PDA

View Full Version : Hey Can I Get Any Faster?



SciManAl
12-14-2003, 03:46 AM
i am using shadow's client..
I have set my router with port forwardingi have agreen light.....
and i only get 1-30 kilobytes per second, on a 2.5 gbs cable hook up... and yes it really does go that fast...


can i go faster if so how??

SciManAl
12-14-2003, 04:38 AM
btw i just tested my internet speed, so it is not bad at all (i took the test while dling a torrent that wouldn't get past 10 kbs)

2003-12-13 22:35:18 EST: 2077 / 214
Your download speed : 2077950 bps, or 2077 kbps.
A 253.6 KB/sec transfer rate.
Your upload speed : 214765 bps, or 214 kbps.
Seems like broadband .. above the 1mbit barrier!

junkyardking
12-14-2003, 05:43 AM
Well you could always download other torrents at the same time, but i wouldnt recommend using shadows as it seems to have high cpu usage, try using the Abc client http://pingpong-abc.sourceforge.net/ it based on shadows but it has alot lower cpu usage i'm downloading about 7 torrents and it's only using 30 -50%,

sam71
12-14-2003, 05:44 AM
You have 2mbit/256k btw not 2.5mbit. And your speed 1-30k/sec is what you start for the first half hour or so sometime it speeds up if more seed or user connect with you. Give it sometime patient is virtue :D

muchspl2
12-14-2003, 05:45 AM
http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=52427

don't cheat, seed afterwards

sam71
12-14-2003, 05:51 AM
Originally posted by junkyardking@14 December 2003 - 05:43
Well you could always download other torrents at the same time, but i wouldnt recommend using shadows as it seems to have high cpu usage, try using the Abc client http://pingpong-abc.sourceforge.net/ it based on shadows but it has alot lower cpu usage i'm downloading about 7 torrents and it's only using 30 -50%, btw shadow is the best while experimental would be the next good choice IMO but crashes too often just like the orginal client v3.30 now with no way to look at others statistic or cap upload.
High cpu usage??? your kidding me, i am downloading 2 torrent and cpu never even exceed 5 percentage. I'm using shadow's latest 5.87 plus cpu usage is dependent on how many users you connect to, more = more cpu load.
Getting 90-100k/sec with about 13 users per torrent = 26 users in all.

SciManAl
12-14-2003, 06:57 AM
settle children no flaming...

i have no CPU usage problems, i am running 19 torrent files right now.. my cpu usage is at 10 percent... all in the settings...

as for the method below, i have tried it.. and it doesn't help that much, as i still have plenty of upstream bandwith left...(that is what the method does...)


http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=52427

don't cheat, seed afterwards



You have 2mbit/256k btw not 2.5mbit. And your speed 1-30k/sec is what you start for the first half hour or so sometime it speeds up if more seed or user connect with you. Give it sometime patient is virtue

first off, i took the test while downloading.. so it should be expected to be a bit slower... as for the gathering of seeds, i am only asking this question because of that very fact, that indeed after many hours of waiting (yes hours and days for some) i still don't hit more than 30kbs, i have never in my entire bittorrent life downloaded anything at over 30 kbs... sad indeed...

SciManAl
12-14-2003, 07:02 AM
hey just an idea i got... does any 1 have a file that usualy has 100+seeders??
i want to see what i can push my speed at.. i tcould be simply bad selected torrents... any files with high poeple rate is cool! perhaps even a sample file from the mysterios invite only forum dl site they started hehehehe... :P just a thought

muchspl2
12-14-2003, 07:12 AM
hold on ill fine one and tell you my speed



http://66.90.75.92/torrents/742/Nero%20Burning%20ROM%206.3.0.0%20by%20MoM%20key.Orion-rar.torrent

muchspl2
12-14-2003, 07:23 AM
done, top about 200 before it compleated, green light, dialup cheat

muchspl2
12-14-2003, 09:50 AM
we need more people trying this and posting thir speeds, + you get a cool app for the new nero

SciManAl
12-14-2003, 01:54 PM
hmm still geting only 3 kbs seriosly disapointed with my comp... hrm... looks like its hammer time agin... *al turns and yells "HEY EARL YOU GOTTA A HAMMER" witch he replies with "SURE IN THE KITCHEN"*

ok that made no sense... but i am going to keep taps on the dl and see how fast it is...

SciManAl
12-14-2003, 01:56 PM
ok sorry for post after post, but i did start runing at 30 kbs solid... as though i had a limit on there somewhere??? mayby ??

this is with the cheat

SciManAl
12-14-2003, 02:04 PM
you know if we run it at he same time we will get better results.... can we schedule a time??

MoneyAddyct
12-14-2003, 04:02 PM
What program do I use to calculate my CPU Usage?

--Nevermind. I wish I'd look for an answer *before* I post a question.

tracydani
12-14-2003, 04:49 PM
Originally posted by SciManAl@14 December 2003 - 08:57

i have no CPU usage problems, i am running 19 torrent files right now..
Maybe if you drop a dozen of those torrents you would have better luck.

I have noticed in the past that the more torrents I have open, the slower it goes. Even if they are not all taking up my full ul speed.

Your upload is only about 26kb and you are dividing that by 19? If you are uploading appropriately, you should see a better dl speed.

TD

muchspl2
12-14-2003, 04:58 PM
yes I tested it with no other torrents open, I believe thats your problem is your trying to get to many at one time

SciManAl
12-14-2003, 05:40 PM
okay, i have ran with only 2 runnning... better, but still a little slow... i got to 50 kbs with the test file... it was okay, but i feel that it could be better but not sure how...

sam71
12-15-2003, 11:14 PM
Try opening 100 bt's all at once, you should see them crawl like a turtle :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
Hell if you're bored and just looking for something to mess with...
It's great to killing time too..

sam71
12-15-2003, 11:14 PM
Try opening 100 bt's all at once, you should see them crawl like a turtle :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Hell if you're bored and just looking for something to mess with...
It's great to killing time too..

SciManAl
12-16-2003, 12:28 AM
actually, i have at a time tried that... but my ram holds it welll, and my 2500 kills the load... very nice...