• Sony says "Anonymous" set stage for data theft

    Sony Corp blamed Internet vigilante group Anonymous for indirectly allowing a hacker to gain access to personal data of more than 100 million video game users.

    The accusation came in a letter to Congress and prompted renewed complaints that the Japanese electronics giant's disclosure had been inadequate and tardy.
    The company said it waited two days after first discovering data was stolen from its PlayStation video game network before contacting law enforcement, and did not meet with FBI officials until five days later.

    "Sony has been the victim of a very carefully planned, very professional, highly sophisticated criminal cyber attack," Kazuo Hirai, chairman of the board of Sony Computer Entertainment America, said in a letter to the U.S. Congress.
    The theft prompted the U.S. Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation to open an investigation, officials said on Wednesday.
    "It is something we are taking extremely seriously," said U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

    He said the government is also probing the theft of reams of email addresses and names that Alliance Data Systems Corp's Epsilon marketing unit discovered last month.
    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has subpoenaed Sony entities over the breaches.
    Schneiderman subpoenaed Sony for conversations and documents that related to its security systems and any representations about those systems made to consumers, said a source familiar with the issue. A Schneiderman spokesman declined comment.



    GOOD ENOUGH?

    Wedbush Securities analyst Michael Pachter said Sony's public disclosures have not been sufficient to quell customer concerns about the theft.
    He would like to see Sony notify each of the 12.3 million customers whose credit data may have been stolen.
    "Sony needs to make a statement to consumers: 'You will not be harmed, and we will indemnify you against any harm,' And they just have not done that in any of their apologies."

    Sony said that its video game network was breached at the same time it was defending itself against a major denial-of-service attack by a group calling itself Anonymous. A denial-of-service attacks makes a server or system unavailable by overwhelming its network with internet traffic.
    Anonymous is the name of a grass-roots cyber group that in December launched attacks that temporarily shut down the sites of MasterCard Inc and Visa Inc using simple software tools available for free over the Internet.

    The group attacked the two credit card companies with denial-of-service attacks that overwhelmed their servers for blocking payments to WikiLeaks.
    Sony said on Wednesday that Anonymous targeted it several weeks ago using a denial-of-service attack in protest of Sony defending itself against a hacker in federal court in San Francisco.

    The attack that stole the personal data of millions of Sony customers was launched separately, while the company was distracted protecting itself against the denial-of-service campaign, Sony said.
    The company said it was not sure whether the organizers of the two attacks were working together.
    Sony did say that its PC gaming unit, Sony Online Entertainment, discovered last Sunday a file planted on a server that was named "Anonymous" and had the words "We are legion," in it. But the self-styled vigilantes denied involvement in the data theft.

    They released a statement via YouTube last month saying that while the group's organizers had not stolen the data, it was possible some members of the group were involved in the matter. (bit.ly/mG3WvT)
    Members of Anonymous involved in the denial-of-service campaign may have decided to seize the opportunity to steal the data while Sony was distracted protecting its network, said Jeff Moss, chief security officer for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN.

    'HALF-BAKED' RESPONSE

    The company noticed unauthorized activity on its network on April 19, and discovered that data had been transferred off the network the next day. It waited until April 22 to notify the FBI.

    Sony chose to disclose the latest details of the attacks in a letter to the U.S. House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on commerce, manufacturing and trade rather than testify in a hearing on cyber attacks that was held on Wednesday.

    Lawmakers expressed disappointment that Sony and Epsilon declined to appear at the hearing and pledged a bill that would require companies to do a better job of safeguarding their customers' data and to quickly disclose to customers when their data was lost.

    Subcommittee Chairwoman Mary Bono Mack noted with dismay that Sony first disclosed the breach on a blog.
    "Sony put the burden on consumers to search for information, instead of accepting the burden of notifying them," she said. "If I have anything to do with it, that kind of half-hearted, half-baked response is not going to fly in the future."

    Source: Reuters
    Comments 15 Comments
    1. proforma's Avatar
      proforma -
      "Sony" set stage for data theft...

      by behaving like pricks. Trusted Systems suck and Sony used them to treat their customers like shit.
    1. mjmacky's Avatar
      mjmacky -
      in protest of Sony defending itself against a hacker in federal court in San Francisco
      Isn't that backwards, wasn't the "hacker" the defendant in San Francisco, while Sony was the aggressive and mal-intentioned plaintiff?
    1. taniquetil's Avatar
      taniquetil -
      I thought that Anonymous had denied responsibility for the attack.
    1. duke0102's Avatar
      duke0102 -
      This really is pathetic, who are they going to blame for there own incompetence next?
    1. EyeCandy's Avatar
      EyeCandy -
      So, to me, this either seems like a small group of Anonymous "members" who found a security exploit, took advantage of it, maybe stole a bit of information for their own personal use, and then left a note as a sort of jab at them, or an attack by a different group that used the Anonymous slogan as a way of deflecting the blame.
    1. shipwreck's Avatar
      shipwreck -
      Either way, Sony are fucked, which is a good thing.
    1. Sporkk's Avatar
      Sporkk -
      Quote Originally Posted by shipwreck View Post
      Either way, Sony are fucked, which is a good thing.
      I agree but so are the customers that had data stolen which is a bad thing.
    1. mjmacky's Avatar
      mjmacky -
      You take that risk as a Sony customer, allowing them access to sensitive information. It all goes with how much trust you put into a company. My PayPal may have a lot of important information, but my Newegg doesn't have so much as a stored credit card number. So if you trusted Sony with that, it's on you as much as it's on them.
    1. Sporkk's Avatar
      Sporkk -
      Quote Originally Posted by mjmacky View Post
      So if you trusted Sony with that, it's on you as much as it's on them.
      I was not aware of any common knowledge that sony was not capable of securing private information. For all you know your paypal could get hacked tomorrow and I could say it's on you as much as it's on them.

      If the hackers did this to make money off people I don't find that heroic at all. The world is full of shit. Is there such a thing as good guys or a good company anymore?
    1. shipwreck's Avatar
      shipwreck -
      Quote Originally Posted by jedispork View Post
      I agree but so are the customers that had data stolen which is a bad thing.
      That is indeed unfortunate, but can't be avoided I'm afraid. Thing is, Sony have been waging a war on their customers for years, there probably is no other company that has such a deep distrust in their customers as they do. So why should they deserve your trust either?

      If anything, this sloppy way of handling sensible data just proves once again how low the standing of their customers is, no appreciation whatsoever.

      The only way large companies like that change their ways is through losing customers and hence money. The 'collateral damage' is unfortunate, but it will be to the benefit of all in the long run. That's if Sony learn from this. If not, they'll become irrelevant.
    1. megabyteme's Avatar
      megabyteme -
      Here is a shortened version for the non-technical, porn watchers among us:

      Sony got their backdoor lubed up by Anonymous. At the same time, while Sony was laughing about how "ineffective, and that the lube was just a nuisance", another hacker group slid a GIANT cock up their asses.

      Now Sony is crying that Anonymous lubed up their ass, enabling the GIANT cock to slide in and FUCK them REALLY hard.

      Sony got fucked so hard, in fact, that the damages may leave them crippled for life.

    1. bobbintb's Avatar
      bobbintb -
      wow this is so fucking pathetic! i find it hilarious how much they are painting themselves as the hapless victim here.
      they really should have a third party investigation. i dont believe half the shit responses sony gives. i cant trust them and i think most of their responses are just bs to cover their own asses.
    1. duke0102's Avatar
      duke0102 -
      @megabyteme
      I love that explanation lol
    1. rdtphd's Avatar
      rdtphd -
      Quote Originally Posted by mjmacky View Post
      in protest of Sony defending itself against a hacker in federal court in San Francisco
      Isn't that backwards, wasn't the "hacker" the defendant in San Francisco, while Sony was the aggressive and mal-intentioned plaintiff?
      I agree. I did a double take when I read that the first time.

      Quote Originally Posted by megabyteme View Post
      Here is a shortened version for the non-technical, porn watchers among us:

      Sony got their backdoor lubed up by Anonymous. At the same time, while Sony was laughing about how "ineffective, and that the lube was just a nuisance", another hacker group slid a GIANT cock up their asses.

      Now Sony is crying that Anonymous lubed up their ass, enabling the GIANT cock to slide in and FUCK them REALLY hard.

      Sony got fucked so hard, in fact, that the damages may leave them crippled for life.

      Nice
    1. haganebr's Avatar
      haganebr -
      Quote Originally Posted by megabyteme View Post
      Here is a shortened version for the non-technical, porn watchers among us:

      Sony got their backdoor lubed up by Anonymous. At the same time, while Sony was laughing about how "ineffective, and that the lube was just a nuisance", another hacker group slid a GIANT cock up their asses.

      Now Sony is crying that Anonymous lubed up their ass, enabling the GIANT cock to slide in and FUCK them REALLY hard.

      Sony got fucked so hard, in fact, that the damages may leave them crippled for life.

      Wouldn't it have been worse without the lube then? Because that's exactly what I thought. "Sony increased it's protection because of the DDoS, allowing them to get hacked... wait, what?"