PDA

View Full Version : Avatars.



{I}{K}{E}
11-02-2004, 11:22 PM
Today I've checked all avatars.
The once that were to big in size / filesize have been removed.

On the old board pictures that were to big were automaticly resized.
This board doesn't have such an option, so all pictures showed up in their original size this was the main reason people were using pictures that were to big.


Avatar rules:

Max: 80x80 pixels.
Filesize: 100 KB ( this counts for avatar and signature images )


Ike

Peerzy
11-02-2004, 11:26 PM
Today I've checked all avatars.
The once that were to big in size / filesize have been removed.

On the old board pictures that were to big were automaticly resized.
This board doesn't have such an option, so all pictures showed up in their original size this was the main reason people were using pictures that were to big.


Avatar rules:

Max: 80x80 pixels.
Filesize: 100 KB ( this counts for avatar and signature images ) Someone needs to get phished:rolleyes:.

EDIT: Off moderation


Ike you checked every avatar? or every user? Thats like 80,000 members. Someone needs to get phished:rolleyes:.

EDIT: Off moderation:w00t:

{I}{K}{E}
11-02-2004, 11:26 PM
you checked every avatar? or every user? Thats like 80,000 members.


That's correct, 89,920 members.

tesco
11-02-2004, 11:27 PM
peerzy, there must be some admin tool to check the avatar sizes or something. :blink:

{I}{K}{E}
11-02-2004, 11:28 PM
peerzy, there must be some admin tool to check the avatar sizes or something. :blink:

nope, I used the Members List which shows 40 members @ the same time with their avatars.

Peerzy
11-02-2004, 11:29 PM
That's correct, 89,920 members.
We gained 13 members since the move to VB:w00t::w00t::w00t:!

however with the database lose we lost a couple of thousand:ermm:.

Ike:01::01::01:

Was mine alright:rolleyes:?

tesco
11-02-2004, 11:31 PM
nope, I used the Members List which shows 40 members @ the same time with their avatars.
well...you have too much free time. :P

{I}{K}{E}
11-02-2004, 11:32 PM
oops just noticed I have not checked em all..... :(

Peerzy
11-02-2004, 11:35 PM
oops just noticed I have not checked em all..... :(
Why not hire a slave to do all your work:ermm:?

{I}{K}{E}
11-02-2004, 11:43 PM
Think I changed them all now

Peerzy
11-02-2004, 11:46 PM
Think I changed them all now
:01::01::01:


Sure.....:shifty:

callum
11-06-2004, 11:51 PM
Think I changed them all now

errrr yours seems a tad big.

{I}{K}{E}
11-07-2004, 12:30 AM
errrr yours seems a tad big.

That's correct, I made a topic about it in the lounge, Only admins/mods can have bigger avatars atm, because I wanna test if it would make a difference if members would be allowed to have an avatar that is max 100x100 instead of 80x80.

tesco
11-07-2004, 01:24 AM
That's correct, I made a topic about it in the lounge, Only admins/mods can have bigger avatars atm, because I wanna test if it would make a difference if members would be allowed to have an avatar that is max 100x100 instead of 80x80.
we could have them at 150 or a little more before it starts to make the side thingy stretch...

{I}{K}{E}
11-07-2004, 01:31 AM
we could have them at 150 or a little more before it starts to make the side thingy stretch...

if we would allow bigger avatars in size then more people will start using oversized avatars in filesize so that would be the only problem also I think 150 is 2 big the max would be 100

Peerzy
11-07-2004, 01:34 AM
Peerzy ----------> http://hometown.aol.co.uk/Lynne1977uk/th_pokey.gif <---------- IKE

Most avatars are stuff people ahve seen on the weba nd are much bigger and the forum resizes them but keeps the same file size anyway.

h121589
11-07-2004, 04:05 AM
Peerzy ----------> http://hometown.aol.co.uk/Lynne1977uk/th_pokey.gif <---------- IKE


:lol:

cpt_azad
11-07-2004, 08:50 AM
That's correct, 89,920 members.
jesus christ dude :ohmy:

asmithz
11-07-2004, 11:34 AM
jesus christ dude :ohmy:


nope, I used the Members List which shows 40 members @ the same time with their avatars.

Not that hard

Jon L. Obscene
11-07-2004, 12:23 PM
we could have them at 150 or a little more before it starts to make the side thingy stretch...

100 square is perfect I think, 150 would look hidious, my sig is 150 high, if you had that square at the side the board would be all pictures :ph34r:
Nah, 100 x 100 is fine, I would'nt think there would be any problems as long as the file size is kept down, having said that it could be made that we upload our own, therefore not harming the db in any way.
File size could still be kept the same, 100kb is fine, always has been.

Just my opinion :01:

Jonno :cool:

DanB
11-07-2004, 12:30 PM
100 square is perfect I think, 150 would look hidious, my sig is 150 high, if you had that square at the side the board would be all pictures :ph34r:
Nah, 100 x 100 is fine, I would'nt think there would be any problems as long as the file size is kept down, having said that it could be made that we upload our own, therefore not harming the db in any way.
File size could still be kept the same, 100kb is fine, always has been.

Just my opinion :01:

Jonno :cool:


Thanks for your seal of approval ;)

Afronaut
11-07-2004, 03:02 PM
I thought 80x80 was ok.

tesco
11-07-2004, 03:36 PM
100 square is perfect I think, 150 would look hidious, my sig is 150 high, if you had that square at the side the board would be all pictures :ph34r:
Nah, 100 x 100 is fine, I would'nt think there would be any problems as long as the file size is kept down, having said that it could be made that we upload our own, therefore not harming the db in any way.
File size could still be kept the same, 100kb is fine, always has been.

Just my opinion :01:

Jonno :cool:
i was just saying that it could be that big before it disrupts the board's layout.

IKE you can just set the max avatar file size to 100kb or maybe 70kb or something. :)

{I}{K}{E}
11-07-2004, 03:58 PM
i was just saying that it could be that big before it disrupts the board's layout.

IKE you can just set the max avatar file size to 100kb or maybe 70kb or something. :)

i've already done that a long time ago :P

Jon L. Obscene
11-07-2004, 04:02 PM
@Dan.. don't be facecious :rolleyes: I gave my opinion knowing how the system works.

@Rosco...... That's as maybe but personally I've been to forums that have them set to 150 and it just looks wrong :ermm:

@Ike...... Dude 100 x100 would be better I think, I'm sure a lot of people would agree :)

Jonno :cool:

{I}{K}{E}
11-07-2004, 04:09 PM
@Ike...... Dude 100 x100 would be better I think, I'm sure a lot of people would agree :)

Jonno :cool:

That's what I thought.

newcster68
11-07-2004, 04:11 PM
Most boards I have seen use 100x100..which is fine..anything bigger just lloks awkward...buut..how long must we debate this..just do it

tesco
11-07-2004, 04:11 PM
@Rosco...... That's as maybe but personally I've been to forums that have them set to 150 and it just looks wrong :ermm:

yuh. i didn't say i wanted it. :P

Jon L. Obscene
11-07-2004, 04:22 PM
That's what I thought.

In other words you think it's a good idea but you've been out voted :rolleyes:

@Rosco...... Oh I see, apologies then :)

@MJPF . .........Also happens to be a standard size for most pics and gifs when you pull the size down to 80 :rolleyes:

Nah, 100 square is good :)

If you're worried about the upload then switch it off, feck me, I'll host anyones avatar :rolleyes:

Jonno :cool:

Virtualbody1234
11-07-2004, 04:51 PM
100x100 is nice. The rules would need to be changed to reflect the change.

Jon L. Obscene
11-07-2004, 05:01 PM
http://www.jokeornot.com/gallery/state_the%20obvious.jpg

Maybe changing the option first :rolleyes:

Jonno :cool:

{I}{K}{E}
11-07-2004, 05:17 PM
100x100 is nice. The rules would need to be changed to reflect the change.

will do that now ;)

bigboab
11-07-2004, 05:19 PM
Nah, 100 x 100 is fine, I would'nt think there would be any problems as long as the file size is kept down, having said that it could be made that we upload our own, therefore not harming the db in any way.
File size could still be kept the same, 100kb is fine, always has been.

Just my opinion :01:

Jonno :cool:
I was always under the impression that the database does not contain any pics, only links to the pics. When the database uploads the pics for display then it sizes them according to the display rules. That is why when picture host 'goes down' the forum is littered by wee red 'X's where pics from that host should be.
If the pics were 'stored' on the Forum database pics would be displayed everytime you accessed a post.

bigboab
11-09-2004, 09:36 PM
Is it not a mixture of both. Some people hot link and some upload, or is that option gone now.I dont know how it is linked. It is just that the database only contains 'text' whether they be hot links or upload links. That is why it should be easy to change your Sig and Avator which are dynamic links within your profile. If you change your Sig and Avator, then that changes in every post that you access, whatever the date. The upload and hot links within a post however will remain unchanged as they are not dynamic, until that post is accessed, and a permanent part of the database unless the post is edited. I could probably have worded that better, but I am out of practice.:)
I'm sure you will know this JP. But there are some members that might not.:)