PDA

View Full Version : Is Awesome-HD good?



krishnenduDX
08-22-2011, 04:47 AM
My friend giving me a invitation of awesome-HD. But i don have much Knowledge about it.
is that a good HD tracker?? Which one is the best..

And what do you think about the best tracker?? share your thoughts..

anon
08-22-2011, 04:49 AM
You may read a review of that site here (http://filesharingtalk.com/threads/389695-Awesome-HD-Review/page2?p=3598098&viewfull=1#post3598098), and see what others think the best HD tracker is (there's been a hundred of those threads since I registered) here (http://scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=%22Best+HD%22+site:filesharingtalk.com&n=2).

superpagla
08-22-2011, 06:17 AM
I think its good....but not the best...most of here thinks it is the fourth best HD tracker....and its ratio proof is very effective.....there are many freeleech....75%, 50% and 25% but no full freeleech....many user use seedbox and u can survive there with a 128 KB upload speed....And they have some large collection of HD content....Now its up to u.....

whatcdfan
08-22-2011, 06:21 AM
Fuck all of 'em, go only for HDbits.

chec
08-22-2011, 10:57 AM
I don't know the tracker is best but they have the best internal encoders on the planet(my idea)

krishnenduDX
08-22-2011, 03:21 PM
Thanks for infos mate..

a7x
08-22-2011, 03:32 PM
Fuck all of 'em, go only for HDbits.

http://filesharingtalk.com/threads/436531-Hd-t

:frusty:

whatcdfan
08-22-2011, 04:18 PM
Fuck all of 'em, go only for HDbits.:D

Mjmacky has unlimited invites, in case if you want one.

*Fixed.

mjmacky
08-22-2011, 05:05 PM
Awesome HD is setup very cleanly, well organized, strong focus on 1080p encodes and bluray remuxes (where they take the original video, audio, chapters and subtitles of a bluray and package them into an MKV). All the internals and almost all of the remuxes (which are also mostly internal) are 75 % freeleech, so even a small swarm shouldn't really hurt your ratio which at the highest is required to be 0.6.

On the downside, they don't have very many 720p internals or a lot of torrent activity in general. Only a handful of films seem to have snatches above 1000, the highest being 1807. I just remember having seen much more activity elsewhere. I also probably don't know what the fuck I'm talking about either, since I haven't been a member of that many sites. Either that or I'm trying to compare it to TV show releases. Either way, I'd easily recommend the site.



Fuck all of 'em, go only for HDbits.:D

Mjmacky has unlimited invites, in case if you want one.

*Fixed.

I'll just end up forwarding them to Oleg

anon
08-22-2011, 05:45 PM
Fuck all of 'em, go only for HDbits.

http://filesharingtalk.com/threads/436531-Hd-t

:frusty:

Sarcasm fail? :unsure:

Mooi1990
08-22-2011, 06:14 PM
a7x & Me :oops:



Fuck all of 'em, go only for HDbits.

http://filesharingtalk.com/threads/436600-Is-Awesome-HD-good

This kinda disqualifies your request for HD-T.


:cheers:

krishnenduDX
08-23-2011, 09:08 AM
Not good at all friends.. IPT is fine...

m using it.. provides good upload speed so that ratio stays good..

Emtorro
08-23-2011, 01:02 PM
For remuxes HD-Torrents is much better as their internal group mux the orignal PGS subs, while AH-D remuxers mostly use SRT or IDX/SUB.

mjmacky: In my experience even for a medium sized tracker (20-30k) 1000 snatches is A LOT. You only see those numbers on huge trackers, open trackers or TV torrents.

mjmacky
08-23-2011, 04:33 PM
Like I said, I probably don't have a clue what I'm talking about when speaking about general BT. As far as I noticed, original PGS subtitles ARE included in the remuxes, and all of them.

Emtorro
08-24-2011, 12:24 AM
As far as I noticed, original PGS subtitles ARE included in the remuxes, and all of them.

At AHD? No, you're completly wrong. It's SRT or IDX/SUB (aka VOBSUB), only a handful of the internal remuxes at AHD have the original PGS subtitles muxed.

VOBSUB might have been converted from PGS but it still looks worse, even 1080p VOBSUB. With SRT you never know. Did they OCR it or just download from a subtitle site? Did they bother to do a good OCRing? That's the reason I got tired of encoders and just download/make remuxes.

mjmacky
08-24-2011, 07:58 AM
Wasn't all of them, just all of the ones I've downloaded. I just looked at the 10 most recent remuxes, 6 of them had PGS. It looks like HiFi converts to text in each case. HDRemuX leaves the PGS but in a couple of situations converts to VOBSUB. I'm guessing they have multiple members in the groups, and each of them do it differently.

My preference is to have SRT. I always thought image-based subs look like shit, even the new style for Bluray.

Emtorro
08-24-2011, 11:11 AM
Nah. 2/14 releases had PGS subs muxed on first page. The rest have VOBSUB/SRT. That's an handful, like I just wrote.
I'm talking about internal remuxers. KRaLiMaRKo isn't an internal group at AHW, neither is User-Upload. ;)