Jackass 3D - High Five, Funniest thing i ever saw

[JustDOSE]

Jackass has gotten more and more faggy, i prob wont watch this movie for that reason but this skit is funny as hell

http://www.megavideo.com/?v=Z46PHPKS

[Cobass]

Ahahahahaha, orsum clip

[IdolEyes787]

That's the single funniest thing that you ever saw?:unsure:
Now I'm depressed .

[100%]

It was funny the first time.

[dsa16]

another 100 million in the bank, 3D movies are killing box office records

[IdolEyes787]

another 100 million in the bank, 3D movies are killing box office records

Comparative box office success is so deceptive that it's ridiculous

DOMESTIC GROSSES
Adjusted for Ticket Price Inflation
1Gone with the Wind MGM $1,606,254,800 $198,676,459 1939^
2 Star Wars Fox $1,416,050,800 $460,998,007 1977^
3 The Sound of Music Fox $1,132,202,200 $158,671,368 1965
4 E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial Uni. $1,127,742,000 $435,110,554 1982^
5 The Ten Commandments Par. $1,041,450,000 $65,500,000 1956
6 Titanic Par. $1,020,349,800 $600,788,188 1997
7 Jaws Uni. $1,018,226,600 $260,000,000 1975
8 Doctor Zhivago MGM $986,876,900 $111,721,910 1965
9 The Exorcist WB $879,020,900 $232,671,011 1973^
10 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Dis. $866,550,000 $184,925,486 1937^
11 101 Dalmatians Dis. $794,342,100 $144,880,014 1961^
12 The Empire Strikes Back Fox $780,536,100 $290,475,067 1980^
13 Ben-Hur MGM $779,100,000 $74,000,000 1959
14 Avatar Fox $772,959,500 $760,287,763 2009^
15 Return of the Jedi Fox $747,772,300 $309,306,177 1983^
16 The Sting Uni. $708,685,700 $156,000,000 1973
17 Raiders of the Lost Ark Par. $700,727,700 $242,374,454 1981^

And as for world-wide and Avatar's seemingly dominating numbers,two of the biggest markets (Russia and China) only came into effect in the last 20 years.

Not to mention the current relative weakness of the US dollar.:mellow:

[iLOVENZB]

The stunts in this movie are performed by professionals ... professional what? :mellow:

I don't think I'll watch another Jackass movie after seeing what they did with the horse:

The cast members arrange to have a stallion mate with another horse and have him ejaculate into a cup. Then Chris Pontius drinks it. (There is a black box censoring this in the R-rated version.)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493430/parentalguide

I have a strong stomach but this nearly made me :sick:

[carlman]

lame...

[Mr. Mulder]

im not impressed by 3d films :ermm: i've seen Up, toy story 3 and the last resident evil in the third dimension. i pay about 14 quid a month for a cinema pass to see everything "for free" but with 3d films i have to pay £3 to see a 3d film. for the third dimension! something that exists for free everyday all around us :blink: and when you put the glasses on the screen seems to look smaller and the image not as sharp. and the films themselves (res evil in particular) seem to exist only because the technology does, less thought seems to go into the film quality its self :dabs:

i think the fourth dimensions time? so Odeon might be able to charge extra by the minute, but what if you get up to go to the toilet and it turns out to be number 2 and you're gone for quite some time, does that count as leaving the fourth dimension and entering the third dimension as everything is naturally 3d and then would 3d charges apply? :eyebrows: I'm not paying for glasses to take a shit <_<

[iLOVENZB]

Mulder, I watched Clash of the Titans in 3D and have to say I was dearly disappointed.

I payed an extra 3$AUD for the "3D experience" and regretted every 3D scene. The glasses were heavy and made the dark scenes even darker, I ended up leaving them off and only putting them on for the long 3D scenes.

There were even sensors near the exits for people who decided to steal the glasses, for the record they were Dolby - not worth the $100 fine if you're caught damaging the glasses or stealing them?

I guess we'll have to ask Cameron fans and ask for their input on Avatar 3D?

[IdolEyes787]

In fairness, Clash of the Titans was not originally filmed in 3D and the technology was added after the fact.That and it was just a shitty movie.

Anyway as it stands there are supposedly different levels of quality in both the 3D cameras themselves and the associated processes ,Cameron's being the best.
The Alamo theater in Texas even went as far as to advertise that their screens were set up but Cameron's crew themselves for optimum effect/minimal darkness/poor viewing angles.

Point being even beyond the movie itself ,just like with sound quality, the 3D experience varies greatly from place to place ( and to a lesser degree seat to seat).
but darkness is still definitely a factor( supposedly presently being overcome).

I bet Harry Potter will get it right.

[iLOVENZB]

IdolEyes it's hard to recognise if your posts are sarcastic or not.

After the first Harry Potter movie, Philosopher's Stone, they were nothing but dark not only in themes but also scene shots - for the better!

Just flicked through today's episode of The Daily Show and Knoxville appears to talk about Jackass 3D - The.Daily.Show.2010.10.11.Johnny.Knoxville.HDTV.XviD-FQM

[pint76o]

I'm going to see this with friends, hope it's funny.

[iLOVENZB]

None of them are funny, unless you have a sick sense of humor.

Why anyone would watch this franchise for laughs is beyond me. I thought it was to give kids inspiration to become famous on YouTube? :ermm:

[JustDOSE]

If you have a lazy eye, a doninate eye, or any eye problems or brain damage(lol) then the 3d movies will suck because you wont be able to see the 3D correctly, and most people 15 years+ have one of these problems. 3D is marketed towards children for good reason, they are the only ones who can see it perfectly, until HD holographic movies are perfected we grown folks will have to settle with our HD widescreens.

[IdolEyes787]

IdolEyes it's hard to recognise if your posts are sarcastic or not.



I'm completely serious .So much so in fact that I'm going to name my children dead and serious.
Might make for uncomfortable conversations though .

"Do you have any children "?
"I have a son ,he's Dead .Would you like me to bring him around so that you can meet him? "

[iLOVENZB]

There you go again with you hints of sarcasm.

[scrabble123]

im not impressed by 3d films :ermm: i've seen Up, toy story 3 and the last resident evil in the third dimension. i pay about 14 quid a month for a cinema pass to see everything "for free" but with 3d films i have to pay £3 to see a 3d film. for the third dimension! something that exists for free everyday all around us :blink: and when you put the glasses on the screen seems to look smaller and the image not as sharp. and the films themselves (res evil in particular) seem to exist only because the technology does, less thought seems to go into the film quality its self :dabs:

i think the fourth dimensions time? so Odeon might be able to charge extra by the minute, but what if you get up to go to the toilet and it turns out to be number 2 and you're gone for quite some time, does that count as leaving the fourth dimension and entering the third dimension as everything is naturally 3d and then would 3d charges apply? :eyebrows: I'm not paying for glasses to take a shit <_<

£14 a month - what cinema is that, it costs about £14 for one ticket at my local cinema

[JustDOSE]

£14 a month - what cinema is that, it costs about £14 for one ticket at my local cinema
ridicules, its $8 here thats 3 euros...

[iLOVENZB]

8$AUD/movie if you're a student.

8 Australian dollars = 7.9056 U.S. dollars
8 Australian dollars = 5.66222604 Euros

[crazzyjoe31]

i saw the other 2 so I have to see this one, but I will wait awhile to see it. I just like to see how many more brain cells these dudes have lost since their last film.