View Full Version : Adobe Vs Quark Vs Macromedia
Dr Spaulding
04-03-2004, 10:16 PM
Adobe now has GoLive (to rival Macromedia Dreamweaver)
Adobe InDesign (who some say pees all over Quark Xpress)
which products do you prefer?
abu_has_the_power
04-03-2004, 10:17 PM
adobe is more deign. macormedia is more programming. and quarkexpress is just like photoshop and some other stuff put together
GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html) :)
Originally posted by haxor41789@3 April 2004 - 17:39
GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html) :)
VIM (http://www.vim.org/) :01:
Image Resized
[img]http://www.io.com/~dierdorf/vi-emacs2.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> ('http://www.io.com/~dierdorf/vi-emacs2.jpg')
Cygnuz-Y
04-04-2004, 12:02 AM
Originally posted by Dr Spaulding@3 April 2004 - 22:16
Adobe now has GoLive (to rival Macromedia Dreamweaver)
Adobe InDesign (who some say pees all over Quark Xpress)
which products do you prefer?
Go live was before dreamweaver, long before dreamweaver....
Dr Spaulding
04-04-2004, 08:03 AM
oh, okay then.
so do you prefer:
InDesign or Quark
GoLive or DreamWeaver
Illustrator or Freehand
1) GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html)
2) GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html)
3) The GIMP (http://www.gimp.org)
:)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.