PDA

View Full Version : Test



Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 11:02 AM
O.K. I'm testing something obviously otherwise I wouldn't have named this thread "Test" , so in order to test this test I am testing stuff that isn't really necessary to test except for the purposes of this test and future results.
Thank you for your cooperation :)

Jonno :cool:

Barbarossa
08-08-2005, 11:15 AM
Did you pass? :unsure:

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 02:41 PM
Not yet.

Jonno :cool:

JPaul
08-08-2005, 02:49 PM
A pleasure.

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 03:43 PM
Jon, some days I feel your entire purpose in life is to confuse me.

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 03:45 PM
You're confused???

How the feck you think I feel? :ph34r:

Jonno :cool:

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 03:50 PM
You're confused???

How the feck you think I feel? :ph34r:

Jonno :cool:

I don't know. I've never felt you.

tesco
08-08-2005, 03:52 PM
So, I think I understand.
The purpose of this test, is to test the features that may be tested in future tests of these testing features. Right? :)

Barbarossa
08-08-2005, 04:01 PM
I want him to pass his test, but I don't know how to help him :(

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 04:01 PM
You're confused???

How the feck you think I feel? :ph34r:

Jonno :cool:

I don't know. I've never felt you.

:( Tell me about it.
BTW that was a coat worthy joke :P

@Rossco.... Yes......yes that's exactly it :) and you guys reckon no one understands me......although do admins count? :unsure:

Jonno :cool:

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 04:27 PM
It's too hot for a coat. Can I get my shoes instead?

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 04:29 PM
Well I spose so but I guess with the choice we could be here several hours :P

Jonno :cool:

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 04:34 PM
Are you insinuating I have too many pairs of shoes?

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 04:40 PM
No, not at all.
Why on earth would I do that? :rolleyes:

You're female, you
wouldn't possibly have more than 2 pairs of shoes :P

Jonno :cool:

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 04:44 PM
No, not at all.
Why on earth would I do that? :rolleyes:

You're female, you
wouldn't possibly have more than 2 pairs of shoes :P

Jonno :cool:

You really are delusional, aren't you.

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 04:53 PM
Yes.

So how many pairs you got?

Actually come to think of it, I think I've now got 6 pairs, only wear 2 tho, just seem to accumulate them :unsure:

Jonno :cool:

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 05:01 PM
Yes.

So how many pairs you got?

Actually come to think of it, I think I've now got 6 pairs, only wear 2 tho, just seem to accumulate them :unsure:

Jonno :cool:

Dunno. I've never counted. I'd estimate that I have around 50 pairs of shoes/sandals/boots. :unsure:

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 05:03 PM
Uh.......huh......I think I'm just gonna leave it at that and let the audience decide for themselves :loll:

Jonno :cool:

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 05:06 PM
Uh.......huh......I think I'm just gonna leave it at that and let the audience decide for themselves :loll:

Jonno :cool:

You're spelling smilies wrong now too? :ohmy:

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 05:08 PM
No :dry: their being corrected :frusty: fucking stupid damn stupid piece of shit :angry:

Jonno :cool:

NikkiD
08-08-2005, 05:20 PM
No :dry: their they're being corrected :frusty: fucking stupid damn stupid piece of shit :angry:

Jonno :cool:

Like I said when you mentioned it to me - I don't trust a program to do my thinking for me. :P

Guillaume
08-08-2005, 05:26 PM
No :dry: their being corrected :frusty: fucking stupid damn stupid piece of shit :angry:

Jonno :cool:

What are you using to spell check your posts Jonno me lad?

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 05:29 PM
as-u-type 3.1 trial. Can't crack it.

They all suck.

@Nikki..... Yeah that's fine if you can think good enough not to need one, as I already said to you :rolleyes:

Jonno :cool:

Guillaume
08-08-2005, 05:30 PM
Spellcheck for FF roxxors. :01:

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 05:34 PM
Spellbound? no. It doesn't, I typed out a load of spelling mistakes and it said it was fine.

Jonno :cool:

Guillaume
08-08-2005, 05:37 PM
Either you didn't configure it properly or even mechanized thinking can't keep up with the jonnoisms. :shifty:

I'm placing my money on the latter.

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 05:43 PM
I could'nt get it to work, besides it doesn't do it as you type does it? You have to highlight and spell check, this as-u-type does everything for you, providing you can get a full version so you can add words (such as smilie codes) to it.

Jonno :cool:

Guillaume
08-08-2005, 05:51 PM
I couldn't get it to work, besides it doesn't do it as you type does it? You have to highlight and spell check, this as-u-type does everything for you, providing you can get a full version so you can add words (such as smilie codes) to it.

Jonno :cool:

You have to install the extension, then libraries containing the languages you want. A simple right-click will check the whole page or mail.

But, do not use this type of apps, since they give me an occasion to extract the michael outta you. :shifty:
BTW, these apps aren't a panacea, since said spellbound wanted to change "apps" to "baps". My pervy mind has managed to twist even my computer. :01:

JPaul
08-08-2005, 05:52 PM
It seems a good programme, what's the name and is it FF friendly.

ziggyjuarez
08-08-2005, 06:18 PM
Testing the fact i cant see no ones sig or ava

JPaul
08-08-2005, 06:23 PM
Testing the fact i cant see no ones sig or ava
You have to switch t'option on then.

ziggyjuarez
08-08-2005, 06:27 PM
Testing the fact i cant see no ones sig or ava
You have to switch t'option on then.
no,
fuck yo sig

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 06:27 PM
Originally Posted by JPaul
It seems a good programme, what's the name and is it FF friendly.


Fanix: As-u-type 3.1

And yes it has no problems with ff at all.

@Guil ... I did install the extension and then library. Still didn't work. And yes I installed the correct library.


But, do not use this type of apps, since they give me an occasion to extract the michael outta you

Not using it does or using it does? :huh:

Jonno :cool:

JPaul
08-08-2005, 06:31 PM
Cheers.

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 06:33 PM
And yes it has no problems with ff at all.


That's should have been "No it has no problems with ff" shouldn't it :frusty:

Jonno :cool:

JPaul
08-08-2005, 06:45 PM
Whatever

Guillaume
08-08-2005, 07:00 PM
Not using it does or using it does? :huh:

Jonno :cool:

Not using it, cause haven't had the opportunity of feeling superior in a while. :snooty:

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 07:04 PM
Meh, I use it and get words right and it messes up my smillies :frusty:
I don't use it and I spell stuff wrong.........it's almost comical to be honest.....in fact I think I might laugh right now :lol:

:mellow:

Jonno :cool:

DarthInsinuate
08-08-2005, 07:17 PM
i need no such thing, my spelling is infallable

Jon L. Obscene
08-08-2005, 07:18 PM
But you don't use full stops or capital letters? Ok then :P

Jonno :cool:

DarthInsinuate
08-08-2005, 09:26 PM
that's more to do with my lethergy than my masterful command of the dictionary

ziggyjuarez
08-13-2005, 09:55 PM
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test
Test test test test test test

tesco
08-13-2005, 10:05 PM
Passed http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/images/statusicon/user_online.gif

enoughfakefiles
08-13-2005, 10:14 PM
Passed http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/images/statusicon/user_online.gif

Failed.http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/images/statusicon/user_invisible.gif

:ohmy:

ziggyjuarez
08-13-2005, 10:20 PM
http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/9231/report6ir.gifreported:dry: