View Full Version : Will humans evolve?
Will humans evolve?
it seems that humans still hae the same problems as centuries ago
thirst
disease
pain
anguish
hunger
spelling
spam
and still they cannot fly
discuss
TheDave
03-31-2005, 10:02 PM
i reckon civilisation will stop us evolving much more now cos diseases that should have killed off the weak dont
bigboab
03-31-2005, 10:04 PM
Will humans evolve?
it seems that humans still hae the same problems as centuries ago
thirst
disease
pain
anguish
hunger
spelling
spam
and still they cannot fly
discuss
A wee touch of the Scottish there? :)
Spam! centuries ago?
I can fly. :)
SpatulaGeekGirl
03-31-2005, 10:06 PM
I think humans are too lazy to adapt these days. We can't be bothered to wait thousands of years to develop wing or gills...so we build aeroplanes and boats. We adapt the world to us, not the other way round.
ziggyjuarez
03-31-2005, 10:13 PM
We use technology not naturalogy dumbass
SpatulaGeekGirl
03-31-2005, 10:15 PM
Naturalogy isn't a word, dumbass.
Will humans evolve?
it seems that humans still hae the same problems as centuries ago
thirst
disease
pain
anguish
hunger
spelling
spam
and still they cannot fly
discuss
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
The yOgi
bigboab
03-31-2005, 10:18 PM
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
The yOgi
So we are going to win all the time eh! Yogi. :lol:
SpatulaGeekGirl
03-31-2005, 10:19 PM
Well said yogi. :smoke:
HeavyMetalParkingLot
03-31-2005, 10:20 PM
Humans evolve everyday.
Gotten a tan recently? There you go, you evolved.
Moved to a colder climate lately and noticed a slight growth in body hair? There you go, you evolved.
And humans can't fly? Hog-wash I say! You just haven't bought the right "stuff" lately....
TheDave
03-31-2005, 10:21 PM
We use technology not naturalogy dumbass
i think what she means its no longer survival of the fittest. people who should be left behind aren't. for example; we wont evolve to run any faster because slow people dont get eaten anymore
ziggyjuarez
03-31-2005, 10:21 PM
Naturalogy isn't a word, dumbass.
If i say it is then it be so.
SpatulaGeekGirl
03-31-2005, 10:23 PM
Exactly. Thank you, TheDave.
Flying Parkinglot:
Humans evolve everyday.
Gotten a tan recently? There you go, you evolved.
Moved to a colder climate lately and noticed a slight growth in body hair? There you go, you evolved.
And humans can't fly? Hog-wash I say! You just haven't bought the right "stuff" lately
That last sentence made your whole story..........errrrm, somewhat airy. :rolleyes:
ziggyjuarez
03-31-2005, 10:25 PM
i think what she means its no longer survival of the fittest. people who should be left behind aren't. for example; we wont evolve to run any faster because slow people dont get eaten anymore
Thats what i also said thank you
SpatulaGeekGirl
03-31-2005, 10:25 PM
Ziggy, read what TheDave wrote. He dumbed it down nicely for you. Say thank you to the nice man. :)
edit: fast posters. :rolleyes:
ziggyjuarez
03-31-2005, 10:27 PM
Ziggy, read what TheDave wrote. He dumbed it down nicely for you. Say thank you to the nice man. :)
I did read it.I understand quite nicely before and i was not talking to you in the first place :lol: great job makeing a fool of yourself
SpatulaGeekGirl
03-31-2005, 10:28 PM
Look who's talking.
ziggyjuarez
03-31-2005, 10:31 PM
Bad defense :pinch:
SpatulaGeekGirl
03-31-2005, 10:36 PM
Just stating facts.
ziggyjuarez
03-31-2005, 10:42 PM
Facts based on post i made in 3 sec tops <_<
this thread de-evolved totally
JPaul
04-01-2005, 06:32 PM
Does natural selection still apply, I would have thought so.
Certainly in places where the technological developments you speak of have not taken hold, yet. So I would venture that some parts of the human race are still adapting to their environment. Not everyone lives in the "developed world"
It also may still be manifesting itself in non-physical ways. One wonders.
manker
04-01-2005, 06:38 PM
Mentalists congregate on the interweb and tend to get cut themself off from the real world, cyber-sex does not engender pro-creation therefore there will be less mentalism in the world.
This is evolution.
JPaul
04-01-2005, 06:40 PM
Mentalists congregate on the interweb and tend to get cut themself off from the real world, cyber-sex does not engender pro-creation therefore there will be less mentalism in the world.
This is evolution.
Wouldn't the loss of a section of the community be devolution.
bujub22
04-01-2005, 06:44 PM
only evolution i like is ..seed to weed to my pipe
manker
04-01-2005, 06:47 PM
Wouldn't the loss of a section of the community be devolution.Are you saying that we shouldn't section mentalists.
Think of the impact on interweb forums. IKE would go nuts.
JPaul
04-01-2005, 06:49 PM
Are you saying that we shouldn't section mentalists.
Think of the impact on interweb forums. IKE would go nuts.
If you are suggesting a mentalists section on the forum you should really start a thread in the Everything About This Forum section.
Or mod a PM.
bigboab
04-01-2005, 06:56 PM
Mentalists congregate on the interweb and tend to get cut themself off from the real world, cyber-sex does not engender pro-creation therefore there will be less mentalism in the world.
This is evolution.
Utter crap! :ph34r: My house is full of CD's and DVD's copulating all over the place. (Forget the slipped disk joke. Go and buy a digital TV). :blink:
bujub22
04-01-2005, 06:59 PM
Or mod a PM.
thats the first time i seen your post messed up @jpaul your slippin ol man :lol:
manker
04-01-2005, 06:59 PM
If you are suggesting a mentalists section on the forum you should really start a thread in the Everything About This Forum section.
Or mod a PM.We should have a separate section for the suggestion of sectioning mentalists into their own section. I'd admin the section myself if only I could find someone to modulate within the section.
manker
04-01-2005, 07:00 PM
thats the first time i seen your post messed up @jpaul your slippin ol man :lol:
:lol:
bigboab
04-01-2005, 07:18 PM
thats the first time i seen your post messed up @jpaul your slippin ol man :lol:
JP did not make an error Joob Joob. He was being grammatically correct. If he had said Mod a MP. Someone would have said 'should that not be 'Mod an MP.
Manker will understand the grammatical implications here. I hope so, because I dont. :lol: :lol:
manker
04-01-2005, 07:22 PM
Manker will understand the grammatical implications here. I hope so, because I dont. http://i136.exs.cx/img136/1270/grammarsml6yk.jpg
JPaul
04-01-2005, 07:23 PM
:lol:
In a feckin' barrell.
Waist of a cartridge.
I think we will eventually lose our legs.
Gemby!
04-02-2005, 05:15 PM
and still they cannot fly
Have you not seen peter pan ??
*happy thoughts* :pinch: :naughty:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.