Apology

[nostalgia]

is in order now that I finally have a great working Shadow's. Because of this, I must say that Shadows is in fact faster then the Shareaza built in torrent client.
Although I will use Shareaza as a back up for k-lite, I will from now on use Shadows for torrents.

[ZaZu]

Try ABC (http://pingpong-abc.sourceforge.net/) it contains the Shadows core but is faster :)

[muchspl2]

to me :o

[nostalgia]

Originally posted by muchspl2@18 January 2004 - 02:19
to me :o
Yep. You defended Shadows whilst people were attacking Shadows as Shareaza being better. You attacked whilst people (including me) were defending Shareaza as being best for torrents. That's why.

[muchspl2]

i c
yea shareaza sucks balls, maybe the g2 network will take off otherwise its slower than individual clients