• Hollywood Studios Sued For Pirating A Movie Script

    Best-selling book author Joe Quirk is suing Sony Pictures and Columbia Pictures because they allegedly ripped off the story from one of his books for their upcoming action movie Premium Rush. The author claims that the entire plot and several scenes were purposely copied from his book The Ultimate Rush, and he demands damages as well as a boycott of the film’s premiere.

    Spearheaded by the MPAA, Hollywood’s major movie studios continuously emphasize how copyright infringement is costing them billions of dollars every year. Pirates are ruining the industry and are the direct reason for the loss of thousands of jobs, they claim.

    However, the movie industry itself is no stranger to infringing on the rights of others. In fact, in 1902 Thomas Edison himself copied Georges Méliès’ film A Trip to the Moon without permission to show it in US theaters. This act of piracy eventually resulted in the bankruptcy of the French filmmaker.

    In the century that followed, and even today, the movie industry is often accused of copyright infringement, most recently by the best-selling author Joe Quirk. Quirk published his first novel titled The Ultimate Rush in 1998, and recently found out that Sony Pictures and Columbia Pictures are planning to release a new movie that appears to be copied from his work.

    Aside from the titles, Quirk’s book and the upcoming film Premium Rush are strikingly similar, which prompted the author to start a lawsuit earlier this week.

    “A comparison of THE ULTIMATE RUSH novel and a copy of the PREMIUM RUSH screenplay shows that PREMIUM RUSH is plagiarized in substantial part from Quirk’s novel, THE ULTIMATE RUSH,” the complaint filed at the U.S. District Court of California reads.

    In addition to Sony Pictures and Columbia Pictures, the lawsuit also targets the production company Pariah and screenplay writers John Kamps and David Koepp. All defendants are accused of several copyright-related offenses as they allegedly turned Quirk’s book into a movie script without permission.

    The complaint includes two dozen pages littered with examples of similarities in the plot, characters, various scenes and even dialogues.

    The Ultimate Rush vs. Premium Rush

    Through the lawsuit Joe Quirk hopes to be compensated for damages the alleged pirating of his book by the prominent movie studios have and will cost. The author also seeks a halt to the distribution of the film and all related materials.

    Quirk further seeks to recover all profits that the movie studios will make from the “unlawful exploitation” of his book.

    Premium Rush has finished filming and is currently in the post-production stage. The film is scheduled to be released on January 13 next year, but it’s now up to the District Court to decide whether this will go ahead.

    Source: TorrentFreak
    Comments 6 Comments
    1. mjmacky's Avatar
      mjmacky -
      The biggest difference between movie industry pirating and users pirating is movie industry makes money out of it. It seems to be always win-win for them until we hit a critical point of being tired of their shit... which doesn't seem that close at this point.
    1. IdolEyes787's Avatar
      IdolEyes787 -
      Ecclesiastes 1:9 What has been done will be done again.There is nothing new under the sun.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091814/

      My advice to Mr. Quirk is to get over it unless he intends to also sue every author back to the dawn of time.



      Probably nobody but me would know or care that is Olympic silver medalist Nelson Vails as the courier.
      Now go and watch Priest on HD.
    1. iLOVENZB's Avatar
      iLOVENZB -
      Quote Originally Posted by mjmacky View Post
      The biggest difference between movie industry pirating and users pirating is movie industry makes money out of it.
      Spoiler: Show


    1. Otkon's Avatar
      Otkon -
      Quote Originally Posted by IdolEyes787 View Post
      Ecclesiastes 1:9 What has been done will be done again.There is nothing new under the sun.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091814/

      My advice to Mr. Quirk is to get over it unless he intends to also sue every author back to the dawn of time.



      Probably nobody but me would know or care that is Olympic silver medalist Nelson Vails as the courier.
      Now go and watch Priest on HD.
      You're a complete idiot. Novelty is one of the unique attributes of the human language. Unprecedented sentences, paragraphs and stories can be created at will. Just as art and music can. This is about laziness, hypocrisy, legality and compensation. Plus you lost your argument quoting the fucking Bible and alluding to the travesty that is Priest.
    1. unclemilty74's Avatar
      unclemilty74 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Otkon View Post
      Quote Originally Posted by IdolEyes787 View Post
      Ecclesiastes 1:9 What has been done will be done again.There is nothing new under the sun.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091814/

      My advice to Mr. Quirk is to get over it unless he intends to also sue every author back to the dawn of time.

      Probably nobody but me would know or care that is Olympic silver medalist Nelson Vails as the courier.
      Now go and watch Priest on HD.
      You're a complete idiot. Novelty is one of the unique attributes of the human language. Unprecedented sentences, paragraphs and stories can be created at will. Just as art and music can. This is about laziness, hypocrisy, legality and compensation. Plus you lost your argument quoting the fucking Bible and alluding to the travesty that is Priest.
      Thank you for responding in a similar manner as I was about to.... I think his argument was supposed to be that there are very few unique storylines, and every movie follows a "done before" storlyine...such as, the main character faces a problem and overcomes it.... This is EVERY movie ever made (well, with the exception of Blair Witch and porn movies)! Thus, now I can sue Hollywood because I just said this...for the first time ever, I'm sure!! As was mine just now, his point was made in a most retarded manner. It is the execution and adaptation of these storylines that make a movie itself unique. In the case of Mr. Quirk, he was obviously plagiarized as the legal motion so obviously reflects. Here's to him, hoping he wins, but it will cost him a lot of money - and hopefully Hollywood will reimburse him for that when they lose!
    1. IdolEyes787's Avatar
      IdolEyes787 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Otkon View Post
      You're a complete idiot. Novelty is one of the unique attributes of the human language. Unprecedented sentences, paragraphs and stories can be created at will. Just as art and music can. This is about laziness, hypocrisy, legality and compensation. Plus you lost your argument quoting the fucking Bible and alluding to the travesty that is Priest.
      Not complete if I were a complete one I'd probably make a statement like "novelty is one of the unique attributes of the human language" Also unsurprisingly you totally misunderstood my point in referencing Priest.
      I would probably add here" in terms of the Bible show some respect for other people's religious beliefs even if you don't share them yourself " but I'm going to just extrapolate based on your post and assume reasonable isn't in your area code.
      Quote Originally Posted by unclemilty74 View Post

      Thank you for responding in a similar manner as I was about to.... I think his argument was supposed to be that there are very few unique storylines, and every movie follows a "done before" storlyine...such as, the main character faces a problem and overcomes it.... This is EVERY movie ever made (well, with the exception of Blair Witch and porn movies)! Thus, now I can sue Hollywood because I just said this...for the first time ever, I'm sure!! As was mine just now, his point was made in a most retarded manner. It is the execution and adaptation of these storylines that make a movie itself unique. In the case of Mr. Quirk, he was obviously plagiarized as the legal motion so obviously reflects. Here's to him, hoping he wins, but it will cost him a lot of money - and hopefully Hollywood will reimburse him for that when they lose!
      You didn't make it through that rant without contradicting yourself.
      Also and more to the point there have been many cases where plagiarism seemed obvious yet a court ruled otherwise.May he suggest in manner retarded or otherwise that you maybe know all the details first before concluding you're right.