Yep Definently Illegal.

[ghostsmack]

Well as you can see...
http://www.geocities.com/bdudebizkit/agreement.JPG
...and I ofcourse did not know of this b4 :blink:

:(

[Entity101]

So? Like if they are gonna sue every individual that uses KL. :frusty:

[k-liteuserintheworld]

Originally posted by ghostsmack@4 January 2004 - 06:09
Well as you can see...
http://www.geocities.com/bdudebizkit/agreement.JPG
...and I ofcourse did not know of this b4 :blink:

:(
I thaught everyone knew that, or does nobody read the user agreement :lol: , in most klite software the user agreement clearly states in bold letters that the software is illegal, but do we care

[ninjamonkey]

i know kazaa lite is illegal in the sense that the copyrighted code was taken from sharman, but is clean kmd illegal?
EDIT: i'm not talking about being able to do illegal things ont he programs. i'm talkgina btou the programs themselves.

[Entity101]

The same applies for all other clean versions of Kazaa.

[ZeroTolerance]

kazaa is legal , its the files that people or riaa think that are illegal ;)

[SeK612]

The files being shared that breech copyright laws are illegal (e.g. copied DVD's cracked software etc) - which is what most people use K++ and P2P programs to download. The official Kazaa is not illegal on its own (I believe Sharman have won court cases which prove this). K++ is illegal as it breeches Sharmans rules of use (as it modifies the actual program).