Page source..

[TheRealDave]

Would it not be better for the forum if we had a little more in the meta tags then what we do already?

<meta name="generator" content="vBulletin 3.0.3" />
<meta name="keywords" content="file sharing, forum, file sharing forum, bittorrent" />
<meta name="description" content="Filesharingtalk.com - File sharing forum" />

and

why is the css file in the page source? would it not be easier for the forum to use an .css file and not to include the whole stylesheet in each page? :blink:

[{I}{K}{E}]

Dunno if more meta tags are usefull. about the .css I agree

[Mr. Blunt]

Aint meta tags always usefull?

[motherflux]

the embedded css is part of the way vB is coded.

[100%]

in the old FST it was


<title>KL, bittorrent and more - File Sharing Forum -&gt; Basic Resources For A Website</title><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="keywords" content="FileSharingTalk, forum, bittorrent, torrents, kazaa, lite, KL Board, edonkey, emule, Shareaza, mule, mirc, irc, community, file sharing, client, clients, security, forums, spyware, free, software, movies, mp3, download, help, kpp, k-lite, codec, pack, real, alternative, codecs, quicktime, alternative, mega, soulseek, lounge, guide, tutorial, faq, freeware, tools, divx, xvid, dvd, rip">
<meta name="description" content="One of the biggest file sharing related forums."><!--TEMPLATE: skin_global, Template Part: css_inline-->
Now that is definetly too much - or?

[motherflux]

nah, keywords help with search engine indexing, etc.

my question is why the google ads weren't placed at the top.
they'd fit better with the 'Other Sites' links sitting on top of them, with the logo to the left of it all.

[Filliz]

The blue background of the google ads hurts my eyes :blink:
It really does. :ph34r:

[Mr. Blunt]

I think they'll tweak the advertisement a little more later.

They were probably just in a hurry to get it up. ;)

[Mr. Blunt]

oops.

[motherflux]

if you have the adblock userContent.css entries you won't see google ads.

[link] (http://texturizer.net/firefox/adblock.html)

[RealitY]

Just wondering if they intend to bring the banner back to the top right again, imagine so...

[{I}{K}{E}]

nah, keywords help with search engine indexing, etc.

my question is why the google ads weren't placed at the top.
they'd fit better with the 'Other Sites' links sitting on top of them, with the logo to the left of it all.

we now have that archive thingy from Krohn that should do the search engine stuff.

[motherflux]

What would this 'archive thingy' be then?

[krohn]

What freak put the google ads there?

Wasn't me..... That is truly one of the worst uses of google ads I've ever seen. Aweful choice in colors plus bad placemnet.

[Mr. Blunt]

What freak put the google ads there?

Wasn't me..... That is truly one of the worst uses of google ads I've ever seen. Aweful choice in colors plus bad placemnet.
Your an admin, move it then. :P

I would just use the default color scheme for the ads right now. :01:

[krohn]

I moved them.... I'm not feeling creative enough to play with colors right now.

[{I}{K}{E}]

What freak put the google ads there?

Wasn't me..... That is truly one of the worst uses of google ads I've ever seen. Aweful choice in colors plus bad placemnet.


Hmm... Teamwork ???

So your calling Rookie a Freak :huh:

[manker]

Teamchat, ladies?

The google ad looks much more at home there, btw. It was taking up too much space. Cheers.

[asmithz]

if you have the adblock userContent.css entries you won't see google ads.

[link] (http://texturizer.net/firefox/adblock.html)

Cool, that works
:D

[{I}{K}{E}]

Cool, that works
:D

Why would you wanna block those adds? Just click them daily :dry:

[RealitY]

Teamchat, ladies?
:P :P