Post Ur Aquamark Results

[atiVidia]

post ur aquamark results :P

ill post mine when i get home

[4th gen]

http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=71631

my results (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1329671476)

[atiVidia]

lol aquamark misreadmy core mhz speed

here (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=476212663)

[bigdawgfoxx]

What is your core speed then?

I cant get Aqua Mark to show my damn scores right on the net...but they are 37,890

[callum]

Here's mine.

results (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=339846645)

[atiVidia]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@24 January 2004 - 15:55
What is your core speed then?

I cant get Aqua Mark to show my damn scores right on the net...but they are 37,890
536/921

[adamp2p]

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1415360567

Here are my scores from last week, when I got them the highest.

[Smurfette]

LOL!!

My demon system appears HERE (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=409126525)... <ahem> not that impressive&#33; :D

[Mad Cat]

Heres mine&#33;

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1281544924

[SciManAl]

my computer died trying this test?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;??&#33;&#33;??&#33;?&#33; isa it not compatible with the 9800xt??????&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;??&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;~?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33; SHIT&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;

LOL hehehe but i imagine it is very high... i can always dream... :rolleyes:

[bigdawgfoxx]

thats not a good sign...could have overheated or it was very unstable....run some burn in test and check it out...

[DarthInsinuate]

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1550075944

[Samurai]

Aqua Mark 3 Score (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1617183127)

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by Samurai@27 January 2004 - 18:15
Aqua Mark 3 Score (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1617183127)
Samurai, 324 / 290 MHz is not the correct default clock for the 9800 Pro.

378/337 is R9800 pro. What do you have? A modded driver? Or the 9800 non pro?

[SciManAl]

thats not a good sign...could have overheated or it was very unstable....run some burn in test and check it out...

don&#39;t know... that was with the 9800xt from ATI... It benchs fine on 3dmark... 03 gets over 10k... but this prog doesn&#39;t seem to run.. and overheating is not a problem... trust me... :D (Card temps are at 6 degrees celsius...)

[Samurai]

Originally posted by adamp2p+28 January 2004 - 01:27--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p &#064; 28 January 2004 - 01:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Samurai@27 January 2004 - 18:15
Aqua Mark 3 Score (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1617183127)
Samurai, 324 / 290 MHz is not the correct default clock for the 9800 Pro.

378/337 is R9800 pro. What do you have? A modded driver? Or the 9800 non pro? [/b][/quote]
Umm I&#39;m just using the drivers that came with my system at the moment.

Does that mean I&#39;m running it slower than it&#39;s capable of? How would I change these settings? Update driver?

My Graphics Card is: ATI RADEON 128MB 9800Pro

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by Samurai+27 January 2004 - 20:53--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Samurai &#064; 27 January 2004 - 20:53)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by adamp2p@28 January 2004 - 01:27
<!--QuoteBegin-Samurai@27 January 2004 - 18:15
Aqua Mark 3 Score (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1617183127)
Samurai, 324 / 290 MHz is not the correct default clock for the 9800 Pro.

378/337 is R9800 pro. What do you have? A modded driver? Or the 9800 non pro?
Umm I&#39;m just using the drivers that came with my system at the moment.

Does that mean I&#39;m running it slower than it&#39;s capable of? How would I change these settings? Update driver?

My Graphics Card is: ATI RADEON 128MB 9800Pro [/b][/quote]
That&#39;s funny, I looked at the ATi website and read up on the 9800 NON PRO, and you have the exact clockspeeds as the 9800 NON PRO.

Read the fine print of the data set provided by the Aquamark3 ARC comparison link and it displays you CORE/MEM clock speeds.

You asked me in a PM to provide more information, and I will:

See this link (http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9800/radeon9800pro/compare.html)

It says that the 9800 NON PRO has the clocks of 325/580. Remember to divide the memory clock by two to the memory clock and remember your card is double data rate (DDR)

580/2 = 290

You should download Rage3d tweak (http://www.majorgeeks.com/download391.html). You can overclock your card very nicely with that tool. If you really have an ATi 9800 Pro it should default to those speeds due to its BIOS. Otherwise someone may have ripped you off and sold you a 9800 NON PRO as a 9800 PRO. If you are sure your card is a 9800 Pro then I would just set it to the default speeds of the pro. To be sure you should open your case and write down the fine print you see on the RAM chips on your card. Type that in for us to evaluate and we will let you know just what your card is capable of.

Okay?

:D

:)

[Dray_04]

my shitty specs only gave me a score of just over 7000,

cant be fu*^ buying it (thats the way you give links to the results ay? you have to &#39;buy&#39; /&#39;download crack&#39;) .

you can just believe me when i say i got a shit result...

...will the 9600xt improve my score heaps or just a lil?

im upgrading the mobo as well

[Smurfette]

Originally posted by dray_02@28 January 2004 - 13:25
my shitty specs only gave me a score of just over 7000,

cant be fu*^ buying it (thats the way you give links to the results ay? you have to &#39;buy&#39; /&#39;download crack&#39;) .

you can just believe me when i say i got a shit result...

...will the 9600xt improve my score heaps or just a lil?

im upgrading the mobo as well
U don&#39;t need to buy the program to post results but buying it does enable the options to customise the tests.

I got 6800-odd so your system is less pitiful than mine mate&#33;

Yeah, the Asus mobo and new gfx card should improve it, I&#39;d have thought.

[_John_Lennon_]

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=878487675

36612

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@28 January 2004 - 14:59
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=878487675

36612
Wow, John...no artifacting there?

[_John_Lennon_]

artifating? Define that.

But I noticed nothing unusual, im running at those setts currently.

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by dray_02@28 January 2004 - 05:25
my shitty specs only gave me a score of just over 7000,

cant be fu*^ buying it (thats the way you give links to the results ay? you have to &#39;buy&#39; /&#39;download crack&#39;) .

you can just believe me when i say i got a shit result...

...will the 9600xt improve my score heaps or just a lil?

im upgrading the mobo as well
NO, all you have to do is register...you do not have to crack anything...to register is free.

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@28 January 2004 - 15:13
artifating? Define that.

But I noticed nothing unusual, im running at those setts currently.
If I were you I would only run those settings when gaming, especially without any extra cooling.

No artifacting..you must have found a sweet spot...

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by adamp2p+28 January 2004 - 18:16--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 28 January 2004 - 18:16)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_@28 January 2004 - 15:13
artifating? Define that.

But I noticed nothing unusual, im running at those setts currently.
If I were you I would only run those settings when gaming, especially without any extra cooling.

No artifacting..you must have found a sweet spot... [/b][/quote]
Yeah, much higher and the back ground colors for things start to wack out on my though, shading goes off when you move things, so thats about the limit on it.

[bigdawgfoxx]

40,344 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1282603883)

[abu_has_the_power]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@22 February 2004 - 22:29
40,344 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1282603883)
not bad man&#33; how does it recog ur cpu as 3200 when u have a 2500? i thought the cpu label is the same, w/e clock u have it in.



mine&#39;s in the link in my sig

[bigdawgfoxx]

Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp. DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks :)

[abu_has_the_power]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@22 February 2004 - 22:44
Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp. DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks :)
did u tweak something to make it recog ur cpu as 3200? cuz i thought ur cpu has a Label that doesn&#39;t change no matter wat speed ur in. like mine. it says p4 2.4c when it&#39;s running at 3.2. :unsure:

[kaiweiler]

Originally posted by abu_has_the_power+23 February 2004 - 00:04--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (abu_has_the_power &#064; 23 February 2004 - 00:04)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx@22 February 2004 - 22:44
Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp.&nbsp; DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks&nbsp; :)
did u tweak something to make it recog ur cpu as 3200? cuz i thought ur cpu has a Label that doesn&#39;t change no matter wat speed ur in. like mine. it says p4 2.4c when it&#39;s running at 3.2. :unsure: [/b][/quote]
nope, I have a 2500 as well and in Aida32 it recognizes it automatically as how fast it is compared to, ie 2800 or 3200
no tweaking, it&#39;s just automatic
maybe it only changes w/ AMD processors not intel?

[abu_has_the_power]

Originally posted by kaiweiler+22 February 2004 - 23:07--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler &#064; 22 February 2004 - 23:07)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@23 February 2004 - 00:04
<!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx@22 February 2004 - 22:44
Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp. DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks :)
did u tweak something to make it recog ur cpu as 3200? cuz i thought ur cpu has a Label that doesn&#39;t change no matter wat speed ur in. like mine. it says p4 2.4c when it&#39;s running at 3.2. :unsure:
nope, I have a 2500 as well and in Aida32 it recognizes it automatically as how fast it is compared to, ie 2800 or 3200
no tweaking, it&#39;s just automatic
maybe it only changes w/ AMD processors not intel? [/b][/quote]
yea. prob. in cpu-z, mine says 2.4c, but it&#39;s running at 3.2. btw, i&#39;m getting another 9600 soon. and i don&#39;t have to spend a penny. i&#39;m doing it not cuz i need it, but i need tv out to work. so i&#39;m just gonna buy a retail package that includes all the adapters and cables. like this one:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc....talog=48&depa=1 (http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=14-240-005&catalog=48&depa=1)

how is it? any suggestions?

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@22 February 2004 - 19:29
40,344 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1282603883)
So, it looks like you finally figured out how to use the aquamark3 ARC. Pretty cool, eh? B)

Wow, 40,000 means 40 average frames per second. You have an excellent system. You should pat yourself on the back for getting it done for so cheap (that&#39;s using your noggin/using the resources available to you).

Keep in mind that Mad Cat&#39;s systemAthlon 64FX51 (which is at least twice as expensive as yours scored only around 46,000 = 46 frames per second). The only factor limiting your score now is your GPU. However, if I were you I would not complain about that...6 frames per second is a marginal increase for the money you spent...

:)

[Dray_04]

yuss i got 21,000 &#33;&#33;&#33;

a big improvement from my previous score of 7,000 something

im happy :):):)

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by dray_02@22 February 2004 - 20:35
yuss i got 21,000 &#33;&#33;&#33;

a big improvement from my previous score of 7,000 something

im happy :):):)
link? BTW, dray_02, did you ever get your sound thing to work?

[Dray_04]

nope not yet... ive tried every obvious thing there is&#33;&#33;&#33;

ive downloaded about 4 different drivers... all of which you guys recommended..

anyhoo my score link

21450 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1416822614)

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by dray_02@22 February 2004 - 20:54
nope not yet... ive tried every obvious thing there is&#33;&#33;&#33;

ive downloaded about 4 different drivers... all of which you guys recommended..

anyhoo my score link

21450 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1416822614)
dray_02: there is something up with your video card, and I haven&#39;t been able to figure it out yet. You say that you have a ATi Radeon 9600 XT, right? Well that&#39;s funny because your Aquamark3 ARC link says you don&#39;t.

It says that your core speed is 500, which is equivalent with the 9600 XT, but the memory speed that is reported by the operating system in your Aquamark3 link is 250 (250X2 = 500). By my calculation (and by ATi&#39;s (http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9600/radeon9600pro/compare.html), you don&#39;t have a 9600 XT (unless the clock is reported incorrectly, which I doubt). Do you have Rage3dtweak installed? If so, naviage to the overclocker tab and tell me what it reads as default.

;)

[ApacNTS]

wow i can only look at the results and dream, i went to test my p.o.s. for kicks and it didnt even recognize the vid card.

[ck-uk]

Originally posted by ApacNTS@23 February 2004 - 06:55
wow i can only look at the results and dream, i went to test my p.o.s. for kicks and it didnt even recognize the vid card.
:P Sorry mate i dont mean to laugh at you.

Get a new card mate even the cheapest ones are pretty decent. :)

[Dray_04]

Originally posted by adamp2p+23 February 2004 - 19:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 23 February 2004 - 19:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-dray_02@22 February 2004 - 20:54
nope not yet... ive tried every obvious thing there is&#33;&#33;&#33;

ive downloaded about 4 different drivers... all of which you guys recommended..

anyhoo my score link

21450 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1416822614)
dray_02: there is something up with your video card, and I haven&#39;t been able to figure it out yet. You say that you have a ATi Radeon 9600 XT, right? Well that&#39;s funny because your Aquamark3 ARC link says you don&#39;t.

It says that your core speed is 500, which is equivalent with the 9600 XT, but the memory speed that is reported by the operating system in your Aquamark3 link is 250 (250X2 = 500). By my calculation (and by ATi&#39;s (http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9600/radeon9600pro/compare.html), you don&#39;t have a 9600 XT (unless the clock is reported incorrectly, which I doubt). Do you have Rage3dtweak installed? If so, naviage to the overclocker tab and tell me what it reads as default.

;) [/b][/quote]
you know what adam, you may be on to something....

i thort the xt was supose to run at 500/500


but according to rage3d tweak v 3.9b the default core and memory clock speeds are 500/250 respectively.....

what is going on????


does that mean i got sold a dud??? it was unopened, packged in a genuwine case, with hl2.... plz tell me tht i didnt get ripped off

[Dray_04]

arggh and accounding to that link you sent me

radeon 9600 series comparison (http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9600/radeon9600pro/compare.html)

my memory clock should be on 600&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; WWTF,... thats pretty darn high....

the most i can overclock the memory core on rage3d tweak (without testing to see if it is stable or not) is 324&#33;&#33;&#33;

:angry:

thats less than the radeon 9600 se

[4th gen]

Originally posted by dray_02@23 February 2004 - 14:46
the most i can overclock the memory core on rage3d tweak (without testing to see if it is stable or not) is 324&#33;&#33;&#33;

:angry:

thats less than the radeon 9600 se
The memory is actually DDR though, so your 324 is actually 648MHz&#33; :D

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by dray_02@23 February 2004 - 07:46
arggh and accounding to that link you sent me

radeon 9600 series comparison (http://www.ati.com/products/radeon9600/radeon9600pro/compare.html)

my memory clock should be on 600&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; WWTF,... thats pretty darn high....

the most i can overclock the memory core on rage3d tweak (without testing to see if it is stable or not) is 324&#33;&#33;&#33;

:angry:

thats less than the radeon 9600 se
What you should to make sure that everything is the way it is supposed to be set the memory clock to 300 MHz in Rage3dtweak. Play an intense game for a few minutes to see if you get any artifacting, if you don&#39;t then you are okay.

Do you still have the box? If you do, take a picture of it, upload it so we can see it.

;)

[bigdawgfoxx]

300Mhz equals 600Mhz since its DDR.

[_John_Lennon_]

Also one more thing dray, and tell me if im reading this wrong,

You have a 2000+, but your processor is listed as 1200Mhz?

Something is off here, arnt the 2000+&#39;s around 1600Mhz or so?

[Dray_04]

ok ill crank it up to 300 and ill play star wars kotor, and tell ya if it makes any difference... ill also try halo

HOLY FUCKEN SHIT&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

i just realised that my processor is running at 1.24ghz&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; OMFG&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; wtf???

its the same processor as i had b4...

i only upgraded the mobo and graphic card... so what the hell is going on here&#33;&#33;&#33;

p.s i dont have a digital camera so i cant take a picture of the box

[Dray_04]

YUSSS&#33;&#33; i got it cranked up to 26, 853

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by dray_02@23 February 2004 - 21:40
YUSSS&#33;&#33; i got it cranked up to 26, 853
Link? :unsure:

[Dray_04]

Benchmarks


1)3d mark01
2)3d mark03
3) Aquamark: GFX:
CPU:
Total


GeForce FX5200
1) 4352
2) 905
3) 777
4392
7149

Radeon 9600XT wid my cpu running at 1.2ghz lol (dw)
1) 7993
2) 3026
3) 1149
2284
9178

Radeon 9600XT with 8x agp mobo
1) 9609
2) 3370
3) 3738
4767
26853

P.s What are the highest recorded scores ever???????

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by dray_02@23 February 2004 - 22:41
Benchmarks


1)3d mark01
2)3d mark03
3) Aquamark: GFX:
CPU:
Total


GeForce FX5200
1) 4352
2) 905
3) 777
4392
7149

Radeon 9600XT wid my cpu running at 1.2ghz lol (dw)
1) 7993
2) 3026
3) 1149
2284
9178

Radeon 9600XT with 8x agp mobo
1) 9609
2) 3370
3) 3738
4767
26853

P.s What are the highest recorded scores ever???????
LINK?

:unsure:

[Dray_04]

dont you believe me?

or do you just wanna see some detailed analysis?

score (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=544460115)

[bigdawgfoxx]

Some guy had one hell of a system and got 68,000. I dont think anyone has reached 70,000 yet

[kaiweiler]

Not sure if this is how you do it but
30,198 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_userhome.php?action=renameMeasurement&measurement=234570&firstMeasurement=0&measurementName=Kai%27s)
This is before my CPU is OC&#39;ed a lot, I am getting new thermal paste this week, then I will OC my CPU higher and my score should improve, but this is what it is at the moment

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by kaiweiler@28 February 2004 - 18:53
Not sure if this is how you do it but
30,198 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_userhome.php?action=renameMeasurement&measurement=234570&firstMeasurement=0&measurementName=Kai%27s)
This is before my CPU is OC&#39;ed a lot, I am getting new thermal paste this week, then I will OC my CPU higher and my score should improve, but this is what it is at the moment
Nope.
You need to make your result public. After that post the URL for that link.

[kaiweiler]

Image Resized
[img]http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/kaiaquamarkscore.JPG' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> ('http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/kaiaquamarkscore.JPG')
Image Resized
[img]http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/aquamarkasdfhoiuasd.JPG' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> ('http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/aquamarkasdfhoiuasd.JPG')
Is this right?

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by kaiweiler@28 February 2004 - 20:21
Image Resized
Image Resized
[img]http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/kaiaquamarkscore.JPG' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> (http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/kaiaquamarkscore.JPG)
Image Resized
Image Resized
[img]http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/aquamarkasdfhoiuasd.JPG' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> (http://www.xnnetworks.net/host/kaiweiler/aquamarkasdfhoiuasd.JPG)
Is this right?
YES, but the second link you need to click "view" and then copy that link.

[peat moss]

Originally posted by SciManAl@25 January 2004 - 05:51
my computer died trying this test?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;??&#33;&#33;??&#33;?&#33; isa it not compatible with the 9800xt??????&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;??&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;~?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33; SHIT&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;?&#33;

LOL hehehe but i imagine it is very high... i can always dream... :rolleyes:
Me too dude &#33; Guess I really did over clock mine :lol:

[kaiweiler]

There we go&#33;
Got it now I think&#33;
30,482 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1819727259)
You people see anything I can improve here? I am gonna OC my CPU more and raise that, but other then that anything I could improve?

[bigdawgfoxx]

My 2500 at 3400 speeds (2310Mhz) gets about 8XXX on the CPU score...so that should help you out some once you overclock more :)

[kaiweiler]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@29 February 2004 - 16:32
My 2500 at 3400 speeds (2310Mhz) gets about 8XXX on the CPU score...so that should help you out some once you overclock more&nbsp; :)
Oh yeah that reminds me, I wanted to ask you, how are you clocked at a 3400+? that&#39;s really impressive&#33;
You are just using regular cooling right? stock heatsink as well?
what is your multiplier and FSB at?
That&#39;s really tight, a 3400+......

[bigdawgfoxx]

Yeah, stock HS/F.

2 intake, 2 exhuast.

I have an 80mm fan on my cpu, but it really didnt seem to make any diff in temps...

My multiplier is at 11 and my FSB is at 210Mhz. Which equals 2310. :D

I averaged it out and between each CPU, the average gain in Mhz is 93Mhz between each one on average. I am 110Mhz above a 3200, so it is a little over a 3400, theoriticly I guess lol :)

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@29 February 2004 - 15:43
Yeah, stock HS/F.

2 intake, 2 exhuast.

I have an 80mm fan on my cpu, but it really didnt seem to make any diff in temps...

My multiplier is at 11 and my FSB is at 210Mhz. Which equals 2310. :D

I averaged it out and between each CPU, the average gain in Mhz is 93Mhz between each one on average. I am 110Mhz above a 3200, so it is a little over a 3400, theoriticly I guess lol :)
If they keep the barton core for the 3400+&#39;s, your probably about right on that equation. Although AMD will never acknowledge how they do their rating system.

[adamp2p]

I do not think that AMD is going to do too much more with the barton core. If you have been keeping up, you would have known that what AMD plans to do is take the Athlon 64 core and disable the 64 bits part and sell it as Athlon XP.

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

Score here bitches (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=7804746)
not the greatest, but i only have a radeon 9500 pro

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

Another score here (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1215524129)
this is the same vid card on my old system (p4 1.4ghz 384 RDRAM)

[4th gen]

Originally posted by Mïcrösöül°V³@1 March 2004 - 07:38
Score here bitches (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=7804746)
not the greatest, but i only have a radeon 9500 pro
I don&#39;t think your score is right. My comp beats yours pretty badly, here (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1329671476). I have a considerable overclock on the graphics card, but the gap between our scores is too high, especially considering your CPU.

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

im new to aquamark, so i dont know what to make of the score really 4th gen.. should i be looking for something to be wrong somewhere?

[DarthInsinuate]

i agree with 4th gen, there&#39;s something wrong with your score - do you happen to have Anti-aliasing and Antisotropic filtering turned on from the ATI control panel?

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@1 March 2004 - 09:17
i agree with 4th gen, there&#39;s something wrong with your score - do you happen to have Anti-aliasing and Antisotropic filtering turned on from the ATI control panel?
That might be the issue. One thing that I noticed about MicrosoulV3&#39;s system (3.3 GHz) is the fact that he does not have the right AGP arpeture set.

You should go into BIOS and increase the AGP arperature to 128 MB.

[_John_Lennon_]

I seem to remember getting around 29k with my 9500 Pro, but that was indeed stock like micros. Quite happy with my 37k now.

[Dray_04]

well im happy with my 28, 000

:)

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

Originally posted by adamp2p+1 March 2004 - 16:25--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p &#064; 1 March 2004 - 16:25)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-DarthInsinuate@1 March 2004 - 09:17
i agree with 4th gen, there&#39;s something wrong with your score - do you happen to have Anti-aliasing and Antisotropic filtering turned on from the ATI control panel?
That might be the issue. One thing that I noticed about MicrosoulV3&#39;s system (3.3 GHz) is the fact that he does not have the right AGP arpeture set.

You should go into BIOS and increase the AGP arperature to 128 MB. [/b][/quote]
so should i bump that up then? i heard that is always sposed to be set at 64 (but what the hell do i know) :D just tell me what i should do, and ill try it :)

[tesco]

lol i just tried out that aquamark program and after trying to figure out what you click to start a test i finally figured it out (well only took like 2 minutes but whatever) and i had like 21fps at teh start :) then went down to like 5 lol. ended up with like 4,500 i think at the end but i was so mad i just exited so fast and uninstalled it.

now im downloading 3dmark 2001, 2003 i only got 156. because of the vid card i couldnt do the second two tests. gotta get a new card, and mobo, and ram, and cpu, and case, and hard drive :blink: to many things to buy, so little money to spend :(

[kaiweiler]

Originally posted by adamp2p@1 March 2004 - 18:25
That might be the issue. One thing that I noticed about MicrosoulV3&#39;s system (3.3 GHz) is the fact that he does not have the right AGP arpeture set.

You should go into BIOS and increase the AGP arperature to 128 MB.
Hmm my AGP aperature is only set at 64 too I believe, it would improve my score if i bump it up to 128??

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

i tried bumping it up to 128, and my score got considerably worse (21000)

[kaiweiler]

Originally posted by Mïcrösöül°V³@1 March 2004 - 23:55
i tried bumping it up to 128, and my score got considerably worse (21000)
odd, so you think it&#39;s best to be left where it is?

[tesco]

Originally posted by kaiweiler+1 March 2004 - 23:18--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 1 March 2004 - 23:18)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mïcrösöül°V³@1 March 2004 - 23:55
i tried bumping it up to 128, and my score got considerably worse (21000)
odd, so you think it&#39;s best to be left where it is? [/b][/quote]
try both and see which is better for you.

i tried out 3dmark 2001se and i got 5848 :lol: gotta get a new computer badly&#33;

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by Mïcrösöül°V³@1 March 2004 - 19:55
i tried bumping it up to 128, and my score got considerably worse (21000)
MicrosoulV3:

First let me tell you that I really like your website (the music that plays is great).

Then let me tell you that you should really run at least three benchmarks and either take the average of those three scores or report the highest.

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

Originally posted by adamp2p+1 March 2004 - 23:21--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 1 March 2004 - 23:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mïcrösöül°V³@1 March 2004 - 19:55
i tried bumping it up to 128, and my score got considerably worse (21000)
MicrosoulV3:

First let me tell you that I really like your website (the music that plays is great).

Then let me tell you that you should really run at least three benchmarks and either take the average of those three scores or report the highest. [/b][/quote]
well thank you adam. :D and i found that if i leave the agp aperature size to 64, that seems to works the best for me.

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

are my core speeds right? they are lower than others with the same vid card.

score here (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=7804746)

[_John_Lennon_]

Those settings seem stock from what I remember of my card.

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

well, it seems that i cant get above 27,000. i tried to OC my card, but the Radeon VPU recovery comes up and resets my card. i guess its locked.

[bigdawgfoxx]

haha holy shit that music is fucking halarious ...theres a yodel in there but to high for me haha

[tesco]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@2 March 2004 - 22:53
haha holy shit that music is fucking halarious ...theres a yodel in there but to high for me haha
:lol: what u talking about?

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by Mïcrösöül°V³@2 March 2004 - 19:48
well, it seems that i cant get above 27,000. i tried to OC my card, but the Radeon VPU recovery comes up and resets my card. i guess its locked.
If you install the Omega driver set you can overclock with ease&#33;

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

Originally posted by adamp2p+2 March 2004 - 22:46--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 2 March 2004 - 22:46)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mïcrösöül°V³@2 March 2004 - 19:48
well, it seems that i cant get above 27,000. i tried to OC my card, but the Radeon VPU recovery comes up and resets my card. i guess its locked.
If you install the Omega driver set you can overclock with ease&#33; [/b][/quote]
explain further please :)

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by Mïcrösöül°V³+2 March 2004 - 21:26--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mïcrösöül°V³ @ 2 March 2004 - 21:26)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by adamp2p@2 March 2004 - 22:46
<!--QuoteBegin-Mïcrösöül°V³@2 March 2004 - 19:48
well, it seems that i cant get above 27,000. i tried to OC my card, but the Radeon VPU recovery comes up and resets my card. i guess its locked.
If you install the Omega driver set you can overclock with ease&#33;
explain further please :) [/b][/quote]
Okay.



(11/09/03)

The Omega Drivers have been recognized by ATI as the best moddeed drivers in the internet&#33;&#33;&#33;

Here is a quote from Terry Makedon when he was interviewed by a German Magazine:

"ATI supports the enthusiast community wholly. Omega Drivers are in fact a good example of ATI’s user community at its best. What they are in principle are CATALYST drivers with different settings enabled via registry keys and other such methods. This provides users an alternative to ATI’s CATALYST default settings. While there are a few different modification drivers out in the community our relationship with the creator of the Omega Drivers is of the highest working standard. The author of these drivers is part of the CATALYST beta driver testing team, and also in direct contact with ATI. In fact we would go so far as to say that if a user chooses to go the mod driver route, they go with the Omega Drivers."

Many thanks to ATI and their support team for this honor&#33;


Download them here (http://www.omegacorner.com/index_ati.html)

BUT READ THE READ ME FISRT&#33;

[atiVidia]

the omega drivers are much better than the AIT defaults.