Nforce2 Chipsets

[Keikan]

I heard that Nforce2 Chipsets are not capable with Ati vid cards is this true?

[clocker]

No.
I have a Asus board with that chipset and a Radeon card and they work just fine.

[chris2775]

Like me, no problem with nforce2 and ati radeon. :huh:
I've a Abit mother board (nf7-s) and a radeon 9600xt 128Mo, and everything work very well under WinMe... :01:

[Virtualbody1234]

The Nforce2 Chipset is a good choice.

[Livy]

i too have the nforce2 chipset, biostar m7ncd and an highteck ati radeon 9200se and no probs here under winxp

[Keikan]

so whats so good about this chipset...?

[DWk]

I've heard it's better than the Via KT400..... but my board has never give any problems, so I stand by Via (since I haven't used nForce2)

[SciManAl]

I haven't in all my years seen a huge noticable difference between the two, they are pretty close neck and neck, i wouldn't worrie about wich one you buy, although the Nforce2 chipset is very popular...

[DarthInsinuate]

reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular

[DWk]

Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 11:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
Well I don't have ddr400....could that be why? :rolleyes:

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400.

[bigdawgfoxx]

I would definently get nForce 2. Works great with my Radeon 9700Pro.

[DWk]

Originally posted by _John_Lennon_+31 January 2004 - 11:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (_John_Lennon_ @ 31 January 2004 - 11:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they&#39;re highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they&#39;re popular
I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400. [/b][/quote]
John, check em out if you have time :D I don&#39;t :(

http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20020814/index.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20030417/index.html

http://www20.tomshardware.com/motherboard/...1boards-01.html (http://www20.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20030523/nforce2_11boards-01.html)

http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20021007/index.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20030701..._tuning-02.html (http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20030701/memory_tuning-02.html)

The last one has some info....didn&#39;t bother to look at it...

Bye :D

[B_U_B_B_A]

the only problem is that the agb bus has to be set to 66mhz in the bios when u r overclocking but as long as u do that then u have no problems