PDA

View Full Version : Norton


Damnatory
10-25-2003, 08:38 AM
I'm still using Norton Antivirus 2000, is the Newest one, NAV 2004 really all that much better? Worth the install?
the-ninja69
10-25-2003, 08:39 AM
I never used norton 2000 but its like almost a 4 yr gap so I assuming it is better. Probably has more options and better scanning engine etc.
asmithz
10-25-2003, 08:40 AM
2004 sucks, 2003 and corp 8.1 is the best.
the-ninja69
10-25-2003, 08:42 AM
Why does 2004 sux? I have just upgraded from 2003 pro to 2004 pro and it is working well with no problems and I like it so far.
Damnatory
10-25-2003, 08:50 AM
Originally posted by the-ninja69@25 October 2003 - 09:39
I never used norton 2000 but its like almost a 4 yr gap so I assuming it is better. Probably has more options and better scanning engine etc.
Yeah I realise the "age" difference, but I've heard some very mixed feelings about 2004. Especially the fact that its still so new and buggy.

So 2003 Corp Ed. 8.1 is best?
the-ninja69
10-25-2003, 08:51 AM
I have to agree though 2003 pro is a solid anti-virus and works well. Despite what ppl say about 2004 my computer runs it fine and it is doing a damn good job. ;)
Damnatory
10-25-2003, 08:58 AM
Okay I'm downloading Norton Antivirus 2003 Professional Edition right now :lol:
Will I need to uninstall 2000, or will the installer just update the old files and overwrite?
Damnatory
10-25-2003, 09:33 AM
You it's kind of ironic, and maybe just done out of habit, but I just scanned Norton Antivirus 2003 with Norton 2000.... :lol: :lol:
What can I say, I hate viruses...
sparsely
10-25-2003, 12:59 PM
Originally posted by Damnatory
So 2003 Corp Ed. 8.1 is best?

No. those are two seperate versions.

NAV 2003
and
SAV 8.1 Corporate

I prefer the corporate version, myself.