PDA

View Full Version : Why Close The Thread About Billy Dean?



hobbes
03-26-2004, 05:05 AM
Just seems to be another example of censorship. This is a forum for fun, but the people we effect are real.

Jetje,

Permanent banning is for people who are intent on spamming the board (to promote another site) or whose primary objective is to anger members, promote kiddie porn, or attack the board itself (hacking).

Billy on the otherhand, did not come here to do any of those things and his trouble boils down to a non-constructive manner of conveying his thoughts when irritated. I have personally been very close to blowing my top from time to time and often the PM's Mods receive are far different from the original text ( ).

The result has been a rather spectacular relationship with most mods, who when treated politely, often start going out of their way to be helpful.

I have just learned to adapt to my own temperment and cool down a bit. I try to remember that overall I am here to have fun, but when people censor me or interfer with my fun by intrusive moderating, I object to the principle (not the actaul loss of a post) and get quite angry.

I think with Billy, he got off to a rough start with some Mods and it spiraled over time, to a point where he was hounded and harassed.

Before I derail myself in a coffee induced ramble, I want to state clearly that Billy is different from other BANNED members in that he does not visit to bring harm to the board, he wants to have fun just like the rest of us.

As it has turned out, his temper and the tempers of the mods reached a point where a time out was needed.

I think it is time to see who the "MEN" are around here? Who can erase past grudges and move forward.

I don't think Billy wants to return here a muted version of his former self nor to kiss up to any Mod, and he shouldn't, but perhaps he will change the manner of his posting to help keep this board fun and exciting.


Since I consider myself a part of this board and I am for having him back, as are the others on this thread, perhaps a poll is needed to see who really doesn't want him back. If the board members don't want him here, then the ban is a good idea. If the do want him here, how can you be looking out for the best interest of the board by banning him?

h1
03-26-2004, 05:21 AM
Watch out hobbes, you'll get censored too...

hobbes
03-26-2004, 05:22 AM
Originally posted by haxor41789@26 March 2004 - 06:21
Watch out hobbes, you'll get censored too...
And who will lose? Me or the board?

Busyman
03-26-2004, 06:33 AM
I never wanted him banned. I've had little spats with him myself but I have thick skin and am time enough for ole Billy. I just tell him to STFU!!!

Unfortunately, not everyone is like me and ole Billy brought it on himself.
When asked to tone down, he heated up like saying fuck you.

Mods: Billy chill out man

Billy: Yeah I killed them and I hope they burn in hell!!! :lol: :lol:

kAb
03-26-2004, 06:53 AM
Yeah it seems to be quite an administration failure by banning billy dean. They know they made a bad decision, so they try to cover up how pissed the community is.

thewizeard
03-26-2004, 08:09 AM
Hobbes, I don't think there should ever be polls concerning individual members, though I would like to see Billy-Dean reinstated. Not that I agreed with all Rikk's views, on the contrary.

It's spring here in Europe and autumn in Australia, so come on 7thE, please consider removing that ban...

cowswithguns
03-26-2004, 09:06 AM
It doesn't really matter whether you liked Billy or he annoyed the crap out of you, you have to admit he made things lively in here.

Why is is that the powers that be on this forum only seem to remember the anger? Do they forget that he also made some intelligent, thought provoking posts, and helped more than a few members in other worlds.

As far as closing threads on this subject, I agree with hobbes, it's just censorship.

I've seen him in action away from this forum and he is funny, helpful and friendly.

I am proud to have him as a friend and think this board is sadly lacking without him.

Busyman
03-26-2004, 09:13 AM
Well I think he was a dick and when he was told to stop being a dick for an instant he was compelled to redicktify his dickessness.

I'm not for him being banned but....I'm not for him being reinstated either.

He shot himself in the foot....on purpose!!!

bowrabob
03-26-2004, 10:39 AM
Originally posted by Busyman@26 March 2004 - 09:13
I'm not for him being banned but....I'm not for him being reinstated either.

Yes, l seem to remember him putting you in your place a few times, go read back in the "news". :lol:

Busyman
03-26-2004, 11:07 AM
Originally posted by bowrabob+26 March 2004 - 06:39--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bowrabob @ 26 March 2004 - 06:39)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@26 March 2004 - 09:13
I&#39;m not for him being banned but....I&#39;m not for him being reinstated either.

Yes, l seem to remember him putting you in your place a few times, go read back in the "news". :lol: [/b][/quote]
Hmmm post a link. ;)

AussieSheila
03-26-2004, 12:15 PM
Why close the thread about Billy Dean? Well, there&#39;s a simple question that I&#39;ve been meaning to get on all day to ask. ;)

Was it because of flaming? trolling? racism? homophobia? posting obscene pictures of naked women inserting oversized dildo&#39;s inside themselves? was it because I said damn? does hobbes smell?

Just some answers please.

:)

Persistant bastards aren&#39;t we?

:lol:

jetje
03-26-2004, 12:23 PM
Just to let you know, i didn&#39;t close that thread ;) Your question in my direction is not right in that case. But i will ask if you read back all my previous answers in that other topic again&#33; If you read you see all the answers in there. Thing is that most people that doesn&#39;t seem to get over it, and keep posting in here are regulars from Billys forum, some people i like and respect a lot. And it&#39;s their freedom to do so but again we ain&#39;t gonna change our point of view. Again we made the decission for banning after big debates, with the best interest of the board. And as you probably do understand, we can&#39;t please everyone. Therefor an on going debate about this is useless and probably the rason it was closed. If you don&#39;t agree just pm an admin about it.

Btw me personal didn&#39;t like the way you started your repost of the closed one,

Originally posted by Hobbes
Just seems to be another example of censorship. This is a forum for fun, but the people we effect are real.
You seem to forget that we mods are just members as you all are, if this forum is for fun why exclude us mods? We are people too, why should we be excluded from what you think is the right for the forum??? Ever thought of that.

oh and the censorship thing, really, if there is a forum on the web that is liberal, it&#39;s this one... and i&#39;m sure that deep in your heart if your honest ... you know that too.... ;)

:)

JONNO_CELEBS
03-26-2004, 12:27 PM
I hav&#39;nt been reading all this about Rikk&#39;s ban so this might have already been answered but would&#39;nt it close the case if one of the staff would just say he&#39; either being let back in on a certain date or he&#39;s banned for life?

So the simple question is

Will Rikk be allowed back in?

And a one word answer will finish the discussion :)

Jonno B)

AussieSheila
03-26-2004, 12:35 PM
:) They did answer that question Jonno. They said no. Despite what 7th said about a months ban.

Thank you Jetje for at least attempting to answer questions, they weren&#39;t good answers but you tried at least. ;)

:helpsmile:

jetje
03-26-2004, 12:36 PM
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@26 March 2004 - 14:27
I hav&#39;nt been reading all this about Rikk&#39;s ban so this might have already been answered but would&#39;nt it close the case if one of the staff would just say he&#39; either being let back in on a certain date or he&#39;s banned for life?

So the simple question is

Will Rikk be allowed back in?

And a one word answer will finish the discussion :)

Jonno B)
Well if that still isn&#39;t clear...

no ;)

As Billy has his own forum, i even doubt he&#39;s willing to get back in here anyways.

:)

DanB
03-26-2004, 12:40 PM
I&#39;m pretty sure it was said in yesterday&#39;s thread that it was permanent <_<

jetje
03-26-2004, 12:41 PM
Originally posted by AussieSheila@26 March 2004 - 14:35
:) They did answer that question Jonno. They said no. Despite what 7th said about a months ban.

Thank you Jetje for at least attempting to answer questions, they weren&#39;t good answers but you tried at least. ;)

:helpsmile:
Sheila, the answers were good, they just weren&#39;t what you would like too hear i presume ;)

but thanks for taking time to post that Sheila, yes we do take everything serious. Believe me if i say there was never a debate or effort and time we mods spent as on the case of Billy Dean. The outcome isn&#39;t satifying for all, and therefor we get the blaims, i understand that. But that&#39;s part of being a mod i guess. Part of making and enforcing some decissions, just like irl.... ;)

Honey
03-26-2004, 12:45 PM
I&#39;ve been reading all this over the past couple of days and am still rather bemused by it all.

Jetje, with all due respect and all bullshit aside... lets cut the crap and get to the point.

In a conversation between BD and Marc which was posted in this forum it clearly states... and I do mean clearly... that the ban was for a 1 (ONE) month period.

Now it doesn&#39;t really matter how you try to justify it, and believe me I can see you&#39;re trying your hardest, with absolutely NO support from your fellow mods of course, but you guys are looking like the biggest bunch of hypocrites in any forum I&#39;ve ever been to.

It seems you are prepared to "move the goalposts" just because it suits yourself. It also takes away any creedence to anything in the past or in future that comes from the tips of your (collectively ALL mods and Admin) fingertips regarding anything.

You don&#39;t want to be seen as "Aussie bashers", but you seem to have a penchant for referring to it. I&#39;ve seen conspiracy theories thrown around, that WE from THAT forum dare to post within these "hallowed" forums. Well life sometimes sucks mate, but you can&#39;t ban the lot of us&#33; And whether you like it or not... we WILL be heard.

Right now you look like the biggest bunch of tossers out. Your esteemed leaders word isn&#39;t worth Jack shit.... and to be very honest, your words are looking pretty damn suss too&#33;

You have nothing to justify the stance you are taking now. Nothing that can possibly atone for yet another case of "fuckupedness"

It&#39;s the bigger man who admits he made the mistake and then rectifies it. It&#39;s the fool who tries to justify it.

:)

bowrabob
03-26-2004, 12:49 PM
l don&#39;t know if Jetje is doing this on purpose, or if he just doesn&#39;t understand, but he is putting things in the wrong order and coming up with the wrong answer. l would have to guess that he does it on purpose, because so many people have pointed out his mistake, that he must have realised by now.

So just for Jetje this is the order of things.[1] The mods had a meeting and decided to ban him.
[2] Billy posted his farewell thread believing he was about to be banned, as 7th mentioned in his PM.
[3] 7th and Billy talked on MSN, where 7th told him he was not banning him for good, just a month.
[4] That month is now up, and Billy is still banned.We want to know why that pledge has been broken. We are not interested in mod chats, only the promise that was made to a member.

7th made the promise, 7th should answer, in here, to everyone. And yes, l have PM&#39;d him.

PS. If you really want to know what Billy thinks, go over to his forum and ask him, don&#39;t guess, you know where it is, you&#39;ve been there enough times.

JONNO_CELEBS
03-26-2004, 12:55 PM
So if he&#39;s been banned for good there is no arguement, at the end of the day it&#39;s 7ths board, he pays for it and what he says goes.

Personally I find that a little sad as Rikk did start some interesting stuff, but atm I think there are worse people on this board who are actually looking for fights and trolling to their hearts content.

Jonno B)

bowrabob
03-26-2004, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@26 March 2004 - 12:55
So if he&#39;s been banned for good there is no arguement, at the end of the day it&#39;s 7ths board, he pays for it and what he says goes.


Who says he&#39;s been banned for good?

7th hasn&#39;t said anything yet, and as you point out, it&#39;s his board, not Jetjes, or anyone else&#39;s.

Ella
03-26-2004, 01:03 PM
I find this quote from Jetje interesting...


Just to let you know, i didn&#39;t close that thread&nbsp; Your question in my direction is not right in that case

...yet...


Things happened as they happened. It was not one person that decided but there was a voting by all team members, the fairest way we can do it on this forum. The result was to ban Billy.

You&#39;re either willing to accept actions as part of "the team", Jetje, or you aren&#39;t. You don&#39;t spout the unified approach in one post, and then distance yourself from your team members&#39; actions in another. That&#39;s just not cricket, mate.

jetje
03-26-2004, 01:11 PM
Well thanks for all compliments ehm... "Honey" :lol:

Bowrabob and eh "honey", again i explained everything. Please re-read if not clear.. as i stated if you can&#39;t live with the explanations, feel free to pm an admin...

@ Ella, hi btw... i just replied to a presumed thinking i closed it, so i would like to set the record clear but as you read any further you see i wrote i could guess and understand why i fellow mod closed it.. So again not running away for any of the actions taken by fellow mods... But if you like to pick on my language and posts feel free, but i&#39;m gonna warn you i have plenty of posts and a bad english writing :lol:

NikkiD
03-26-2004, 01:12 PM
You know what? You people really make me laugh.

First of all the ban on BD was never discussed as being temporary by our team. That was a decision that was made on the fly and that half of us didn&#39;t even know about, because many of us didn&#39;t read through that entire transcript. So no, we can&#39;t answer to whether this was temporary or permanent, because some of us are still confused as to which it was, and are still trying to find that out.

As for the reason the thread was closed, I have no idea who closed it, and wouldn&#39;t have done so myself.

For a group that is so down on this board, it&#39;s "staff" and it&#39;s members, you lot sure do a lot of pissing and moaning about it. If you don&#39;t care, why waste your time?

JONNO_CELEBS
03-26-2004, 01:13 PM
You know something else???

I&#39;ve had a gut full of all of you

Fuck the lot of you

bowrabob
03-26-2004, 01:17 PM
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@26 March 2004 - 13:13
You know something else???

I&#39;ve had a gut full of all of you

Fuck the lot of you
:huh:

bowrabob
03-26-2004, 01:19 PM
Originally posted by NikkiD@26 March 2004 - 13:12
For a group that is so down on this board, it&#39;s "staff" and it&#39;s members, you lot sure do a lot of pissing and moaning about it. If you don&#39;t care, why waste your time?
Another uncalled for attack. Is it because we&#39;re Australian? Should we apologise for that too?

jetje
03-26-2004, 01:22 PM
Originally posted by bowrabob+26 March 2004 - 15:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bowrabob @ 26 March 2004 - 15:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-NikkiD@26 March 2004 - 13:12
For a group that is so down on this board, it&#39;s "staff" and it&#39;s members, you lot sure do a lot of pissing and moaning about it. If you don&#39;t care, why waste your time?
Another uncalled for attack. Is it because we&#39;re Australian? Should we apologise for that too? [/b][/quote]
Who&#39;s attacking who here Bowa. You guys keep bringing up it&#39;s because your australian... Man if you wouldn&#39;t have written that i probably never knew that.... :lol:

NikkiD
03-26-2004, 01:26 PM
Did I say anything about your nationality? That has nothing to do with it. I wouldn&#39;t care if you were all from different countries. Your clique has nothing better to do these days it seems, than come over here and troll, looking to stir up trouble, on a board that you constantly say you care nothing about anymore. I was merely stating that you waste a lot of time and effort on something you care nothing about.

jetje
03-26-2004, 01:27 PM
btw i limit this discusion to 5 more posts then it gets closed, why... plain simple i don&#39;t want bashing in here...

As said before if you can&#39;t live with the decissions made feel free to pm 7th ... as you think i&#39;m not talking about a team&#39;s decission.
From now these kinda follow up posts will be closed, just that you people know that. There is no single need for keeping repeating our selfs all the time...

:)

Honey
03-26-2004, 01:28 PM
Originally posted by NikkiD@26 March 2004 - 20:12
You know what? You people really make me laugh.

First of all the ban on BD was never discussed as being temporary by our team. That was a decision that was made on the fly and that half of us didn&#39;t even know about, because many of us didn&#39;t read through that entire transcript. So no, we can&#39;t answer to whether this was temporary or permanent, because some of us are still confused as to which it was, and are still trying to find that out.

As for the reason the thread was closed, I have no idea who closed it, and wouldn&#39;t have done so myself.

For a group that is so down on this board, it&#39;s "staff" and it&#39;s members, you lot sure do a lot of pissing and moaning about it. If you don&#39;t care, why waste your time?
Well good on you Nikki... though one would like to wonder how you would feel if you came to RnC&#39;s and were "treated" with the obvious contempt you show us.

There is a question that needs to be answered... nothing more, nothing less.

And until it IS answered then I guess you can look forward to more of the same.

Quite simple really isn&#39;t it?

And it if you think that it&#39;s a case of pissing and moaning... well.. you are also entitled to your opinion. Though I don&#39;t see anyone having a "go" because of it?
Different strokes for different folks eh what?

@ Jetje.. im not eh.. or ehm Honey... I AM Honey... errrm... are we clear on that now?.. :)

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ella
03-26-2004, 01:30 PM
Your clique has nothing better to do these days it seems, than come over here and troll, looking to stir up trouble, on a board that you constantly say you care nothing about anymore. I was merely stating that you waste a lot of time and effort on something you care nothing about.

It&#39;s where we come when we&#39;re bored. So shoot us. :rolleyes:

Cheese
03-26-2004, 01:30 PM
Originally posted by jetje@26 March 2004 - 12:27
btw i limit this discusion to 5 more posts then it gets closed, why... plain simple i don&#39;t want bashing in here...

As said before if you can&#39;t live with the decissions made feel free to pm 7th ... as you think i&#39;m not talking about a team&#39;s decission.
From now these kinda follow up posts will be closed, just that you people know that. There is no single need for keeping repeating our selfs all the time...

:)
You can&#39;t close this thread, that&#39;ll be my day&#39;s entertainment gone. :lol:

RGX
03-26-2004, 01:33 PM
Sorry but this is getting a little extreme. We dont segregate you as "the aussies". If anything, you bring it up. Im not sure why you seem to feel like you are being persecuted as a group, but over the internet tbh I and im sure most members of this forum dont care where your from. It doesnt matter.

I also think its a bit rich that you only seem to reply in threads about Billy Dean. Do you even use the forum anymore?

Jetje is also being (IMO) unfairly treated. He is attempting to answer your questions but is getting flamed. As i understand it, banning Billy Dean was a group discussion, not just Jetjes, so can we please act civilised and not work in little gangs?

All IMO of course, flame me all you want, because this discussion is getting very old. Billy Dean as far as I can see was banned for a month, and hasnt come back. Has he attempted to PM a mod or admin about it, requesting his return?

As far as censorship goes, this board IS the most liberal on the web. You try bringing up filesharing or p2p in post other forums and you most likely wont even receive a warning, just a quick ban. Did anyone bother to PM a mod asking them to consider re-opening the topic first before denouncing them publicly?

Feel free to pick apart this post, as im sure you are itching to do <_<

muchspl2
03-26-2004, 01:35 PM
I just hope no one make a big deal about internet.news with another thread
I can see it now, waaa internet.news was such a great person, bring him back :lol:
get over it, is it such a big deal that he is or isn&#39;t here
you people are just wanting some drama, so you create it

Cheese
03-26-2004, 01:36 PM
IBTL. :lol:

jetje
03-26-2004, 01:40 PM
as stated earlier closed in 5...4...3...2...1 pm an admin if needed... B)



:)

edit... eh sorry for that withcheese, you gotta find another entertaing topic :lol: