PDA

View Full Version : Why Have A Bad Taste Link In Your Sig?



MERLIN
04-07-2003, 12:27 PM
On browsing the forum and clicking on the links in people sig`s, i find that some of them link directly to pages of a nature that should not be veiwed by underage people. I think that there should be some sort of rule about where your sig can link to. There are probably many children on this forum and they should not be exposed to such immorality. I am totaly against this practise of the "nasty sig" and it should be banned or moderated....so come on you mods lets get rid of the filth on here once and for all. Any body else have the same oppinion? :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r:

jetje
04-07-2003, 12:50 PM
just inform us of who has that in your opinion we will check them. It is hard for us mods to check them all the time. ;)

MERLIN
04-07-2003, 12:55 PM
How about....the_ninja69....... :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r:

The Knife Thrower
04-07-2003, 04:56 PM
I looked at that guy's sig. I'm not even going to click any of the links.

CornerPocket
04-07-2003, 05:09 PM
Sig reveiwed, PM requesting immediate removal; as we prefer members to take action on thier doings. If not intervention will be done by us. <_<



As Jetje stated,
Dont hesitate to PM a Mod/Admin if you feel there are inappropriate sigs/links are being used on this site.

Doctor_Watson
04-07-2003, 06:19 PM
I am sure my collegue would praise you all for your actions ;)

By the way - hello all and what a nice place. The saga continues B)

your friend
Dr.W

N£MO
04-07-2003, 06:27 PM
Originally posted by Doctor_Watson@7 April 2003 - 19:19
I am sure my collegue would praise you all for your actions ;)

By the way - hello all and what a nice place. The saga continues B)

your friend
Dr.W
Not another one of UKMan&#39;s clones..... :huh:

The Wise Man
04-08-2003, 01:15 AM
N£MO, I don&#39;t think your sig is appropriate for kids, but then again, this isn&#39;t really a kids site. :P :lol:

j2k4
04-08-2003, 06:19 PM
OUT and OUT with out and out bad taste&#33;
Let us at least attempt to be adult in the choices we make-these are self-representative sigs&#33;

Jibbler
04-09-2003, 12:03 AM
Originally posted by MERLIN@7 April 2003 - 07:27
On browsing the forum and clicking on the links in people sig`s, i find that some of them link directly to pages of a nature that should not be veiwed by underage people. I think that there should be some sort of rule about where your sig can link to. There are probably many children on this forum and they should not be exposed to such immorality. I am totaly against this practise of the "nasty sig" and it should be banned or moderated....so come on you mods lets get rid of the filth on here once and for all. Any body else have the same oppinion? :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r:
I agree that there are very specific rules about the sigs and threads on this board, and I do agree that they should be followed. However, in the interest of free speech, the internet remains an unregulated community because we, the collective users, choose to keep it that way.

I believe people should police themselves, and not others. Calling another member&#39;s post "immoral" only defines your personal limits. The mods seem to have sided with you. Hope everything gets resolved. :huh: ;)

MagicNakor
04-09-2003, 12:56 AM
Not necessarily. We do have underage people on these boards, and while it&#39;s easy enough for anyone to find porn on the internet, we don&#39;t have to condone it here.

:ninja:

ezyryder
04-09-2003, 11:48 AM
curse my curiosity. Why did I have to click on the first link? Yes I absolutley agree, that has to be taken off his sig.

N£MO
04-09-2003, 12:54 PM
Originally posted by The Wise Man@8 April 2003 - 02:15
N£MO, I don&#39;t think your sig is appropriate for kids, but then again, this isn&#39;t really a kids site. :P :lol:
What surpressed country are you from where you think that my sig is not appropriate for kids....im not offending anyone and my sig is not showing any naked bits(not that there would be anything wrong if i did),so in what way is it not ok for kids?

And for your info there are loads of under 16&#39;s who frequent this site often.

clocker
04-09-2003, 01:31 PM
The girl is fine.

The snake is TOTALLY naked.

ezyryder
04-09-2003, 02:17 PM
N£MO&#39;s Sig is perfectally fine and suitable. It is no worse than Britney Spears or Christina Aguilera dancing arround with thin bits of cloathing hiding thier valuables. It just so happens that she has a snake instead and is by far better looking.

Bender
04-09-2003, 02:38 PM
Originally posted by The Wise Man@8 April 2003 - 03:15
N£MO, I don&#39;t think your sig is appropriate for kids, but then again, this isn&#39;t really a kids site. :P :lol:
I think The Wise Man (aka The_Great_Dude) meant it as a joke, look at the smilies. :)

But I agree the snake could use some clothes. :D

clocker
04-09-2003, 07:04 PM
The snake&#39;s nudity would not be so provocative were it not for that sh*t eating grin on his face.

I assume that the snake is a he...
&#39;cause if it&#39;s not then this sig is WAY over the top&#33; :P

N£MO
04-09-2003, 07:46 PM
I&#39;ve always liked to imagine the snake is a she :o ....maybe thats just my perverse imagination :D

clocker
04-09-2003, 10:39 PM
You&#39;ve actually spent time pondering the sex of the snake?

VERY disturbing....

J'Pol
04-09-2003, 10:41 PM
Originally posted by clocker@9 April 2003 - 23:39
You&#39;ve actually spent time pondering the sex of the snake?

VERY disturbing....
Well you can just stick your head up your a....

Sorry you have done.

My mistake. I&#39;ll just get my coat

clocker
04-09-2003, 10:46 PM
You should offer your coat to that poor girl.
She looks cold.

J'Pol
04-09-2003, 10:52 PM
I think not baby puppy

Bender
04-09-2003, 11:13 PM
I think I have to move this &#39;discussion&#39; to the Lounge. :D

J'Pol
04-09-2003, 11:21 PM
Good idea robot boy.