Whats Wrong With Bumping Old Posts?

[kAb]

No animals are harmed during the bumping... :huh:

[j2k4]

Originally posted by kAb@18 February 2004 - 01:38
No animals are harmed during the bumping... :huh:
What would you need an animal for, kAb?

[kAb]

Originally posted by j2k4+17 February 2004 - 22:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 &#064; 17 February 2004 - 22:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-kAb@18 February 2004 - 01:38
No animals are harmed during the bumping... :huh:
What would you need an animal for, kAb? [/b][/quote]
Lets see.

*bump*

...

*squeal*
*cockledoodledoo*
*giraffe*


Huh, well even so, I don&#39;t believe any were harmed :unsure:

[Mathea]

I think it depends on the post. Bumping a "merry christmas" post is just stupid... seeing as to how it&#39;s february. He was just doing it to be a jackass.

[toco004]

Originally posted by Mathea@18 February 2004 - 05:47
I think it depends on the post. Bumping a "merry christmas" post is just stupid... seeing as to how it&#39;s february. He was just doing it to be a jackass.
no cause its funny.AHAHAHAHAA......NO&#33;
ok was&#39;nt but for a while <_<

[Keikan]

Someones been drinking too much coffee

[toco004]

i know i got to stop :sadwalk:

[AussieSheila]

Originally posted by toco004@18 February 2004 - 15:54
no cause its funny.AHAHAHAHAA......NO&#33;
ok was&#39;nt but for a wile <_<
:smilie4: :blink: Shouldn&#39;t there be an "h" in while?

:P

[toco004]

o yeh <_< thank you :D

[Spindulik]

Originally posted by Mathea@18 February 2004 - 01:47
...He was just doing it to be a jackass.
Wait a minute. You mean to tell us that you can read minds across the internet? Did you really talk to him? How do you know he was "being a jackass"? Granted, he appears to be a jackass by doing jackass things, but maybe he was actually acting like an asshole instead. I think it falls sort of in that catagory.

Maybe he is just wacked out, no jackassing involved. Beyond retard.

[Mathea]

Originally posted by Spindulik@18 February 2004 - 06:26
maybe he was actually acting like an asshole instead.
my bad. could be that instead

[Knuckles187]

Originally posted by Mathea@18 February 2004 - 05:47
I think it depends on the post. Bumping a "merry christmas" post is just stupid... seeing as to how it&#39;s february. He was just doing it to be a jackass.
look at yall boring bastards&#33;



it was funny... it put a smile on my face anyway&#33;


MERRY CHRISTMAS sour faced beyatches :P

[Ella]

So as Sam has been put on moderation, I would like it pointed out to me where bumping old threads is against board rules. As much as it may be annoying and so forth, I don&#39;t believe he has actually contravened any rules per se.

[atiVidia]

bump

sam&#39;s on moderation??? holy shit whadi miss???

[Knuckles187]

Originally posted by Ella@18 February 2004 - 11:25
So as Sam has been put on moderation, I would like it pointed out to me where bumping old threads is against board rules. As much as it may be annoying and so forth, I don&#39;t believe he has actually contravened any rules per se.
agreed &#33; :P


unless it was in subsection 6 under paragraph 4 next to duck related sexual acts.

[atiVidia]

sams on moderation for bumping? thats not against the rules&#33;

mods, we need ya here&#33;

[Mr. Mulder]

*bump*

There&#39;s no harm in bumping, certainly not punishable by moderation :01:

[[B][O][T]]

Originally posted by Ella@18 February 2004 - 11:25
So as Sam has been put on moderation, I would like it pointed out to me where bumping old threads is against board rules. As much as it may be annoying and so forth, I don&#39;t believe he has actually contravened any rules per se.
Bumping and digging up threads from 2002 and reply to them with "Ok" "lol" is pure spam, why not leave those threads alone? It could be fun and intresting for some people I guess?

BOT

[AussieSheila]

:D I thought it was funny. :ph34r:

[Spider_dude]

i was sleeping but i guess it could have been funny.

[Yogi]

Bump :lol:

[bujub22]

Originally posted by SexualFartening@18 February 2004 - 08:34
Bump :lol:
yah bump

[Knuckles187]

Originally posted by bujub22+18 February 2004 - 13:49--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bujub22 @ 18 February 2004 - 13:49)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SexualFartening@18 February 2004 - 08:34
Bump :lol:
yah bump [/b][/quote]
did i mention BUMP

[bujub22]

Originally posted by Knuckles187+18 February 2004 - 10:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Knuckles187 @ 18 February 2004 - 10:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by bujub22@18 February 2004 - 13:49
<!--QuoteBegin-SexualFartening@18 February 2004 - 08:34
Bump :lol:
yah bump
did i mention BUMP [/b][/quote]
i did bump

[NikkiD]

Bumping an old post that has some sort of value or interest is fine, but bumping 50 posts, simply to annoy the mods who were on at the time (and come on, you can&#39;t tell me there was any other reason than that), is childish and it IS spam. And regardless of what anyone may think, this area of the forum still falls under forum rules. They may not be as heavily enforced, but crap like what happened last night will always be dealt with.

I find it really amusing, that everyone complains about the atmosphere around here "sucking" lately, and yet some of those same people complaining are the ones who are content to (excuse my language) fuck the place up.

[RPerry]

/me Agrees with Nikki B)



and btw...... " bump " :P

[DanB]

Originally posted by Spider_dude@18 February 2004 - 13:28
i was sleeping but i guess it could have been funny.
Are you me? :blink: :blink:

[Nightwolf]

I for one find it annoying when someone bumps a thread just by typing the word &#39;bump&#39;. If you want your topic to get back to the top of the list, use your brain and make an effort to say something interesting or relevant to the thread. Otherwise, as NikkiD said, it&#39;s just SPAM&#33;

[kAb]

Super Secret Bump

[Adster]

I already mentioned this once

tell me where in the rules that it says it is prohibited to bump dead threads??

OK let me bump all my god music threads then mods put me on moderation for it go ahead

it&#39;s childish to do it yes but if the Admin in mods don&#39;t have a sense of humor then this place is certainly f*cked up it&#39;s ass if it hasn&#39;t already

the days where you used to birth about myself and FC as the spamemrs are long gone now you get the real deal Mods bwhahahahahahaahh :P

[Adster]

Originally posted by [O][T]+18 February 2004 - 21:54--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE ([O][T] @ 18 February 2004 - 21:54)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Ella@18 February 2004 - 11:25
So as Sam has been put on moderation, I would like it pointed out to me where bumping old threads is against board rules. As much as it may be annoying and so forth, I don&#39;t believe he has actually contravened any rules per se.
Bumping and digging up threads from 2002 and reply to them with "Ok" "lol" is pure spam, why not leave those threads alone? It could be fun and intresting for some people I guess?

BOT [/quote]
so if I bump a old what music are you listening too with a

OK ill listened to that now "

that is spam??

some people have to look up the meaning of the word spam

[4th gen]

If the mods are gonna put people on moderation for bumping &#39;dead&#39; threads, at least change the rules. Just because people bump old threads (however irritating it may be) doesn&#39;t allow mods to move the goalposts.

[internet.news]

Originally posted by SexualFartening@18 February 2004 - 11:34
Bump :lol:
Stop *bumping* this thread

[blitz]

Originally posted by samsamsamsam+19 February 2004 - 05:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (samsamsamsam @ 19 February 2004 - 05:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SexualFartening@18 February 2004 - 11:34
Bump :lol:
Stop *bumping* this thread [/b][/quote]
:P you just "bumped" it yourself.

[Adster]

:P OK let me bump every single mods first ever post with a constructive reply then lets see what happens :P

[blitz]

HAHA, you&#39;d probably get banned....

[kAb]

btw, who cares if 100 old posts are bumped, its the SPAM lounge. spam is acceptable anyways. and its not spam.

[blitz]

Originally posted by kAb@19 February 2004 - 05:38
btw, who cares if 100 old posts are bumped, its the SPAM lounge. spam is acceptable anyways. and its not spam.
:blink: wait wait, how is it not spam? this is spam, isn&#39;t it?

[internet.news]

Originally posted by blitz81388+19 February 2004 - 04:32--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (blitz81388 @ 19 February 2004 - 04:32)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by samsamsamsam@19 February 2004 - 05:31
<!--QuoteBegin-SexualFartening@18 February 2004 - 11:34
Bump :lol:
Stop *bumping* this thread
:P you just "bumped" it yourself. [/b][/quote]
and then you bumped it :o

[blitz]

yah, well you bumped it again :P

[internet.news]

Originally posted by blitz81388@19 February 2004 - 04:57
yah, well you bumped it again :P
Did I?? :o

Hope I don&#39;t do it again :huh:

[blitz]

I&#39;m sure you won&#39;t next time.

[internet.news]

Originally posted by blitz81388@19 February 2004 - 04:59
I&#39;m sure you won&#39;t next time.
I&#39;ll try ;)

[blitz]

Originally posted by samsamsamsam+19 February 2004 - 06:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (samsamsamsam @ 19 February 2004 - 06:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-blitz81388@19 February 2004 - 04:59
I&#39;m sure you won&#39;t next time.
I&#39;ll try ;) [/b][/quote]
:D

[[B][O][T]]

Originally posted by Adster+19 February 2004 - 05:18--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Adster &#064; 19 February 2004 - 05:18)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by BOT@18 February 2004 - 21:54
<!--QuoteBegin-Ella@18 February 2004 - 11:25
So as Sam has been put on moderation, I would like it pointed out to me where bumping old threads is against board rules. As much as it may be annoying and so forth, I don&#39;t believe he has actually contravened any rules per se.
Bumping and digging up threads from 2002 and reply to them with "Ok" "lol" is pure spam, why not leave those threads alone? It could be fun and intresting for some people I guess?

BOT
so if I bump a old what music are you listening too with a

OK ill listened to that now "

that is spam??

some people have to look up the meaning of the word spam[/b][/quote]
When I said old threads from 2002 I ment old threads.
Let the old topic&#39;s be a part of the forum history. (Meaning do not reply to them)
I guess We will have to add a rule about this sooner or later.

BOT

[MCHeshPants420]

No animals are harmed during the bumping... :huh:

Just don't okay.

[NRGFreak]

Nothing! Just like bumping this one.

BUMP!

[BumperCar]

So, nobody really answered the question, what is wrong with bumping old posts?