bowrabob
03-30-2004, 01:37 AM
So much for free speech!
When the team discussed a ban of Billy Dean, the discussion was of a permanent ban. Not a 30 day suspension. The offer of a 30 day suspension was made to Billy Dean by 7th, but we were never informed of this formally. We would have stuck by 7th's 30 day ban had Billy Dean accepted the 30 day ban. As far as we're concerned, he DID NOT. Banned means no posting.
What a farce! First you all deny there was a 30 day ban, then, when the members let you know they are displeased with the treachery, you lie and claim Billy posted during the month!
Then you close the Free Billy thread and change the name, whilst allowing the Don't Free Billy thread to remain open.
This really is pathetic! You have dragged the esteem of the mods down with your conduct over the last few days.
BTW, telling people to PM admin when they have a problem is stretching a joke too far. 7th does not answer PMs. He has replied to none of mine, if he did this could be cleared up easily.
When the team discussed a ban of Billy Dean, the discussion was of a permanent ban. Not a 30 day suspension. The offer of a 30 day suspension was made to Billy Dean by 7th, but we were never informed of this formally. We would have stuck by 7th's 30 day ban had Billy Dean accepted the 30 day ban. As far as we're concerned, he DID NOT. Banned means no posting.
What a farce! First you all deny there was a 30 day ban, then, when the members let you know they are displeased with the treachery, you lie and claim Billy posted during the month!
Then you close the Free Billy thread and change the name, whilst allowing the Don't Free Billy thread to remain open.
This really is pathetic! You have dragged the esteem of the mods down with your conduct over the last few days.
BTW, telling people to PM admin when they have a problem is stretching a joke too far. 7th does not answer PMs. He has replied to none of mine, if he did this could be cleared up easily.