PDA

View Full Version : The Moon Shots Were Faked



j4y3m
11-06-2003, 01:29 PM
http://www.batesmotel.8m.com/ :rolleyes:

Yogi
11-06-2003, 01:38 PM
I know.

Elvis is alive aswell, living together with Jimmy Hoffa and Tupac Shakur!!!

:lol: Yogi

j4y3m
11-06-2003, 01:38 PM
Originally posted by SensualGardening@6 November 2003 - 13:38
I know.

Elvis is alive aswell, living together with Jimmy Hoffa and Tupac Shakur!!!

:lol: Yogi
Yeh! Preach On! :P

Evil Gemini
11-06-2003, 02:02 PM
Yeah i believe that the moon landings were fake too.

Alucard1475
11-06-2003, 02:26 PM
Originally posted by neattairoski@7 November 2003 - 00:02
Yeah i believe that the moon landings were fake too.
you believe....well, I know

j2k4
11-06-2003, 04:27 PM
Are we reduced now to entertaining antique conspiracies?

There would seem to be plenty of fodder for new ones.... :huh:

hobbes
11-06-2003, 04:38 PM
Could someone please vouch for the authenticity of this Moon shot? Thankshttp://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139602049/mooning.jpeg

Damnatory
11-06-2003, 05:06 PM
Alot of those theories can be countered, with perfectly viable reasons I&#39;m sure. <_<

Maybe I&#39;m naive, but I refuse to believe that it was a hoax.

scribblec
11-06-2003, 05:27 PM
so what r the new conspiricies

TheDave
11-06-2003, 05:31 PM
the crosshairs behind the subjects could be explained. but two completely different locations looking exactly the same as one spot in the desert&#33;? now thats just slack

Mr. Mulder
11-06-2003, 05:35 PM
If they really went to the moon, how come they didn&#39;t bring back any cheese? It seems pretty pointless to go all that way just for a walk about ;)

DarthInsinuate
11-06-2003, 05:36 PM
Originally posted by hobbes@6 November 2003 - 16:38
Could someone please vouch for the authencity of this Moon shot? Thanks
http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139602049/mooning.jpeg
There is a strange anomaly in the bottom right (err, right bottom?), it is yet to be determined what that might be

Kunal
11-06-2003, 05:42 PM
want to know how &#39;science&#39; was invented. one day someone was bored and decided to make up lots of crap and call it &#39;science&#39; and ever since then its been popular :lol:

Kunal
11-06-2003, 05:42 PM
Originally posted by hobbes@6 November 2003 - 16:38
Could someone please vouch for the authencity of this Moon shot? Thankshttp://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139602049/mooning.jpeg
:lol: :lol: :lol:

j2k4
11-06-2003, 05:51 PM
Originally posted by DarthInsinuate+6 November 2003 - 13:36--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DarthInsinuate &#064; 6 November 2003 - 13:36)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-hobbes@6 November 2003 - 16:38
Could someone please vouch for the authencity of this Moon shot? Thanks
http://w1.1396.telia.com/~u139602049/mooning.jpeg
There is a strange anomaly in the bottom right (err, right bottom?), it is yet to be determined what that might be[/b][/quote]
It has been proven to be a photographic anomaly caused by the gravity of the moon(s). :)

Mr. Mulder
11-06-2003, 05:53 PM
:rolleyes: Is it true that these moons are capable of expelling violent outbursts of toxic gas?

hobbes
11-06-2003, 06:03 PM
Now I am really worried about JPaul&#33;

I made a major typo in the word "authenticity" and even this could not draw him out.

Octopussy
11-06-2003, 06:53 PM
im not readin this because this is crap everyone knows this is fukin bs THEY DID LAND ON THE MOON

scribblec
11-06-2003, 07:01 PM
Originally posted by Octopussy@6 November 2003 - 18:53
im not readin this because this is crap everyone knows this is fukin bs THEY DID LAND ON THE MOON
whatever man go get educated or something


or marry killa sin or something or net they would be perfect for u....

Jems
11-06-2003, 07:06 PM
The idea that the moon landings were faked is based on a lot of bad science and misinterpretation -things we take for granted are different on the moon.

See: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html to explain just about everything.

Spindulik
11-06-2003, 08:56 PM
Originally posted by stupidguy@6 November 2003 - 09:29
http://www.batesmotel.8m.com/ :rolleyes:
That guy&#39;s website is FULL of crap.

He knows nothing about lighting and camera optics.

There is no atmosphere on the moon. Thus the sun glare from the moon is overwhelming, such as the light reflecting from the surface of the moon and the space suits and the space craft. In fact, the moon is SO bright, it illuminates the earth at night.

He talks about the astronaut&#39;s shadows not being the correct length due to multiple lighting. Anyone who took a photography class in high school knows the distortion that 80mm and 50mm cameras have.

He also says that the reflection of the astronaut photographer&#39;s head, seen on one of the mirrored helmets of another astronaut, should not be seen, because the camera is on his chest. DUH&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; The helmets are CONCAVE. Look at a mirrored christmas bulb up close some day. You see the ceiling wall and floor all in one view, idiot. It is ROUND&#33;

That website is loaded with tons of false information.

He states that you don&#39;t see any stars. Oh well. Look at the technology of space cameras used for that mission. The LUX or FSTOP speed of the imaging on the moon isn&#39;t what today&#39;s technology is. REMEMBER, the brightness of the moon and sun is so intense, the white balance would eliminate stars.

Oh this guy is nuts. I am going to create a web page exactly like his and discount everything he has to say. With real logical explainations.


I have done custom photography, weddings and professional lighting for years, to earn extra money on the side. I use lighting for indoors and outdoors. I have my own darkroom too. I own over 12 cameras, all professional, including an 4x5 Graflex camera for studio shots and modeling.

This bozo knows crap.

_FuNgA_
11-06-2003, 10:18 PM
dude the moon landings were REAL&#33;

Octopussy
11-06-2003, 10:44 PM
Originally posted by scribblec+6 November 2003 - 19:01--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (scribblec @ 6 November 2003 - 19:01)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Octopussy@6 November 2003 - 18:53
im not readin this because this is crap everyone knows this is fukin bs THEY DID LAND ON THE MOON
whatever man go get educated or something


or marry killa sin or something or net they would be perfect for u.... [/b][/quote]
lmao get educated rofl yea? i gota 3.6 gpa

and what the fuck does anythign have to do with eduction you dum fuck everyoen knows the moon landing was real why teh fuck would they fake it are you saying all the satellites in space are fake too? fukin dum ass YOU GET EDUCATED how old are you? 30? got nothing better to do then talk shit on forums?

j2k4
11-06-2003, 11:36 PM
Originally posted by Spindulik@6 November 2003 - 16:56
He also says that the reflection of the astronaut photographer&#39;s head, seen on one of the mirrored helmets of another astronaut, should not be seen, because the camera is on his chest. DUH&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; The helmets are CONCAVE. Look at a mirrored christmas bulb up close some day. You see the ceiling wall and floor all in one view, idiot. It is ROUND&#33;


Spin, old buddy, old pal-

I think you meant convex, yes? :)

Doesn&#39;t change the fact of the guy&#39;s basic and irritating "bozo-ness". ;)

hobbes
11-07-2003, 03:00 AM
Originally posted by Octopussy+6 November 2003 - 23:44--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Octopussy &#064; 6 November 2003 - 23:44)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by scribblec@6 November 2003 - 19:01
<!--QuoteBegin-Octopussy@6 November 2003 - 18:53
im not readin this because this is crap everyone knows this is fukin bs THEY DID LAND ON THE MOON
whatever man go get educated or something


or marry killa sin or something or net they would be perfect for u....
lmao get educated rofl yea? i gota 3.6 gpa

and what the fuck does anythign have to do with eduction you dum fuck everyoen knows the moon landing was real why teh fuck would they fake it are you saying all the satellites in space are fake too? fukin dum ass YOU GET EDUCATED how old are you? 30? got nothing better to do then talk shit on forums?[/b][/quote]
Don&#39;t know about you guys but the rebuttal screams "secure, honor student" to me. I would have to say that the average neanderthal in his school system needs to be reminded to breathe every six seconds or so.

Do you do your homework with a stone and chisel?

Translation: Don&#39;t be such a 12 year old. Learn to be secure in yourself, take the high road, and let your detractors embarass themselves.

Spindulik
11-07-2003, 03:25 AM
Originally posted by j2k4+6 November 2003 - 19:36--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 @ 6 November 2003 - 19:36)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Spindulik@6 November 2003 - 16:56
He also says that the reflection of the astronaut photographer&#39;s head, seen on one of the mirrored helmets of another astronaut, should not be seen, because the camera is on his chest. DUH&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; The helmets are CONCAVE. Look at a mirrored christmas bulb up close some day. You see the ceiling wall and floor all in one view, idiot. It is ROUND&#33;


Spin, old buddy, old pal-

I think you meant convex, yes? :)

Doesn&#39;t change the fact of the guy&#39;s basic and irritating "bozo-ness". ;) [/b][/quote]
You are correct. I meant to say convex. However, when in the suit, it is concave to the "wearer". Can I talk myself out of this one?


Are those glass mirror-like shields parabolic?

exeus
11-07-2003, 03:38 AM
i know that we told false hoods by our governments
and i think just because you are taught at school hear on tellie ect does not make something true, to know answers you have to search for them yourself....

sparsely
11-07-2003, 03:43 AM
lol.
we never landed on the moon, silly&#33; :lol:

I also believe the government had something to do with the cancellation of Mr. Belvedere, but I can&#39;t prove it.

hobbes
11-07-2003, 03:45 AM
Originally posted by Sparsely@7 November 2003 - 04:43
lol.
we never landed on the moon, silly&#33; :lol:

I also believe the government had something to do with the cancellation of Mr. Belvedere, but I can&#39;t prove it.
Mr. Belevere will live in our hearts and minds forever. The government be damned&#33;&#33;&#33;

leonidas
11-07-2003, 01:50 PM
Originally posted by Spindulik+6 November 2003 - 21:56--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Spindulik @ 6 November 2003 - 21:56)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-stupidguy@6 November 2003 - 09:29
http://www.batesmotel.8m.com/ :rolleyes:
That guy&#39;s website is FULL of crap.

He knows nothing about lighting and camera optics.

There is no atmosphere on the moon. Thus the sun glare from the moon is overwhelming, such as the light reflecting from the surface of the moon and the space suits and the space craft. In fact, the moon is SO bright, it illuminates the earth at night.

He talks about the astronaut&#39;s shadows not being the correct length due to multiple lighting. Anyone who took a photography class in high school knows the distortion that 80mm and 50mm cameras have.

He also says that the reflection of the astronaut photographer&#39;s head, seen on one of the mirrored helmets of another astronaut, should not be seen, because the camera is on his chest. DUH&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; The helmets are CONCAVE. Look at a mirrored christmas bulb up close some day. You see the ceiling wall and floor all in one view, idiot. It is ROUND&#33;

That website is loaded with tons of false information.

He states that you don&#39;t see any stars. Oh well. Look at the technology of space cameras used for that mission. The LUX or FSTOP speed of the imaging on the moon isn&#39;t what today&#39;s technology is. REMEMBER, the brightness of the moon and sun is so intense, the white balance would eliminate stars.

Oh this guy is nuts. I am going to create a web page exactly like his and discount everything he has to say. With real logical explainations.


I have done custom photography, weddings and professional lighting for years, to earn extra money on the side. I use lighting for indoors and outdoors. I have my own darkroom too. I own over 12 cameras, all professional, including an 4x5 Graflex camera for studio shots and modeling.

This bozo knows crap. [/b][/quote]
& he&#39;s using AOL :lol: :lol:

Spatula Geek Girl
11-07-2003, 07:06 PM
You&#39;ve all confused me&#33;&#33;&#33; When I was younger I thought it was real, I had no reason to believe otherwise, then I saw this program with the same things on it, this big "The moon landing: fake?" and I looked at the facts and they seemed right so I though, "Yeah Probably..."

But now I’m confused&#33;

I&#39;m so easily convinced... :(






PIES&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

noname12
11-07-2003, 07:13 PM
The moon landings are not fake, I was having a picnic on the moon the very same day they landed... They didnt think to watch where they stuck that flag in though, ruined a perfectly good pie <_<