PDA

View Full Version : Bt++



Yer_maw
12-05-2003, 01:32 AM
hi i just started using bt++ this evening, and it works fine apart from it uses all of my available RAM and all my available virtual memory and the computer runs at a snails pace with only one dload. i have an athalon 1800 and 512mb of ddr ram and a 512k cable connection. surely this cant be the case? or do i just have to live with it, if so, im back to kazaa! does anyone know why this happens or a better client that handles memory better?

cheers.

4play
12-05-2003, 01:35 AM
http://bt.degreez.net/

shadows experminental is a good one.

ultimatejester
12-05-2003, 01:35 AM
What Bt cleint are you using. Old offical bittorrent version was a big memory hogger. Most ppl use Shad0ws Cleint (http://bt.degreez.net/). I have a PIII with 192 sdram and i never had a problem like this.

RealitY
12-05-2003, 01:37 AM
Try Shadow, maybe try adjusting your upload speeds according to you connection.
Also, no, it's not a resource hog, I'm running less than you just fine...

ultimatejester
12-05-2003, 01:38 AM
Originally posted by REALITY@5 December 2003 - 01:37
Try Shadow, maybe try adjusting your upload speeds according to you connection.
Also, no, it's not a resource hog, I'm running less than you just fine...
I am talking about about the Old official Bittorrent 3.2. Shad0ws version is the best one out there.

Yer_maw
12-05-2003, 01:39 AM
hmm, im using the b++ client the cpu usage is 3% but the memory is totally gone. ill try shadow client.

3rd gen noob
12-05-2003, 01:39 AM
azureus :)

Yer_maw
12-05-2003, 01:50 AM
..

RealitY
12-05-2003, 01:57 AM
Originally posted by ultimatejester+4 December 2003 - 17:38--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ultimatejester @ 4 December 2003 - 17:38)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-REALITY@5 December 2003 - 01:37
Try Shadow, maybe try adjusting your upload speeds according to you connection.
Also, no, it&#39;s not a resource hog, I&#39;m running less than you just fine...
I am talking about about the Old official Bittorrent 3.2. Shad0ws version is the best one out there. [/b][/quote]
Was talking to the poster...

muchspl2
12-05-2003, 01:58 AM
bt ++ is the worst client you could ever choose, for 1 it put bad data into the swarm, you think everything is fine but others see
piece failed hash check, re-downloading

its not a problem to the people that use shad0ws client and others with shad0w&#39;s core
we block you from connecting to us, so you never see our data and you don&#39;t send us fubared bit&#39;s of the file


ditch bt++ and tell anyone that still uses it how messed up that client is



http://www.dessent.net/btfaq/

Yer_maw
12-05-2003, 02:00 AM
using shadows now. no problem at all, and all the RAM in the world.

thanks for your help&#33;

GibboNet
12-07-2003, 01:55 AM
I tried bt++ for all of ten minutes, because most of my downloading is done on my &#39;server&#39; box, which has only 32 Mb RAM. It wouldn&#39;t accept torrent files, and was majorly slow.

Shad0w&#39;s client worked great for me but I have problems with dial up anyway.. so i&#39;ve stopped using bit torrent.