PDA

View Full Version : Quitting pot..



Smith
03-27-2005, 07:14 PM
Ive decieded that my short term memory is way better than getting high, so as of today i vow to never do weed again. the high isnt even that fun and all it does is make me stupid and it makes having a convo with people hard. Besides making me stupid, im sick of people comming up to me at school and asking me if im high.

Anyway, farewell weed, we had some good times but i wont miss you :crying:

JPaul
03-27-2005, 07:38 PM
It also increases your chances of mental illness apparently.

I think the UK is considering re-re-classifying, based on the recent studies.

DanB
03-27-2005, 07:39 PM
There is talk of making skunk a Class B :ohmy: :swine:

Smith
03-27-2005, 07:40 PM
You smoke skunk? I guess im used to BC stuff :)

JPaul
03-27-2005, 07:41 PM
There is talk of making skunk a Class B :ohmy: :swine:
Is skunk just a higher concentration of TCP (or whatever the active component is).

DanB
03-27-2005, 07:45 PM
Yeah it is a lot stronger, more THC is good, but because there is more 'active' ingredient it is also deemed more dangerous.

Personally I reckon hash with bits of plastic, diesel, pig fat and lacquer mixed in is probably more dangerous, but ...


edit - BC stuff? :unsure:

Smith
03-27-2005, 07:45 PM
Dan, is good weed hard to find in the uk?

DanB
03-27-2005, 07:46 PM
not if you now where to get it

JPaul
03-27-2005, 07:51 PM
Yeah it is a lot stronger, more THC is good, but because there is more 'active' ingredient it is also deemed more dangerous.

Personally I reckon hash with bits of plastic, diesel, pig fat and lacquer mixed in is probably more dangerous, but ...


edit - BC stuff? :unsure:
Isn't oil even stronger, that was Class A at one time I think. However I could be talking pish there, plenty of precedent for that.

DanB
03-27-2005, 07:51 PM
this would shock people


JP, I have always believed oil to be a myth because it is something I have heard of yet never met anybody that has ever had any or even seen any, but its certainly meant to be strong stuff. Even In Amsterdam I didn't see any :(


edit grr attachment was meant to be between those two comments

JPaul
03-27-2005, 07:54 PM
lol

Smith
03-27-2005, 08:37 PM
BC- British coloumbia'

Its on the coast, the best stuff in canada comes from there.

bujub22
03-27-2005, 08:59 PM
all this talk of weed makes me wana get high :frown:

hobbes
03-27-2005, 09:05 PM
BC- British coloumbia'

Its on the coast, the best stuff in canada comes from there.

What a brilliant way to spell it.

It combines the spelling of a country whose economy is based on drugs-Colombia, with the actaul local spelling- Columbia.

bujub22
03-27-2005, 09:06 PM
What a brilliant way to spell it.

It combines the spelling of a country whose economy is based on drugs-Colombia, with the actaul local spelling- Columbia.
i can't tell if that s sarcasm or u been fo real :frusty:

Gemby!
03-27-2005, 09:17 PM
Am I the only one in here not on drugs ?? :blink:

bujub22
03-27-2005, 09:18 PM
Am I the only one in here not on drugs ?? :blink:
that depends on what u consider drugs :shifty:

Gemby!
03-27-2005, 09:20 PM
the drugs you take for non-medicinal purposes- and feeling good is not a reason :nono:

bujub22
03-27-2005, 09:44 PM
the drugs you take for non-medicinal purposes- and feeling good is not a reason :nono:
coffee :lookaroun

bujub22
03-27-2005, 09:46 PM
he'll be backhalf baked

Gemby!
03-27-2005, 09:53 PM
coffee :lookaroun

that dont count - coffee smells nice :lookaroun

Yogi
03-27-2005, 10:29 PM
MARIJUANA MYTHS
by Paul Hager
Chair, ICLU Drug Task Force

1. Marijuana causes brain damage

The most celebrated study that claims to show brain damage is
the rhesus monkey study of Dr. Robert Heath, done in the late
1970s. This study was reviewed by a distinguished panel of
scientists sponsored by the Institute of Medicine and the National
Academy of Sciences. Their results were published under the title,
Marijuana and Health in 1982. Heath's work was sharply criticized
for its insufficient sample size (only four monkeys), its failure
to control experimental bias, and the misidentification of normal
monkey brain structure as "damaged". Actual studies of human
populations of marijuana users have shown no evidence of brain
damage. For example, two studies from 1977, published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) showed no
evidence of brain damage in heavy users of marijuana. That same
year, the American Medical Association (AMA) officially came out in
favor of decriminalizing marijuana. That's not the sort of thing
you'd expect if the AMA thought marijuana damaged the brain.

2. Marijuana damages the reproductive system

This claim is based chiefly on the work of Dr. Gabriel Nahas,
who experimented with tissue (cells) isolated in petri dishes, and
the work of researchers who dosed animals with near-lethal amounts
of cannabinoids (i.e., the intoxicating part of marijuana). Nahas'
generalizations from his petri dishes to human beings have been
rejected by the scientific community as being invalid. In the case
of the animal experiments, the animals that survived their ordeal
returned to normal within 30 days of the end of the experiment.
Studies of actual human populations have failed to demonstrate that
marijuana adversely affects the reproductive system.

3. Marijuana is a "gateway" drug -- it leads to hard drugs

This is one of the more persistent myths. A real world
example of what happens when marijuana is readily available can be
found in Holland. The Dutch partially legalized marijuana in the
1970s. Since then, hard drug use -- heroin and cocaine -- have
DECLINED substantially. If marijuana really were a gateway drug,
one would have expected use of hard drugs to have gone up, not
down. This apparent "negative gateway" effect has also been
observed in the United States. Studies done in the early 1970s
showed a negative correlation between use of marijuana and use of
alcohol. A 1993 Rand Corporation study that compared drug use in
states that had decriminalized marijuana versus those that had not,
found that where marijuana was more available -- the states that
had decriminalized -- hard drug abuse as measured by emergency room
episodes decreased. In short, what science and actual experience
tell us is that marijuana tends to substitute for the much more
dangerous hard drugs like alcohol, cocaine, and heroin.


4. Marijuana suppresses the immune system

Like the studies claiming to show damage to the reproductive
system, this myth is based on studies where animals were given
extremely high -- in many cases, near-lethal -- doses of
cannabinoids. These results have never been duplicated in human
beings. Interestingly, two studies done in 1978 and one done in
1988 showed that hashish and marijuana may have actually stimulated
the immune system in the people studied.

5. Marijuana is much more dangerous than tobacco

Smoked marijuana contains about the same amount of carcinogens
as does an equivalent amount of tobacco. It should be remembered,
however, that a heavy tobacco smoker consumes much more tobacco
than a heavy marijuana smoker consumes marijuana. This is because
smoked tobacco, with a 90% addiction rate, is the most addictive of
all drugs while marijuana is less addictive than caffeine. Two
other factors are important. The first is that paraphernalia laws
directed against marijuana users make it difficult to smoke safely.
These laws make water pipes and bongs, which filter some of the
carcinogens out of the smoke, illegal and, hence, unavailable. The
second is that, if marijuana were legal, it would be more
economical to have cannabis drinks like bhang (a traditional drink
in the Middle East) or tea which are totally non-carcinogenic.
This is in stark contrast with "smokeless" tobacco products like
snuff which can cause cancer of the mouth and throat. When all of
these facts are taken together, it can be clearly seen that the
reverse is true: marijuana is much SAFER than tobacco.

6. Legal marijuana would cause carnage on the highways

Although marijuana, when used to intoxication, does impair
performance in a manner similar to alcohol, actual studies of the
effect of marijuana on the automobile accident rate suggest that it
poses LESS of a hazard than alcohol. When a random sample of fatal
accident victims was studied, it was initially found that marijuana
was associated with RELATIVELY as many accidents as alcohol. In
other words, the number of accident victims intoxicated on
marijuana relative to the number of marijuana users in society gave
a ratio similar to that for accident victims intoxicated on alcohol
relative to the total number of alcohol users. However, a closer
examination of the victims revealed that around 85% of the people
intoxicated on marijuana WERE ALSO INTOXICATED ON ALCOHOL. For
people only intoxicated on marijuana, the rate was much lower than
for alcohol alone. This finding has been supported by other
research using completely different methods. For example, an
economic analysis of the effects of decriminalization on marijuana
usage found that states that had reduced penalties for marijuana
possession experienced a rise in marijuana use and a decline in
alcohol use with the result that fatal highway accidents decreased.
This would suggest that, far from causing "carnage", legal
marijuana might actually save lives.

7. Marijuana "flattens" human brainwaves

This is an out-and-out lie perpetrated by the Partnership for
a Drug-Free America. A few years ago, they ran a TV ad that
purported to show, first, a normal human brainwave, and second, a
flat brainwave from a 14-year-old "on marijuana". When researchers
called up the TV networks to complain about this commercial, the
Partnership had to pull it from the air. It seems that the
Partnership faked the flat "marijuana brainwave". In reality,
marijuana has the effect of slightly INCREASING alpha wave
activity. Alpha waves are associated with meditative and relaxed
states which are, in turn, often associated with human creativity.

8. Marijuana is more potent today than in the past

This myth is the result of bad data. The researchers who made
the claim of increased potency used as their baseline the THC
content of marijuana seized by police in the early 1970s. Poor
storage of this marijuana in un-air conditioned evidence rooms
caused it to deteriorate and decline in potency before any chemical
assay was performed. Contemporaneous, independent assays of
unseized "street" marijuana from the early 1970s showed a potency
equivalent to that of modern "street" marijuana. Actually, the
most potent form of this drug that was generally available was sold
legally in the 1920s and 1930s by the pharmaceutical company
Smith-Klein under the name, "American Cannabis".

9. Marijuana impairs short-term memory

This is true but misleading. Any impairment of short-term
memory disappears when one is no longer under the influence of
marijuana. Often, the short-term memory effect is paired with a
reference to Dr. Heath's poor rhesus monkeys to imply that the
condition is permanent.

10. Marijuana lingers in the body like DDT

This is also true but misleading. Cannabinoids are fat
soluble as are innumerable nutrients and, yes, some poisons like
DDT. For example, the essential nutrient, Vitamin A, is fat
soluble but one never hears people who favor marijuana prohibition
making this comparison.

11. There are over a thousand chemicals in marijuana smoke

Again, true but misleading. The 31 August 1990 issue of the
magazine Science notes that of the over 800 volatile chemicals
present in roasted COFFEE, only 21 have actually been tested on
animals and 16 of these cause cancer in rodents. Yet, coffee
remains legal and is generally considered fairly safe.

12. No one has ever died of a marijuana overdose

This is true. It was put in to see if you are paying
attention. Animal tests have revealed that extremely high doses of
cannabinoids are needed to have lethal effect. This has led
scientists to conclude that the ratio of the amount of cannabinoids
necessary to get a person intoxicated (i.e., stoned) relative to
the amount necessary to kill them is 1 to 40,000. In other words,
to overdose, you would have to consume 40,000 times as much
marijuana as you needed to get stoned. In contrast, the ratio for
alcohol varies between 1 to 4 and 1 to 10. It is easy to see how
upwards of 5000 people die from alcohol overdoses every year and no
one EVER dies of marijuana overdoses.

WHAT IS THE ICLU DRUG TASK FORCE?

The Indiana Civil Liberties Union (ICLU) Drug Task Force is
involved in education and lobbying efforts directed toward
reforming drug policy. Specifically, we support ACLU Policy
Statement number 210 which calls for the legalization of marijuana.
We also support an end to the drug war. In its place, we favor
"harm reduction" strategies which treat drug abuse as what it is --
a medical problem -- rather than a criminal justice problem.

The Drug Task Force also works to end urine and hair testing
of workers by private industry. These kinds of tests violate
worker privacy to no good purpose because they detect past use of
certain drugs (mostly marijuana) while ignoring others (e.g., LSD)
and cannot detect current impairment. In situations where public
and worker safety is a legitimate concern, we advocate impairment
testing devices which reliably detect degradation of performance
without infringing upon worker privacy.

For more information about the activities of the Drug Task
Force, call the ICLU at (317) 635-4059 or call Paul Hager at (812)
333-1384 or e-mail to [email protected] on the InterNet.

SOURCES

1) Marijuana and Health, Institute of Medicine, National Academy
of Sciences, 1982. Note: the Committee on Substance Abuse and
Habitual Behavior of the "Marijuana and Health" study had its
part of the final report suppressed when it reviewed the
evidence and recommended that possession of small amounts of
marijuana should no longer be a crime (TIME magazine, July 19,
1982). The two JAMA studies are: Co, B.T., Goodwin, D.W.,
Gado, M., Mikhael, M., and Hill, S.Y.: "Absence of cerebral
atrophy in chronic cannabis users", JAMA, 237:1229-1230, 1977;
and, Kuehnle, J., Mendelson, J.H., Davis, K.R., and New,
P.F.J.: "Computed tomographic examination of heavy marijuana
smokers", JAMA, 237:1231-1232, 1977.

2) See Marijuana and Health, ibid., for information on this
research. See also, Marijuana Reconsidered (1978) by Dr.
Lester Grinspoon.

3) The Dutch experience is written up in "The Economics of
Legalizing Drugs", by Richard J. Dennis, The Atlantic Monthly,
Vol 266, No. 5, Nov 1990, p. 130. See "A Comparison of
Marijuana Users and Non-users" by Norman Zinberg and Andrew
Weil (1971) for the negative correlation between use of
marijuana and use of alcohol. The 1993 Rand Corporation study
is "The Effect of Marijuana Decriminalization on Hospital
Emergency Room Episodes: 1975 - 1978" by Karyn E. Model.

4) See a review of studies and their methodology in "Marijuana
and Immunity", Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Vol 20(1),
Jan-Mar 1988. Studies showing stimulation of the immune
system: Kaklamani, et al., "Hashish smoking and T-
lymphocytes", 1978; Kalofoutis et al., "The significance of
lymphocyte lipid changes after smoking hashish", 1978. The
1988 study: Wallace, J.M., Tashkin, D.P., Oishi, J.S.,
Barbers, R.G., "Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subpopulations and
Mitogen Responsiveness in Tobacco and Marijuana Smokers",
1988, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, ibid.

5) The 90% figure comes from Health Consequences of Smoking:
Nicotine Addiction, Surgeon General's Report, 1988. In Health
magazine in an article entitled, "Hooked, Not Hooked" by
Deborah Franklin (pp. 39-52), compares the addictives of
various drugs and ranks marijuana below coffeine. For current
information on cannabis drinks see Working Men and Ganja:
Marijuana Use in Rural Jamaica by M. C. Dreher, Institute for
the Study of Human Issues, 1982, ISBN 0-89727-025-8. For
information on cannabis and actual cancer risk, see Marijuana
and Health, ibid.

6) For a survey of studies relating to cannabis and highway
accidents see "Marijuana, Driving and Accident Safety", by
Dale Gieringer, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, ibid. The
effect of decriminalization on highway accidents is analyzed
in "Do Youths Substitute Alcohol and Marijuana? Some
Econometric Evidence" by Frank J. Chaloupka and Adit
Laixuthai, Nov. 1992, University of Illinois at Chicago.

7) For information about the Partnership ad, see Jack Herer's
book, The Emperor Wears No Clothes, 1990, p. 74. See also
"Hard Sell in the Drug War", The Nation, March 9, 1992, by
Cynthia Cotts, which reveals that the Partnership receives a
large percentage of its advertizing budget from alcohol,
tobacco, and pharmaceutical companies and is thus disposed
toward exaggerating the risks of marijuana while downplaying
the risks of legal drugs. For information on memory and the
alpha brainwave enhancement effect, see "Marijuana, Memory,
and Perception", by R. L. Dornbush, M.D., M. Fink, M.D., and
A. M. Freedman, M.D., presented at the 124th annual meeting of
the American Psychiatric Association, May 3-7, 1971.

8) See "Cannabis 1988, Old Drug New Dangers, The Potency
Question" by Tod H Mikuriya, M.D. and Michael Aldrich, Ph.D.,
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, ibid.

9) See Marijuana and Health, ibid. Also see "Marijuana, Memory,
and Perception", ibid.

10) The fat solubility of cannabinoids and certain vitamins is
well known. See Marijuana and Health, ibid. For some
information on vitamin A, see "The A Team" in Scientific
American, Vol 264, No. 2, February 1991, p. 16.

11) See "Too Many Rodent Carcinogens: Mitogenesis Increases
Mutagenesis", Bruce N. Ames and Lois Swirsky Gold, Science,
Vol 249, 31 August 1990, p. 971.

12) Cannabis and alcohol toxicity is compared in Marijuana
Reconsidered, ibid., p. 227. Yearly alcohol overdoses was
taken from "Drug Prohibition in the United States: Costs,
Consequences, and Alternatives" by Ethan A. Nadelmann,
Science, Vol 245, 1 September 1989, p. 943.
--
paul hager [email protected]

"The most formidable weapon against errors of every kind is reason."
-- Thomas Paine, _The Age of Reason_






SourceErowid (http://www.erowid.org/)



Yogi :)

Gemby!
03-27-2005, 10:33 PM
I think it would be easier to list what it doesn't do :rolleyes:

plus they say everything is bad for you nowadays....

100%
03-27-2005, 10:36 PM
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0091887569.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Yogi
03-27-2005, 10:36 PM
I think it would be easier to list what it doesn't do :rolleyes:

plus they say everything is bad for you nowadays....


It is a lst of what it doesn't do............. :huh:

Yogi
03-27-2005, 10:38 PM
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0091887569.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg


OMG, zeddy............

You turn into one of those parents to become, who relates everything to babies???? :lol:

Gemby!
03-27-2005, 10:40 PM
It is a lst of what it doesn't do............. :huh:

Thats what you do when you put too much writing on a page, I got confused :rolleyes:

Yogi
03-27-2005, 10:42 PM
Thats what you do when you put too much writing on a page, I got confused :rolleyes:


Confused, huh???

Sure those cakes you just had weren't a little spacy??? :rolleyes: ;)



Yogi

100%
03-27-2005, 10:42 PM
OMG, zeddy............

You turn into one of those parents to become, who relates everything to babies???? :lol:


fk fk fk fkf fkfkfkfkfkfkfkfkfkdksdskkdskdksfdkfdkfdkjjfkkfdfkfdjkkjfdkfd :frusty: :frusty: :frusty: :frusty: :frusty: :frusty:
:blushing: :blushing:
:ph34r: :ph34r:
shit shit fk

I'm fkd....

Yogi
03-27-2005, 10:44 PM
fk fk fk fkf fkfkfkfkfkfkfkfkfkdksdskkdskdksfdkfdkfdkjjfkkfdfkfdjkkjfdkfd :frusty: :frusty: :frusty: :frusty: :frusty: :frusty:
:blushing: :blushing:
:ph34r: :ph34r:
shit shit fk

I'm fkd....


http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/images/smilies/blow.gif



:lol:



Yownd

100%
03-27-2005, 11:01 PM
so godamn predictable

owned

Gripper
03-27-2005, 11:08 PM
I've smoked,drunk and am at the moment hooked on legal prescribed drugs,I can smoke or not..no problem,I can drink or not..no problem.
If I dont take my perscription ..big problem.
What's worse something you pay for that makes you feel good in moderation,or something I get for free from the NHS that makes me feel shit if I dont take it

Lilmiss
03-28-2005, 12:37 AM
/shrinks quietly back out of thread. :shifty:

100%
03-28-2005, 12:51 AM
I used to smoke it everyday everymoment everywhere
yes i had even read that it wasn't possible to neeed it
I disagree with all those say that it isn\t addictive - isn't escapism, warp, beauty, sex, tutti addictive?

teen stone is heavy, sailing stoned is free,staring at walls isnt

until i met a woman...and so that hshish world no longer applied

golden aftermath

occasional warp is the l33t

lee551
03-28-2005, 01:02 AM
good luck quitting. it definately wears down your memory capabilities, and i dont even have a good memory to begin with. best to just use it occasionally so you can avoid burnout. :cool:

bujub22
03-28-2005, 01:48 AM
that dont count - coffee smells nice :lookaroun
but it's considered addicting so its a drug ;)

bujub22
03-28-2005, 01:59 AM
I used to smoke it everyday everymoment everywhere
yes i had even read that it wasn't possible to neeed it
I disagree with all those say that it isn\t addictive - isn't escapism, warp, beauty, sex, tutti addictive?

teen stone is heavy, sailing stoned is free,staring at walls isnt

until i met a woman...and so that hshish world no longer applied

golden aftermath

occasional warp is the l33t
ill be the first to say if it has'nt been said before ,this sounds like :shifty: pussy wiped :lol: ;)

100%
03-28-2005, 02:04 AM
congratulions on being the first to say so
ass wipe
kusuchdak meira ;)

bujub22
03-28-2005, 02:37 AM
congratulions on being the first to say so
ass wipe
kusuchdak meira ;)
:lol:

i dont know what that means but owahumwa brother :lol:

sArA
03-28-2005, 03:03 AM
this would shock people


JP, I have always believed oil to be a myth because it is something I have heard of yet never met anybody that has ever had any or even seen any, but its certainly meant to be strong stuff. Even In Amsterdam I didn't see any :(


edit grr attachment was meant to be between those two comments


Oil is just a different hit, its not a myth...;)

Strength largely depends on how much you put in.... :)

Djtima
03-28-2005, 04:41 AM
lol... why is this the filesharing talk forum?? :huh:
by the look of this thread it should be the drugsharing forum or somthing along those lines.. you know what i mean...

bujub22
03-28-2005, 04:48 AM
lol... why is this the filesharing talk forum?? :huh:
by the look of this thread it should be the drugsharing forum or somthing along those lines.. you know what i mean...
these are the file are of are lives


stay tuned......................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.............................................................................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.............................................................................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.............................................................................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.............................................................................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.............................................................................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.............................................................................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.............................................................................................
.....................................................
....................................................
.....................................................
.......................................................

Djtima
03-28-2005, 04:52 AM
these are the file are of are lives


that makes heaps of sence :blink: :ermm:

bujub22
03-28-2005, 05:02 AM
that makes heaps of sence :blink: :ermm:
no it does'nt y are u agree with me :blink:

UKResident
03-28-2005, 05:19 AM
Good idea Canuck, if you have short term memory loss at your age you can imagine what it will do to you as you get older. Apart from that, the lethargy it instils in you will hold you back from the life you have the potential to lead.

@Dan. Hash oil is no myth, l can assure you. There are three main oils; one is to take the dried marijuana and powder it. You put this into a container and cover it with a catalyst, anything from alcohol to petrol. It is then covered and kept in a cool place. After a few days oil will appear on the top, this can be skimmed off and put aside. After about 10 days of this, stirring it and topping up the catalyst, you will have extracted all the oil. This is then put out in the sun to allow the catalyst to evaporate.

The second method, quicker, but very dangerous if not done carefully, is to "cook" the powder in the catalyst. This needs to be done in an extra large pot as the 'steam' is heavier than air and will sit in the pot, if it is allowed to spill over into the heat source you'll have an explosion on your hands. This method is often done with those tube contraptions that take away the 'steam'. The advantage of doing it this way is that it takes only a few hours from start to finish.

The third 'oil' is actually completely different, and is the best, and scarcest, of all. This involves pollenating the plants using a suede 'apron'. This 'apron' is full length and covers the arms too. The man holds his arms outstretched and walks through fields of grass at a time when the male flowers are out. Remember this is not sinsemilla, the plants in plantations are seeded. At the end of the day the 'apron' is scaped with a knife and the result is 'oil'.

Using the first two methods, the hash to oil ratio is between five and seven to one. This is not cost effective in itself, as you don't get five to seven times the money for it in Europe, the reason it's made is because a kilo of hash oil takes up slightly less room than hash, and can be made into any shape for smuggling, and still fetches around three to four times that of hash, a bit more if cut with metholated spirits.

Djtima
03-28-2005, 05:37 AM
damn... where do you druglords learn this shit? :huh:

brotherdoobie
03-28-2005, 06:23 AM
damn... where do you druglords learn this shit? :huh:

I tripped and fell into my mother's world of drugs, before birth....affected
or was in it inflicted...injected, conflicted, before conception

H
A
L
F

of my life...in the shadows, behind her closed windows.

CONTROLLED by her?

N
O, by myself...it's really that simple.

No longer,am I suffocating...not for a long while. It's sweet so sweet being able to breath.Now that you know what it feels like to breath, Smile...your free.

Best wishes to you Canuk

Peace Paul

bujub22
03-28-2005, 06:30 AM
damn... where do you druglords learn this shit? :huh:
where do u live?

Djtima
03-28-2005, 07:32 AM
austraila...
but seeming you come from new york i guess im going to get a lesson about how hard arsed people from manhattan are and how they smoke pot and make crunckjuice while smoking pot... how far off am i?

DanB
03-28-2005, 10:51 AM
I am now not going to rest until I get my hands on some oil this calendar year then :angry:

uNz[i]
03-28-2005, 12:47 PM
austraila...
but seeming you come from new york i guess im going to get a lesson about how hard arsed people from manhattan are and how they smoke pot and make crunckjuice while smoking pot... how far off am i?

I learned all the stuff in this thread during my teens and early 20's, ...and I'm in Australia too.
It's all down to who you know, not where you come from.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 01:03 PM
']I learned all the stuff in this thread during my teens and early 20's, ...and I'm in Australia too.
It's all down to who you know, not where you come from.

Agreed.

Though living in Holland does help.



YoBud

Snee
03-28-2005, 01:09 PM
@Dan. Hash oil is no myth, l can assure you. There are three main oils; one is to take the dried marijuana and powder it. You put this into a container and cover it with a catalyst, anything from alcohol to petrol. It is then covered and kept in a cool place. After a few days oil will appear on the top, this can be skimmed off and put aside. After about 10 days of this, stirring it and topping up the catalyst, you will have extracted all the oil. This is then put out in the sun to allow the catalyst to evaporate.

The second method, quicker, but very dangerous if not done carefully, is to "cook" the powder in the catalyst. This needs to be done in an extra large pot as the 'steam' is heavier than air and will sit in the pot, if it is allowed to spill over into the heat source you'll have an explosion on your hands. This method is often done with those tube contraptions that take away the 'steam'. The advantage of doing it this way is that it takes only a few hours from start to finish.

The third 'oil' is actually completely different, and is the best, and scarcest, of all. This involves pollenating the plants using a suede 'apron'. This 'apron' is full length and covers the arms too. The man holds his arms outstretched and walks through fields of grass at a time when the male flowers are out. Remember this is not sinsemilla, the plants in plantations are seeded. At the end of the day the 'apron' is scaped with a knife and the result is 'oil'.

Using the first two methods, the hash to oil ratio is between five and seven to one. This is not cost effective in itself, as you don't get five to seven times the money for it in Europe, the reason it's made is because a kilo of hash oil takes up slightly less room than hash, and can be made into any shape for smuggling, and still fetches around three to four times that of hash, a bit more if cut with metholated spirits.


By drinking l take it you mean alcohol? No l don't, l don't take drugs either and l certainly don't smoke. Only idiots smoke, whatever you may say. Why would anyone take up that digusting habit? l also eat well, l've been a vegetarian all my life and spend only the necessary time on the "bog", unless l'm reading the Guardian of course, then l may stay a little longer.

'k

UKResident
03-28-2005, 01:26 PM
@SnnY. And your point is? Apart from your usual sarcastic shit. Are you saying if l don't take it l can't know about it? Then why don't you prove me wrong or, as Busyman would say, STFU!

Snee
03-28-2005, 01:28 PM
OIC, you just posted instructions to something you've never tried.

Very health concious that.


"It's no myth, I assure you".

'cos google told you or what?

UKResident
03-28-2005, 01:35 PM
See? Sarcasm, your usual MO, nothing to say but shit. YANBAASSGTFOOH

DanB
03-28-2005, 01:35 PM
hi Rikk :)

Snee
03-28-2005, 01:37 PM
How about you try and tell me why you felt you knew enough about making a potentially dangerous substance to post that knowledge publically on the internet where impressionable young minds have access to it.

What with you being so health concious and all I mean, mr marathon-man.

Rather than whine about sarcasm, that is.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 01:41 PM
UKResident:


......your usual sarcasm......

Reminder:

Buy stock in black-kettle inc.

MCHeshPants420
03-28-2005, 01:47 PM
UKResident:



Reminder:

Buy stock in black-kettle inc.

I thought you were more of a pot man? :unsure:

Yogi
03-28-2005, 02:11 PM
I thought you were more of a pot man? :unsure:

:lol: :lol: :lol:


True, but when i make stock of that, i usually drink it............... :P

UKResident
03-28-2005, 02:23 PM
How about you try and tell me why you felt you knew enough about making a potentially dangerous substance
Are you that important?


hi Rikk
Sorry Dan, way out, and to be quite honest it's getting rather boring.

bujub22
03-28-2005, 02:25 PM
']I learned all the stuff in this thread during my teens and early 20's, ...and I'm in Australia too.
It's all down to who you know, not where you come from.
true i was goin to ask how old he was but i see he's only 15 so he's still got time to learn..also they teach this crap in normal science class u jus got to hav the balls to ask ;)

learned all in home garden class i was a plant freak in middle school :ph34r:

Gemby!
03-28-2005, 02:26 PM
I feel this is an appropraite time to say...

Drugs are bad :nono:

MCHeshPants420
03-28-2005, 02:27 PM
I feel this is an appropraite time to say...

Drugs are bad :nono:

Then I feel it is an appropriate time to say "Mkay.."

DanB
03-28-2005, 02:34 PM
Sorry Dan, way out, and to be quite honest it's getting rather boring.

Pass it on for me then please

Gemby!
03-28-2005, 02:35 PM
Then I feel it is an appropriate time to say "Mkay.."

and now i will say 'meh' :w00t:

Snee
03-28-2005, 02:43 PM
Are you that important?
'k.

Guess you can't weasel your way out of it any other way, rikk.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 02:45 PM
So being Rikk is getting boring??? :cool:

I can imagine........... :P

Snee
03-28-2005, 02:58 PM
One would think that someone who'll constantly go to such lengths to talk to people on a board where there is no love for him, would jump at the chance of disproving anyone questioning his credibility if at all possible.

:rolleyes:

Guess we aren't important enough to explain himself to, but important enough to come back to and argue with, over and over.

bujub22
03-28-2005, 03:02 PM
One would think that someone who'll constantly go to such lengths to talk to people on a board where there is no love for him, would jump at the chance of disproving anyone questioning his credibility if at all possible.

:rolleyes:

Guess we aren't important enough to explain himself to, but important enough to come back to and argue with, over and over.
thats right if he dont like it he can pass the dutch to the mofo on left ;)

Yogi
03-28-2005, 03:04 PM
Like a wife being abused by her spous keeps having him around, saying: But he can be

sweet for the children.....sometimes.......

Snee
03-28-2005, 03:07 PM
thats right if he dont like it he can pass the dutch to the mofo on left ;)
http://www.teesnthings.com/ProductImages/South%20Park%20T-Shirt/crips-south-park-t-shirt.jpg


"Look, my gang...which i can't talk about because it's super secret is the most important thing to me now, and if you two don't like it, you can just pass the blunt to the nigga on your left" - Jimmy

bujub22
03-28-2005, 03:11 PM
thats right snny:lol:

Peerzy
03-28-2005, 03:12 PM
Sorry Dan, way out, and to be quite honest it's getting rather boring.


Yeah common Dan, everyone knows he likes the name Billy much better than Rikk :rolleyes:

Snee
03-28-2005, 03:19 PM
Like a wife being abused by her spous keeps having him around, saying: But he can be

sweet for the children.....sometimes.......
One can only hope that she'll learn one day.

UKResident
03-28-2005, 04:23 PM
Guess we aren't important enough to explain himself to, but important enough to come back to and argue with, over and over.
Boy, you really are full of your own self importance aren't you? What are you, Swedish or something wasn't it? If someone civil had asked me to explain, l would have, l just don't respond to people like you.

DanB
03-28-2005, 04:24 PM
Am I civil enough for you to explain to? :unsure:

UKResident
03-28-2005, 04:25 PM
Yeah common Dan, everyone knows he likes the name Billy much better than Rikk

Baaa, baaa.

UKResident
03-28-2005, 04:27 PM
Am I civil enough for you to explain to?

Yes Dan, what would you like to know?

Snee
03-28-2005, 04:27 PM
Boy, you really are full of your own self importance aren't you? What are you, Swedish or something wasn't it? If someone civil had asked me to explain, l would have, l just don't respond to people like you.
As I recall, the first instance of criticism in this thread came when you accused me of being sarcastic.

At any rate, I haven't really seen you act in a civil manner on this forum yet, so why would you expect politeness in return?

EDit: bit strange a demand from someone who goes ballistic at the drop of a hat.

DanB
03-28-2005, 04:32 PM
Yes Dan, what would you like to know?


why you felt you knew enough about making a potentially dangerous substance to post that knowledge publically on the internet where impressionable young minds have access to it.

please :naughty:

UKResident
03-28-2005, 04:36 PM
As I recall, the first instance of criticism in this thread came when you accused me of being sarcastic.
So you don't believe your sarcasm was cause for criticism? You are a strange one, l shall add you to my ignore list, along with Yogi, is he still around?

manker
03-28-2005, 04:37 PM
Boy, you really are full of your own self importance aren't you? What are you, Swedish or something wasn't it? If someone civil had asked me to explain, l would have, l just don't respond to people like you.You said that to me, last month in the drawing room. Clocker too, I believe.

Then you responded* again and again and again - ad infinitum.

I think you say that when people back you into a corner and you're at a bit of a loss as to what to say at that particular juncture. This is a rather good example of that.

*bit

Lilmiss
03-28-2005, 04:39 PM
I'm having a smoke and laughing.


Is that wrong?

Snee
03-28-2005, 04:39 PM
So you don't believe your sarcasm was cause for criticism? You are a strange one, l shall add you to my ignore list, along with Yogi, is he still around?
Was I being sarcastic in this thread tho', before you accused me?

Or did you perhaps use your powers of mentalism to deduce that I would be in the future?

Feel free to block everybody tho', hell, why don't you block out the entire board.

@lilmiss: not really.

UKResident
03-28-2005, 04:40 PM
why you felt you knew enough about making a potentially dangerous substance to post that knowledge publically on the internet where impressionable young minds have access to it.
Impressionable young minds? On a forum about stealing, surely not?

What exactly did you want to know, how l knew, or why l posted it? Perhaps you'd like to explain, while you're at it, why you posted instructions for making crack.

manker
03-28-2005, 04:41 PM
I'm having a smoke and laughing.


Is that wrong? Noooo, everyone laughts at Billy. Doobage or not :D

It's a shame about the whole hiding behind a facade thing. I wish the modulators would unban him.

Free Billy Dean!!11

JPaul
03-28-2005, 04:41 PM
Was I being sarcastic in this thread tho', before you accused me?

Or did you perhaps use your powers of mentalism to deduce that I would be in the future?

Feel free to block everybody tho', hell, why don't you block out the entire board.


:lol:

Snee
03-28-2005, 04:42 PM
RE dan: I haven't seen him make any claims about pursuing a drug-free lifestyle. :unsure:

DanB
03-28-2005, 04:42 PM
I just wanted you to answer SnnY's question, I didn't question you about it.

And, SnnY hasn't asked me, although if he did I would explain

TheDave
03-28-2005, 04:42 PM
is it racist to call people uncivilised because they're swedish? :unsure:

UKResident
03-28-2005, 04:44 PM
You said that to me, last month in the drawing room.

Aah! l see all the monkeys are here now, must be time to break out the bananas.

TheDave
03-28-2005, 04:46 PM
Aah! l see all the monkeys are here now, must be time to break out the bananas.
i bet you're laughing out loud at that arent you

manker
03-28-2005, 04:46 PM
Aah! l see all the monkeys are here now, must be time to break out the bananas.Your selective quoting, wit and sheer lack of any discernable comeback astounds me.

No, really. It does.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 04:47 PM
YES!!!! :w00t:

One post and he ignores me!!! :01:

Snee
03-28-2005, 04:47 PM
YES!!!! :w00t:

One post and he ignores me!!! :01:
:new record: :score:

UKResident
03-28-2005, 04:49 PM
I just wanted you to answer SnnY's question,

Oh, l see. Well the problem there Dan is that SnnY's 'question' wasn't a question at all, so there is no answer.


is it racist to call people uncivilised because they're swedish?

l don't know, give it a go and see how it feels.

Snee
03-28-2005, 04:50 PM
I'd have thought it was a question.



Yep, that was what the question-mark was there for, I'm pretty certain.

Oops, now I see, I forgot it in the second one.


??? have a few.


You'd think I'd be the one having problems getting whether a sentence contains a question, and not "UKResident", what with him being a bonafide briton and all, whereas I'm not.

JPaul
03-28-2005, 04:54 PM
I've never been to Sweden, but I have been to Norway.

I found the people to be both civil and friendly. They all spoke English and seemed keen to practice it.

I spoke to an old chap who was the double of Geri, from Geri's game. He was a smashing bloke.

TheDave
03-28-2005, 04:57 PM
i watched the getaway in stockholm 5 dvd this morning. that was good.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 04:59 PM
I once hooked up with a swedish chick while on holiday in England.

It would 've been great, would she not have drunk 9 ciders............ :crying:

Her idea of a blowjob was quite........ :sick:


Yögi

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:02 PM
I once hooked up with a swedish chick while on holiday in England.

It would 've been great, would she not have drunk 9 ciders............ :crying:

Her idea of a blowjob was quite........ :sick:


Yögi

did she lick your bum?

UKResident
03-28-2005, 05:02 PM
*sigh* Is that it? Tussling with you lot is like being whipped with feather dusters.

Why don't l just pop down to the Fox & Castle for a quick game of darts, that should give Wanker time to think of something clever. On second thoughts, maybe a few games of pool too.

Manchester United 0, AC Milan 1.
AC Milan 1, Manchester United 0.

That was pretty funny, maybe you could start there?

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:04 PM
australia 33 - western samoa 0
world cup qualifier, how about that?

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:05 PM
*sigh* Is that it? Tussling with you lot is like being whipped with feather dusters.

Why don't l just pop down to the Fox & Castle for a quick game of darts, that should give Wanker time to think of something clever. On second thoughts, maybe a few games of pool too.

Manchester United 0, AC Milan 1.
AC Milan 1, Manchester United 0.

That was pretty funny, maybe you could start there?
Translation=

He can't think of a good retort, so he thought he'd huddle up in a corner for a little bit, and cry like a little girl, 'cos nobody loves him :(

manker
03-28-2005, 05:06 PM
To add a little more Scandinavian flavour to the thread, I once had sex with a Finnish girl while in Tenerife. Quite striking she was; taller than me, bright ginger hair, pert breasts and white pubic hair. She was 19.

When I tell people they either look embarrased, confused or just laugh - I duno, SnnY, is that normal, the pubes bit I mean :unsure:

manker
03-28-2005, 05:08 PM
Translation=

He can't think of a good retort, so he thought he'd huddle up in a corner for a little bit, and cry like a little girl, 'cos nobody loves him :(True, dat.

Mind, you forgot the bit which translates as:

I can't be Billy 'cos I'm laughing about Man United losing.

Dead clever, that.

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:08 PM
To add a little more Scandinavian flavour to the thread, I once had sex with a Finnish girl while in Tenerife. Quite striking she was; taller than me, bright ginger hair, pert breasts and white pubic hair. She was 19.

When I tell people they either look embarrased, confused or just laugh - I duno, SnnY, is that normal, the pubes bit I mean :unsure:
Seen blonde, dunno' about white, maybe she had a dye-job on top and no pigmentation below. :unsure:

Ad says red is the only colour that works for his hair. :unsure:

DanB
03-28-2005, 05:09 PM
To add a little more Scandinavian flavour to the thread, I once had sex with a Finnish girl while in Tenerife. Quite striking she was; taller than me, bright ginger hair, pert breasts and white pubic hair. She was 19.

When I tell people they either look embarrased, confused or just laugh - I duno, SnnY, is that normal, the pubes bit I mean :unsure:


:lol: :lol:

and Scandanavian flavour? :blink:

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:13 PM
bet you were finnished in 5 minutes manker

manker
03-28-2005, 05:14 PM
Seen blonde, dunno' about white, maybe she had a dye-job on top and no pigmentation below. :unsure:

Ad says red is the only colour that works for his hair. :unsure:Didn't think of that!

Maybe I was with teh albino. Her hair didn't look dyed but then I s'pose it could have been. Her eyes definitely weren't pink, but neither are ad's :unsure:

Gonna consider that mystery solved, cheers :01:

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:15 PM
maybe she was just jailbat?

manker
03-28-2005, 05:15 PM
bet you were finnished in 5 minutes manker:boab:

But if you're just crap at speeling then I'm like a stallion after 17 cider shandies, so it was considerably longer :snooty:

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:17 PM
Didn't think of that!

Maybe I was with teh albino. Her hair didn't look dyed but then I s'pose it could have been. Her eyes definitely weren't pink, but neither are ad's :unsure:

Gonna consider that mystery solved, cheers :01:
NP

Answering questions isn't hard, not hard at all. Well, when you don't have to make up the answer.

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:18 PM
sorry the pun was bad, having trouble with my keyboard and it not working when azureus uses all my memory. gypsy client it is

manker
03-28-2005, 05:19 PM
maybe she was just jailbat?Said she was 19 - she was probably telling the truth :ermm:

MCHeshPants420
03-28-2005, 05:19 PM
Damn, I was going to make a Finnish pun.:(

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:20 PM
To add a little more Scandinavian flavour to the thread, I once had sex with a Finnish ewe while in Tenerife. Quite striking she was; taller than me, bright ginger wool, pert breasts and white pubic wool. She was 19 stone.

When I tell people they either look embarrased, confused or just laugh - I duno, SnnY, is that normal, the pubes bit I mean :unsure:

well you are welsh after all.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 05:21 PM
did she lick your bum?


Nah, if only........ :w00t:

Let's just say she produced strange looking saliva............. :sick:

manker
03-28-2005, 05:21 PM
NP

Answering questions isn't hard, not hard at all. Well, when you don't have to make up the answer.:D

Helps too when you don't have to remember whether you're an unemployed ex-patriot dopehead farm hand, a 62 year old vegan marathon runner or a complete mentalist who knows Rolf Harris.

manker
03-28-2005, 05:23 PM
well you are welsh after all.Pretending to speak Welsh to teh foreign ladies gets them wet.

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:23 PM
Nah, if only........ :w00t:

Let's just say she produced strange looking saliva............. :sick:

she was sick on your cawk?

MCHeshPants420
03-28-2005, 05:24 PM
she was sick on your cawk?

Hawt.

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:24 PM
That's gotta' sting.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 05:25 PM
she was sick on your cawk?

Let's just say i lost my appetite, 'k??? :crying:

DanB
03-28-2005, 05:27 PM
eurgh

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:29 PM
:D

Helps too when you don't have to remember whether you're an unemployed ex-patriot dopehead farm hand, a 62 year old vegan marathon runner or a complete mentalist who knows Rolf Harris.
Good point, I have it way too easy.

MCHeshPants420
03-28-2005, 05:29 PM
Let's just say i lost my appetite, 'k??? :crying:

Bizarrely, I have a pretty similar story with a Finnish girl. Never got to find out if the cuffs and collar matched... :(

JPaul
03-28-2005, 05:30 PM
Bizarrely, I have a pretty similar story with a Finnish girl. Never got to find out if the cuffs and collar matched... :(
So, not that similar then.

DanB
03-28-2005, 05:31 PM
So are all Finnish girls light weights then?

Spider_dude
03-28-2005, 05:32 PM
except the fat ones

TheDave
03-28-2005, 05:34 PM
they're all hawt according to getaway in stockholm

DanB
03-28-2005, 05:34 PM
boom boom

MCHeshPants420
03-28-2005, 05:35 PM
Actually I just checked and she was from Denmark... :blushing:

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:37 PM
they're all hawt according to getaway in stockholm
except the fat ones

JPaul
03-28-2005, 05:37 PM
Actually I just checked and she was from Denmark... :blushing:
What in the name of gepulon did you check.

Do you keep notes.

manker
03-28-2005, 05:38 PM
So are all Finnish girls light weights then?There were about four of the Finn girls that were drinking with us, they seemed to be able to handle their pints of Stella and apple schnapps chasers okay.

Well, about as well as you'd expect of a bunch of skinny teenage girls to be able to handle a shedload of booze :naughty:




Think I'd better mention that I was 20 at the time, before I'd finished uni.

DanB
03-28-2005, 05:38 PM
What in the name of gepulon did you check.

Do you keep notes.

:lol: :lol:

manker
03-28-2005, 05:39 PM
What in the name of gepulon did you check.

Do you keep notes.The Chebus scrolls.

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:39 PM
What in the name of gepulon did you check.

Do you keep notes.
He keeps a database in team-chat. :ph34r:

JPaul
03-28-2005, 05:40 PM
The Chebus scrolls.
scroll = verb

suggestions for meaning to the usual address.

JPaul
03-28-2005, 05:41 PM
He keeps a database in team-chat. :ph34r:
It's what he keeps in t'basement that worries me.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 05:42 PM
Actually I just checked and she was from Denmark... :blushing:

Danish blue??? :w00t:

Snee
03-28-2005, 05:43 PM
Danish blue??? :w00t:
Oh, so you've run into her too.

JPaul
03-28-2005, 05:44 PM
Oh, so you've run into her too.
Danish blue is runny, cheese.

Yogi
03-28-2005, 06:32 PM
Danish blue is runny, cheese.


No, Cheese, camembert is runny. :naughty:

Danish Blue is firm. :01:

Yogi
03-28-2005, 06:33 PM
Oh, so you've run into her too.
:blushing:

100%
03-28-2005, 08:14 PM
Feb. 23, 2005 -- New clues about Alzheimer's disease have emerged from a Spanish study of marijuana. The drug's active ingredients -- cannabinoids -- help prevent brain problems seen in Alzheimer's, say the scientists.


http://my.webmd.com/content/article/101/106061.htm

Now where did I leave that bong tongue.gif
................

RPerry
03-31-2005, 07:54 PM
Pass it on for me then please

I could post the 2 current members who have matching IP's to this account if you wish :rolleyes:

As you can see, I grow tired as well :frusty:

manker
03-31-2005, 07:56 PM
I could post the 2 current members who have matching IP's to this account if you wish :rolleyes:

As you can see, I grow tired as well :frusty:Please do :intruiged:

Gemby!
03-31-2005, 07:57 PM
Hey how is the quitting the pot going thecanuk ?

Snee
03-31-2005, 08:01 PM
I could post the 2 current members who have matching IP's to this account if you wish :rolleyes:

As you can see, I grow tired as well :frusty:
I remember a mod once telling me that two people who had previously been proven (by several others) to live on different sides of the atlantic were the same people, because the same ip had been used by both.

Plz tell me you won't be fooled by proxies.

RPerry
03-31-2005, 08:04 PM
I remember a mod once telling me that two people who had previously been proven (by several others) to live on different sides of the atlantic were the same people, because the same ip had been used by both.

Plz tell me you won't be fooled by proxies.

this isn't a one time only happening, I have been tracking it for a while. :shifty:

Snee
03-31-2005, 08:08 PM
I don't suppose you could tell us, just out of curiosity, like? :unsure:

manker
03-31-2005, 08:09 PM
this isn't a one time only happening, I have been tracking it for a while. :shifty:You tantalising bar-steward! Can't just leave it at that.

I'll confess to being DanB (http://www.filesharingtalk.com/vb3/t92229-.html) if you elaborate.

enoughfakefiles
03-31-2005, 08:14 PM
Now i`m intruiged. :lol:

Snee
03-31-2005, 08:18 PM
Some of us swap proxies pretty often, so there's bound to be some overlap, it was probably even more so back when we had that link to a list of proxies readily available right on the board.

For that matter, maybe your "two current members" are the same person?

bigboab
03-31-2005, 08:29 PM
Some of us swap proxies pretty often, so there's bound to be some overlap, it was probably even more so back when we had that link to a list of proxies readily available right on the board.

For that matter, maybe your "two current members" are the same person?

Do you want his name? :rolleyes:

Snee
03-31-2005, 08:31 PM
Do you want his name? :rolleyes:
Oh, someone told me a name.

Not the right one, but anyway :dry:

DanB
04-01-2005, 03:42 PM
I could post the 2 current members who have matching IP's to this account if you wish :rolleyes:

As you can see, I grow tired as well :frusty:

are you trying to imply something there? :unsure:


I don't post for two days and come back to find out I am being banded round as one half of Billy Deans new alter ego.

Teh fook :blink:

Snee
04-01-2005, 03:47 PM
:lol:

Rob fixded it.

MCHeshPants420
04-01-2005, 04:21 PM
are you trying to imply something there? :unsure:


I don't post for two days and come back to find out I am being banded round as one half of Billy Deans new alter ego.

Teh fook :blink:

Shut it, Billy-UKResident-manker-Busyman-muchspl-Internet_news-Withcheese-danb-Gemby-Rperry-Jonno-Paul-Rapfan-Anthony-Aussiesheila-sam-SnnY :dry:

Snee
04-01-2005, 04:28 PM
:01:

bujub22
04-01-2005, 04:41 PM
:crying: i missed something!?

Snee
04-01-2005, 04:45 PM
Nah, it was nothing, just a silly mixup.

bujub22
04-01-2005, 04:47 PM
i think your tellin me lies but im to lazy to scroll back to find out so ill take your word fo it now (NOW)

DanB
04-01-2005, 04:51 PM
Why don't you ask Rob?

He seems to be the one with all the answers :dry:

bujub22
04-01-2005, 05:50 PM
who!?

manker
04-01-2005, 05:52 PM
:lol:

There was a bit of a misunderstanding cawk-up between a mod, SnnY and Dan. All been resolved now tho', joob ;)