PDA

View Full Version : My Newest Benchmark



kaiweiler
04-17-2004, 02:48 PM
Hey, here's my newest benchmark from aquamark3!
I know it's not nearly as high as some of you Athlon 64 systems and 9800XT's but for my system i'd say it's pretty good
check out the overclockage :01:
while running the benchmark, my cpu was at 41C
Benchmark (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=2089794876)

tesco
04-17-2004, 03:01 PM
pretty sweet, with my mx440 i got like 4,000 total score lol...but i havent tried with my fx5200 yet...

kaiweiler
04-17-2004, 03:04 PM
Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@17 April 2004 - 11:01
pretty sweet, with my mx440 i got like 4,000 total score lol...but i havent tried with my fx5200 yet...
yeah the 5200 isn't all that great in benches i dont think, but it sure beats a mx440 lol

tesco
04-17-2004, 03:06 PM
Originally posted by kaiweiler+17 April 2004 - 10:04--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 17 April 2004 - 10:04)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ROSSCO_2004@17 April 2004 - 11:01
pretty sweet, with my mx440 i got like 4,000 total score lol...but i havent tried with my fx5200 yet...
yeah the 5200 isn&#39;t all that great in benches i dont think, but it sure beats a mx440 lol [/b][/quote]
it will beat it because it has directx 9 so i can do all of the tests, wait maybe im thinking bout 3dmark :unsure: well anyway, not bad for gettting it free.

adamp2p
04-17-2004, 08:16 PM
Originally posted by kaiweiler@17 April 2004 - 06:48
Hey, here&#39;s my newest benchmark from aquamark3&#33;
I know it&#39;s not nearly as high as some of you Athlon 64 systems and 9800XT&#39;s but for my system i&#39;d say it&#39;s pretty good
check out the overclockage&nbsp; :01:
while running the benchmark, my cpu was at 41C
Benchmark (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=2089794876)
There is something fishy with your system, dude.

Did you make sure to set AA and AF in BOTH Direct 3d AND Open GL to "application controlled" BEFORE running the benchmark?

See This page for a good service config (http://www.tweakhound.com/xp/xptweaks/supertweaks6.htm)


Do you have an untweaked system? In other words, you might want to save the following as a .reg file and merge it, it might speed things up a bit:


Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;PriorityControl&#93;
&#34;Win32PrioritySeparation&#34;=dword&#58;00000026

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SOFTWARE&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;policies&#092;Explorer&#93;
@=&#34;1&#34;

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Policies&#092;Explorer&#93;
&#34;NoSharedDocuments&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SOFTWARE&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Explorer&#092;AlwaysUnloadDLL&#93;
@=&#34;1&#34;

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SOFTWARE&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Explorer&#93;
&#34;AlwaysUnloadDLL&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;FileSystem&#93;
&#34;NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation&#34;=dword&#58;00000001
&#34;NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate&#34;=dword&#58;00000001
&#34;Win95TruncatedExtensions&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;Session Manager&#092;Memory Management&#93;
&#34;DisablePagingExecutive&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;Update&#93;
&#34;UpdateMode&#34;=dword&#58;00000000

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Control Panel&#092;Desktop&#93;
&#34;AutoEndTasks&#34;=&#34;1&#34;
&#34;HungAppTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;MenuShowDelay&#34;=&#34;0&#34;
&#34;WaitToKillAppTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;WaitToKillServiceTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;

&#91;HKEY_USERS&#092;.DEFAULT&#092;Control Panel&#092;Desktop&#93;
&#34;MenuShowDelay&#34;=&#34;0&#34;

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;Session Manager&#092;Memory Management&#092;PrefetchParameters&#93;
&#34;EnablePrefetcher&#34;=&#34;5&#34;

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#93;
&#34;WaitToKillServiceTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;WaitToKillAppTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;AlwaysUnloadDLL&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Explorer&#092;Advanced&#93;
&#34;DisableThumbnailCache&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_USERS&#092;.DEFAULT&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Internet Settings&#93;
&#34;MaxConnectionsPerServer&#34;=dword&#58;00000020
&#34;MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server&#34;=dword&#58;00000020

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Internet Settings&#93;
&#34;MaxConnectionsPerServer&#34;=dword&#58;00000020
&#34;MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server&#34;=dword&#58;00000020

atiVidia
04-18-2004, 12:52 AM
my newest benchie is in my sig (april)

tesco
04-18-2004, 12:55 AM
Originally posted by atiVidia@17 April 2004 - 19:52
my newest benchie is in my sig (april)
nice increase :)

atiVidia
04-18-2004, 01:09 AM
Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+17 April 2004 - 19:55--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 17 April 2004 - 19:55)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@17 April 2004 - 19:52
my newest benchie is in my sig (april)
nice increase :) [/b][/quote]
thx :lol:

adamp2p
04-18-2004, 02:20 AM
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1083181511

my newest

kaiweiler
04-18-2004, 02:24 AM
Originally posted by adamp2p@17 April 2004 - 16:16
There is something fishy with your system, dude.

Did you make sure to set AA and AF in BOTH Direct 3d AND Open GL to "application controlled" BEFORE running the benchmark?

See This page for a good service config (http://www.tweakhound.com/xp/xptweaks/supertweaks6.htm)


Do you have an untweaked system? In other words, you might want to save the following as a .reg file and merge it, it might speed things up a bit:


Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;PriorityControl&#93;
&#34;Win32PrioritySeparation&#34;=dword&#58;00000026

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SOFTWARE&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;policies&#092;Explorer&#93;
@=&#34;1&#34;

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Policies&#092;Explorer&#93;
&#34;NoSharedDocuments&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SOFTWARE&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Explorer&#092;AlwaysUnloadDLL&#93;
@=&#34;1&#34;

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SOFTWARE&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Explorer&#93;
&#34;AlwaysUnloadDLL&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;FileSystem&#93;
&#34;NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation&#34;=dword&#58;00000001
&#34;NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate&#34;=dword&#58;00000001
&#34;Win95TruncatedExtensions&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;Session Manager&#092;Memory Management&#93;
&#34;DisablePagingExecutive&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;Update&#93;
&#34;UpdateMode&#34;=dword&#58;00000000

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Control Panel&#092;Desktop&#93;
&#34;AutoEndTasks&#34;=&#34;1&#34;
&#34;HungAppTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;MenuShowDelay&#34;=&#34;0&#34;
&#34;WaitToKillAppTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;WaitToKillServiceTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;

&#91;HKEY_USERS&#092;.DEFAULT&#092;Control Panel&#092;Desktop&#93;
&#34;MenuShowDelay&#34;=&#34;0&#34;

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#092;Session Manager&#092;Memory Management&#092;PrefetchParameters&#93;
&#34;EnablePrefetcher&#34;=&#34;5&#34;

&#91;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#092;SYSTEM&#092;CurrentControlSet&#092;Control&#93;
&#34;WaitToKillServiceTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;WaitToKillAppTimeout&#34;=&#34;1000&#34;
&#34;AlwaysUnloadDLL&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Explorer&#092;Advanced&#93;
&#34;DisableThumbnailCache&#34;=dword&#58;00000001

&#91;HKEY_USERS&#092;.DEFAULT&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Internet Settings&#93;
&#34;MaxConnectionsPerServer&#34;=dword&#58;00000020
&#34;MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server&#34;=dword&#58;00000020

&#91;HKEY_CURRENT_USER&#092;Software&#092;Microsoft&#092;Windows&#092;CurrentVersion&#092;Internet Settings&#93;
&#34;MaxConnectionsPerServer&#34;=dword&#58;00000020
&#34;MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server&#34;=dword&#58;00000020
I don&#39;t get what your saying?
did i set AA and AF and all this stuff? I just went to run test, didn&#39;t do a custom test or anything if thats what your asking
please explain

adamp2p
04-18-2004, 02:34 AM
Kai:

right click on the desktop>properties>settings>advanced>ATi 3d tabs (there might be one for open GL and one for Direct 3d, or there might be two different tabs, depending on your driver)

In both Direct 3d and Open GL select "Application controlled" for AA and AF. That way when the benchmark is run you don&#39;t get a lower score due to your settings.

Also disable "always off" vertical sync when benchmarking in both Open GL and Direct 3d.

kaiweiler
04-18-2004, 11:00 PM
Originally posted by adamp2p@17 April 2004 - 22:34
Kai:

right click on the desktop>properties>settings>advanced>ATi 3d tabs (there might be one for open GL and one for Direct 3d, or there might be two different tabs, depending on your driver)

In both Direct 3d and Open GL select "Application controlled" for AA and AF. That way when the benchmark is run you don&#39;t get a lower score due to your settings.

Also disable "always off" vertical sync when benchmarking in both Open GL and Direct 3d.
Went to that and hit custom settings, the AF and AA were already set right but I changed the vertical sync to always off, will run another bench and see if it makes any difference
thanks, anything else i can do to improve scores?

adamp2p
04-19-2004, 02:02 AM
Originally posted by kaiweiler+18 April 2004 - 15:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler &#064; 18 April 2004 - 15:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-adamp2p@17 April 2004 - 22:34
Kai:

right click on the desktop>properties>settings>advanced>ATi 3d tabs (there might be one for open GL and one for Direct 3d, or there might be two different tabs, depending on your driver)

In both Direct 3d and Open GL select "Application controlled" for AA and AF. That way when the benchmark is run you don&#39;t get a lower score due to your settings.

Also disable "always off" vertical sync when benchmarking in both Open GL and Direct 3d.
Went to that and hit custom settings, the AF and AA were already set right but I changed the vertical sync to always off, will run another bench and see if it makes any difference
thanks, anything else i can do to improve scores? [/b][/quote]
Yeah, try to disable as many services as possible. I gave you a link above to a list of services that you need versus those that you do not.

Edit: your aquamark3 link is dead??

kaiweiler
04-19-2004, 02:28 AM
Here (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1620032391) is my aquamark score, must have deleted the old one when I was adding some new ones

atiVidia
04-19-2004, 02:31 AM
Originally posted by kaiweiler+18 April 2004 - 18:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 18 April 2004 - 18:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-adamp2p@17 April 2004 - 22:34
[...]disable "always off" vertical sync when benchmarking in both Open GL and Direct 3d.
[...]I changed the vertical sync to always off[...] [/b][/quote]
lol i missed something here


didnt he ask u to make sure that "always off" is disabled?

kaiweiler
04-19-2004, 02:35 AM
Originally posted by atiVidia@18 April 2004 - 22:31
lol i missed something here


didnt he ask u to make sure that "always off" is disabled?
haha maybe, I took it as
also disable (set to always off) vertical sync....
not sure if that&#39;s what he meant or not?

atiVidia
04-19-2004, 02:39 AM
MAJOR WARNING&#33;&#33;&#33;

if u have been using your comp for an extensive period of time (6+ months) and u disable indexing service thru the process manager, you WILL suffer from MASSIVE data corruption. it can be recovered, but only by plugging your hard drive into another comp with XP.

i keep indexing running on my drive, but disabled it on all physical drives. if the ricess itself is disabled, any currently indexed items will be corrupted.

only disable indexing if you installed windows XP recently (a week ago or earlier)

kaiweiler
04-19-2004, 02:40 AM
umm thanks for the warning
I installed XP pro like a month or so ago, but I think I&#39;m fine anyway
@adam - that reg code you gave me, I can just paste that in notepad, save as ***.reg and then run it, no risks right?

tesco
04-19-2004, 02:45 AM
Originally posted by atiVidia@18 April 2004 - 21:39
MAJOR WARNING&#33;&#33;&#33;

if u have been using your comp for an extensive period of time (6+ months) and u disable indexing service thru the process manager, you WILL suffer from MASSIVE data corruption. it can be recovered, but only by plugging your hard drive into another comp with XP.

i keep indexing running on my drive, but disabled it on all physical drives. if the ricess itself is disabled, any currently indexed items will be corrupted.

only disable indexing if you installed windows XP recently (a week ago or earlier)
uhh ive always disabled indexing service right after an installation, and have been doing this for over 1 year....and no problems.....unless you mean on one xp installation, in which case it doesnt matter cause i never keep an installation for more then 2 months lol

kaiweiler
04-19-2004, 02:49 AM
Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+18 April 2004 - 22:45--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 18 April 2004 - 22:45)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@18 April 2004 - 21:39
MAJOR WARNING&#33;&#33;&#33;

if u have been using your comp for an extensive period of time (6+ months) and u disable indexing service thru the process manager, you WILL suffer from MASSIVE data corruption. it can be recovered, but only by plugging your hard drive into another comp with XP.

i keep indexing running on my drive, but disabled it on all physical drives. if the ricess itself is disabled, any currently indexed items will be corrupted.

only disable indexing if you installed windows XP recently (a week ago or earlier)
uhh ive always disabled indexing service right after an installation, and have been doing this for over 1 year....and no problems.....unless you mean on one xp installation, in which case it doesnt matter cause i never keep an installation for more then 2 months lol [/b][/quote]
he means if you leave your comp for 6 months or more and then disable indexing, then you can have "massive" data corruption, maybe...

adamp2p
04-19-2004, 03:39 AM
Originally posted by kaiweiler@18 April 2004 - 18:40
umm thanks for the warning
I installed XP pro like a month or so ago, but I think I&#39;m fine anyway
@adam - that reg code you gave me, I can just paste that in notepad, save as ***.reg and then run it, no risks right?
That&#39;s right&#33; All those entries are totally safe. You can even google them to learn more about what each of them do.

Open notepad, copy/paste then save as a .reg file (probably to the desktop).

Double click, it should ask you if you want to merge the data, and you say yes and reboot.

adamp2p
04-19-2004, 03:48 AM
Originally posted by kaiweiler+18 April 2004 - 18:49--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 18 April 2004 - 18:49)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@18 April 2004 - 22:45
<!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@18 April 2004 - 21:39
MAJOR WARNING&#33;&#33;&#33;

if u have been using your comp for an extensive period of time (6+ months) and u disable indexing service thru the process manager, you WILL suffer from MASSIVE data corruption. it can be recovered, but only by plugging your hard drive into another comp with XP.

i keep indexing running on my drive, but disabled it on all physical drives. if the ricess itself is disabled, any currently indexed items will be corrupted.

only disable indexing if you installed windows XP recently (a week ago or earlier)
uhh ive always disabled indexing service right after an installation, and have been doing this for over 1 year....and no problems.....unless you mean on one xp installation, in which case it doesnt matter cause i never keep an installation for more then 2 months lol
he means if you leave your comp for 6 months or more and then disable indexing, then you can have "massive" data corruption, maybe... [/b][/quote]
I am not so sure that this is the case. I highly doubt it actually.



Indexing Service
This service always has been a major resource hog. I NEVER recommend having this service enabled. Remove the function via the "Add / Remove Programs" icon in the control panel (Windows Setup Programs). It uses about 500 K to 2 MB in an idle state, not to mention the amount of memory and CPU resources it takes to INDEX the drives. I have had people (and witnessed it on other people&#39;s computers) report to me that the Indexing Service sometimes starts up EVEN while the system is NOT idle... as in the middle of a game. You may feel, as I do, that this is unacceptable. If your computer suddenly seems "sluggish," Indexing Service is usually the cause of it.

Default XP Home: Manual
Default XP Pro: Manual
Safe Setting: Disabled

Log on as: Local System account

Dependencies:

What service Indexing Service needs to function properly:

Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
What other service require Indexing Service to function properly:

None


source (http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/service411.htm#Indexing_Service)

DarkClown12
04-19-2004, 03:52 AM
running my vid card i got it to over 7,000 running the benchmark 3dmark01 just thought i would tell you guys, it is overclocked

atiVidia
04-19-2004, 04:57 PM
Originally posted by adamp2p+18 April 2004 - 22:48--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 18 April 2004 - 22:48)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by kaiweiler@18 April 2004 - 18:49

Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@18 April 2004 - 22:45
<!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@18 April 2004 - 21:39
MAJOR WARNING&#33;&#33;&#33;

if u have been using your comp for an extensive period of time (6+ months) and u disable indexing service thru the process manager, you WILL suffer from MASSIVE data corruption. it can be recovered, but only by plugging your hard drive into another comp with XP.

i keep indexing running on my drive, but disabled it on all physical drives. if the ricess itself is disabled, any currently indexed items will be corrupted.

only disable indexing if you installed windows XP recently (a week ago or earlier)
uhh ive always disabled indexing service right after an installation, and have been doing this for over 1 year....and no problems.....unless you mean on one xp installation, in which case it doesnt matter cause i never keep an installation for more then 2 months lol
he means if you leave your comp for 6 months or more and then disable indexing, then you can have "massive" data corruption, maybe...
I am not so sure that this is the case. I highly doubt it actually.



Indexing Service
This service always has been a major resource hog. I NEVER recommend having this service enabled. Remove the function via the "Add / Remove Programs" icon in the control panel (Windows Setup Programs). It uses about 500 K to 2 MB in an idle state, not to mention the amount of memory and CPU resources it takes to INDEX the drives. I have had people (and witnessed it on other people&#39;s computers) report to me that the Indexing Service sometimes starts up EVEN while the system is NOT idle... as in the middle of a game. You may feel, as I do, that this is unacceptable. If your computer suddenly seems "sluggish," Indexing Service is usually the cause of it.

Default XP Home: Manual
Default XP Pro: Manual
Safe Setting: Disabled

Log on as: Local System account

Dependencies:

What service Indexing Service needs to function properly:

Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
What other service require Indexing Service to function properly:

None


source (http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/service411.htm#Indexing_Service) [/b][/quote]
i had to move my hdd to another comp after disabling indexing in order to recover the lost data thru the other comp&#39;s disk check. then i booted off my HDD and reenabled indexing. i think its only an issue on HDDS greater that 137 which were using indexing and then were disabled lol. anyhow thi is from personal experience.

just be safe.



what u can do is disable it temporarily (for the benchmark) and reenable it before shitting down.

kaiweiler
04-19-2004, 07:47 PM
Originally posted by kaiweiler+18 April 2004 - 22:35--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 18 April 2004 - 22:35)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@18 April 2004 - 22:31
lol i missed something here


didnt he ask u to make sure that "always off" is disabled?
haha maybe, I took it as
also disable (set to always off) vertical sync....
not sure if that&#39;s what he meant or not? [/b][/quote]
so which one is it?

adamp2p
04-20-2004, 12:00 AM
Originally posted by kaiweiler+19 April 2004 - 11:47--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 19 April 2004 - 11:47)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by kaiweiler@18 April 2004 - 22:35
<!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@18 April 2004 - 22:31
lol i missed something here


didnt he ask u to make sure that "always off" is disabled?
haha maybe, I took it as
also disable (set to always off) vertical sync....
not sure if that&#39;s what he meant or not?
so which one is it? [/b][/quote]
Always off.

kaiweiler
04-20-2004, 01:06 PM
alright, that&#39;s what I thought you meant adam, thanks&#33;
I tried all that and it didn&#39;t raise my scores all that much, maybe 100-150 points tops
when i the best time to bench your comp? I always restart mine, and then once it is fully booted, wait 5 mins and run the bench, is that the best time?
I figure if you run the test after your comp&#39;s been on a while, you&#39;ll most likly have a few unwanted processes running and stuff like that

tesco
04-20-2004, 01:11 PM
Originally posted by kaiweiler@20 April 2004 - 08:06
alright, that&#39;s what I thought you meant adam, thanks&#33;
I tried all that and it didn&#39;t raise my scores all that much, maybe 100-150 points tops
when i the best time to bench your comp? I always restart mine, and then once it is fully booted, wait 5 mins and run the bench, is that the best time?
I figure if you run the test after your comp&#39;s been on a while, you&#39;ll most likly have a few unwanted processes running and stuff like that
press alt-ctrl-del and you can just close any un-needed processes. also close ur virus scanner and firewall and other programs which arent needed for the computer to run the benchmark.