Strange Sound, Screeching Songs...et Cetera

[[B][O][T]]

You can find Part I here (http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=49358)

Please discuss strange sound, screeching music files (mostly mp3's) in this thread.

If You're looking for full complete albums I suggest that You download SoulSeek, there's already a thread about SoulSeek here (http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=45353).

You can find a guide for making high quality mp3 files here (http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=22763).

This post will be edited from time to time.

Thanks,
BOT

[Adster]

What happened to the 40 pages of screeching mp3s :huh:
just curious did it have to do with the server or database cleaning out??

[[B][O][T]]

Originally posted by 7thElement (Our new Admin) in private room
If there is a post with a lot of replies (1000 or more) then it can overload the server because the server does load every single post into the RAM and just shows X posts per page - This means that if there is a 1000 posts topic and a user does only read the latest addiotion it does still load all 1000 into the ram.

Normally posts don't get that big but I think it would be better to do some "Part I" / "Part 2" / "Part 3" etc stuff with huge topics.

If a topic reaches more than 2500 posts then it is over anyway if 10 people browse (PHPBB developer told me that in a chat) cause then 10 users use more or less all available resources.

This is the reason why I'm starting a new thread about this, You can find the first part here (http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=49358).

BOT

[Adster]

OK cheers thought so dam i can see about 3 threads in musicworld ready to start fresh

[dadadadadadadad]

:ph34r: Every "missing by evanescence, new version heard on the radio" i download, has that fucking ANNOYING dial up modem "tun tin tun" sound on it!!!

[Adster]

read our soulseek thread

[john27374]

Is there any effective way to weed out the bad files in kazaa lite? I've heard that setting Integrity Rating to "Excellent" can usually solve the problem of screeching mp3s, but is it really that effective?

Couldn't the kazaa makers solve this whole problem by checking the entire file, rather than just the beginning?

[Adster]

umm the kaza makers dotn check the files :huh:

[Adster]

OK got board last night and started downloading mp3s off kazaa to test out a few things heres the interesting part...

I never got a screeching file but it seems like screeching isn't a problem you Can cancel it imminently coz you know its f*cked up, however what I did download was looped files, which kids adults who haven't heard the song don't realize it is looped ans share it and it spreads easy so once again its the users fault.

they a perfect clean smooth lops too but you don't need much brains to know its looped when your like me and you loop music everyday for production radio you tend to know when you hear a loop

[deepthawt]

:unsure: i just started on this hypothesis but here goes. Has anyone gotten a corrupted song thats was a windows media file? :unsure:

[Rappy]

all of mine were mp3 @ 192 quality i donno why

[deepthawt]

i mean i know how the riaa and thier agents are exploiting the hash, but why not in .wma files???? bill? could this be a good thing ? :blink: :huh:

[har99001]

If anyone could shed some light on this that would be cool. Are there any infomative sights that can explain what is going on with this. I can only assume that this is a result from the riaa trying to prevent p2p.

[RIAAcansuckIT]

Ok no one has a concrete answer to this problem....does ANYONE know what is going on with this screeching in our music files? :ph34r:

[3rd gen noob]

Originally posted by RIAAcansuckIT@1 December 2003 - 05:12
Ok no one has a concrete answer to this problem....does ANYONE know what is going on with this screeching in our music files? :ph34r:
riaa are f*cking them up
simple :)

[RIAAcansuckIT]

RIAA = the lords of all douche bags :angry:

[nuclear hawk]

ok I might have a solution to a problem. However...I bet RIAA's motherfuckers will read this post as well and invent something new...
Well the problem is actually in numerous accounts/adresses (RIAA's motherfuckers change them constantly). When you download it's enough for you to get one of those adresses as source and you are screwed!
Solution: go to options-> advanced options(I think, if I am not right-just find it yourself) reduce Max number of sources per file to 2, restart k-lite.
There you go now, you have reduced the probability of running into RIAA's motherfuckers by aprox 80%. That means that if at one download you'll get fucked up file, try again and chances are you'l get a good one. I have tried it-no screwed songs so far.
Good luck, and think about next solution
Oh by the way sorry for my language, it's just i don't like RIAA

[nuclear hawk]

Oh by the way-naturally try files with less sources, couse more sources-means more RIAA adresses=> more probability to run into theese motherfuckers
Setting integrity rate to exelent, might help as well but not too much, since integrity checks the beginning of the file, and we know that first 10 seconds are ok
Oh something else...

FUCK RIAA

[Gutter]

Originally posted by RapFan@30 November 2003 - 07:32
all of mine were mp3 @ 192 quality i donno why
usually if i am searching for a song (and resort to using kazaa) i search for 192k only. and I haven't gotten a "screechy" mp3 yet

[pommy]

Oh this shits me........last month I could find a decent obie trice / 50 cent track without screeches..

Now I can't find a damn thing without screeches.

I can't believe there's that many RIAA servers. A big part of the problem must users are downloading these corrupt files and leaving them in their music folder for other people to download this shit from them.

Why don't they just f****** delete rubbish files and I'm sure screechy files would be less abundant.

Not happy!!

[Adster]

What gutter said usually only 128s have the screeching

just on this please I haven't downloaded a screeching file yet I want to hear one!!!

Ive only heard loops beeps and blank silence

[deepthawt]

ok somerone please tell me if they have a corrupt .wma file?

[nuclear hawk]

I don't know abouw .wma file, but they have corrupted all kinds of files!!!!!!!

[Gutter]

i have heard the looped mp3s but never downloaded a screechy mp3.

Stick to KaZaa for just movies and porn from now on :lol:

[Jayhawk]

i think the loop songs are funny they sure do make me laugh and i have also never incountered a screechy mp3 but then again its been close to a year since i have d/l a song off of k-lite

[shootsup]

One suggestion is to lay off the 50 cent music(?).......

[Explosive]

Originally posted by deepthawt@3 December 2003 - 13:16
ok somerone please tell me if they have a corrupt .wma file?
I think they haven't corrupted wmas so far...

[deepthawt]

:ph34r: CONSPIRACY HYPOTHESIS :ph34r:
mp3's are a license free kinda thing that no one owns no one enitity is responsible for, but wma is microsofts own baby . would they let another member of the computing community activley corrupt the integrity of thier format? The potenital harm to microsofts media format would bve disasterous if people began to believe that windows media had issuse's(hissing and looping and that sort ).remeber not everyone in fileshsaring is reading the forums and that sort , heck you got people out there putting thier real email addreses in the username fields and people paying for "gold ' level filesharing , the panic and resulting bad press would leave microsoft to respond to whats wrong with wma. well the issue i find is that wma is designed to shrink the file size of wave files without a loss of sound quality for use on ??/ well theres the rub , the need ofr a smaller files size is for data transfer over the internet and or use on a device that is not part of the copyright agrrement for use of the media type that was purchased(at least to my understanding)potentially the blowback to micro$oft could look really bad ,(cause after all we didnt make the file format and devices for use of violating copyrights ..they did.were only using these things for what we were sold them for.even the road runner commercial mentions downloading movies and music faster(transmission filmes is the only legal movie downloading site i know of)these are only seminal thoughts , what do you think? :unsure:

[furmansk]

hey guys im new on here like posting wise but i wanted to ask a question about this stuff. Ok so if i get a file that is all high pitched noises and all does that mean that the RIAA has gotten my IP and is tracking me? If so ive had some of those files cause my friends come over and d/l stuff with out askin me. But i just wanted to ask. And now the RIAA has made about 41 lawsuits about the p2p stuff i read in the paper which sucks but thats 41 out of 4,000,000 people at least. So its like 41 down alot more to go lol :D .

[ThompZen]

I have an idea....lets blow up the RIAA servers... <_<
ok, maybe not...but why do they have to f*** up our music? like in Norway, downloading music is legal (so far), so it pisses me off that we can&#39;t enjoy an mp3 without getting an headache over the freakin&#39; noice....F*C* RIAA... :blink:

[WolverineDK]

ThompZen you are lucky that downloading music is legal in Norway because in Denmark it is illegal to download music and that sucks :angry: :angry: :angry: :( :( :( :( :( <_< <_< <_<
FUCK all the "antipirategroups" like RIAA and MPAA and the stupid fuckedup danish KODA and APG and all other groups around the world.

peace
WolverineDK

[mikelite]

about the schreeching mp3&#39;s perhaps there is a need to encrypt the mp3&#39;s :)
...........
There is always a way of course.

Now here&#39;s a good question (i think) :blink:

if the RIAA is providing information over the kazaa networks, even if
the information is designed to cause MIS-information, does that mean
that the RIAA is now condoning the use of kazaa? B)

In other words, if they are supplying ppl with downloads than the very
song names that they are providing should be legal as they are allowing
these songs to be dl&#39;ed (albeit a crappy copy) :ph34r: from their servers
for free. (Perhaps we should start logging which songs they have
endorsed already? :lol: )

This won&#39;t be much of an issue soon as we start to see 18gb dvd-rw
double layer disks coming about. Then friends will get together and copy
each others WHOLE mp3 collection :beerchug:(what? 4000 songs a disc?)
we won&#39;t need p2p anymore as it will become too slow again. :P

I understand the need for musicians to be compensated for their labours
and yes it is a problem that they are not being compensated enough.

However, remember the technology to convert audio into an exact playable
copy is relatively new. (150 years?) :geek: aside from music box type equipment.
Now we have evolved into the information age where music can be stored
as 0&#39;s and 1&#39;s in a computer and played exactly as it was recorded -
which costs nothing to copy&#33;&#33;&#33;

Ppl see that it costs relatively nothing for musicians
to create good songs (i know this is not true but..), then when the albums come
out they cost &#036;20 a pop, then concerts are &#036;&#036; and t-shirts &#036;&#036;. So when that album
or song comes over the p2p networks having been soaked as we have
as consumers we obviously don&#39;t feel like buying that song.

you see the consumers started thinking about whats actually going on...

Supply and demand. Ppl are willing to dl instead of buying...


The reason ppl &#39;steal&#39; mp3&#39;s is not because they want &#39;free&#39; music.
It is because ppl are tired of paying exorbiant fee&#39;s for albums where
all they want is one song of the album. The music industry has forgotten
who caters to who. :afro:

And I see schreeching mp3 files showing up as the RIAA&#39;s way of trying
to spit in ppl&#39;s food after having a bad day. :cry1: Will they discourage ppl from
dl&#39;ing? probably not and just distill more of a hatred towards them.:shit:





-mikelite :angel1:

[ThompZen]

Hm, I just read an article on www.neowin.net about Kazaa closing down Kazaa Lite&#33;?&#33; :huh: Is this true? And yes, we are very lucky that downloading music is legal, so far.. :D

[deepthawt]

Originally posted by mikelite@7 December 2003 - 06:01


In other words, if they are supplying ppl with downloads than the very
song names that they are providing should be legal as they are allowing
these songs to be dl&#39;ed (albeit a crappy copy) :ph34r: from their servers
for free. (Perhaps we should start logging which songs they have
endorsed already? :lol: )


i think his falls in the legal black hole of honeypots (just cause its there doesnt mean you can go stickin your pooh hands in it)

[oldgil]

yknow what? If thes Muther fuckers spent as much time and money into doing something worth while like helping the poor&#33; instead of paying for servers and taking man hours to wreck songs just to fuck with people and seriously its not like these people dont make enough money anyway... i mean seriously "what im losing 100,000 dollars a year out of my 5 million dollar a year (or more) so im gonna take my time to fuck with kids who want only one song out of a 20 dollar album... i mean seriously RIAA fuckers do something productive for our country&#33; :angry:

[mikelite]

Originally posted by deepthawt+8 December 2003 - 04:24--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (deepthawt &#064; 8 December 2003 - 04:24)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-mikelite@7 December 2003 - 06:01


In other words, if they are supplying ppl with downloads than the very
song names that they are providing should be legal as they are allowing
these songs to be dl&#39;ed (albeit a crappy copy)&nbsp; :ph34r: from their servers
for free. (Perhaps we should start logging which songs they have
endorsed already? :lol: )


i think his falls in the legal black hole of honeypots (just cause its there doesnt mean you can go stickin your pooh hands in it)[/b][/quote]
:o :blink: :smartass:

Well what are legalitys of honeypots?
Lets say you run a honeypot on port 80
and for some reason a dns server has
pointed itself at your address?
Does this constitute a cyber-crime if someones
web-browser opens up the honeypot homepage
off that server? -- however, you are responsible
(as the server&#39;s administrator) for the content
placed on so said server.

-Gibberish. :confused:

Okay lets look at this another way.

Anyone, according to the most p2p toa (terms of agreement)
legalise, is responsible for the content they share on the
network. Admittantly not everyone respects this toa.
However, if I am a musician and I offer my music
on a p2p network, it is my RIGHT to do so knowing full
well that others may download and listen to without
any compensation back to my part (except the
feeling i&#39;ve done a good thing).

The riaa OWNS the copyrights for these songs
(and if they are providing false information
on songs they do NOT OWN that could be
cause for litigation) therefore if they want to
serve music titles on these p2p networks
it is their RIGHT to do so as owners of those
copyrights. (Musician lose their copyright ability
after selling their songs to.. i don&#39;t know, the
riaa- but receive royalties in return - and royalties
weren&#39;t always given&#33;&#33;)

If the riaa is providing info across the p2p networks
attacking random hashes then I think that is something
called tampering under the dmca. Perhaps some of us
should read that dmca..... :huh:

P2P can protect itself just fine WITH the DMCA.
Perhaps counter-suing under the dmca?

-mikelite

[nuclear hawk]

TompZen
I would if i could

[nuclear hawk]

mikelite
find a good lawyer - one that cold match RIAA&#39;s lawyers and i am with you
I&#39;ll sue their fucking asses.
Well, may be if we could organaize folks to file organized lawsuit, it could work, the problem is...we&#39;ll never be able to do it...

[deepthawt]

ok here goes.....
:honey pots; are programs that emulate services on designated port , but once succesfully cracked, offers no real power to the attacker .the honeypot prgram then alerts the says admin to the attack and allows the admin to track the attackers every move.
:proving the riaa role in the screeching files and other types of corrupt files is a stretch . were all basing this on circumstantial evidence . if you know anything about kazaa&#39;s hash system then the exploit is obvious.just try to open a currupted mp3 in word pad youll be quite susprised. I&#39;d suspect that anyone who set the time on the vcr could do it.


so now you say lets sue the riaa under the law that they wrote to protect them selves? great tactic suntzu and miramoto musashi would be proud.
but how? how do you sue for the right to illegaly trade copyrighted material?
you cant even give a dollar to a bum on the street without legaly having to have a receipt to prove the transaction.your talkin about hopin in the ring with ali ,cause you think you can box.your messin with other peoples money .people who have had money before you had a pot to piss in . you think they re gonna roll over and play dead whilst we all reap the benifit of free music and games and software?
thats why there are hackers and crackers and other types of ne&#39;re-do-well&#39;s, to stretech the limits of imagination ,and security.lets face it the fileshare community is riddled with criminals, criminals that know what they are doing and know how to do it .if your scared just forget what were talkin about and go to church .have you noticed the people gettin cuaght by the riaa are 14 year olds?its a digital revolution based on non violence and civil disobedience.
this isnt about a good copy of in da club anymore, for the first time americans of all ages sex&#39;s and race&#39;s will expeirence an opression strong enought to unify us all to fight for the common right,freedom. :ph34r:

[mikelite]

&nbsp; so now you say lets sue the riaa under the law that they wrote to protect them selves? great tactic&nbsp; suntzu and miramoto musashi would be proud.


Well a strong stance is much better than running and hiding.
If we don&#39;t face this sort of thing head-on we are surrendering
our rights and justifying their actions.




but how? how do you sue for the right to illegaly trade copyrighted material?
you cant even give a dollar to a bum on the street without legaly having to have a receipt to prove the transaction.your talkin about hopin in the ring with ali ,cause you think you can box.


And yes the RIAA is a multi-billion dollar industry, granted and yet they
trample over the rights of their consumers in efforts to enforce a
technological back-pedal. However, with billions of computer users worldwide
how are they to stop this thing we call progress. It&#39;s too late and they are realizing this now.
Look at micro&#036;oft they have a much better cause to sue ppl as
ppl pirate their software all around the world, but are they suing everyone?
I don&#39;t think so. They know that public opinion is important.
(and billion dollar industries can really pay out if they lose.... :))




lets face it the fileshare community is riddled with criminals, criminals that know what they are doing and know how to do it .


hmmm, when freedom is outlawed - only outlaws will be free.
I will not conceed that the p2p users are criminals (pedophiles are however).
Prohibition made it illegal to drink, but the law was eventually changed
because it was outdated. (Hey, if you own an ugly horse
i won&#39;t call you a criminal, but others could.)



this isnt about a good copy of in da club anymore, for the first time americans of all ages sex&#39;s and race&#39;s will expeirence an opression strong enought to unify us all to fight for the common right,freedom. :ph34r:


I agree, and it is fundamentally important that technological freedom be fought for.

-mikelite

[deepthawt]

I agree, and it is fundamentally important that technological freedom be fought for.

techno-freedom?
go ask ted&#33;&#33;
http://www.panix.com/~clays/Una/
imho i disagree with the notion of suing, i think we could get more done outside the confines of "normal "law. maybe civil disobedience, or outright revolution , but trying to play the law game against the people who wrote the rules.....

[mikelite]

Just for fun, here are some quick links
right off google about ppl suing them :cowboy:

Negativeland suing the RIAA (http://www.negativland.com/riaa/dowesue.html)

Webcasters suing them... (http://news.com.com/2100-1027_3-5069102.html)

Kazaa suing the RIAA? (http://www.bandddesigns.com/wasted/arch/000465.html)

Web casters again.... sue the riaa. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A31245-2003Jul9?language=printer)

Scientists suing them &#33;&#33;&#33; (http://www.eff.org/Legal/Cases/Felten_v_RIAA/20010606_eff_felten_pr.html)

The RIAA amnesty program suit (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,112428,00.asp)


Now to compensate artists here is a good thought: a paypal tip-jar ...

Tipjar idea (http://www.indiemuse.com/tipjar.html)

Courtney Love&#39;s speech about artists paychecks.. this is interesting
Courtney Loves speech (http://dir.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/index.html)

and finally what the RIAA has to say about dl copyrighted songs:
Music united website (http://www.musicunited.org/index.html)

:nuke:

[Sabec]

Originally posted by furmansk@6 December 2003 - 02:44
hey guys im new on here like posting wise but i wanted to ask a question about this stuff. Ok so if i get a file that is all high pitched noises and all does that mean that the RIAA has gotten my IP and is tracking me? If so ive had some of those files cause my friends come over and d/l stuff with out askin me. But i just wanted to ask. And now the RIAA has made about 41 lawsuits about the p2p stuff i read in the paper which sucks but thats 41 out of 4,000,000 people at least. So its like 41 down alot more to go lol :D .
I love this guy

But really, is RIAA servers the *real* reason for the problem? Are there really 1000&#39;s of servers out there serving every possible song with mostly garbage bits in it?

I&#39;ve read through *a lot* of this thread - it&#39;s freaking long so I didn&#39;t read all of it -but after all that I didn&#39;t see anyone who actually had any conclusions about it.

[EPAPDLEV]

50 cents sucks anyway,man

[EPAPDLEV]

Today, in Holland high court has declared Kazaa legal , lucky me.

[EPAPDLEV]

B.t.w Obie Trice sux 2.

[deepthawt]

well... this is still my united states of WHATEVER&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

[aznxassassian]

To find out which song has the screetching noise before downloading...look at the quality of the song. if it isn&#39;t standard quality (for example 56kbps, 128 kbps, 192 kbps, 256 kbps are the common quality mp3 files) then do not download.

for example, if you download (Fountains of Wayne - Stacy&#39;s Mom) and the quality is 178 kbps, then do not download. instead download another one that has a quality that is 128 kbps.

sorry, i can&#39;t make it any more clear, if any problems, reply back to me. THANKS&#33;

:D

[Rappy]

i just download like 10 of the same song at the same time and listen to all of them until i find one that works ;)

[Rappy]

Originally posted by aznxassassian@22 December 2003 - 04:23
To find out which song has the screetching noise before downloading...look at the quality of the song. if it isn&#39;t standard quality (for example 56kbps, 128 kbps, 192 kbps, 256 kbps are the common quality mp3 files) then do not download.

for example, if you download (Fountains of Wayne - Stacy&#39;s Mom) and the quality is 178 kbps, then do not download. instead download another one that has a quality that is 128 kbps.

sorry, i can&#39;t make it any more clear, if any problems, reply back to me. THANKS&#33;

:D
i have more problems with the standard quality ones then the ones like 185 or whatever

[yoink78]

what are the RIAA? retarded? If people don&#39;t have access to free downloads, it&#39;s definitely not gonna make them go to the store and buy a CD instead. There will always be a way to get free music. If the RIAA had 1 millionth of a quarter of a brain, they would realize that kazaa helps promote artists. If kazaa wasn&#39;t there, a lot of artists would be not listened to or talked about. Most people won&#39;t spend 20 fuckin bucks just to buy one CD. Kazaa makes a lot of people listen to artists that they wouldn&#39;t normally bother. After listening to free music, people will want to buy concert tickets and buy other products like t-shirts from the artist. RIAA, fuck off and get a life. The people that support the RIAA are very ignorant. I know a 2 and a half year old that is way smarter than them. Half the US uses kazaa. There is no point in trying to fuck up kazaa because it is not going to work. I don&#39;t understand, why does the riaa want to screw up music artists careers and lose them money? Why does the RIAA hate music artists so much? if they wanted to support music artists they would support kazaa and all the fame it gives to music artists. They couldn&#39;t stop people from sharing free mp3&#39;s even if they knew how. All the RIAA is, is a bunch of people that hate music and music artists. I am very pissed off at the RIAA. Somebody ought to do something about those fuckers before they ruin the music industry. How about starting the ARIAA. The anti-recording industry of America. Who wants to join? A bunch of us from this forum should be members. How about we start a website or something. They call themselves the recording industry? If they really were the recording industry then they wouldn&#39;t want to bankrupt themselves. All shutting down Kazaa is doing is losing them money. I know tons of people that spend lots of money on things like concert tickets and t-shirts from listening to music on kazaa. Nobody wants to spend 20 bucks on some crappy CD. Fuck the RIAA. You are not the recording industry of America, you are a bunch of stupid weirdos trying to shut down the RIAA. Kazaa is the real RIAA. Kazaa is the only thing decent to humanity these days. They help musicians so much. They are the only thing that is really giving music artists popularity and fame.

[Rappy]

this belongs in the lounge <_<

[Evil Gemini]

Fuck the RIAA. You are not the recording industry of America, you are a bunch of stupid weirdos trying to shut down the RIAA


Allrighty then&#33;&#33;&#33;

[Ariel_001]

Has anyone here ever tryed looking at a Screeching mp3 in a editor. It looks very interesting. I think the noise are very well calculated and are not random at all.
(it does not mean I like it :angry: )

http://server5.uploadit.org/files2/241203-i.JPG

http://server5.uploadit.org/files2/241203-o.JPG

http://server5.uploadit.org/files2/241203-p.JPG

[Sparkle1984]

Originally posted by yoink78@22 December 2003 - 16:30
what are the RIAA? retarded? If people don&#39;t have access to free downloads, it&#39;s definitely not gonna make them go to the store and buy a CD instead. There will always be a way to get free music. If the RIAA had 1 millionth of a quarter of a brain, they would realize that kazaa helps promote artists. If kazaa wasn&#39;t there, a lot of artists would be not listened to or talked about. Most people won&#39;t spend 20 fuckin bucks just to buy one CD. Kazaa makes a lot of people listen to artists that they wouldn&#39;t normally bother. After listening to free music, people will want to buy concert tickets and buy other products like t-shirts from the artist. RIAA, fuck off and get a life. The people that support the RIAA are very ignorant. I know a 2 and a half year old that is way smarter than them. Half the US uses kazaa. There is no point in trying to fuck up kazaa because it is not going to work. I don&#39;t understand, why does the riaa want to screw up music artists careers and lose them money? Why does the RIAA hate music artists so much? if they wanted to support music artists they would support kazaa and all the fame it gives to music artists. They couldn&#39;t stop people from sharing free mp3&#39;s even if they knew how. All the RIAA is, is a bunch of people that hate music and music artists. I am very pissed off at the RIAA. Somebody ought to do something about those fuckers before they ruin the music industry. How about starting the ARIAA. The anti-recording industry of America. Who wants to join? A bunch of us from this forum should be members. How about we start a website or something. They call themselves the recording industry? If they really were the recording industry then they wouldn&#39;t want to bankrupt themselves. All shutting down Kazaa is doing is losing them money. I know tons of people that spend lots of money on things like concert tickets and t-shirts from listening to music on kazaa. Nobody wants to spend 20 bucks on some crappy CD. Fuck the RIAA. You are not the recording industry of America, you are a bunch of stupid weirdos trying to shut down the RIAA. Kazaa is the real RIAA. Kazaa is the only thing decent to humanity these days. They help musicians so much. They are the only thing that is really giving music artists popularity and fame.
Nice one &#33;&#33; :D

We are the only decent people in humanity these days &#33;&#33; :lol:

[bulio]

fuckin&#39; riaa 80% of my notorious big songs are screeching :angry:



what are the RIAA? retarded? If people don&#39;t have access to free downloads, it&#39;s definitely not gonna make them go to the store and buy a CD instead. There will always be a way to get free music. If the RIAA had 1 millionth of a quarter of a brain, they would realize that kazaa helps promote artists. If kazaa wasn&#39;t there, a lot of artists would be not listened to or talked about. Most people won&#39;t spend 20 fuckin bucks just to buy one CD. Kazaa makes a lot of people listen to artists that they wouldn&#39;t normally bother. After listening to free music, people will want to buy concert tickets and buy other products like t-shirts from the artist. RIAA, fuck off and get a life. The people that support the RIAA are very ignorant. I know a 2 and a half year old that is way smarter than them. Half the US uses kazaa. There is no point in trying to fuck up kazaa because it is not going to work. I don&#39;t understand, why does the riaa want to screw up music artists careers and lose them money? Why does the RIAA hate music artists so much? if they wanted to support music artists they would support kazaa and all the fame it gives to music artists. They couldn&#39;t stop people from sharing free mp3&#39;s even if they knew how. All the RIAA is, is a bunch of people that hate music and music artists. I am very pissed off at the RIAA. Somebody ought to do something about those fuckers before they ruin the music industry. How about starting the ARIAA. The anti-recording industry of America. Who wants to join? A bunch of us from this forum should be members. How about we start a website or something. They call themselves the recording industry? If they really were the recording industry then they wouldn&#39;t want to bankrupt themselves. All shutting down Kazaa is doing is losing them money. I know tons of people that spend lots of money on things like concert tickets and t-shirts from listening to music on kazaa. Nobody wants to spend 20 bucks on some crappy CD. Fuck the RIAA. You are not the recording industry of America, you are a bunch of stupid weirdos trying to shut down the RIAA. Kazaa is the real RIAA. Kazaa is the only thing decent to humanity these days. They help musicians so much. They are the only thing that is really giving music artists popularity and fame.


-Omg, so tru, if kazza was shut, i&#39;d never buy a damn cd again :angry: :angry:

get a life, you stupid fuckers :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

[mikelite]

Originally posted by Ariel_001@24 December 2003 - 05:57
Has anyone here ever tryed looking at a Screeching mp3 in a editor. It looks very interesting. I think the noise are very well calculated and are not random at all.
(it does not mean I like it :angry: )

try opening up the mp3&#39;s in wordpad or similar editor
and you will find code that is meant to replace the regular code
(######### abbbcccddddeeee ...... abcd) sort of stuff.
It is designed to mimic the regular hash of the code.

Not a bad design and could easily be picked out... :ghostface: :music1:

[Ariel_001]

Originally posted by mikelite+25 December 2003 - 05:58--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mikelite @ 25 December 2003 - 05:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Ariel_001@24 December 2003 - 05:57
Has anyone here ever tryed looking at a Screeching mp3 in a editor. It looks very interesting. I think the noise are very well calculated and are not random at all.
(it does not mean I like it :angry: )

try opening up the mp3&#39;s in wordpad or similar editor
and you will find code that is meant to replace the regular code
(######### abbbcccddddeeee ...... abcd) sort of stuff.
It is designed to mimic the regular hash of the code.

Not a bad design and could easily be picked out... :ghostface: :music1: [/b][/quote]
Is it really like that. I never knew that. well I have/try to see this. :D

[Suction Testicle Man]

Have you guys tried copying one of these screeching tracks to a CD? I have. And the screeching goes. The part with the screeching is simply cut out and it sounds like the track is jumping. Also, I downloaded a Kins Of Leon track - and noticed it had screeching, but for a split-second in the middle of the track. Whatever it is, I am convinced it is not the RIAA screwing up the tracks. KaZaA is downloading them wrong somehow. Does this happen to people with older versions?

STM

[Ariel_001]

Whatever it is, I am convinced it is not the RIAA screwing up the tracks. KaZaA is downloading them wrong somehow.

I don`t think so. If that were the case then this problem would have show up a long time ago.

[Suction Testicle Man]

Originally posted by Ariel_001@28 December 2003 - 16:19

Whatever it is, I am convinced it is not the RIAA screwing up the tracks. KaZaA is downloading them wrong somehow.

I don`t think so. If that were the case then this problem would have show up a long time ago.
Well maybe not KaZaA then, but if the RIAA are gonna screw up a song - why only add the screeching noise to the song halfway through for 1 second?

And can anyone provide an explanation for why the screeching disappears when put on a CD? :smilie4:

[mikelite]

Originally posted by Suction Testicle Man@28 December 2003 - 23:07


And can anyone provide an explanation for why the screeching disappears when put on a CD? :smilie4:
because....

to burn an mp3 to a cd-rom it needs to be converted to
and audio track. The software that you are using is probably
cutting the bad sections out.

and if it isnt cutting out the bad parts it probably won&#39;t
convert that section to anything but blank noise. :smilie4:

[RanzigeRidder]

Life would be so much easier if people stopped sharing the music files with the screeching noises, I sometimes encounter a file that has been shared by more than 100 users which is crap. This means there are a lot of people downloading these crappy files and never listen to it, or don&#39;t delete them.
Personally I always listen to the tracks I have downloaded and if I encounter any abnormalities in it I immediately trash the file from my shared folder, if everybody could just do this. What is the sense in keeping this shit on your computer anyway it only takes up space&#33;

[urwhack323]

ok one thing is i&#39;ve downloaded the song "fuck it (don&#39;t want u back)" like ten times i&#39;ve tried all the different kinds and i don&#39;t get one good one&#33; and who the hell r the RIAA??&#33;&#33; i hate them even tho i don&#39;t know who they r lol. i still need to know how to get rid of the screeching noises&#33; :angry:

[orcutt989]

Originally posted by john27374@28 November 2003 - 04:18
Is there any effective way to weed out the bad files in kazaa lite? I&#39;ve heard that setting Integrity Rating to "Excellent" can usually solve the problem of screeching mp3s, but is it really that effective?

Couldn&#39;t the kazaa makers solve this whole problem by checking the entire file, rather than just the beginning?
haha you idiot.... :lol:

[Afronaut]

We could try to keep them Idiotic remarks away from here, could we?
It is not really hard, there&#39;s not really a reason for name-callings etc.
I know it sucks to get a bad files but we dont need to be Nasty about it.

Personally, i&#39;ve yet to find a Screetzy mp3. ;)
I have found Albums wrongly Tagged or missing songs,
but its a small price of gettin a cool collection. :)

I think it is a matter of where to look and what apps to use.

Peace:
-GS-

[Jayhawk]

i am with you on the screeching mp3 GS i have never found one myself i have found looped songs before though

[digmen1]

I don&#39;t think the screeching is a major problem.

I&#39;ve only had a couple in 2 years.

But there again I don&#39;t download that many songs.

I never bought any CD&#39;s before, I used to tape LP&#39;s (vynl)

It is far too dear at &#036; 20 for a Cd, I only used to buy the for presents for my old man etc.

There are usally only one or 2 good tracks on a CD.

I bought Led Zeppelin way back on Vynl, then they want me to buya casette, and now a CD or DVD.

I also pay for it evry time I listen to a song on the radio &#33; (they pay royalties you know) and when I watch TV &#33;

So that&#39;s enough - Paul McCartney makes millions a year from his song writing so he wont miss a few bucks from the RIAA.

Yes delete any screechers or half downloaded tracks.

Annd stop ripping at 127 etc. Always use a common format please &#33; no wma &#33;
Fuck Bill Gates also &#33;

DG
NZ

[jarulepainislove]

Has any one compared a normal song to an infected song (same song) via notepad?

It seems there adding extra (�) into the track i&#39;ve deleted these and the song played normal...Just got bored figured i&#39;d try it out...&#33;

[frodisaur]

That is very interesting.
I have had screeching tracks and also tracks that sort of chirped or burbled in a few spots. I think the chirping tracks were badly ripped. Recently though, I&#39;ve had two really odd experiences. The first involved trying to download the bonus disc of the Beatles Anthology DVD. Each chapter would have hundreds of users but I could never get a transfer rate above .05 Kbs. I have DSL and I tried all hours of the day and night. The other odd thing is the Tracks Of Death. These tracks play fine but if you select the file it crashes Explorer. This is more than a little creepy and makes it a pain to delete the file as it can only be selected as part of a group of files (draw a box around them all).
I can come up with my own conspiracy theories about this but if anyone knows anything or has any good guesses about this I&#39;d love to know.

[sharedholder]

Forget &#39;&#39; Strange sound ,Screeching Songs&#39;&#39; , for mp3singles download Blubster and read my guide here (http://sharedandmm.clicdev.com/f/index.php?act=idx)

[Afronaut]

Originally posted by sharedholder@7 January 2004 - 00:08
Forget &#39;&#39; Strange sound ,Screeching Songs&#39;&#39; , for mp3singles download Blubster and read my guide here (http://sharedandmm.clicdev.com/f/index.php?act=idx)
Sure,

But how about Full Albums at High Quality and Well Tagged?

If that sounds appealing, try SoulSeek. (http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=45353)

;)

Cheers:
-GS-

[sharedholder]

:lol: High Quality and Well Tagged files are on Blubster too , and please don&#39;t start again the story about B & S . :lol:


Cheers:
-SH-

[wormless]

y dont they just lock this topic it is pointless keeping it open. how are noobs supposed to read pinned topics when they are left open&#33;

[uNdEaD$$$]

I&#39;ve never had this problem, Ever. I&#39;ve found the songs to be less than perfect but nothing wrong with them.

[Afronaut]

Originally posted by wormless@7 January 2004 - 02:12
y dont they just lock this topic it is pointless keeping it open. how are noobs supposed to read pinned topics when they are left open&#33;
There was a shitload of topics coming to MusicWorld about Screeching mp3&#39;s etc.
Pinned was created so we can Merge all talk about it.
No need to close it, yet.

@ Shareholder,
I didnt start the topics about Blubster, i merely stated my opinion about it.
I dont have Guts enuff to start a topics like "Forget SoulSeek" etc,
the way you have introduced the blubster was not really nice in my opinion,
why drag SoulSeek in to the Topic Title?
You&#39;re gettin some "feedback" from hardcore SS users everytime now on
when you post about blubster and i dont think it was your intension.
Next time when you have a New Program to post about, try not to
do it on other programs expence, it is clearly not working.

Cheers
-GS-

[DRACOJOE2]

Originally posted by RanzigeRidder@29 December 2003 - 17:04
Life would be so much easier if people stopped sharing the music files with the screeching noises, I sometimes encounter a file that has been shared by more than 100 users which is crap. This means there are a lot of people downloading these crappy files and never listen to it, or don&#39;t delete them.
Personally I always listen to the tracks I have downloaded and if I encounter any abnormalities in it I immediately trash the file from my shared folder, if everybody could just do this. What is the sense in keeping this shit on your computer anyway it only takes up space&#33;
OK lets say you want an unreleased song such as one off of the upcoming Incubus cd. Say you search for the song and come up with 100 users. If you download it from multiple sources your getting bits and peices from lots of people. That means if only one person out of the hundred is an riaa server and you get a small part of the song from them it will have the screech in it. So what you do is set kazaa to download from only one or two users and you will prob get a good version. Most of these files are 128 bitrate so go for the 192. I have gotten a few 192 bitrate songs that were messed but vary few compared to the lower ones. Hope this Helps. :beerchug:

[Mad Cat]

Originally posted by DRACOJOE2+10 January 2004 - 14:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DRACOJOE2 @ 10 January 2004 - 14:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-RanzigeRidder@29 December 2003 - 17:04
Life would be so much easier if people stopped sharing the music files with the screeching noises, I sometimes encounter a file that has been shared by more than 100 users which is crap. This means there are a lot of people downloading these crappy files and never listen to it, or don&#39;t delete them.
Personally I always listen to the tracks I have downloaded and if I encounter any abnormalities in it I immediately trash the file from my shared folder, if everybody could just do this. What is the sense in keeping this shit on your computer anyway it only takes up space&#33;
OK lets say you want an unreleased song such as one off of the upcoming Incubus cd. Say you search for the song and come up with 100 users. If you download it from multiple sources your getting bits and peices from lots of people. That means if only one person out of the hundred is an riaa server and you get a small part of the song from them it will have the screech in it. So what you do is set kazaa to download from only one or two users and you will prob get a good version. Most of these files are 128 bitrate so go for the 192. I have gotten a few 192 bitrate songs that were messed but vary few compared to the lower ones. Hope this Helps. :beerchug: [/b][/quote]
Thats wrong, it only does multiple sources of the same file, e.g. using filesizes.

So if... (I&#39;m making these figures up as an example)
So screechy one = 3648 Kb
Normal one = 3886 Kb

If you select to download one that is 3886 Kb, you will not get any of the screechy one mixed in, since its a different file.

[DRACOJOE2]

No your wrong. Mp3s are made up out of packets and at a set bitrate each packet contians the same amount of bits wether it is music screaching or silent so a song with the screeching will be the same size as the good one because the bad packets of bits replace the good ones that are supposed to be there. Anyway what I was saying is dont download the 128 bits per socond sample rate song because thats what most of the bad songs are at. Download the 192 bitrate ones. I didnt say andthing about the actual file size.

[Mad Cat]

Originally posted by DRACOJOE2@10 January 2004 - 14:54
No your wrong. Mp3s are made up out of packets and at a set bitrate each packet contians the same amount of bits wether it is music screaching or silent so a song with the screeching will be the same size as the good one because the bad packets of bits replace the good ones that are supposed to be there. Anyway what I was saying is dont download the 128 bits per socond sample rate song because thats what most of the bad songs are at. Download the 192 bitrate ones. I didnt say andthing about the actual file size.
But the RIAA must make the files in someway, like we rip them. It is very hard to make 2 exactly the same rips of the same CD isn&#39;t it, 2 that could be called identical anyway. So hence it would be very hard for them to do what you said. Wouldn&#39;t it?

[Askjeevesbot]

It seems like its getting harder and harder to find music that doesn&#39;t have screaching sounds or like im getting now no sound at all :( hopefully this nex client will help this problem

[superdude]

Hello there.
I have read the whole topic discussion and i will try to pick up the basic points. After that i will state my opinion, which is probably shared with many of my fellow peers.

-Everyone hates the RIAA because they think that the RIAA is somehow corrupting the audio data on mp3&#39;s (primarily), and the data changes

-The strange noises are DEFINETLY and DOUBTLESSLY NOT random. I believe that the &#39;corrupters&#39; have some sort of program that corrupts songs in a common way, and that adds professionaly mixed loops, made by music pro&#39;s.

-RIAA doesn&#39;t seem to understand that the world of music has changed. If any of those &#39;desk-musicians&#39; at RIAA know what &#39;art&#39; is, they would know that Music is one of the 7 arts. Now: Art was born and it was intended to be FREE, and it was made by man for man to admire. Not for Man to pay for it. Anyone who knows what a real artist is, knows that they do it for the art, not for the money.
(Britney spears, madonna and that kind of interpreters are NOT artists. They are products of marketing and publicity). The world has changed. If anyone has read &#39;Who moved my cheese?&#39; will undestand the importance of change in the world. The record industry has earned millions scince they invended recordings, and now they are ina crisis, if they dont adapt to change, evolve, they will get extinct.

-This is all about money. It is obvious and clear that the so called &#39;RIAA&#39; is in this all for money. I can say that the most POPular songs are corrupted, because they are the money makers. Mostly music that is in the charts, (billboard and stuff like that) is what more people download and that means less millions for them. They dont give a f*ck about the poor, they dont give a f*uck about us, they want our money. If you dont have a high income or you have your mind cleared of ads, you dont buy cd&#39;s. But aslong as there are people that buy their expensive cd&#39;s, they wont care. They have never done.


-I live in Mexico. I believe its the country with the 3rd place in piracy and copyright violations in the world. Now, if you guys pay about &#036;20USD for a CD, I pay WAY more. But, i have never bought a CD, even before P2P networks existed. Its not that i didnt have the money, its about common sense. I see a CD at the store for &#036;300MXP and i see it in the street for &#036;10MXP (thats like a dollar, or less...), its about common sense. We know the quality is the same, and that we are making jobs for MILLIONS of people that live outta this copied cd industry. There are tons of ads on TV that say &#39;Dont buy copied, you make them lose their jobs...&#39; I read on a CD once, &#39;Music piracy takes money from those who have the most, and helps those who have the least. Thanks for your preference&#39;. I dont know you, but i have common sense. Sure i do. BTW, in Mexico you can find almost everything copied and very cheap. Its incredible. They even have better quality than the original at great prices. Of course ur not paying the Ronnaldo, shakira, Bspears, aguilera salarys for those commercials. I dont buy a Pepsi because i saw shakira on it. bought it cuz it tastes good.


This is a world wide problem. and i belive resisting the siege of the RIAA is the best thing we can do for now. If anyone has the crazed *ss idea to sue them, its almost a lost case. There are billions of dollars on that case, and i dont think that you could ever win...

Keep the resistance up. If they created a prog. to corrupt their songs that they promote themselves, we can make something to clean them up.

Its also contradictory how they hate p2p, because every song on any network was once ripped from a store-bought cd. Its not stolen music after all.
(Dont come to me saying that someone didnt pay for the rights. Thats bull, and all the music copied is for personal use. Not for commercial or public transmision, or distribution.)

I want to hear your comments&#33; Thanks.

[BigD_Gtwn]

Are you guys sure that the screechy songs are put out by the RIAA? I remember reading that a Princeton student was sued over this paper: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/ which describes the proccess to easily circumvent the copyright protection on some new CD&#39;s. The CD&#39;s were intended to be uncopyable by most PC&#39;s but the student discovered by holding th shift key while inserting the disc prevented the copyright driver from loading and enabled full copying ability.

So, my question is: are the screechy songs truely on the RIAA&#39;s servers (considering K-lite++ has that IP blocker, although i don&#39;t really know what it does) or are these songs tainted at the consumer level where the ripping takes place?

Where did the info that the songs belong to the RIAA come from in the first place? was it just a rumor that was repeated so many times it became fact?

Take care

Derek


PS Superdude: where the hell do you find high quality copies in mexico? when i go all i find is crap.

[superdude]

I think we all asume that when we say &#39;RIAA&#39; we mean not only the real Recording industry of america Asoc., I think we are talking about all Copyrights asociations. Scince they are the ones afected by p2p networks it is obvious that they are doing it. But It could also be some sort of failure in the network. But thats improbable bcuz it would have been fixed already by the developers. Also, even tho all those ip&#39;s have been banned, only someone with lots of resources would keep the fight up. I dont suppose we are all rich, but we are many many users.


PS. Derek:: You can find them outside every single Metro Station, Bus Stations, outside schools, marketplaces, etc. Where things are not formal, you can find almost everything. This is in mexico city if i didnt mention it... Oh yeah. I buy my cd&#39;s from some guy that sells them outside my highschool. I just bought myself the new Sesto Sento CD, &#39;The Bright Side&#39; It costed me 20 pesos thats like 1.75USD, and its great&#33; It costs over 400 pesos in the stores and it costs like 20Euros to get it from europe.

[Afronaut]

http://www.thekult.net/riaa_banner.gif



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:





:cool2:

[tontonel]

GUYS &#33;

FIRST OF ALL, AS MUCH AS I&#39;VE SEEN RIAA IT&#39;S F***ING UP MAINLY THE NEW SONGS AND SOME OF THE BEST OF OLD SONGS. BUT NOT ONLY.

IT&#39;S SIMPLE TO FIND SONGS WITHOUT ANY SCREECHING IF U FOLLOW SOME SIMPLE RULES.

FIRST OF ALL DOWNLOAD THE SAME SONG AT DIFFERENT BITRATES (THE BEST ONES ARE ABOVE 160KBS) AND DIFFERENT VERSIONS (SIZES,NAMES) OF THE SAME SONG. ONCE U HAVE LET&#39;S SAY 5 VERSIONS OF THE SAME SONG CHECK THEM AND SEE WITH ONE IS THE GOOD ONE. DON&#39;T WAIT A DAY OR A WEEK TO CHECK THEM BECAUSE IN THAT TIME O LOT OF PEOPLE MIGHT DOWNLOAD THE SCREECHY VERSION FROM YOU. IF I HAVE TROUBLE FINDING THE GOOD VERSION OF THAT SONG I GO AND DWNLOAD VERSIONS WITH LESS USERS AND I KEEP ON DOWNLOADING UNTIL I FIND THE GOOD ONE. AND I [B]ALWAYS FIND WORKING VERSIONS OF ANY SONGS THAT IT OUT THERE[B]. ANY SONG. AND I DOWNLOADED I THINK MANY THOUSANDS OF SONGS SINCE KAZAA STARTED &#33;


- PLEEEEASE&#33; CHECK YOUR DOWNLOADS AND ERASE THE BAD ONES.

- PLEEEEASE&#33; CHECK THE MOVIES U R DWLDING WITH AVIPREVIEW AND IF U HAVE DOWNLOADED MOVIES CHECK THEM AND IF THEY ARE FAKES RENAME THEM OR DELETE THEM &#33; PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEAASE &#33; I&#39;M SO SICK OF SO MANY KAZAA USERS WHO KEEP ON SHARING FAKES OR SCREECHY SONGS. IT&#39;S SO SIMPLE TO DETECT FAKE MOVIES EVEN BEFORE U START DOWNLOADING. JUST LOOK AT THE LENGHT ON THE MOVIE, LET&#39;S SAY IT&#39;S 1 HOUR AND 41 MINUTES. GO TO IMBD.COM AND CHECK THE REAL LENGHT OF THE MOVIE. IF IT&#39;S APROX THE SAME ( +OR- 2 OR 3 MINUTES) U FOUND THE REAL COPY OF THAT MOVIE. WHY R U WASTING DAYS AND DAYS DOWNLOADING FAKES WHEN FROM THE BEGINING U CAN SEE THAT THEY ARE FAKES. PLEEEEASE &#33; CHECK YOUR MOVIES &#33;

- PLEEEASE &#33; RIAA IT&#39;S SMALL. LET&#39;S SAY IT HAS 1000 COMPUTERS SHARING SCREECHY SONGS. BUT THERE ARE AT LEAST 3 MILION PEOPLE USING KAZAA EVERY DAY. IF WE KEEP ON DELETING THE SCREECHY SONGS FROM OUR COMPUTER WE WILL DEFEAT RIAA &#33;PLEASE SAVE KAZAA.

+ THIS PART IS FOR THE MOTHER FU**ERS FROM RIAA :
ARE U FU**ING STUPID. DON&#39;T U KNOW THAT THERE ARE MILIONS OF KAZAA USERS OUTSIDE USA ? DON&#39;T U KNOW THAT YOUR FILTHY HANDS CAN&#39;T GO AS FAR AS RUSSIA, ROMANIA, MEXICO, CHILE AND A BUNCH OF OTHER COUNTRIES.
KAZAA WILL LIVE FOREVER AND THERE IS NOTHING U CAN DO ABOUT IT &#33;

FU** YOU RIAA. :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: MSN, AOL, COMCAST SUCKS &#33;&#33;
SBC DSL ROCKS &#33; :D :D :D :D

[derberserker]

I&#39;ve been getting sabotaged files for over a year now.I read several months ago that various artists and their respective labels have been hiring "puter folks to pollute the net with as many as they can.Seems that THEY are getting desperate to try and put a dent in the p2p family of programs.I usually do a search then hover my cursor over the files to read whatever info I can about the file.Alot of times the "screeching" files have a bandwith of "1".Also,sometimes you can read the filename and spot a trend in the search results.Sometimes you just gotta do a little extra work.

[mogadishu]

Originally posted by Guitar&#045;Slinger@21 January 2004 - 01:13
http://www.thekult.net/riaa_banner.gif



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:





:cool2:
riaa is taking lessons from mccarthy.... :helpsmile:

[assamees]

the tutorials are closed why?

[[B][O][T]]

Unpinned this topic, nobody talks about screeching sounds anymore anyway AFAICS. Maybe someone can make a better topic with information about screeching song files, and maybe pin that one instead.

Please contact GS for that :)

BOT

[FuNkY CaPrIcOrN]

Originally posted by [B][O][T]@16 February 2004 - 03:31
Unpinned this topic, nobody talks about screeching sounds anymore anyway AFAICS. Maybe someone can make a better topic with information about screeching song files, and maybe pin that one instead.

Please contact GS for that :)

BOT
:P Did BOT read my Thread and made him think? :P

:lol:

[[B][O][T]]

Originally posted by FuNkY CaPrIcOrN+16 February 2004 - 08:33--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (FuNkY CaPrIcOrN @ 16 February 2004 - 08:33)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-&#091;B
[O][T],16 February 2004 - 03:31] Unpinned this topic, nobody talks about screeching sounds anymore anyway AFAICS. Maybe someone can make a better topic with information about screeching song files, and maybe pin that one instead.

Please contact GS for that :)

BOT
:P Did BOT read my Thread and made him think? :P

:lol: [/b][/quote]
Eummmm <s>no</s> :angry: yes :)

BOT

[netdogg3]

If ya`ll wanna hear one d/load murphy lee "what da hook gon be.when I use kazaa I get the screech.when I use winmx to download no problemo.

[tensegg]

Originally posted by netdogg3@15 March 2004 - 12:49
If ya`ll wanna hear one d/load murphy lee "what da hook gon be.when I use kazaa I get the screech.when I use winmx to download no problemo.
i just had to queue for a year and a half :lol:

MP3 shield, aint had a duff mp3 of any kind since I used it, or a screeching one, download and info HERE (http://www.mp3shield.com/), or you can get it from my k-lite sig below :D

[h121589]

Originally posted by tensegg+10 April 2004 - 01:57--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (tensegg @ 10 April 2004 - 01:57)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-netdogg3@15 March 2004 - 12:49
If ya`ll wanna hear one d/load murphy lee "what da hook gon be.when I use kazaa I get the screech.when I use winmx to download no problemo.
i just had to queue for a year and a half :lol:

MP3 shield, aint had a duff mp3 of any kind since I used it, or a screeching one, download and info HERE (http://www.mp3shield.com/), or you can get it from my k-lite sig below :D [/b][/quote]
thanx 4 the software :D

[tensegg]

thanx 4 the software&nbsp;
your very welcome bro :D

fella by the name of err0rsmith deserves the thanks for MP3shield ;)

congrats on the fifth star :D :lol: :lol: