Adobe Vs Quark Vs Macromedia

[Dr Spaulding]

Adobe now has GoLive (to rival Macromedia Dreamweaver)
Adobe InDesign (who some say pees all over Quark Xpress)
which products do you prefer?

[abu_has_the_power]

adobe is more deign. macormedia is more programming. and quarkexpress is just like photoshop and some other stuff put together

[h1]

GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html) :)

[LSA]

Originally posted by haxor41789@3 April 2004 - 17:39
GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html) :)
VIM (http://www.vim.org/) :01:

Image Resized
[img]http://www.io.com/~dierdorf/vi-emacs2.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'> ('http://www.io.com/~dierdorf/vi-emacs2.jpg')

[Cygnuz-Y]

Originally posted by Dr Spaulding@3 April 2004 - 22:16
Adobe now has GoLive (to rival Macromedia Dreamweaver)
Adobe InDesign (who some say pees all over Quark Xpress)
which products do you prefer?
Go live was before dreamweaver, long before dreamweaver....

[Dr Spaulding]

oh, okay then.
so do you prefer:

InDesign or Quark

GoLive or DreamWeaver

Illustrator or Freehand

[h1]

1) GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html)
2) GnuEMACS (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html)
3) The GIMP (http://www.gimp.org)

:)