offended by it,just think it looks poor and amateurish.That is just my opinion though. :D
Yeah, I can see what you mean, compared to a lot of Sigs it IS poor and amateurish. Basically, I AM an amateur, both in IT and in photography.

The difference is that a lot of Sigs tend to be pictures of celebrities/porn stars that the user has never met. I took that picture in my hotel room last Christmas morning, it&#39;s of a Thai GoGo dancer that I was seeing at that time. That&#39;s the reason that her face isn&#39;t on the picture, she isn&#39;t a professional and wouldn&#39;t appreciate having her face on the net (I hav a LOT of photos of her, I just couldn&#39;t post most of them here). Now every time that I see it I&#39;m reminded of her. :)

To my mind that beats having an image of some star as a Sig. Look at the picture again and imagine waking up with her beside you on Christmas day, I did exactly that last year. There are worse ways to spend Christmas morning&#33;&#33;

[Adster]

enough with the sigs if they want to show tits then shoe em&#33;

[MUSLEMAN]

i was told i could not show tits and had to remove my avatarhttp://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/1/slookani.gif

[Rat Faced]

BCCorn, is that ANOTHER NikkiD pic?

:lol: :lol:

[MUSLEMAN]

Originally posted by Rat Faced@6 October 2003 - 13:01
BCCorn, is that ANOTHER NikkiD pic?

:lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: roflmao :lol:

[BCCorn]

Originally posted by Rat Faced@6 October 2003 - 17:01
BCCorn, is that ANOTHER NikkiD pic?

:lol: :lol:
That isn&#39;t the name she was using at the time but..........

[Formula1]

LOL :lol: