PDA

View Full Version : Which is better: ATI 9600 or Nvidia 5200



Spindulik
11-27-2004, 04:39 PM
I have two video cards:

NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 128MB

and

ATI Radeon 9600 128MB

I use the NVIDIA and my kids use the ATI Radeon. I want the best one on my PC. I like to have a video card that works good in video games, 3D AUTOCAD programming, and VIDEO editing.

--------
Also, there is a "SKIN" contest on ATI and i probably need to install the ATI Radeon on my PC to test it out.
http://buy.ati.com/myprofile/ccccontest.asp

bigdawgfoxx
11-27-2004, 04:49 PM
9600

Spindulik
11-27-2004, 05:07 PM
9600


Thanks!

tesco
11-27-2004, 05:09 PM
9600 for sure.

Mr. Elmo
11-27-2004, 06:11 PM
9600 for sure.
unless you mean 9600se....just seem kinda weird you're comparing a 9600 to a 5200

Spindulik
11-27-2004, 06:38 PM
unless you mean 9600se....just seem kinda weird you're comparing a 9600 to a 5200


Weird, however those are the only 2 cards I have at hand right now.

They both seem to be fairly good video cards, and I haven't compared (or bench tested) them, side- by-side with any heavy duty software yet.


For general purpose, they are fine, but I do plan on using one for Unreal Tournament.

Thanks everyone!


---edit---
I spent $50.00 for the ATI Radeon 9600 Is that a good price?

Spindulik
11-27-2004, 11:27 PM
OK, I have tried the ATI Radeon 9600 (128MB), I don't like it.

To begin with, it needs too many drivers, control panels, etc. I press Ctrl+Alt+Del and now see a few extra programs running in the background. Half of them don't even need to be running at all, from what I researched on the internet.

Secondly, when playing Unreal Tournament, I get weird graphics. I had this exact same problem with an older model of the ATI video card. Also, the 3D rendering seems to affect my mouse-movement.

I am not comfortable with this ATI card.

Maybe, Unreal Tournament (UT) has been designed around NVIDIA's chipset, being that I think I have seen the logo within UT software.

I played a few DVD movies and see no difference there.


Basic Performance: I see no difference with the ATI Radeon 9600 and the GeForce FX 5200


I like the GeForce FX 5200 better.

pc-gamer-dude
11-28-2004, 12:27 AM
did u clean out your Nvidia drivers properly? are u shure uknow wut ur doing because that ATI should smoke that FX5200 by a noticable(spelling?) amount.

Spindulik
11-28-2004, 12:34 AM
did u clean out your Nvidia drivers properly? are u shure uknow wut ur doing because that ATI should smoke that FX5200 by a noticable(spelling?) amount.


Yes, I know what I am doing.

I have a fesh clean install of XP (including service pack 1) with restore points and I backed up the entire registry.

The ATI is great, but I am also an Unreal Tournament fan (original version), and that video glitch with ATI is bothersome.

I am going to do some BRYCE and BLENDER 3D rendering and see what happens.

Mr. Elmo
11-28-2004, 01:21 AM
if you dont like the extra stuff....dont install catalyst driver, get the omega driver or dna driver...or something else


9600>5200

Spindulik
11-28-2004, 01:56 AM
if you dont like the extra stuff....dont install catalyst driver, get the omega driver or dna driver...or something else


9600>5200

I'll try that. Thanks.


----------------------
In the meantime, I remember a long time ago that a 16MB video card (Voodoo - PCI slot) was too expensive to afford and unbelievable that it had that many MBs.

Duffman
11-28-2004, 06:39 AM
Duh 9600's a bigger number.

Formula1
11-28-2004, 04:33 PM
http://newegg.com has great prices on pc hardwares, if you live in the U.S. i'd recommend it...

Spindulik
12-08-2004, 03:19 AM
Duh 9600's a bigger number.


DUH, numbers mean nothing, especially between conpetitors.


For example, the CPU rivals:
AMD's "2800" is not 2.8 hHz, yet Intel's "P4 2.8gHz" is actually 2.8gHz


Average benchmark tests for the AMD 2800 is 2.13gHz