What is the fastest internet speed???

[suhailinter]

What is the fastest internet speed???
I am looking for the fastest internet connection all over the world........

[nightwatcherr]

1 gb

ı have server

[Evelyn]

n00b talk :D

[anon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF2v32xCD0Y

[sbglobal79]

It may be 28 mbps in India.

[anon]

This would-be breakthrough arrived in my country recently:

124134

Customer reviews indicate they give approximately half that speed, and the service starts failing continuously after a couple of weeks. Just like when I had their 128Kbit in 2004!

FiOS seems cheap, fast and stable, but coverage is still very limited :(

[testing406]

You can have ridiculous speeds, but a lot of the internet isn't fast enough to warrant them.

[harry4200]

I have bell canada.. its pretty fast (50mbs)

[sorinxdx]

There are some screnshots on reddit from google fiber users - 900Mb/s :whistling

[DngrMs]

I have 120Mb/s at home and that's plenty fast enough for my needs. In real terms it's closer to 100Mb/s than 120.

Realistically the only things that saturate it are CDN's, Usenet, IRC transfers (host dependent) and highly available torrents. Even commercial streaming services use less than 1/3 of the available bandwidth (and often much less :().

My NSP is pretty good with speed, I have a 100Mb/s unlimited account and normally suck stuff down at between 8.5 and 9.5 megabytes a second... my HDTV gets here pretty quick... :)

Based on the services I have access to, and the bandwidth their hosts have available, I can't imagine a real world benefit of more than about 100Mb/s at the moment. I think 30Mb/s is probably a great target for home use as even that is pretty damn quick.

And I pay less than ~US$40 a month for all that... including the NSP... :)

[putul54]

It may be 128 mbps in Bangladesh.

[fiki196]

Probably the fastest residential internet connection is So-net Entertainment's 2gbps at this time in Japan. Though it's mostly unusable by anything outside of japan. Many servers support up to 10gbps. But at the time of this writing there is nothing as fast for home users. Either way if you choose a connection and if you have an option of fiber to the home go with that, next would be cable,which can also go up to 10gbps but probably can't go much above that in the future,while fiber optic cables have a lot of room for expansion, laboratory tests have show that you can get at least 1 petabit(131.000 GB/s) per second trough a single optic fiber. The biggest constrain for fiber optic internet is the end hardware. So basically fiber depends only on the hardware that uses it, and is resistant to magnetic,electric and most interference .

[abtx]

I'm in vietnam. My real speed is 4.2Mb/s download and 4.2Mb/s upload at the same time. And I pay ~65$ a month. I think this is awsome for a developing country as Viet Nam!

[ahqaf]

Hi, at present time I am searching for the faster internet connection all over the world.

[dion09529]

I'm in vietnam. My real speed is 4.2Mb/s download and 4.2Mb/s upload at the same time. And I pay ~65$ a month. I think this is awesome for a developing country as Viet Nam!

I thought the shrimps are all the rage in Vietnam.

[lunchboxzt]

Google Fiber in Kansas City, 1gbps straight to internet backbone for $79 a month.

[ryu4000]

Should be jpn the US is finally catching up slowly to the rest of the world.

[joebot]

Yeah, it's probably Japan or South Korea in the lead for the fastest

[cheetah33]

Def Google Fiber (1 Gb/s Up and Down), but it's only in one city inside the US. Fastest in Canada is 350 MB/s (Up and Down) available through Rogers but it's not available everywhere, only available in the more populated areas.

[Baggervance]

Check this out http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25840502

1.4 Tb/s

[Urongo]

In my country 500mb

[playerup]

Google Fiber in Kansas City, 1gbps straight to internet backbone for $79 a month.

Why exactly did they start this off in Kansas City?

[piercerseth]

I think Google realized they'd be facilitated with right-of-way, permits, all the boring administrative shit regarding laying the fiber. Streamlined thebureacracy etc. I know in Provo, UT all they had to do was show up as the infrastructure was already in place.

Funny how in Austin TWC doubled their offerings to 300Mbps when Google came to town.

[Beck38]

Austin, TX, is probably (for the US) a VERY interesting place for broadband. Reason is that, since the early 1980's, there have been at least 2 (and in a lot of areas of town 3 or more) cablecos competing HEAD TO HEAD. I was an adviser to the city cable board between 1982 to 1985.

Reason? Well, the 'original' cabletv company 'back in the day' was like most around the country during that period of time; almost a 'mom and pop' operation. Austin only had one (count 'em ONE) tv station at the time (CBS/channel 7) and had to pull in the other network and independent channels out of San Antonio. Again, as was typical at the time, 12 channel system.

But in the northwest neighborhoods, a second cableco, which was a kind of 'community' effort mostly made up from the large apartment complexes and such, built a system. Remember (!), TVRO (television Receive Only) dishes (c-band) for commercial use ran around $10-20K each, and large dishes capable of multiple reception from multiple satellites (although there were only 3-4 or so at the time) and multiple transponders/channels on each (12-24) were in the $50K+ region. Which is why the complex owners got together and pooled resources.. Add to that, the other cableco (Austin Cable) decided not to 'expand' into that area.

It stayed that way for a few years. I moved into a home that bordered right between the two in that northwest area, and was one of the first streets that 'had a choice' as to providers (1984). But I had already put up my own 5m dish (!).

But over the years, each company expanded their service, and since Austin Power is a muni power company and owned all the poles in the city, they sold pole 'space' to all comers. Especially when they got suckered into the HP&L (Houston Power and Light) South Texas Nuk project (massive cost overruns) they needed the money.

So for a long time before the telcos and the big cablecos swallowed up anything, there were huge areas that had thriving competition. Then the telco (AT&T) got involved (uverse) and all of a sudden, folks had 3 choices. (I can't remember which large multi-state cableco took over which cable operation, I moved out of Austin in the mid 80's amd didn't pay much attention to what happened).

So now, with Goggle fiber, possibly a large chunk of town will have 4 choices for internet/tv/phone/whatever.

I'm sure the executives of all the current 'incumbent' operators are having a cow about right now.

[pokitisme]

well im in kc and ide have to say just cause they say 1gbps doesnt mean ur comp can handle it--i do not have gf but fro wht i understand the speeds only get faster determining how many people in ur area have it as well---its kinda like p2p but with internet speeds and the fact its p2p based doesnt enthuse me to much----lets say ur the only person around that can afford it well from what im told then ur getting like 300 mbs thats all good but its not the stated 1+gbs-and as i said what is ur write speed to hd and could ur comp actually handle downloading 5 dvd 5 movies that fast---i dont think so.on my comp newleecher has to hang a bit if i download lets say 50'000 1mb pdf's in a row due to write speeds of the hd.

[djnemonic]

New York, Delaware and New Jersey have the fastest broadband download speeds in the U.S.

[incaved]

I have 120Mb/s at home and that's plenty fast enough for my needs. In real terms it's closer to 100Mb/s than 120.

Realistically the only things that saturate it are CDN's, Usenet, IRC transfers (host dependent) and highly available torrents. Even commercial streaming services use less than 1/3 of the available bandwidth (and often much less :().

My NSP is pretty good with speed, I have a 100Mb/s unlimited account and normally suck stuff down at between 8.5 and 9.5 megabytes a second... my HDTV gets here pretty quick... :)

Based on the services I have access to, and the bandwidth their hosts have available, I can't imagine a real world benefit of more than about 100Mb/s at the moment. I think 30Mb/s is probably a great target for home use as even that is pretty damn quick.

And I pay less than ~US$40 a month for all that... including the NSP... :)

Agree with you. I have same speeds and only see it go to ~120Mb/s on Usenet.

[happydude]

120 mb/s

[spoiltbratt102]

1.5mb/s in aus

[hoangminh]

i think more than 120Mb/s

[shaina]

Rogers DSL..... In Canada
250 Mbps (with fiber optic lines in some areas 350 Mbps)


Based on the services I have access to, and the bandwidth their hosts have available, I can't imagine a real world benefit of more than about 100Mb/s at the moment. I think 30Mb/s is probably a great target for home use as even that is pretty damn quick.
And I pay less than ~US$40 a month for all that... including the NSP... :)

I can really assume you don't have any teenagers at home. Today if you think 30Mb/s is enough speed..
I am from Canada , I had 150Mb/s service for about 6 months , and I was getting over that with speed test , with my 3 kids laptops going , my USENET download speeds went in the toilet. I have now bumped up to 250Mb/s with a AC modem router. Now I am getting really good download speeds (180Mb/s or higher with the kids sometimes hogging beyond). The cost is a little high at $80 unlimited downloads a month , but it sure saves a lot of arguing and frustration.

[rascarl]

1 gig is the fastest here in the UK. Though it's only available in limited areas. Other than that probably 152 mb virginmedia is the fastest.

I have 100 mb. Fast enough for my needs.

[arulkaruppannan]

Scientists in the UK have created the fastest ever real-world internet connection, using commercial-grade fibre optic lines to clock up speeds of 1.4 terabits per second.

[Gribley]

Scientists in the UK have created the fastest ever real-world internet connection, using commercial-grade fibre optic lines to clock up speeds of 1.4 terabits per second.

Not at my house they havn`t. That will be popping up in 10 yrs then.... just as they bring out hologram video at 5MB/sec where it will still take 30mins to download a film* :D

*yes I didn`t try to work out the numbers

[bfnewman71]

I have 60Mbps here in Utah with Comcast. Google has announced plans to put Google Fiber in Salt Lake City, I can't wait! Finally Gigabit speed!

[Shinok]

and no bandiwth limit?

[bfnewman71]

No limit with Google Fiber that i know of. It's still a new thing that is many months away.

[Leonski]

None of it is even nearly fast enough. I want instant and I want it now. 1950s TV could broadcast live audio/visual to screens faster than most of todays net.

[stellalogan631]

100 Mbps I experienced. :)

[f1kid]

download speed 105.85 mbps
upload 5.88 mbps

virgin

[RVB]

Down 20,12 mbps
Up 1,78 mbps
Omg im too slow

[quydom196]

500mb :)))

[huhwat]

I can't wait for google fiber. Currently getting 50 down and 10 up

[mjmacky]

Fastest internet speed will be 10 to 20 Mbps.
That sounds like some future shit right there

-1995

[shaina]

Rogers in Canada now offers Rogers Ignite Gigabit, yes 1Gbps down and 50Mbps up:D

As i have said before, i have 250Mbps now and will be bumping up to the Gigabit soon :yup:

And 100Mbps with a household of 5 (2 adults:unsure: and 3 kids:D) is not good enough for today's internet users:cry:

[anon]

XFINITY

166172

No wonder people hate this company so much.

[megabyteme]

XFINITY

No wonder people hate this company so much.

True, true. And their politics that run counter to everything the interwebs offers regarding freedoms. There's that.

...and they are known to go down almost as often as OP's mum...

Oh, and they got roughly 400 Million of taxpayer dollars to provide service to rural areas. they have not kept their promise to do so. Not even fucking close.

[Joomladev]

According to Cisco, South Korea has the best broadband service in the world, with an average download throughput of 33.5 megabits per second.

[tonyhalttunen]

Verizon FiOS 300 mbps

[Robson]

Where are you from? Search you local operation for getting faster connection.

[renestitt]

During the middle of the night, I can normally get 15 Mbps down and 0.9 Mbps up. They're currently building FTTN in my town I don't have the highest hopes.

[elisajames]

1gb

[roobens]

Advertised: 75
Actual: 40-50 on a good day, low as 15
I can pay 20 dollars a month more for the business package that will "more likely hang around 60, which is the max, and get a free static IP". I think the IP isn't free if I have to pay and get a lower supposed top speed.

This is Optimum/Cablevision in NYC and I only wonder what the competition (TWC/Fios) are like because although are in NYC, and in my zip code, and in my neighborhood, neither service my building. Sometimes the internet is faster when I'm on the train between midtown and the Lower East Side.

[Martinsmith]

1 Gbps in india..

[expertchinmay]

Mtnl

[shkelzeni04]

it depends on where you live

[ZeroC00l]

Spectrum / Charter 100mbit/10mbit upload. While it's not the fastest, it's fast for me as I had AT&T DSL 6mbit/768kbps. Actual speeds 110mbit/11mbit. Be nice to have 1GB in my area. :D

[anon]

178454

:unsure:

[SarbjitGrewal]

Here, I have more than 40 MBPS internet speed.

[rotansharma]

According to Cisco, South Korea has the best broadband service in the world, with an average download throughput of 33.5 megabits per second – nearly three times the speed of second-place Hong Kong – an average upload throughput of 17 megabits per second ..

[shriniwas852]

It is 20.3 Mbps provide by Singapore

[Gribley]

really 20.3Mb (not MB).... I rack up 80Mbps so I must be super special. Even if it was 20MB fairly sure you are full of it since the have gig networks out there for Idol.

[shaina]

really 20.3Mb (not MB).... I rack up 80Mbps so I must be super special. Even if it was 20MB fairly sure you are full of it since the have gig networks out there for Idol.

So where does that leave getting 950Mbps:unsure:

[Gribley]

really 20.3Mb (not MB).... I rack up 80Mbps so I must be super special. Even if it was 20MB fairly sure you are full of it since the have gig networks out there for Idol.

So where does that leave getting 950Mbps:unsure:

You are in Idols exchange I can only assume ;) and at that speed I guess you need to download to SSD. Funny when your download is faster than the SATA i/f but that isn`t going to be an issue in the UK for some time.....

[shaina]

You are in Idols exchange I can only assume ;) and at that speed I guess you need to download to SSD. Funny when your download is faster than the SATA i/f but that isn`t going to be an issue in the UK for some time.....

No, Idol is in my exchange:snooty: (lets see if saying that is going to bite me in the ass!!) Kidding aside, my Usenet maxes out around 300-400Mbps, but the reason the speeds are good is when you have so many internet users in the house, you don't really get any slowdowns:). And it is strange that i looked up the average speeds in the UK, and they are really behind?? Why makes zero sense, and sucks at the same time :cry:
I forgot to mention it to MacGyver, i actually did switch from a 7200rpm HD to a Samsung SSD, and holy shit did it make a huge difference!!!. Now multitasking it never bogs when i am downloading and doing many other things at the same time,and the startup is way faster.. If you read this post MacGyver, thanks for the suggestion buddy it worked great!!

PS. I should say that if you do run an AMD CPU Samsung SSD's may not be the friendliest when it comes to there running software, but it doesn't affect the speeds and stuff, they do recommend Crucial SSD's, but i couldn't pass up the price for the Samsung :D
Thanks again....

[nQQ]

You are in Idols exchange I can only assume ;) and at that speed I guess you need to download to SSD. Funny when your download is faster than the SATA i/f but that isn`t going to be an issue in the UK for some time.....

No, Idol is in my exchange:snooty: (lets see if saying that is going to bite me in the ass!!) Kidding aside, my Usenet maxes out around 300-400Mbps, but the reason the speeds are good is when you have so many internet users in the house, you don't really get any slowdowns:). And it is strange that i looked up the average speeds in the UK, and they are really behind?? Why makes zero sense, and sucks at the same time :cry:
I forgot to mention it to MacGyver, i actually did switch from a 7200rpm HD to a Samsung SSD, and holy shit did it make a huge difference!!!. Now multitasking it never bogs when i am downloading and doing many other things at the same time,and the startup is way faster.. If you read this post MacGyver, thanks for the suggestion buddy it worked great!!

PS. I should say that if you do run an AMD CPU Samsung SSD's may not be the friendliest when it comes to there running software, but it doesn't affect the speeds and stuff, they do recommend Crucial SSD's, but i couldn't pass up the price for the Samsung :D
Thanks again....

any reason samsung SSD over others? Just due to the rapid decline in Bitcoin farming there is a glut of memory and cards, so SSD are coming down and may be worth thr upgrade after christmas

[shaina]

any reason Samsung SSD over others? Just due to the rapid decline in Bitcoin farming there is a glut of memory and cards, so SSD are coming down and may be worth thr upgrade after Christmas

I don't buy, sell or do anything with Bitcoin, just not my thing. The SSD was on sale, under $100 (Canadian) and it was 500gigs. Most of the others were over that, and did some research and they say the samsug's are rated on the top of the food chain, for reliability and quality. And yes they have come down big time, and Canada has joined the band wagon on the US Black Friday (American Thanksgiving) sales, and they are actually better in most cases than boxing day or Christmas sales, or they just put the same sales on again..

I am not sure where you live nQQ?? So no disrespect if you already knew this:)

And when i did some more reading on the SSD's , Samsung favors Intel's CPU's, and Crucial is more friendly with both AMD and Intel, and it actually doesn't really have to do with the drive, but with SSD's it comes with software to control it if you want, and that has some bugs in it, and Samsung is not rushing to fix it. But really you don't need the software and the sites said you can uninstall it without affecting the performance. Plus for the price the Samsung's specs were better, for the equivalent one Crucial's sells, it was higher...
And not sure if you understand why the prices are better for Black Friday?? The retailers try to get rid of there innovatory, reason they get rebates back from manufacturers on volume sales, plus to make room for the new products coming in, and me personally i don't need the latest and greatest anymore. I used to be like that, but now i don't care, as long as it suits my purpose and will last i am good:) ..

What i am watching as well is everyone here seems to talk about PS4's and Xbox's, but i am reading about the sales of the new Nintendo Switch, and wow!!! they are selling a ton of them!!!!!.....

Edit: I should add that i purchased a new TV just before Black Friday, i didn't want to get stuck in lines or they maybe sold out of it, the salesmen knew it was going on sale, he just didn't know how much?? and it went down a bit from the deal i got, so i went back and they priced matched the sale, now that same TV has gone back up again and others they are trying to get rid of (older models), are on sale. But i guarantee on Boxing day here if they still have inventory, it will go back to the price i paid...

And i apologize to everyone that i went off topic in the forum post.........

[anon]

at that speed I guess you need to download to SSD. Funny when your download is faster than the SATA i/f

SATA-I is already 1500 Mbps, even accounting for 8b/10b encoding there is still plenty of headroom :P

Okay, I'll return to the topic now. The fastest speed is 10 Mbps because that's what I have :mushy:

[MacGyverSG1]

You are in Idols exchange I can only assume ;) and at that speed I guess you need to download to SSD. Funny when your download is faster than the SATA i/f but that isn`t going to be an issue in the UK for some time.....

No, Idol is in my exchange:snooty: (lets see if saying that is going to bite me in the ass!!) Kidding aside, my Usenet maxes out around 300-400Mbps, but the reason the speeds are good is when you have so many internet users in the house, you don't really get any slowdowns:). And it is strange that i looked up the average speeds in the UK, and they are really behind?? Why makes zero sense, and sucks at the same time :cry:
I forgot to mention it to MacGyver, i actually did switch from a 7200rpm HD to a Samsung SSD, and holy shit did it make a huge difference!!!. Now multitasking it never bogs when i am downloading and doing many other things at the same time,and the startup is way faster.. If you read this post MacGyver, thanks for the suggestion buddy it worked great!!

PS. I should say that if you do run an AMD CPU Samsung SSD's may not be the friendliest when it comes to there running software, but it doesn't affect the speeds and stuff, they do recommend Crucial SSD's, but i couldn't pass up the price for the Samsung :D
Thanks again....

Good to hear. From my own experience I assumed an SSD would do the trick. HDDs have been the biggest bottleneck for computers for many years now.

[shaina]

Good to hear. From my own experience I assumed an SSD would do the trick. HDDs have been the biggest bottleneck for computers for many years now.

No joke!!, it is like day and night!!, I am now thinking i have an old laptop and my mock pc server(to run operating system and server program (UMS)), and i may buy SSD's for them. I can get away with 120gig ones as well, laptop just use it for the internet. But i am not sure if it will do much on the server being he rest of the drives are just 7200 speeds?? But if it does help the transfer/encoding speeds, it would be a bonus...
Again much appreciate the suggestion/help buddy, worked out great:D

[Gribley]

Still should of tried a HC2. Try it, don`t like it then sell it for almost cost anyway on EBayrip

[MacGyverSG1]

The 120GB (128GB) SSDs will be slower than the 250GB (256GB) and larger drives. It uses half the channels because of smaller storage size and cuts the speed down. Still better than HDD.

[shaina]

Okay, I'll return to the topic now. The fastest speed is 10 Mbps because that's what I have :mushy:

No offense Anon, but i remember that speed 15 years ago:whistling. Can you not get faster speeds where you live??

Now i also learned that if you have things that max out at 100Mbps run them on standard 2.4 GHz (will only go to that speed), and everything over use 5GHz:yup:, and that is if you are forced to use WiFi, if not, use Ethernet wired connection if you can!!!


Still should of tried a HC2. Try it, don`t like it then sell it for almost cost anyway on EBayrip

Ok call me slow?? What is HC2 short for?? Do you have a link on info Gribley??


The 120GB (128GB) SSDs will be slower than the 250GB (256GB) and larger drives. It uses half the channels because of smaller storage size and cuts the speed down. Still better than HDD.

Even know it shows the same specs for read and write?? I am pretty sure the Samsung's specs don't change?? Just the storage size??

I could always go to 250gig, not that much difference in price now, if you think it will be better?? Just over-kill for my vintage Del laptop:D

[Gribley]

The 120GB (128GB) SSDs will be slower than the 250GB (256GB) and larger drives. It uses half the channels because of smaller storage size and cuts the speed down. Still better than HDD.
And you`ll never really be able to tell. I have a 256 boot, 1Tb VM image drive (work stuff) and 111Gb games drive (I guess that is 120Gb) Stick the download crap on a external box and really you`ll not care about speeds since you just kick `em off, dl and see without having to manage, my odroid only has 750Gb on a HDD.

Also have a 3 and 4 TB drives for other stuff.... one is hybrid

[MacGyverSG1]

The 120GB (128GB) SSDs will be slower than the 250GB (256GB) and larger drives. It uses half the channels because of smaller storage size and cuts the speed down. Still better than HDD.


Even though it shows the same specs for read and write?? I am pretty sure the Samsung's specs don't change?? Just the storage size??

I could always go to 250gig, not that much difference in price now, if you think it will be better?? Just over-kill for my vintage Del laptop:D

The 120GB (128GB) SATA SSDs are always (AFAIK) slower than the 250GB+ drives. Most SSD makers have stopped making 120GB (128GB) drives, except for the low end.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13421/the-mushkin-source-sata-ssd-review

[shaina]

[QUOTE] The 120GB (128GB) SATA SSDs are always (AFAIK) slower than the 250GB+ drives. Most SSD makers have stopped making 120GB (128GB) drives, except for the low end.

For reasons why?? I have no idea, but seems you would be right MacGyver:)
If you do look around, the new 3D NAND Internal Solid State Drive's, don't offer 120GB size, they do start at 205GB plus, and if you look at the pricing, the difference from a 250-500GB is not that much difference as well....

[MacGyverSG1]

Yeah, I guess it doesn't make financial sense to make 120GB (128GB) drives. They only use half the NAND channels (4 vs. 8) compared to larger drives. I think with the densities of the NAND getting larger 250GB (256GB) is the smallest size that makes sense now. I remember when 32GB and 64GB SSDs first came out. Probably only a matter of time when 250GB (256GB) drives will disappear.

[shaina]

Yeah, I guess it doesn't make financial sense to make 120GB (128GB) drives. They only use half the NAND channels (4 vs. 8) compared to larger drives. I think with the densities of the NAND getting larger 250GB (256GB) is the smallest size that makes sense now. I remember when 32GB and 64GB SSDs first came out. Probably only a matter of time when 250GB (256GB) drives will disappear.
You may be right on the 250Gig drives MacGyver, considering my 500Gig drive only shows 465GB:D
I can say i don't remember about about the small SSD'a because i didn't need them or better yet may have been out of my snack bracket :whistling..
I can say i remember and had many USB keys that were under a Gig, now the norm to get it at least 64Gigs. Fuck i am old LOL!!!..

[Gribley]

Well I tried a 8GB compact flash to SATA card for a while until it was obvious it was shit and totally unstable. I`m just as old

Should we now delve into Boolean logic with NAND gates and such. Must say in my past digi electronics was my preference.... analog is infinitely more difficult in my mind although yeah I can do that as well.

[shaina]

Well I tried a 8GB compact flash to SATA card for a while until it was obvious it was shit and totally unstable. I`m just as old
Should we now delve into Boolean logic with NAND gates and such. Must say in my past digi electronics was my preference.... analog is infinitely more difficult in my mind although yeah I can do that as well.

What do you have that needed a 8Gb flash card?? To max out your flip phone:drummer:

The other stuff, give me a few minutes to go into the Google archives to figure out what the heck you are talking about:D

[IT4INT]

The global average broadband internet speed is 11.03Mbps (megabits per second).
Taiwan has the fastest internet speed in the world overtaking Singapore with an average speed of 85.02Mbps.
Yemen has the slowest internet speed in the world with an average speed of just 0.38Mbps.

[xdaehak]

I am on 50Mbps and its super fine for what i do, sometimes ping in games can be a bit suss

[anon]

I am on 50Mbps and its super fine for what i do, sometimes ping in games can be a bit suss

Speed and latency aren't the same thing. This is a pretty contentious issue for Latin American gamers, as some providers don't have peering agreements and thus packets have to detour all the way through the United States, adding 150 ms or more.

[andymacwan]

Currently the fastest internet speed available to a major consumer base in many countries, is the gigabit internet or 1gbps internet or 1000mbps.

[mehak_sharma]

5g

[anon]

50 gigabit seedboxes exist now, so...

[Zupper]

It all hinges on the capacity of your ISPs Servers. Someone I know has estimated speed of 386meg but at times he is barely able to load a web page.

[anon]

Speed, latency and packet loss are different things :P Personally, I value stability over speed and upload over download.

187282

I'm sure this is laughably slow in Romania, but just because someone doesn't love you with all you want it doesn't mean they don't love you with all they have :mushy:

[RNO]

I am in switzerland and we have an ISP with 10Gbps connection.

My computer has only a 2.5 Gbps LAN port so I could only tried to reach this speed.
I use newshosting and I could download up to 178 Mo/s

It is really fast, really really fast.

[anon]

My computer has only a 2.5 Gbps LAN port so I could only tried to reach this speed.

Can always resell the remaining 7.5 to your neighbors, nya!

[wedwilson]

The highest internet speed ever recorded is 319 terabits per second (Tb/s). This was achieved by researchers at the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) in Japan in 2020