Arizona tries to close FST.

[Quarterquack]

Skiz is the only one who can help us now (http://www.azleg.gov//FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/50leg/2r/bills/hb2549s.htm&Session_ID=107).

Round up some of your friends, cross two borders and save FST, Skiz.

[Skiz]

:unsure:

[Artemis]

Darthy, have they been spiking your wheaties with hallucinogens again ?

[IdolEyes787]

:unsure:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhdiSqt6sXE

[Quarterquack]

Darthy, have they been spiking your wheaties with hallucinogens again ?

This kind of comment is exactly what Arizona is trying to outlaw.

[Artemis]

I'm shocked, you realise that would reduce my repertoire to vague allusions of sexual impropriety, and casting aspersions on my victims heritage. :blink:

[Quarterquack]

I'm shocked, you realise that would reduce my repertoire to vague allusions of sexual impropriety, and casting aspersions on my victims heritage. :blink:

Also targeted.

Arizona just wants us to talk about fucking daisies. And titties. Basically anything that can make a man happy.

Sorry if my posts have become incredibly short. I'm just incredibly frustrated that while I sit in a room reading about man's advances into nano-sized particle therapy, about space suit advances since the year 1969, and about prediction algorithms for solar flares, people with real, legislative power choose to allocate resources to fucking curation. Everything that is wrong with bigoted, backwards beliefs is found in these very drafters.

[Artemis]

I'm shocked, you realise that would reduce my repertoire to vague allusions of sexual impropriety, and casting aspersions on my victims heritage. :blink:

Also targeted.

Arizona just wants us to talk about fucking daisies. And titties. Basically anything that can make a man happy.

Sorry if my posts have become incredibly short. I'm just incredibly frustrated that while I sit in a room reading about man's advances into nano-sized particle therapy, about space suit advances since the year 1969, and about prediction algorithms for solar flares, people with real, legislative power choose to allocate resources to fucking curation. Everything that is wrong with bigoted, backwards beliefs is found in these very drafters.
Are you sure you got that right? I thought American legislators liked guns and rather dubious self defense laws, rather than sex (personally I'd rather be fucked than killed)judging from the news from Florida. Despite overwhelming legal opinion and overwhelming public opinon to the contrary the state is sticking to it's rather racist stance.

[CharlesW]

Also targeted.

Arizona just wants us to talk about fucking daisies. And titties. Basically anything that can make a man happy.

Sorry if my posts have become incredibly short. I'm just incredibly frustrated that while I sit in a room reading about man's advances into nano-sized particle therapy, about space suit advances since the year 1969, and about prediction algorithms for solar flares, people with real, legislative power choose to allocate resources to fucking curation. Everything that is wrong with bigoted, backwards beliefs is found in these very drafters.

Its not right, man should be allowed to behave in as vile a way as he likes. There are no consequences after all.

[mjmacky]

Are you sure you got that right? I thought American legislators liked guns and rather dubious self defense laws, rather than sex (personally I'd rather be fucked than killed)judging from the news from Florida. Despite overwhelming legal opinion and overwhelming public opinon to the contrary the state is sticking to it's rather racist stance.

I live in Florida, may be the cause of my utterly desperate requirement to flee the U.S. altogether. They are all ignorant superficial rednecks here, currently housing the worst governor in U.S. history. A story like the recent one does not surprise me in the slightest.

Did I ever tell anyone the story of how me and a couple of friends had to infiltrate a trailer park to beat the shit out of a group of meth-ed out skinheads that were hunting one of our black friends? Florida.

[Quarterquack]

Its not right, man should be allowed to behave in as vile a way as he likes. There are no consequences after all.

Thanks for proving everything that is wrong with this bill is true.

The fact that you can bring up your previous closet fears out into an argument not even close to being the same just screams "downfall" to this new bill.

[Quarterquack]

beat the shit out of a group of meth-ed out skinheads that were hunting one of our black friends? Florida.

Supply and Demand is an economic concept, you shining beacon of a real-world manifestation of Walter White, you.

[Artemis]

I genuinely do not understand the American fascination with shooting holes in each other in such large numbers. Being a primarily rural population and also having many sport animals some attracting hunting tourists, New Zealand has a strong gun culture. It is however properly regulated. Anyone who wants to own a gun must pass a test and get a photo ID like a drivers licence. MSSA's (Military Style Semi Automatic) are now banned. To purchase a weapon you MUST present your valid licence, and there are special classes of licence for handguns and collectors weapons.

[mjmacky]

I wish the musket would come back into style.

[IdolEyes787]

I wish the musket would come back into style.

You should watch this series Top Shot.They gather a bunch of marksmen and shoot the fuck out of stuff.

[mjmacky]

I wish the musket would come back into style.

You should watch this series Top Shot.They gather a bunch of marksmen and shoot the fuck out of stuff.

That sounds like the worst recommendation anyone has ever suggested to me. I thought you said you were at least pretending to like me.

[IdolEyes787]

They shoot the fuck out of stuff real good ?

[IdolEyes787]

Also stuff occasionally blows up.:)

[IdolEyes787]

And it's Anime.:yup:

[ckrit]

Its not right, man should be allowed to behave in as vile a way as he likes. There are no consequences after all.
:emo: :stalker:

[manker]

Its not right, man should be allowed to behave in as vile a way as he likes. There are no consequences after all.
:emo: :stalker:I bet Dave couldn't make more than five posts of reasonable length before someone posts a balustrade smiley at him.
Even if he tried particularly hard not to be mental.

[mjmacky]

And it's Anime.:yup:

I've never seen redneck anime, and if you find it to exist, well that would just blow my mind.

[manker]

And it's Anime.:yup:

I've never seen redneck anime, and if you find it to exist, well that would just blow my mind.Rule 34, pneub.

[Artemis]

Dear moderator, I feel a strong urge to yeehaw at this point, is there something wrong with me? :blink:

[mjmacky]

I've never seen redneck anime, and if you find it to exist, well that would just blow my mind.Rule 34, pneub.

That rule doesn't apply to the reverse.

[manker]

Dear moderator, I feel a strong urge to yeehaw at this point, is there something wrong with me? :blink:
How you orate during onanism is a personal thing and is no reflection on your mental state.
I hope :ermm:

[mjmacky]

Dear moderator, I feel a strong urge to yeehaw at this point, is there something wrong with me? :blink:
How you orate during onanism is a personal thing and is no reflection on your mental state.
I hope :ermm:

I was about to say you should have quoted him. Anyways, I meant to say "doesn't apply in reverse" in my previous statement. Your error made me revisit my error.

[Artemis]

Dear moderator, I feel a strong urge to yeehaw at this point, is there something wrong with me? :blink:
How you orate during onanism is a personal thing and is no reflection on your mental state.
I hope :ermm:

The mind boggles

[manker]

rule 34, pneub.

that rule doesn't apply to the reverse.nsfw
106473

[mjmacky]

That's not proper anime, and revisit the idea that rule doesn't apply in reverse.

[Artemis]

It does if he says it backwards :yup:

[mjmacky]

It does if he says it backwards :yup:

It of porn is there, exists it if.

I think that's Yoda's response to, "what's your favorite fetish?".

[Artemis]

It does if he says it backwards :yup:

It of porn is there, exists it if.

I think that's Yoda's response to, "what's your favorite fetish?".

My favorite porn fetish is watching it on fast forward, it's hilarious! :P

[manker]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.

[Artemis]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.
You used too many words, you need too keep your sentences shorter and more concise to stop your audience from falling asleep. :blink:

[manker]

I've got Mary chastising me for not making long enough posts, and now you saying that they're too verbose.

Anyway, I've made a mental note: Mary can't get enough of my soliloquies and if you read more than three sentences, you get crotchety.

[Snee]

To Long; Didn't Read?

[mjmacky]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.

You're trying to get away with it. The rule only states that porn covers existing subject, but there is no exclusive requirement in said rule. That being, that you can have porn for things that don't exist. I'll submit an example.

P.S. It was taking too long to find a decent porno (older mythologies just seemed too accessible), and I didn't want to do the Silverman thing, so I just made my own. How can this porno exist by your assumption?

106579

[mjmacky]

To Long; Didn't Read?

I am not one to long for a read that is too long to read.

[manker]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.

You're trying to get away with it. The rule only states that porn covers existing subject, but there is no exclusive requirement in said rule. That being, that you can have porn for things that don't exist. I'll submit an example.

P.S. It was taking too long to find a decent porno (older mythologies just seemed too accessible), and I didn't want to do the Silverman thing, so I just made my own. How can this porno exist by your assumption?

106579Your point detracts from your stance :schnauz:

The rule I posted is the real and actual rule. The one you alluded to is the shorthand version for people who are hard of reading and/or thinking.

[mjmacky]

You're trying to get away with it. The rule only states that porn covers existing subject, but there is no exclusive requirement in said rule. That being, that you can have porn for things that don't exist. I'll submit an example.

P.S. It was taking too long to find a decent porno (older mythologies just seemed too accessible), and I didn't want to do the Silverman thing, so I just made my own. How can this porno exist by your assumption?

106579Your point detracts from your stance :schnauz:

The rule I posted is the real and actual rule. The one you alluded to is the shorthand version for people who are hard of reading and/or thinking.

I'm beginning to doubt that you know what my stance is. Also, the original rule was even shorter than the one I used. There's probably a rule about that.

[manker]

It is easy to lose track but I'm fairly confident that your stance is that you wish you were from Arkansas and that your sister was narcoleptic.

[mjmacky]

The original stance was, "find me redneck anime".

[manker]

Which I did :blink:

[mjmacky]

Which I did :blink:

You most certainly did not.

[manker]

Always the contrary, Mary.
The problem is that you think in straight lines. I'm pretty sure that your favourite source of anime output wouldn't deign to stop drawing schoolgirls with cawks long enough to meet your precise requirements. You need, therefore, to consider that sexual-related material does, indeed, pre-exist for any conceivable subject and work backwards from that.

Once this small mental ellipse is complete, you can return to your comfort zone of linearity and methodically cross-hatch the internets.

[mjmacky]

Always the contrary, Mary.
The problem is that you think in straight lines. I'm pretty sure that your favourite source of anime output wouldn't deign to stop drawing schoolgirls with cawks long enough to meet your precise requirements. You need, therefore, to consider that sexual-related material does, indeed, pre-exist for any conceivable subject and work backwards from that.

Once this small mental ellipse is complete, you can return to your comfort zone of linearity and methodically cross-hatch the internets.

If I were to analyze it, I don't see much of a theme of linear thinking, rather the first thing I'm picking up on is reverse engineering. The problem here lays with qualifications. The first qualification being what makes an anime. There's the issue of style & origin in addition to it being animated (video vs. image). The second qualification being that rule 34 doesn't determine if something actually exists or is tangible, it is a distinct convention that porn can exist, and porn only; therefore it is not a qualifier for anything outside of porn.

Set aside the err in your handling of the second qualifier, the rule 34 scenario, and let's hypothesize and presume to accept that you're interpretation both makes sense and is justifiable. You would have been attempting to present evidence that some redneck cartoon(s) exist. In that case, since there are many redneck cartoons, one would only need to submit the titles of a well-known redneck cartoon, e.g. King of the Hill, Squidbillies, or Bugs Bunny (a la Elmer Fudd).

Most interesting that you press on though. It's been a fairly extended amount of time since such a deliberately inane topic of debate that inherited an air of serious discourse has entertained me through my willing participation. To ally myself with the opposing platform through expressing an idea, I would have taken a different approach than you. I would have tackled the "redneck" factor directly. By that I mean the Japanese have their own version of a "redneck", therefore you could established a cultural equivalency and worked from there.

Have I gotten carried away yet?

[manker]

Always the contrary, Mary.
The problem is that you think in straight lines. I'm pretty sure that your favourite source of anime output wouldn't deign to stop drawing schoolgirls with cawks long enough to meet your precise requirements. You need, therefore, to consider that sexual-related material does, indeed, pre-exist for any conceivable subject and work backwards from that.

Once this small mental ellipse is complete, you can return to your comfort zone of linearity and methodically cross-hatch the internets.

If I were to analyze it, I don't see much of a theme of linear thinking, rather the first thing I'm picking up on is reverse engineering. The problem here lays with qualifications. The first qualification being what makes an anime. There's the issue of style & origin in addition to it being animated (video vs. image). The second qualification being that rule 34 doesn't determine if something actually exists or is tangible, it is a distinct convention that porn can exist, and porn only; therefore it is not a qualifier for anything outside of porn.

Set aside the err in your handling of the second qualifier, the rule 34 scenario, and let's hypothesize and presume to accept that you're interpretation both makes sense and is justifiable. You would have been attempting to present evidence that some redneck cartoon(s) exist. In that case, since there are many redneck cartoons, one would only need to submit the titles of a well-known redneck cartoon, e.g. King of the Hill, Squidbillies, or Bugs Bunny (a la Elmer Fudd).

Most interesting that you press on though. It's been a fairly extended amount of time since such a deliberately inane topic of debate that inherited an air of serious discourse has entertained me through my willing participation. To ally myself with the opposing platform through expressing an idea, I would have taken a different approach than you. I would have tackled the "redneck" factor directly. By that I mean the Japanese have their own version of a "redneck", therefore you could established a cultural equivalency and worked from there.

Have I gotten carried away yet?
That's a great post. Possibly the greatest ever on this particular subject.

You've got rule34 all wrong, but that isn't your fault as it's presented wrongly on the internets more often than it's expressed correctly - and who is to say what the correct rule is. I'm surely no authority.

I hadn't considered the other, quite obviously, redneck animations, to be honest. I was thinking too narrowly in that respect, too. Now you've brought it up, though, it appears that I was even more correct than I first thought. Which is astounding, because I'd already taken a stance which was pretty gosh darn correct.

However, your last paragraph particularly threw me, which is why I said about your post being great. I didn't think that Japanese culture would have their own rednecks. But why not? I bet they're represented somewhere in anime too, given the propensity of the Japanese to output an extraordinary level of anime on subjects both within and without of its borders. Since you mention that too, it brings into focus the utter justification of my first comment whereupon I called you a pneub for assuming its non-existence.

All I can say is thank you for framing my argument in a much more cohesive way than I did.

[mjmacky]

You've got rule34 all wrong, but that isn't your fault as it's presented wrongly on the internets more often than it's expressed correctly - and who is to say what the correct rule is. I'm surely no authority.

I hadn't considered the other, quite obviously, redneck animations, to be honest. I was thinking too narrowly in that respect, too. Now you've brought it up, though, it appears that I was even more correct than I first thought. Which is astounding, because I'd already taken a stance which was pretty gosh darn correct.

However, your last paragraph particularly threw me, which is why I said about your post being great. I didn't think that Japanese culture would have their own rednecks. But why not? I bet they're represented somewhere in anime too, given the propensity of the Japanese to output an extraordinary level of anime on subjects both within and without of its borders. Since you mention that too, it brings into focus the utter justification of my first comment whereupon I called you a pneub for assuming its non-existence.

All I can say is thank you for framing my argument in a much more cohesive way than I did.

Are you insisting this image is not the accurate origin, even without authority?
107085
Or that it can claim origin from this list of rules?
107086

To be correct about your original stance, you would either need to submit some porn of redneck anime, or a sample of redneck anime. Even with my assistance you went back to square one. I feel like I'm not being thoroughly appreciated :(
Am I supposed to find it myself now? :idunno:

[manker]

I am indeed insisting that and, ffs, that list of rules denotes /b/ as /B/.
:mellow:

I posted some porn of redneck anime, or at least the front cover of a comic I definitely don't have saved on my HD.
Lastly, what part of me suggesting that you methodically cross-hatch the internets inferred anything other than you finding it yourself.

I'm busy with busy things and overlord jobs.

[mjmacky]

You could at least attempt to figure out what a Japanese redneck is. Once that's accomplished, you can submit your evidence. You have not yet posted an image from any anime, or its porn equivalent, hentai. :(

It makes it a very disappointing experience. If I did the latter, I'm likely to get reported. I'd rather let a moderator do that.

[manker]

Well, that's down to you. Get cross-hatching, biznatch.

Also, why would a moderator report you. She'd just issue an infraction or, more likely, not do anything at all.
They're particularly laissez-faire around these parts, I've heard :smilie4:

[Artemis]

:dave: tried to give one staff member an embolism with the misuse of the to/too construct and it very nearly wurked..... So they are a patient lot.

[mjmacky]

Yeah, but I want to post tits and wet vaginas.

[manker]

I think you can post tits avec pas de problem.
Wet vagina is probably okay as long as you put it in a spoiler tag and mark it NSFW.

I do have the handicap of never having read the rules. I'm just thinking that it's a courtesy thing :idunno:

[mjmacky]

I am indeed insisting that and, ffs, that list of rules denotes /b/ as /B/.
:mellow:

By the ways, you should back up your claims of insistence with the alternative origin story or pic.

[manker]

I am indeed insisting that and, ffs, that list of rules denotes /b/ as /B/.
:mellow:

By the ways, you should back up your claims of insistence with the alternative origin story or pic.I would but it 404'd.

[IdolEyes787]

I think you can post tits avec pas de problem.
Wet vagina is probably okay as long as you put it in a spoiler tag and mark it NSFW.

I do have the handicap of never having read the rules. I'm just thinking that it's a courtesy thing :idunno:

Depictions of rape is OK though right?

107130

[mjmacky]

Not so much a rape as an aggressive "sex with the natives" policy.

[manker]

I think you can post tits avec pas de problem.
Wet vagina is probably okay as long as you put it in a spoiler tag and mark it NSFW.

I do have the handicap of never having read the rules. I'm just thinking that it's a courtesy thing :idunno:

Depictions of rape is OK though right?

107130
Pretty sure it's fine so long as you can make a good case of her asking for it, if it was something of a shock to her or if these are not the droids you are looking for.