I'm confused

[IdolEyes787]

If someone ,say just for example pair20002000 had a BitMe account and then for whatever reason didn't and also had a SCC account and then again for some unexplained reason didn't , why then would he looking to trade another SCC account for another BitMe account? :unsure:

http://filesharingtalk.com/threads/431382-have-Bitme-acc-want-scc-acc

Maybe he's not doing anything that's obviously against the site rules here and is just really,really forgetful .:unsure:

[tesco]

Maybe he needs to jump from site to site to get some specific content?
He trades the scc for a bitme, trades back, etc.

[robisoare]

this is trading all about

[IdolEyes787]

No trading as I understand the meaning is when you actually want one thing and you offer something comparable in return.

This I think is commerce. :ermm:

[tesco]

It's belonging to multiple trackers while only actually owning one.

[IdolEyes787]

It's belonging to multiple trackers while only actually owning one.

So only site owners trade ?:unsure:
I would have thunk that it would be pretty easy to catch them then .

[Snee]

Seems dead practical that, especially if it's buffered accounts. As long as he can keep trading them away before eating the whole buffer he can just keep going, and without having to seed.

[KFlint]

No trading as I understand the meaning is when you actually want one thing and you offer something comparable in return.

This I think is commerce. :ermm:

I will repeat you the same thing as I always tell you, not sure why feel the need to bring it to this section.

We allow traders to do whatever they want as long as they don't scam other members and we don't have evidence that they sell accounts/invites. Even if we didn't allow users to trade to get accounts to trackers they already appear to have, we have no proof they still have it. What if the original account was traded, what if it was lost due to inactivity, ban because they were already identify as schumbags etc etc etc...

[IdolEyes787]

I will repeat you the same thing as I always tell you, not sure why feel the need to bring it to this section.



Not to be blithe but pointless or not I don't see it contravening any rules and basically precisely because I feel like it.:unsure:|
Btw it's not like I do it incessantly or anything unless twice in three years is considered incessant.:unsure:

Also when I'm specifically instructed to stop doing something I think I'm pretty good about it.

[Cabalo]

You're preaching morality in the trade section. :blink: Have you been drinking?

It reminds me this (http://www.fisheaters.com/animals9.html).

[IdolEyes787]

You're preaching morality in the trade section. :blink: Have you been drinking?

It reminds me this (http://www.fisheaters.com/animals9.html).

No I'm preaching about the behavior of certain people and doing it outside the trade section where doing so apparently isn't allowed.
Anyway I will shut up now if everyone else does.

[Something Else]

I will shut up now if everyone else does.

I reminds you that. :shifty:

[blackalice28]

I don't like these kinds of guys...

[IdolEyes787]

What,people who pointlessly resurrect long dead threads to add inane spam comments?
I couldn't agree more.

[theeldorado]

lolllll:-))):rolleyes: